Powershift posted:It's probably best we don't discuss the new navigator this close to supper time, people may be eating.
|
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 02:59 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 19:35 |
|
Powershift posted:It's probably best we don't discuss the new navigator this close to supper time, people may be eating.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 03:01 |
|
It's terrifying how accurate this is...
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 03:08 |
|
Throatwarbler posted:Ford press release says the 3.5l TT engine will be in it. I'm surprised the 6.2l isn't going in too. Interior will be new as well. If the 3.5l TT is enough to comfortably pull the Weinermobile that's a pretty impressive ad talking point.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 04:26 |
|
Throatwarbler posted:Ford press release says the 3.5l TT engine will be in it. I'm surprised the 6.2l isn't going in too. Interior will be new as well. 6.2 is gone from the F150 too, it's probably dead in the next few years. Also long-term look for Lincoln to go to an all Ecoboost engine lineup. At least, that's the rumored plan.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 05:16 |
|
Q_res posted:6.2 is gone from the F150 too, it's probably dead in the next few years. Why would it be dead when the engine is a ground up design barely a few years old? Are the Superdutys going to be diesel only? I didn't see a whole lot wrong with the Navigator or Expedition other than engine and interior both of which could have been easily fixed but inexplicably they've been left to rot on the vine.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 05:26 |
|
Well it's out. quote:Seven years is a long time. It represents a year of a dog's life and is long enough to cover high school and most of college for the average human. For the auto industry, though, seven years is an absolute eternity. Most vehicles receive clean-sheet redesigns within the span of seven years, usually getting a facelift of some sort after year three or four. Not Lincoln. Overall it's pretty good. I think it looks better than the Escalade, and having both more interior room with IRS and a better tow rating is good work. Throatwarbler fucked around with this message at 07:34 on Jan 23, 2014 |
# ? Jan 23, 2014 07:31 |
|
It's not terrible. It's "meh" at best.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 08:40 |
The front of that thing isn't evoking wings so much as diabeetus testing supplies.
|
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 09:25 |
|
hahahahahaha I never thought I'd say it, but the new Escalade looks beautiful compared to that. While Lincoln has decided to go back to some weird retro-80's look, Cadillac managed to dabble in the dramatic styling of the 30's and bring it into modern times. The body styling for the new Escalade looks great. Hints of Cadillac splash here and there, but there's no overwhelming "LOOK AT ME I'M IN A CADILLAC" bling anymore. Ok, maybe the tail lights. But they somehow made it work. They look pretty cool to me. Even the interior is amazing... And I'm no fan of luxo-barge SUVs that will never see anything worse than a rain puddle. But if I had the money to burn, I'd go puddle-splashing in the new Escalade.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 09:43 |
|
Devyl posted:I'm no fan of luxo-barge SUVs that will never see anything worse than a rain puddle. But if I had the money to burn, I'd go puddle-splashing in the new Escalade. But that's the whole point of those vehicles. Just look at the front bumper and those wheels - completely unsuitable for anything but onroad use. If you actually want to go offroad in a hilariously large and expensive vehicle then there is always the LandCruiser and Discovery to choose from.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 10:21 |
|
Throatwarbler posted:Seven years is a long time. It represents a year of a dog's life and is long enough to cover high school and most of college for the average human. Seven years represent a year of a dog's life? Who the gently caress wrote this copy, a Taiwanese motherboard manufacturer?
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 12:19 |
|
I don't actually "like" either of these, but I like the Navigator better/dislike it less.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 13:58 |
|
It's still got that mahoosive dump truck column shifter, I see.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 14:41 |
|
Throatwarbler posted:
That rear end is a criminal. No way its better than an Escalade.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 14:48 |
|
I'd like one of these please (VW GTD). Unfortunately they will never come across the pond.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 15:56 |
|
Cream_Filling posted:That rear end is a criminal. No way its better than an Escalade. The dinky single exhaust could have been integrated a bit better, or replaced with something a bit more aggressive looking. I'm more concerned with the lack of luxury features. Everything the MKT has should be on the Navigator too. That means cooled 2nd row seats, auto parallel park, panoramic sunroof, etc. Other than that, At ~$10k cheaper than the Escalade, with more towing, more cargo space and IRS, I like it.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 16:04 |
|
It's a lot less hideous than the MKT as the very least, which I'm pretty sure took it's design inspiration from a hearse.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 17:27 |
|
The original Navigator was quite popular back in the late 90's/early 2000's - since it was much more progressive than it's GM counterparts and you would see them in the ever important Rap Video segment......but once the 2002 Escalade came out the Navigator hasn't really done anything. I would say the same thing about all the Ford vs GM large SUV's post 2000...the Tahoe/GMC/Caddys have been "Better Looking" for going on 13+ years. For some reason I still like the 2013+ GM exterior styling better than Fords as well.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 17:33 |
|
that lincoln looks like it should have been released last generation. Usually Ford is the one releasing future looking stuff but in this case it looks like they started work 5 years ago and never looked up.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 17:39 |
Now that Marchionne has finished the acquisition of Chrysler, I wonder if we'll see a modern Grand Wagoneer added to the mix. He's talked about the drat thing as much as the second coming of Alfa Romeo. Hopefully, it doesn't look like a grumpy old man or a giant gillette razor.
