|
Little Mac posted:Is there gonna be a Guardians trailer? Please say there's gonna be a Guardians trailer. James Gunn said no
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 02:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 19:41 |
|
|
Little Mac posted:Is there gonna be a Guardians trailer? No.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 02:43
|
|
|
Dacap posted:James Gunn said no Oh well. These are still good (not Transformers, Transformers is bad).
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 02:43
|
|
|
Cap and ASM 2 looks amazing. The battle in the DC sky with the multiple Helicarries and Spiderman swinging around the tesla coils are rad as gently caress. Transformers, uh, its like 50/50 awesome vs silly stuff. Grimlock not riding beast! Grimlock king!! Man, Falcon looks amazingly bad rear end. April can't come fast enough!
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 02:49
|
|
|
Metal Loaf posted:Coming in 2016: Avengers 2.5: Cap's Kooky Quartet. It makes me wonder if Marvel has the film rights for Henry Gyrich, because if they want to do more with the "SHIELD are a bunch of dicks" story with those guys, he'd be perfect for it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 02:50
|
|
|
Dacap posted:Yeah, him plus that costume makes an absolutely perfect Spidey. Ugh, I hate the Bay movies insistence that Decepticons have to be bland grey or beige barely identifiable robots. Like, I think the cannon guy is Megatron/Galvatron? Maybe? EDIT: On the other hand, the Spidey trailer looks really good. The Electro plot is classic Spider-Man hubris kicking him in the rear end. Try to be suave and cool as a superhero, end up with stalker-y supervillain you can't talk down because he realises it was all bullshit the first time. It wouldn't be Peter Parker if he was allowed too much joy in either life. Gaz-L fucked around with this message at 02:59 on Feb 3, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 02:54
|
|
|
Dacap posted:James Gunn said no I can understand that. Marvel just wants to push Cap 2 for now. I'd expect a huge push right after Cap's been in theaters for a week or two.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 03:47
|
|
|
E the Shaggy posted:I can understand that. Marvel just wants to push Cap 2 for now. I'd expect a huge push right after Cap's been in theaters for a week or two.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 04:00
|
|
|
You'd think so, wouldn't you?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 04:04
|
|
|
achillesforever6 posted:But wouldn't they want to get some hype for GOTG since its not that well known of a property? they wouldn't want to push it alongside higher-profile properties that will overshadow any marketing they can do for it. Best bet is early Spring - like, March. April is too late - when they'll mostly be done marketing Cap but when there's sometimes a brief deadzone before the hype-machines for the big summer blockbusters go into overdrive. Although this summer isn't nearly as crowded as next summer, so they probably aren't that worried. We probably exaggerate how concerned they are about the Guardians' lack of brand-recognition, in general. As long as they can slap a "From the Studio that brought you "The Avengers" and "Iron Man"" on it, it's in no worse shape than the rest of their properties.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 04:06
|
|
|
achillesforever6 posted:But wouldn't they want to get some hype for GOTG since its not that well known of a property? The first trailer needs to show up pretty soon. I think waiting until after Cap 2 is released would be wasting valuable marketing time. Plant the seeds of interest early.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 04:06
|
|
|
If the trailer is able to sustain the vibe from the Comic-Con footage (which was basically weird, but funny and full of action) and really promote the marketability of Rocket Raccoon, along with the aforementioned "From the makers of..." sticker on it, it'll sell itself. What I'm more worried about is what it's going up against. If it opens against say, the Ninja Turtles reboot, it could easily get buried at the box office and scare Marvel off of "risky projects."
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 04:09
|
|
|
People have short attention spans and the market is saturated. If they start hyping GotG now people will forget all about it by summer
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 04:20
|
|
|
James Gunn also promised something "soon".
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 04:42
|
|
|
There's no way they won't have a trailer for Guardians of the Galaxy running before The Winter Soldier.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 06:15
|
|
|
Dacap posted:New Amazing Spider-Man preview Everything about this is perfect  The humour, the action, Jamie Foxx's hair, the Sinister Six tease, Jamie Foxx's hair.Dacap posted:Yeah, him plus that costume makes an absolutely perfect Spidey. I've seen every Bay Transformers film and disliked every one bad I can't not watch a film where Optimus with a sword rides Grimlock 
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 10:34
|
|
|
Aw I just looked at the Spider-man vs. Transformers view count, it's around 30,000 vs. 170,000. That makes me kind-of sad.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 10:48
|
|
|
Waterhaul posted:Everything about this is perfect Dude, it's going on three weeks since I've had booze or fried foods. Be strong, you know you'll only walk away upset and unfulfilled. Keep that one cool image in your mind as whatever your brain cooks up is going to be head and shoulders better than what Bay shits out onto the screen. Is Shia LeBouf still in these?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 12:21
|
|
|
Soonmot posted:Is Shia LeBouf still in these? He's been replaced by Mark Wahlberg which make the film bearable enough to entice me back.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 12:53
|
|
|
So Ed Brubaker makes an appearance in the new Captain America trailer around 20 seconds in. Is he the first non-Stan Lee comic book creator cameo in a Marvel movie?
