- spasticColon
- Sep 22, 2004
-
In loving memory of Donald Pleasance
|
I bet the Malaysian Air Force accidentally shot down the plane.
I'm going to laugh my rear end off if that's what happened and then feel bad for laughing my rear end off.
And I see some people are reviving the Flight 93 conspiracy theory with this flight in that it was hijacked so they shot it down.
spasticColon fucked around with this message at 01:01 on Mar 12, 2014
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 00:58
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2024 17:51
|
|
- Tiny Timbs
- Sep 6, 2008
-
|
US special forces swapped out with the pilots at the last minute, acting on intel that the plane was carrying a passenger of interest.
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:03
|
|
- No. 6
- Jun 30, 2002
-
|
If I wanted to hide a plane, I'd stuff it up my gaping anus.
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:16
|
|
- Rocks
- Dec 30, 2011
-
|
I have a theory about where it may have ended up at one point but no idea why it is (or was) there. Diego Garcia.
At this point, any sort of catastrophic or mechanical failure is incredibly unlikely. There are way too many automated systems in place with a whole lot of redundancy to support this. It would be incredibly unlikely for both a transponder and ACARS system to fail. In the case of AF447, the ACARS system was spitting out failure messages back to Air France. This has not been shown to happen at least at this time. Weather, does not appear to play any role at this time. The crew, did not indicate any sort of distress or emergency taking place. No debris or equipment of any kind has been been located. This leads me to suspect that the flight crew was in on whatever happened. The whole fake passport thing to me just happens to be coincidence. I doubt this was terrorism because terrorists usually aim to make some sort of statement or demands. Not blow up an airline and have no one know about it. It's also unlikely the crew was incapacitated. There's a number of sensors in place to read cabin pressure changes and pilots are trained for high-altitude, rapid-depressurization. If they did pass out, the plane would have continued onto its programmed route and not made what appears to be a very intentional left turn.
From the images below, you can see that the last reported position from ATC was right around the IGARI intersection (which we can almost certainly assume was part of the flight plan).
It also happens to be conveniently located just prior to the aircraft entering Vietnamese ATC and essentially, in the middle of nowhere. IGARI is a compulsory reporting point meaning that radar coverage can potentially be unreliable but it's also pretty standard in any oceanic environment even while in radar contact for the pilots to report their position. Whether the aircraft was spotted on radar or ATC was just going by a position report, we may not know. If one was to attempt to deliberately "disappear" from the system, the handoff from one ATC sector to another would be an ideal place since the pilots are the ones initiating contact. The IGARI intersection makes for an ideal location given this scenario.
The next interesting bit of information that has recently surfaced is a radar return (possibly from MH370) just near Penang Island.
Edit: I guess it's actually a bit more northwest but even so, a direct from where ever they began the turn, it still puts them in the very near vicinity . This new evidence just happens to fall on a path from the IGARI intersection (or there about) directly to the Diego Garcia Airbase (FJDG).
The time and distance needed to make it to Diego Garcia from IGARI is well within the capabilities of the 777 under the conditions that we assume were correct at takeoff. The total trip from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing is roughly 2700nm compared to the new total of WMKK R208 (assumed) IGARI direct FJDG, being approximately 2300nm.
If anyone wanted to "hide" this plane, that would be the way to do it. Limited radar coverage, secluded air force base with probably no cell phone service. Kind of makes you wonder who or what was on that aircraft. Just my thoughts.
Did you copy this from another forum? What's your deal bud?
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:26
|
|
- Drunk & Ugly
- Feb 10, 2003
-
GIMME GIMME GIMME, DON'T ASK WHAT FOR
|
I have a theory about where it may have ended up at one point but no idea why it is (or was) there. Diego Garcia.
At this point, any sort of catastrophic or mechanical failure is incredibly unlikely. There are way too many automated systems in place with a whole lot of redundancy to support this. It would be incredibly unlikely for both a transponder and ACARS system to fail. In the case of AF447, the ACARS system was spitting out failure messages back to Air France. This has not been shown to happen at least at this time. Weather, does not appear to play any role at this time. The crew, did not indicate any sort of distress or emergency taking place. No debris or equipment of any kind has been been located. This leads me to suspect that the flight crew was in on whatever happened. The whole fake passport thing to me just happens to be coincidence. I doubt this was terrorism because terrorists usually aim to make some sort of statement or demands. Not blow up an airline and have no one know about it. It's also unlikely the crew was incapacitated. There's a number of sensors in place to read cabin pressure changes and pilots are trained for high-altitude, rapid-depressurization. If they did pass out, the plane would have continued onto its programmed route and not made what appears to be a very intentional left turn.
From the images below, you can see that the last reported position from ATC was right around the IGARI intersection (which we can almost certainly assume was part of the flight plan).