|
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 17:58 |
|
Xguard86 posted:that lincoln looks like it should have been released last generation. It really should have. Outside of the front, it doesn't look anything different than what was out a few years ago. There's only so much you can do with a box on wheels, but the Caddy design looks newer instead of like a minor facelift on the old platform.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 18:23 |
Cadillac's Art & Science design language could easily work for architecture, so it's not too surprising that its execution on the new Escalade turned out so well. That being said, the Navigator really feels like a warmed over effort in comparison, which is going to throw more fuel on the fire of those predicting Lincoln's doom. I don't understand why Ford seems to be struggling with the modernization of the marque.
|
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 18:41 |
|
What is the quality of VW cars manufactured in Mexico? When the GTI goes on sale later this year, what is the expectation that it will be a 'good car', or is there some dropoff compared to the quality of the Euro manufactured car?
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 18:54 |
|
I don't know that there's any concrete evidence to say that they are built any better or worse.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 19:01 |
|
tijag posted:What is the quality of VW cars manufactured in Mexico? When the GTI goes on sale later this year, what is the expectation that it will be a 'good car', or is there some dropoff compared to the quality of the Euro manufactured car? When I looked a few years ago (at TrueDelta and Consumer Reports), a VW hecho en Mexico was on par or better than one from Germany.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 19:02 |
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:When I looked a few years ago (at TrueDelta and Consumer Reports), a VW hecho en Mexico was on par or better than one from Germany. I think the leading cause of the misconception about Mexican made VW's being poo poo is things like the new Jetta getting cheapened out. The car being even more of a rattle trap with a cheap rear end interior had nothing to do with the place of manufacture.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 19:08 |
|
tijag posted:What is the quality of VW cars manufactured in Mexico? When the GTI goes on sale later this year, what is the expectation that it will be a 'good car', or is there some dropoff compared to the quality of the Euro manufactured car? I sat in a Jetta made in Mexico for Europe, at the dealership, and the finish was rubbish. Glue leaks on some trim panels, shoddy assembly. A world of difference with the outgoing model which I owned previously.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 19:22 |
|
With the truck chat we were having a few pages ago I went window shopping for trucks on a whim. For the people who complain about others who buy pick-ups and never use them for pick-up stuff, and I've been one of them, you get a lot of drat vehicle for the money when it comes to pick-ups. Four doors, rear wheel drive, v6 and a bunch of "trunk" space for $20-24k make trucks hard to compete with. Plus with the long travel suspension you can drive on lovely, pot holed roads and not give a drat. With all that said WTF is up with Tacoma pricing? People want 23k for a 2009! Or $27000 for a 2013. Plus Toyota hasn't updated these things in almost 10 years. The best engine you can get is a 4.0 liter v6 that puts out 236 hp. They still have 4 and 5 speed autos. How are these things still selling and commanding this much money?
