|
Tetraptous posted:Yes, I'm aware of Nyquist--but 192 kHz is still way way above that! Then I think I misread your post, but I'm gonna leave my thing there since I'm certain there's at least a person or two who might find it informative in combination with your post about the limits of human hearing.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2014 13:58 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 15:29 |
|
ErIog posted:I agree with the overall point you're making here, but your reasoning is wrong. You're comparing two different things here. 44 kHz sampling can only reproduce sound frequencies up to 22 kHz because you need to capture both the peak and the valley of the wave in order to represent it digitally. So in order to reproduce your example of a 20 kHz tone you would need a minimum sampling rate of 40 kHz. Yep. When sampling at a frequency of X, you're guaranteed to perfectly capture any signal whose content is below X/2 (the Nyquist frequency). The difficulty is that if there's any content above X/2, that's going to introduce error, in the form of aliasing. In order to guarantee that it's perfectly captured, you have to filter off that content. And that's a pain in the rear end to do in analog circuitry; most analog low-pass filters are nowhere close to ideal sinc. This is actually the main reason that studios started working in 96KHz/192KHz in the early 90s -- it meant you had plenty of headroom in the signal's spectrum to capture without aliasing. Then, when you were done mastering, you'd decimate to 44.1KHz with an antialiasing filter. These days, it's less important, because almost all audio-grade ADCs are oversampling anyways.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2014 18:35 |
|
You also have stuff like Super Audio CD's 2.822 megahertz sampling, which is done at a 1 bit depth.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2014 18:50 |
|
...of SCIENCE! posted:if it means more Oingo Boingo/Satan Danny Elfman and less "needly needly bum bum lalalalala" Tim Burton soundtrack autopilot Danny Elfman then I can't hate it too much The songs really made the original and I hope this happens. Either way, it won't be as good without Hervé Villechaize.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2014 19:55 |
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Hey guys remember those muscle pads that you strap around your fat, slovenly gut, that do your workout for you? I can't help but wonder if a big reason for these workout machines is because of the old mention that Bruce Lee apparently used similar setups when he slept, so people figure it must work because a martial arts icon once did something similar. Greyhawk posted:you can Don't doubt a person with an Crimean anime avatar.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 00:04 |
|
Evil Fluffy posted:I can't help but wonder if a big reason for these workout machines is because of the old mention that Bruce Lee apparently used similar setups when he slept, so people figure it must work because a martial arts icon once did something similar. Isn't diet a big part of weight loss/control as well? I mean, exercise is important, but I recall reading somewhere that the vast majority of what developed nations eat is very high in fat and the like.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 03:34 |
|
CommissarMega posted:Isn't diet a big part of weight loss/control as well? I mean, exercise is important, but I recall reading somewhere that the vast majority of what developed nations eat is very high in fat and the like. America's been on a low fat kick for decades now, it just gets replaced by other basic nutrients in high amounts.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 03:40 |
|
Install Windows posted:America's been on a low fat kick for decades now, it just gets replaced by other basic nutrients in high amounts. other basic nutrients = corn syrup
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 03:48 |
|
...of SCIENCE! posted:other basic nutrients = corn syrup Don't act like it's different than other sugars, thanks.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 03:50 |
|
Install Windows posted:Don't act like it's different than other sugars, thanks. b-b-but...5% difference between sucrose and fructose compared to table sugar!!!
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 03:52 |
|
...of SCIENCE! posted:b-b-but...5% difference between sucrose and fructose compared to table sugar!!! All refined sugars are poison (Seriously though high fructose corn syrup is terrible for you)
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 08:19 |
|
Yeah, just not appreciably moreso than any other sugar, it's just that hfcs is in everything so you get more of it.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 08:40 |
|
...of SCIENCE! posted:other basic nutrients = corn syrup And Sodium. Lots of Sodium.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 08:43 |
|
HFCS is terrible for you, but refined carbs in general aren't great for you. Eat more whole grains, veggies and proteins that aren't fried thanks.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 11:40 |
|
Hard-hitting stuff: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/2014/04/01/Crowdfund-it-and-they-will-come quote:Crowdfunding is a great liberal idea--that might just be the saving of conservatives.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 13:29 |
|
lil mortimer posted:Hard-hitting stuff: Jesus loving CHRIST. If I order a big mac before a conservative, it seems like their natural response is to fall to the floor kicking and screaming about persecution. Seriously, what is it with the right wing in the US? I've never seen a bigger collection of loving pussy-bitch-crybabies in my life.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 14:22 |
|
neongrey posted:Yeah, just not appreciably moreso than any other sugar, it's just that hfcs is in everything so you get more of it. The secret is that in every other developed country, they just use table sugar instead. Because America made regular table sugar really expensive in the 70s, which is the only reason corn syrup is competitive at all. Table sugar, for wholesale purchases like for a food company, costs up to 3x less than in America in Canada, the UK, and so on. Incidentally they're all getting megafat just ever so slightly slower than America.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 16:52 |
|
Install Windows posted:The secret is that in every other developed country, they just use table sugar instead. Because America made regular table sugar really expensive in the 70s, which is the only reason corn syrup is competitive at all. As a Scot I should point out that Scotland is in fact 2nd, just behind the USA. We loving love our sugar.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 17:23 |
|
lil mortimer posted:Hard-hitting stuff:
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 18:38 |
|
lil mortimer posted:Hard-hitting stuff: So what about the atlas shrugs movie... Or the creationist movie... And I would assume there is dozens of stupid bible merchandise kick starters funded. Dude just a big baby that has to make everything a war between left wing and right wing.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 21:34 |
|
Shwqa posted:So what about the atlas shrugs movie... Or the creationist movie... And I would assume there is dozens of stupid bible merchandise kick starters funded. You've just reminded me that there is the Atlas Shrugged movie. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/atlas_shrugged_part_i/
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 21:58 |
|
Paladinus posted:You've just reminded me that there is the Atlas Shrugged movie. Didn't they try to Kickstart the second movie in the series and failed miserably?