Thurm fucked around with this message at 13:07 on Feb 3, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 13:04
|
|
|
Thurm posted:So Ed Brubaker makes an appearance in the new Captain America trailer around 20 seconds in. Is he the first non-Stan Lee comic book creator cameo in a Marvel movie? Walter and Louse Simonson, J. Michael Straczinsky and a bunch of others were in Thor.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 13:09
|
|
|
Soonmot posted:Dude, it's going on three weeks since I've had booze or fried foods. Be strong, you know you'll only walk away upset and unfulfilled. Keep that one cool image in your mind as whatever your brain cooks up is going to be head and shoulders better than what Bay shits out onto the screen. Maybe when I see the trailer on the big screen it might placate it. Transformers is usually 30 seconds of cool images with what feels like 3 hours plus of nonsense. Thurm posted:So Ed Brubaker makes an appearance in the new Captain America trailer around 20 seconds in. Is he the first non-Stan Lee comic book creator cameo in a Marvel movie? Huh I didn't notice him without his fedora. But no he's not anywhere near the first there was Miller in Sin City and Daredevil, Claremont was in X3, Kevin Smith in Daredevil off the top of my head.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 13:13
|
|
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:He's been replaced by Mark Wahlberg which make the film bearable enough to entice me back. Okay, Whalberg is no longer on my "see anything he makes" list.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 13:20
|
|
|
Soonmot posted:Okay, Whalberg is no longer on my "see anything he makes" list. So, what you're saying, is that The Departed wasn't enough to take him off that list but Transformers 4 was?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 13:50
|
|
|
Yeah. Yeah it is.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 14:07
|
|
|
He did the one where trees kill people.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 14:11
|
|
|
Actually, the trees keep people from killing themselves, and then the trees stop working. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 14:37
|
|
|
Don't you dare pin M Night Shameaboutthelastfilm's failing's on Marky Mark.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 14:42
|
|
|
Will he's the next Spielberg so it must be somebody's fault.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 14:48
|
|
|
The last time Bay and Mark worked together they created Pain & Gain, set to get nominated into several categories in this year's Cinebytes awards. So I hope this is Pain & Gain but with Transformers. All that missing is The Rock, who was also a Transformers once.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 15:05
|
|
|
greatn posted:Actually, the trees keep people from killing themselves, and then the trees stop working. A sin of inaction is a sin all the same.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 15:10
|
|
|
If you haven't seen Pain & Gain I suggest you fix that and know that Bay and Marky Mark will kick rear end with Transformers 4.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 15:40
|
|
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:If you haven't seen Pain & Gain I suggest you fix that and know that Bay and Marky Mark will kick rear end with Transformers 4. Sorry, didn't Pain and Gain get its rear end rightly handed to it by pretty much everyone? Have you realised something that Mark Kermode didn't? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcHvRhq36hw Sion fucked around with this message at 16:47 on Feb 3, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 16:45
|
|
|
Sorry, nerds, Pain & Gain ruled.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 16:54
|
|
|
Yeah, Pain & Gain was lots of fun.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 17:05
|
|
|
Pain and Gain was great, Bay is a good, entertaining, interesting director, Transformers isn't that bad depending on how you look at it (but yeah from a normal lens), and I'm kind of underwhelmed by Grimlock's design but them taking on what look like fantasy TFs might be fun. It looks like it's going full retard which is appropriate with Marky Mark as the lead. I hope he's in full confused and angry mode.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 17:25
|
|
|
 you Sion, but Pain and Gain owns amigo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 17:26
|
|
|
I can't believe trailers for loving Transformers and Amazing Spider-Man hyped me up more than Cap. I have no hope in Marvel movies at this point aside from Guardians, but it is still disappointing as hell that they did not try to pick even a slice of superspy aesthetics from Brubaker/Epting comics. Now, Spider-Man looks like an awesome goofy-rear end cartoon (ELECTRIC EELS holy poo poo) and Transformers have a robot in robot trenchcoat dual-wielding robot SMGs. This is what fun looks like.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 17:27
|
|
|
Error 404 posted:
No, see, I haven't seen it but every single review of it I saw basically said 'there's nothing good in this film at all.' Is it worth givin' a look?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 17:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 19:41 |
|
|
Sion posted:No, see, I haven't seen it but every single review of it I saw basically said 'there's nothing good in this film at all.' Is it worth givin' a look? Yes. It's not a "good" movie in the classic sense, instead imagine a super stylistic crime thriller written by Captain Foo about a real life crime so outlandish they actually have to pause a scene and pop up some text to remind you 'this actually happened'. It's a loving fun movie, and in a really dark way, loving funny too. But, it's also easy to see how all the above would be unappealing to some folks, so their dislike is totally understandable.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 17:37
|
|