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 19:26 |
|
TOYOTAS ARE RELIABLE AND LAST FOREVER The Toyota and Honda reputation markup is across the board for used vehicles whether it's true or not for that specific model. Bulk Vanderhuge fucked around with this message at 19:32 on Jan 23, 2014 |
# ? Jan 23, 2014 19:30 |
|
Coredump posted:With all that said WTF is up with Tacoma pricing? People want 23k for a 2009! Or $27000 for a 2013. Plus Toyota hasn't updated these things in almost 10 years. The best engine you can get is a 4.0 liter v6 that puts out 236 hp. They still have 4 and 5 speed autos. How are these things still selling and commanding this much money? The Colorado / Canyon never caught on big and have been off the market for a while (though they are coming back). The Frontier is in the same overpriced-and-ancient boat as the Tacoma, and both are still vastly more modern than the Ranger that left us after 2011... which while not overpriced, was even more ancient than either since it hadn't received a real update since 1998. The small truck market is a wasteland but people still buy the Tacoma because IT'S A TOYOTA which is probably all that makes it the slightly better of the only two godawful options.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 19:34 |
|
fknlo posted:It really should have. Outside of the front, it doesn't look anything different than what was out a few years ago. There's only so much you can do with a box on wheels, but the Caddy design looks newer instead of like a minor facelift on the old platform. Well, to be fair this is a placeholder refresh/update of the old truck while we wait for the all new one.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 20:53 |
|
I think the new navigator looks like the old navigator with a hideous front end tacked on, but the new escalade is nearly seventy two thousand dollars. http://www.autoblog.com/2014/01/23/2015-cadillac-escalade-on-sale-in-april-priced-at-71-695/ Unless lincoln goes completely nuts with the pricing, it is at a huge advantage in that department.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 23:51 |
|
Ya but what's my payment? 23 percent but I can drive it home today AND free mud flaps? poo poo lets do this thing.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2014 23:56 |
|
fknlo posted:I think the leading cause of the misconception about Mexican made VW's being poo poo is things like the new Jetta getting cheapened out. The car being even more of a rattle trap with a cheap rear end interior had nothing to do with the place of manufacture. Yeah, VW cutting costs because they want to go HAM in the huge but low margin car market of North America, German-built VWs being a little less prevalent in the US, designed-in typical VW reliability, and a bit of racism too.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2014 00:09 |
|
None of that stuff matters. VW's problem is that they have an uncompetitive compact SUV, no competitive midsize FWD SUV and no half ton body on frame pickup. Those are basically the only vehicles Americans actually buy that are actually profitable. Without those products they are basically playing in the same league as a pre-2009 Mazda. http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/22/us-vw-usa-labour-idUSBREA0L15O20140122 quote:(Reuters) - Volkswagen's (VOWG_p.DE) top labor representative has dubbed the carmaker's U.S. operations a "disaster" and called for more models and swift decisions to revive the German group's declining fortunes in the world's second-largest auto market. http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/20...-at-least-2018/ quote:
Throatwarbler fucked around with this message at 00:22 on Jan 24, 2014 |
# ? Jan 24, 2014 00:18 |
|
Throatwarbler posted:None of that stuff matters. VW's problem is that they have an uncompetitive compact SUV, no competitive midsize FWD SUV and no half ton body on frame pickup. Even if VW was to make a BOF pickup (or bring us Amarok), I think it would take a lonnnnnnnnnnnng time for consumer truck buyers to warm up to the brand. Merica.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2014 01:07 |
|
blk posted:Even if VW was to make a BOF pickup (or bring us Amarok), I think it would take a lonnnnnnnnnnnng time for consumer truck buyers to warm up to the brand. Merica. A VW pickup would be so weird if it isn't a small thing like the Caddy, but I can't imagine a brand new small pickup would even be sellable.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2014 01:14 |
|
Tekne posted:Now that Marchionne has finished the acquisition of Chrysler, I wonder if we'll see a modern Grand Wagoneer added to the mix. He's talked about the drat thing as much as the second coming of Alfa Romeo. Hopefully, it doesn't look like a grumpy old man or a giant gillette razor. Well the GW is just going to be a Jeep Durango no? Let Jeep have the Mercedes based unibody stuff. What Chrysler should do going forward is to redu the Durango and resurrect the Aspen nameplate for full size SUVs based on the Ram frame, without any off-road pretensions. The new Durango could have the 3.0l diesel as the base engine and the 5.7l as the upmarket engine, both with the 8 speed and 2 speed transfer case. The Aspen could have the 6.4l as standard, with air suspension and big rims and full time AWD. The Ram already has coil springs in the back. Maybe throw in a supercharged 6.4l for the SRT model too. Marchionne's press release doesn't bode well for any future body on frame supercharged V8 Escalade fighters though. http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=7804697 quote:Italy's Fiat is the new owner of the bulk of Chrysler's assets, closing a deal Wednesday that saves the troubled U.S. automaker from liquidation and places a new company in the hands of Fiat's CEO. Throatwarbler fucked around with this message at 03:34 on Jan 24, 2014 |
# ? Jan 24, 2014 03:26 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 19:35 |
|
So VW doesn't sell the Tiguan or Amarok in the US?
|
# ? Jan 24, 2014 04:59 |