It also happens to be conveniently located just prior to the aircraft entering Vietnamese ATC and essentially, in the middle of nowhere. IGARI is a compulsory reporting point meaning that radar coverage can potentially be unreliable but it's also pretty standard in any oceanic environment even while in radar contact for the pilots to report their position. Whether the aircraft was spotted on radar or ATC was just going by a position report, we may not know. If one was to attempt to deliberately "disappear" from the system, the handoff from one ATC sector to another would be an ideal place since the pilots are the ones initiating contact. The IGARI intersection makes for an ideal location given this scenario.
The next interesting bit of information that has recently surfaced is a radar return (possibly from MH370) just near Penang Island.
Edit: I guess it's actually a bit more northwest but even so, a direct from where ever they began the turn, it still puts them in the very near vicinity . This new evidence just happens to fall on a path from the IGARI intersection (or there about) directly to the Diego Garcia Airbase (FJDG).
The time and distance needed to make it to Diego Garcia from IGARI is well within the capabilities of the 777 under the conditions that we assume were correct at takeoff. The total trip from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing is roughly 2700nm compared to the new total of WMKK R208 (assumed) IGARI direct FJDG, being approximately 2300nm.
If anyone wanted to "hide" this plane, that would be the way to do it. Limited radar coverage, secluded air force base with probably no cell phone service. Kind of makes you wonder who or what was on that aircraft. Just my thoughts.
THE IMAGES DONT WORK
GOVERNMENT? OBAMA!
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:29
|
|
- Al Borland
- Oct 29, 2006
-
by XyloJW
|
It crashed in the ocean because the pilots were too busy geetting blowjobs. The ocean is big. The end.
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:38
|
|
- doomisland
- Oct 5, 2004
-
|
mother loving grays
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:39
|
|
- Drunk & Ugly
- Feb 10, 2003
-
GIMME GIMME GIMME, DON'T ASK WHAT FOR
|
quote:bob2
5:26 PM on 11/3/2014
You can't take more than 100ml of mouthwash on a plane but you can travel on false passports, the pilots can entertain Aussie chicks and nobody can track a plane the size of a block of flats. MADNESS !!
MADNESS
but bob has a point
edit sorry bob2 dont wanna misquote
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:41
|
|
- Harry Joe
- Jan 15, 2006
-
My name be neither Harry, nor Joe, but Harry Joe shall do
|
bermuda.
triangle.
gg scrubs i'll be in my trailer
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:41
|
|
- Tiny Timbs
- Sep 6, 2008
-
|
how did they manage to avoid all the military personnel on diego garcia
what part did you not get about a conspiracy theory involving taking a plane to a military base
edit: the part where the military/CIA/allied foreign agents did it
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:41
|
|
- doomisland
- Oct 5, 2004
-
|
im going to take that theory and run with it
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:43
|
|
- doomisland
- Oct 5, 2004
-
|
also jews?????
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:44
|
|
- Rocks
- Dec 30, 2011
-
|
Wouldn't China know pretty quick if the USA stole a bunch of their citizens?
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:44
|
|
- doomisland
- Oct 5, 2004
-
|
Wouldn't China know pretty quick if the USA stole a bunch of their citizens?
maybe they do man
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:45
|
|
- Tiny Timbs
- Sep 6, 2008
-
|
Wouldn't China know pretty quick if the USA stole a bunch of their citizens?
if they're in on it they're in on it
if they're not in on it they're like everyone else going "hey how'd that plane just disappear wooooooah"
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:49
|
|
- Al Borland
- Oct 29, 2006
-
by XyloJW
|
Of course the jews. They wanted to resell the plane for scrap parts and brainwash the citizens into moeny making slaves or something. IDK.
Alien jews. Jewliens.
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:51
|
|
- Tiny Timbs
- Sep 6, 2008
-
|
How many Jews were on the plane?
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:52
|
|
- Tiny Timbs
- Sep 6, 2008
-
|
That's right, none.
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:52
|
|
- Tiny Timbs
- Sep 6, 2008
-
|
Same for most places in Asia tho
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 01:52
|
|
- A Fancy 400 lbs
- Jul 24, 2008
-
|
MADNESS
but bob has a point
edit sorry bob2 dont wanna misquote
bob2 died a month ago though, i smell something fishy
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 02:49
|
|
- Chinatown
- Sep 11, 2001
-
by Fluffdaddy
-
Fun Shoe
|
The plane flew to Crimea guys.
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 02:58
|
|
- Lote
- Aug 5, 2001
-
Place your bets
|
They said that they could hear the pilots mumbling in their last contact. Is it possible that they were actually saying STENDEC?
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 03:31
|
|
- hofnar
- Dec 27, 2008
-
by sebmojo
|
Ooh good one. Creepy
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 03:33
|
|
- Reign Of Pain
- May 1, 2005
-
-
Nap Ghost
|
Is this the thread that SA is using to do the whole http://www.tomnod.com/nod/ thing when it comes back up?
