|
sql server has always been the best db server for the money.
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 19:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 21:16 |
|
|
I love Netbeans because when I type psvm +[tab] it autocompletes to public static void main( String[] args ){}
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 19:04
|
|
|
QuantumNinja posted:Like 50% of all XBox360 games are written in C#/XNA, including those Batman ones. in the same way that doom3 was written in lua.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 19:11
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:optimize ur queries. add more ram. get prepped for hekaton make sure shits indexed
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 20:05
|
|
|
Malcolm XML posted:i agree but windows actually has/had better support for threading than unix and had the equiv of kqueue/epoll since NT 4.0. backwards? you mean because they tell you when the operation completes, and not when a non-blocking synchronous operation will be possible? what's really missing from Windows is a unified "poll" I/O operation: sockets have their own, pipes have their own, console input queues (  ) have their own... if you had that, you could submit a "poll" operation and wait for that to completeI object to "kernel managed threadpools" unless you refer to the fact that IOCPs can be configured with a maximum number of associated threads that can run at the same time
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 20:08
|
|
|
hackbunny posted:backwards? you mean because they tell you when the operation completes, and not when a non-blocking synchronous operation will be possible? what's really missing from Windows is a unified "poll" I/O operation: sockets have their own, pipes have their own, console input queues ( yeah they are backwards compared to what unix does. i guess they make more sense than what unix ends up doing but it makes porting code a pain (dave cutler was right) i meant wahtever createthreadpool does i have c# deal with it for me~
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 20:42
|
|
|
Malcolm XML posted:yeah they are backwards compared to what unix does unix has both - AIO pretty much is overlapped I/O - while you need huge amounts of glue (and possibly undocumented IOCTLs) to get an universal asynchronous poll on windows e: AIO is actually a better implementation of overlapped I/O's than windows'. see: lio_listio Malcolm XML posted:i guess they make more sense than what unix ends up doing but it makes porting code a pain (dave cutler was right) poll/nonblocking is more convenient in many cases. I'd like to have both e: windows I/O seems like it was optimized for bulk operations on storage devices Malcolm XML posted:i meant wahtever createthreadpool does well those are based (in part) on the thread-pooling capabilities of IOCPs. in part, though, they're a heavy-handed attempt to provide (near-)universal asynchronous poll hackbunny fucked around with this message at 21:29 on Feb 26, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 21:21
|
|
|
hackbunny posted:unix has both - AIO pretty much is overlapped I/O - while you need huge amounts of glue (and possibly undocumented IOCTLs) to get an universal asynchronous poll on windows yep thats what u get with an api designed in 1992 or w/e need to just take kqueue or something tbh
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 21:32
|
|
|
take kqq/r^2
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 22:01
|
|
|
and thus find out the repulse force. of my posting!
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 22:01
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 22:13
|
|
|
just skipped like 1800 unread posts to say that pinvoking higher performance code from a managing c# application is awesome and fast, thanks microsoft
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 22:24
|
|
|
this thread is a 6'6 non passing trans woman except dumb and not cool
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 22:25
|
|
|
atom is built on node. lmao
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 23:19
|
|
|
node is the sulk's career of frameworks
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 23:27
|
|
|
literally cannot believe someone looked at the shitshow that is javascript and said "this is great, now if only my server side code could be as hosed up and lovely as my client side code"
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 03:32
|
|
|
Malcolm XML posted:yep thats what u get with an api designed in 1992 or w/e probably not going to happen, if the windows 7-8 transition is any indication, the NT kernel is pretty much set in stone e: every time they release a new sdk I run a diff of the headers hackbunny fucked around with this message at 10:31 on Feb 27, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 10:04
|
|
|
HORATIO HORNBLOWER posted:literally cannot believe someone looked at the shitshow that is javascript and said "this is great, now if only my server side code could be as hosed up and lovely as my client side code" yeah, this
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 11:55
|
|
|
can you use ember.js in node apps?
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 12:13
|
|
|
power botton posted:can you use ember.js in node apps? sure
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 13:13
|
|
|
Damiya posted:sure of all possible answers this is somehow the wrongest.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 13:24
|
|
|
Stringent posted:of all possible answers this is somehow the wrongest. I mean i would recommend angular over ember of you're doing like node-webkit or something but you definitely can use ember.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 13:26
|
|
|
Damiya posted:I mean i would recommend angular over ember of you're doing like node-webkit or something but you definitely can use ember. that's not what i meant
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 13:35
|
|
|
Stringent posted:that's not what i meant What would be an appropriate response. 'oh my god how dare you use node for a thing you animal'? I mean let's be fair the node ecosystem has a ton of really solid tools and it's easy to dive into and it has its place just like ruby or python or whatever. for example bower, grunt, gulp, all awesome tools. node as a server is whack as gently caress but as a platform for building out client apps rapidly it's actually pretty solid and good to work with
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 13:40
|
|
|
tbf tho I like writing javascript
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 13:40
|
|
|
Damiya posted:What would be an appropriate response. ruby annoys the poo poo out of me (mostly because of the people who hype/evangelize it), but i have to admit there's a lot of good and useful stuff written in ruby these days
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 13:41
|
|
|
ChUnKy BaCoN!
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 13:56
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:ChUnKy BaCoN!
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 14:05
|
|
|
prefect posted:ruby annoys the poo poo out of me (mostly because of the people who hype/evangelize it), but i have to admit there's a lot of good and useful stuff written in ruby these days the only people i know who enjoy ruby packaging actually i don't know any
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 15:18
|
|
|
looking forward to never having to touch ruby again it's a terrible language
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 15:18
|
|
|
Damiya posted:tbf tho I like writing javascript stockholme syndrome
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 15:20
|
|
|
p. easy to see why node.js is well liked, it sort of fills the same niche as doing a bit of perl in cgi in that the amount of baseline effort to get off the ground is close to zero, unpack, perhaps npm down a package you like, start as long as all you want to do is wire a couple of packages together in a minimal way and perhaps serve some trivial rest api then it is sort of innocuous also typescript is the best fix for javascript if you have to do javascript
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 15:45
|
|
|
well that and you can use parts of the same code on both your client and server which i suppose is nice but otoh you can always compile a real language down to javascript instead
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 15:53
|
|
|
Mr Dog posted:well that and you can use parts of the same code on both your client and server which i suppose is nice I don't understand how demented your architecture must be for this to be desirable.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 15:58
|
|
|
HORATIO HORNBLOWER posted:literally cannot believe someone looked at the shitshow that is javascript and said "this is great, now if only my server side code could be as hosed up and lovely as my client side code" web "developers"
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 16:04
|
|
|
more like dICK posted:I don't understand how demented your architecture must be for this to be desirable. bbbbut then we can do business logic and mvc stuff in the client browser! sure itll make even the most basic website fragile laggy poo poo, but we wont have to send as much over the wire! only it turns out we do. also we have to do all the same business logic on the server too to validate
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 16:06
|
|
|
HORATIO HORNBLOWER posted:literally cannot believe someone looked at the shitshow that is javascript and said "this is great, now if only my server side code could be as hosed up and lovely as my client side code" quote this forever
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 17:45
|
|
|
tef posted:looking forward to never having to touch ruby again it's a terrible language for reasons other than syntactical ambiguity?
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 17:53
|
|
|
ruby-style everything-is-an-object you can mess with is sort of the perfect example of an emerson-type foolish consistency
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 18:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 21:16 |
|
|
Damiya posted:What would be an appropriate response. oh gently caress paul graham was right. this is a blub post
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2014 18:53
|
|