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 22:19 |
|
Morglon posted:Didn't they try to Kickstart the second movie in the series and failed miserably? Didn't they end up making that anyways though?
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 22:22 |
|
moerketid posted:As a Scot I should point out that Scotland is in fact 2nd, just behind the USA. We loving love our sugar. Mexico is the fattest large country now (lots of small island countries like Tonga have crazy high fat rates, because they're all descendants of people who survived months-long canoe voyages with hardly any food).
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 22:22 |
|
Morglon posted:Didn't they try to Kickstart the second movie in the series and failed miserably? The second movie came out with an entirely different cast. ! and the third part comes out this year!
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 22:23 |
|
theflyingorc posted:The second movie came out with an entirely different cast. The first one wasnt the worst movie. They had good actors and a weak script. The second was poo poo acting and poo poo script. The 3rd will just be Rush Limbaugh bellowing at some liberal strawman for 2 hours.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 22:37 |
|
theflyingorc posted:The second movie came out with an entirely different cast. Also with an entirely different cast!
|
# ? Apr 2, 2014 22:39 |
|
Fauxtool posted:The first one wasnt the worst movie. They had good actors and a weak script. The second was poo poo acting and poo poo script. So what you're telling me here is Atlas Sucked. I'll show myself out.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 01:49 |
|
Morglon posted:So what you're telling me here is Atlas Sucked. My favorite was the gbs title. Atlus shrugged when asked about irony.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 01:54 |
|
In Greek mythology, Atlas did not hold up the Earth. He held up the Sky, which is entirely different. The Sky (Oranos) held himself up, staying as far as he could from Earth (Gaia) after their son Kronos hacked off the Sky's genitals. Zeus punished the strongest of the Titans by giving him a completely worthless job. Atlas wasn't an essential part of the cosmology, he was extraneous.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 03:02 |
|
AlbieQuirky posted:Mexico is the fattest large country now (lots of small island countries like Tonga have crazy high fat rates, because they're all descendants of people who survived months-long canoe voyages with hardly any food). Are they eating more to make up for what their ancestors missed out on?
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 08:35 |
|
Amphigory posted:Are they eating more to make up for what their ancestors missed out on? As far as I have read, starvation/deprivation can cause metabolic damage that causes people to be more prone to gain/hold onto weight - from studies of people with eating disorders as teens as they go into a recovered adult life. But I have no idea whether that could apply to a population/generations (and the study could have counter-evidence etc - just throwing that out there).
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 10:48 |
|
Long time readers may be interested to hear that Doobie's Dog House has its grand opening in three weeks.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 11:06 |
|
Amphigory posted:Are they eating more to make up for what their ancestors missed out on? They are descendants of people with more efficient metabolism and likely other traits that allow them to thrive in a low calorie environment. And now they live in an environment, where calories are cheap and plentiful.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 11:12 |
|
Jedit posted:Long time readers may be interested to hear that Doobie's Dog House has its grand opening in three weeks. No way.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 13:07 |
|
Dear god
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 13:09 |
|
Holy poo poo.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 13:12 |
|
did the vent hood finally materialize like manna from the heavens?
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 13:17 |
|
Fauxtool posted:did the vent hood finally materialize like manna from the heavens? Last I heard Wayne was selling a whole heap of his personal possessions to raise the money for the fitting.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 13:40 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 15:29 |
|
There's some info on that Facebook page, including a picture of the interior:
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 14:29 |