|
This is probably staring me right in the face, but how can I access the settings for Youtube Center (the userscript)?
|
# ? Mar 26, 2014 02:41 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 05:02 |
|
The gear icon next to the upload button in the top right. It added itself to the bottom of Youtube's menu.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2014 03:09 |
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:Anyone else finding that this suddenly no longer works? Running Firefox 29. If you're using Tab Mix Plus, there might be a conflict. I remember having to muck around after some upgrade to get it working again, having to install a beta version or something.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2014 22:00 |
|
You peeps who have upgraded; can we still hide the File menu bar?The Dark One posted:I like Ctrl-Tab and Ctrl-Shift-Tab for that.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2014 09:32 |
|
This is odd. I just updated to Aurora 30 (Windows 64) and video playback seems to be dead. On Youtube, I get a flash of the staticky error screen, then blackness, and on the BBC news site I get the teaser still for a moment before it puts up its own error screen. Flash is up to date and I've restarted Aurora a couple of times. Doesn't seem to be a network issue: IE and my housemate's installation of Firefox are running properly. Anyone else with similar issues? Edit: Aaaand problem's with the Youtube Center addon. Damnation. Bieeanshee fucked around with this message at 21:44 on Mar 27, 2014 |
# ? Mar 27, 2014 15:58 |
|
Bieeardo posted:This is odd. I just updated to Aurora 30 (Windows 64) and video playback seems to be dead. On Youtube, I get a flash of the staticky error screen, then blackness, and on the BBC news site I get the teaser still for a moment before it puts up its own error screen. Aurora 30 is broken for me right now on Windows 8.1 x64. Broke two days ago - I can launch the program directly from the .exe file, but no shortcuts work. Gives me "The class is not registered" error. Firefox Beta 29 works fine so that'll do for now.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2014 22:19 |
|
pipes! posted:I wonder if we could all endorse the new Mozilla CEO for his Homophobia skills on LinkedIn. Anyone who's used JavascrIpt already knew Brendan Eich has a very broken idea of equality.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2014 04:52 |
|
biznatchio posted:Anyone who's used JavascrIpt already knew Brendan Eich has a very broken idea of equality.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2014 05:37 |
|
On the windows version of australis is it supposed to have this weird gray muddying with the system window color in the tab bar? It seems to be a part of the default persona, goes away when I switch to a different one, but I'd prefer to keep the default. I don't know why but it's particularly distracting and ugly to me.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2014 05:47 |
|
The Milkman posted:On the windows version of australis is it supposed to have this weird gray muddying with the system window color in the tab bar? Yes; it's there to help make the unselected tabs' text have more contrast. You could probably get rid of it via userChrome if you really cared...
|
# ? Mar 31, 2014 06:36 |
|
Since updating to 28 FF insists on playing mp3 in the browser instead of downloading them - ignoring the Options > Application settings, and even the media.windows-media-foundation.enabled = false workaround no longer works.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2014 13:14 |
|
Is it possible to disable the ability for websites to modify the browser right-click context menu? It is pretty much ingrained into my brain as a solid habit that right-click -> select top option "goes back" and it's how I navigate. Which is normally fine because that's the default behaviour: But apparently sites can modify this behaviour. Possibly via a non-standard Mozilla API, I haven't bothered to check. So if I go to MDN for example (which I've been using a hell of a lot lately) I get this: I click "Edit Page" every single loving time without fail. Please let there be a way to block this.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 13:52 |
|
Xik posted:Is it possible to disable the ability for websites to modify the browser right-click context menu?