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 04:08
|
|
- Tiny Timbs
- Sep 6, 2008
-
|
Only if it'll let me pan over to Diego Garcia and leave notes there
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 04:08
|
|
- Reign Of Pain
- May 1, 2005
-
-
Nap Ghost
|
Only if it'll let me pan over to Diego Garcia and leave notes there
Pretty sure you have to sign up for the premier membership
CNN posted: You -- the person now reading this story -- can help experts solve the mystery of what happened to Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, which disappeared over the open sea.
vvv fake vvv
Reign Of Pain fucked around with this message at 04:24 on Mar 12, 2014
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 04:10
|
|
- jscolon2.0
- Jul 9, 2001
-
With great payroll, comes great disappointment.
|
I have a theory about where it may have ended up at one point but no idea why it is (or was) there. Diego Garcia.
At this point, any sort of catastrophic or mechanical failure is incredibly unlikely. There are way too many automated systems in place with a whole lot of redundancy to support this. It would be incredibly unlikely for both a transponder and ACARS system to fail. In the case of AF447, the ACARS system was spitting out failure messages back to Air France. This has not been shown to happen at least at this time. Weather, does not appear to play any role at this time. The crew, did not indicate any sort of distress or emergency taking place. No debris or equipment of any kind has been been located. This leads me to suspect that the flight crew was in on whatever happened. The whole fake passport thing to me just happens to be coincidence. I doubt this was terrorism because terrorists usually aim to make some sort of statement or demands. Not blow up an airline and have no one know about it. It's also unlikely the crew was incapacitated. There's a number of sensors in place to read cabin pressure changes and pilots are trained for high-altitude, rapid-depressurization. If they did pass out, the plane would have continued onto its programmed route and not made what appears to be a very intentional left turn.
From the images below, you can see that the last reported position from ATC was right around the IGARI intersection (which we can almost certainly assume was part of the flight plan).
It also happens to be conveniently located just prior to the aircraft entering Vietnamese ATC and essentially, in the middle of nowhere. IGARI is a compulsory reporting point meaning that radar coverage can potentially be unreliable but it's also pretty standard in any oceanic environment even while in radar contact for the pilots to report their position. Whether the aircraft was spotted on radar or ATC was just going by a position report, we may not know. If one was to attempt to deliberately "disappear" from the system, the handoff from one ATC sector to another would be an ideal place since the pilots are the ones initiating contact. The IGARI intersection makes for an ideal location given this scenario.
The next interesting bit of information that has recently surfaced is a radar return (possibly from MH370) just near Penang Island.
Edit: I guess it's actually a bit more northwest but even so, a direct from where ever they began the turn, it still puts them in the very near vicinity . This new evidence just happens to fall on a path from the IGARI intersection (or there about) directly to the Diego Garcia Airbase (FJDG).
The time and distance needed to make it to Diego Garcia from IGARI is well within the capabilities of the 777 under the conditions that we assume were correct at takeoff. The total trip from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing is roughly 2700nm compared to the new total of WMKK R208 (assumed) IGARI direct FJDG, being approximately 2300nm.
If anyone wanted to "hide" this plane, that would be the way to do it. Limited radar coverage, secluded air force base with probably no cell phone service. Kind of makes you wonder who or what was on that aircraft. Just my thoughts.
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 04:21
|
|
- ashgromnies
- Jun 19, 2004
-
|
Pretty sure you have to sign up for the premier membership
vvv fake vvv
No you don't have to sign up for premier.
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 04:27
|
|
- Whirlwind Jones
- Apr 13, 2013
-
by Lowtax
|
I can't even tell if you're being serious right now because gbs2.1 but lmao
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 04:28
|
|
- Rad Russian
- Aug 15, 2007
-
Soviet Power Supreme!
|
Sudden course change and a long straight flight does coincide with a theory of being intercepted by a fighter jet and then being forced to be "escorted" in a different direction. If there was a mechanical failure and they were simply turning back, they would go back towards the airport not in a random direction. They covered enough distance after the turn to make it back to their starting point if they actually wanted to.
Also as seen from map linked above they did it RIGHT before crossing into Vietnam airspace which is suspicious. If Malaysian airforce was intercepting them or following them, then this would be the exact point they would instruct the plane to turn immediately or else. That way Vietnam airforce would not get involved. Malaysian jet fighter that was following/intercepting the plane would not be able to fly into that airspace.
a) Why no communication?
- All signal jammed by interceptor(s)
b) Why fly where they did?
- Take it as far away from Vietnam airspace as possible and off-radar so no one can see it and then shot the plane down.
Rad Russian fucked around with this message at 04:48 on Mar 12, 2014
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 04:39
|
|
- Bubble-T
- Dec 26, 2004
-
You know, I've got a funny feeling I've seen this all before.
|
What possible reason could the Malaysian Airforce have for shooting down a passenger plane that's leaving their airspace that would also require them to have it turn around and fly back over Malaysia first.
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 04:53
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2024 17:51
|
|
- Reign Of Pain
- May 1, 2005
-
-
Nap Ghost
|
Sudden course change and a long straight flight does coincide with a theory of being intercepted by a fighter jet and then being forced to be "escorted" in a different direction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGvHnDeS12o
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 04:54
|
|