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 14:31 |
|
It seems the Firefox addon site is broken at the moment. 404 when trying to install that addon. I will try it later though, but I'm not sure if it will help. It appears to be geared towards rearranging or removing menu items, particularly those added via addons. Since the MDN and other sites probably add the entries via client javascript, I doubt it would work. I was hoping there would be an option hidden somewhere so I can turn the functionality completely off globally. Whatever feature it is, it's Firefox only since I can go to MDN in Chromium and it doesn't modify the context menu.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 15:04 |
|
Xik posted:It seems the Firefox addon site is broken at the moment. 404 when trying to install that addon. I will try it later though, but I'm not sure if it will help. It appears to be geared towards rearranging or removing menu items, particularly those added via addons. It's probably not going to help then. Maybe you can block something with noscript? I'm not seeing the added items on the page you linked, but that's probably because I'm not logged in there or something.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 15:24 |
|
Flipperwaldt posted:Maybe you can block something with noscript? I'm not seeing the added items on the page you linked, but that's probably because I'm not logged in there or something. I'm not logged in either, I don't have an account. I'm using Firefox 28 if that matters. Does it really not change the menu when going to a wiki page or anything on MDN? Perhaps Firebug (developer tools) adds it in or something? I'll have to investigate. e: Nope, not Firebug. Xik fucked around with this message at 15:41 on Apr 2, 2014 |
# ? Apr 2, 2014 15:38 |
|
Xik posted:I'm not logged in either, I don't have an account. I'm using Firefox 28 if that matters. It must be that the addon sorta disables the rightclick menu entirely and then offers you its own version or something like that, maybe.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 16:17 |
|
Xik posted:Is it possible to disable the ability for websites to modify the browser right-click context menu? You can Shift + Right-Click to open the default context menu no matter what.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 18:28 |
|
Avenging Dentist posted:You can Shift + Right-Click to open the default context menu no matter what.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 18:47 |
|
Youtube has/had a thing that would load the next video using a nifty javascript loader, so the next video would load without refreshing the page. Recently it has stopped working, it looks like as of Firefox 28 on Win 8.1. Happens with Safe Mode too. Not sure with Aurora/Australis and/or Linux, which I have at home. Did Mozilla break something, or is this just Google going, "gently caress you, Chrome is the only browser, use Chrome"? Of course, it still works in Chrome. Also, Youtube always seems to use Flash now, unless it's explicitly disabled, even though I have requested HTML5 if available and and have support for the codecs, as it plays fine if Flash is disabled. Again, works correctly in Chrome. This does happen with Australis on Linux. Goddamn the internet. Edit: looks like it's Google's fault. Happens on Win 7 too, and I tested it also on Win 8.1 with Aurora, 28, and 27. Scroogled again. Qtotonibudinibudet fucked around with this message at 19:51 on Apr 2, 2014 |
# ? Apr 2, 2014 19:00 |
|
Avenging Dentist posted:You can Shift + Right-Click to open the default context menu no matter what. Thanks for the tip, but if I could remember to do that on MDN I would remember that back isn't the first option. I searched around and apparently this used to be within the Advanced Javascript options until they decided to remove all those options. The option can still be accessed via about :config as dom.event.contextmenu.enabled. Set it to false to disable the ability for sites to mess with the context menu. I tried it on other sites and it works, which is fine. Except the fact that the Mozilla Developer Network appears to either ignore and override that option or modify the context menu a different way. Mozilla, why do you hate me.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 19:16 |
|
These menus are part of the HTML5 Specification. It seems only Firefox supports them at the moment, and there's no preference (yet?) to disable them. You could write a greasemonkey script that would remove the contextmenu attribute from every element on a page, though the JavaScript on the page could always mess with this I suppose. Personally I would buy a mouse with a back button. Edit: ^^^ The dom.event.contextmenu.enabled preference doesn't apply to these menu items. Edit 2: I wrote a greasemonkey script for MDN. Really simple in this case since it's one menu attached to the body tag. code:
Flipperwaldt posted:Unless you're using Menu Editor apparently vv It wont restore menu items you've changed with Menu Editor, it'll just remove the ones a site has added. I used to use Menu Editor, but it had a tendency to screw things up. Now I use a custom userstyle to hide menu items I never use (including back). Implied Consent fucked around with this message at 20:21 on Apr 2, 2014 |
# ? Apr 2, 2014 19:19 |
|
Implied Consent posted:Personally I would buy a mouse with a back button. Ha, I use this fat "ergonomic" mouse and it actually has one. But like I said, I'm already "trained" to use that context menu item. I'll try to make using the button a habit instead. Implied Consent posted:These menus are part of the HTML5 Specification. It seems only Firefox supports them at the moment, and there's no preference (yet?) to disable them. Sorted. You're seriously loving awesome for posting about the html5 element. If anyone cares as much as I did, I quickly bashed out a Greasemonkey script to remove the menu items. If anyone needs to do this in the future, don't remove the individual contextmenu html elements. It will remove them and leave an empty context menu group that looks gross. Instead get the parent "menu" element and just remove that. You can see what I did if you look at the 3 line source code .
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 20:11 |
|
Beated!
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 20:18 |
|
Implied Consent posted:Beated! Welp, sorry! I appreciate that you were willing to create it for me though, you're doubly awesome!
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 20:26 |
|
Well if it makes you feel any worse, I prefer my approach and it works fine for me!
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 20:32 |
|
RightToClick might help if you don't want to use a Greasemonkey script.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 03:52 |
|
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2014/04/03/brendan-eich-steps-down-as-mozilla-ceo/
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 20:28 |
|
May every door hit him on the way out.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 21:17 |
|
What was the controversy?
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 21:25 |
|
Applebees posted:What was the controversy? Seriously though, he donated $1,000 to Prop 8 (making it illegal for same sex marriages in California) back in 2008
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 21:32 |
|
Also he never even like, bothered to give a real apology for that and vow to not do such stupid poo poo again.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 22:20 |
|
Install Windows posted:Also he never even like, bothered to give a real apology for that and vow to not do such stupid poo poo again. Here's his comments on the topic.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 22:40 |
|
That whole thing is loving stupid. Not believing in gay marriage is stupid, but them firing him over it is even stupider. His personal beliefs wouldn't have interfered with his duties as CEO. He never should've been fired for a personal belief. But whatever, they didn't ask my opinion.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 01:24 |
|
Fangs404 posted:That whole thing is loving stupid. Not believing in gay marriage is stupid, but them firing him over it is even stupider. His personal beliefs wouldn't have interfered with his duties as CEO. He never should've been fired for a personal belief. But whatever, they didn't ask my opinion. Well this just proved that he has a continual bad track record on equality. First === and now this.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 02:09 |
|
Fangs404 posted:That whole thing is loving stupid. Not believing in gay marriage is stupid, but them firing him over it is even stupider. His personal beliefs wouldn't have interfered with his duties as CEO. He never should've been fired for a personal belief. But whatever, they didn't ask my opinion. CEOs are supposed to deal with PR debacles, not create them.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 04:18 |
Having been persecuted and forced out of not one but two workplaces for not having same political viewpoints as everyone else who worked there I sort of feel for the guy, you really shouldn't donate money to any political causes or talk about who you vote for or anything, it can only lead to bad things nowadays unfortunately.
|
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 05:49 |
|
Pryor on Fire posted:Having been persecuted and forced out of not one but two workplaces for not having same political viewpoints as everyone else who worked there I sort of feel for the guy, you really shouldn't donate money to any political causes or talk about who you vote for or anything, it can only lead to bad things nowadays unfortunately. I don't think bigotry should get to hide under the umbrella of "different political viewpoint".
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 06:41 |
|
Homophobia and bigotry in general aren't valid "political viewpoints". Would you still feel sorry for the guy if it was found out that he made a donation to some white supremacy group? What about if the donation was to some anti-feminist movement? (The above is a hypothetical question, if you answer "yes" you are a loving terrible human being.)
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 07:04 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 05:02 |
|
Any further arguments about what political opinions should disqualify someone from employment will be held in D&D
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 07:09 |