Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

I just heard Mike Huckabee on Fox News say...without a trace of irony..

"If Mitt Romeny would have courted the Evangelical/Pro Life/Traditional Values vote more heavily, he would have won the election! 10% of those people stayed home for the election"

...

They really don't get it do they?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mercury_Storm
Jun 12, 2003

*chomp chomp chomp*
I say, the Illuminati right wing bloggers hit right on the mark with those unskewed poll sites, and the whole Fox news Rove meltdown made it even better for betting on actual data and not "gut feelings" (or whatever the gently caress) to win out. We---- I mean those bloggers should get right back to work for 2016 to make sure everyone can bet their grand-kid's college fund on Hillary winning out against right wing ~~~DreamZ~~~ again.

Alec Bald Snatch
Sep 12, 2012

by exmarx

FuzzySkinner posted:

I just heard Mike Huckabee on Fox News say...without a trace of irony..

"If Mitt Romeny would have courted the Evangelical/Pro Life/Traditional Values vote more heavily, he would have won the election! 10% of those people stayed home for the election"

...

They really don't get it do they?

Well technically he's right if by stayed home you mean lost their mental faculties due to age and/or died in between 2008 and 2012.

agarjogger
May 16, 2011

FuzzySkinner posted:

I just heard Mike Huckabee on Fox News say...without a trace of irony..

"If Mitt Romeny would have courted the Evangelical/Pro Life/Traditional Values vote more heavily, he would have won the election! 10% of those people stayed home for the election"

...

They really don't get it do they?

This is the most terrifying thing I've ever heard on Fox.
Holy Christ, 90% of those people voted?

Phone
Jul 30, 2005

親子丼をほしい。
"Those people"? Sounds like racism to me. :colbert:

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

agarjogger posted:

This is the most terrifying thing I've ever heard on Fox.
Holy Christ, 90% of those people voted?

It turns out churches are actually a pretty easy way to do local organizing, as black churches have found out for the past 60+ years.

FMguru
Sep 10, 2003

peed on;
sexually

agarjogger posted:

This is the most terrifying thing I've ever heard on Fox.
Holy Christ, 90% of those people voted?
Yep, and they still lost by several percentage points. :toot:

Gotta say I'm all in favor of the GOP responding to changing demographics by thinking that they need to get even whiter and more conservative. Excellent plan guys, can't see how it could possibly fail.

mr. mephistopheles
Dec 2, 2009

FMguru posted:

Yep, and they still lost by several percentage points. :toot:

Gotta say I'm all in favor of the GOP responding to changing demographics by thinking that they need to get even whiter and more conservative. Excellent plan guys, can't see how it could possibly fail.

This combined with learning that political beliefs held early in life generally do not change as people get older and millennials lean liberal by a huge margin is basically what keeps me sane. If conservatives weren't so cartoonishly incompetent and oblivious, I'd probably give up on life altogether. They still manage to hang on by being stupidly filthy loving rich and liberals apparently not knowing that midterm elections are a thing that exists.

FMguru
Sep 10, 2003

peed on;
sexually

mr. mephistopheles posted:

This combined with learning that political beliefs held early in life generally do not change as people get older and millennials lean liberal by a huge margin is basically what keeps me sane. If conservatives weren't so cartoonishly incompetent and oblivious, I'd probably give up on life altogether. They still manage to hang on by being stupidly filthy loving rich and liberals apparently not knowing that midterm elections are a thing that exists.
For a fun example of a party responding to demographic change by entrenching in its diminishing core and basically disappearing altogether, check out the history of the California GOP 1994-2014. They don't hold a single statewide office (Dems are 10 for 10) and aren't likely to any time soon. The state GOP is hopelessly out of power that even the state Chamber of Commerce has given up funding them. All because they refused to adapt to the demographic fact of Latino population growth. Just a spectacular public suicide effort.

ToxicSlurpee
Nov 5, 2003

-=SEND HELP=-


Pillbug

mr. mephistopheles posted:

This combined with learning that political beliefs held early in life generally do not change as people get older and millennials lean liberal by a huge margin is basically what keeps me sane. If conservatives weren't so cartoonishly incompetent and oblivious, I'd probably give up on life altogether. They still manage to hang on by being stupidly filthy loving rich and liberals apparently not knowing that midterm elections are a thing that exists.

They also hang on by rigging the system, which isn't going to be an easy thing to root out. Preventing people from voting, rampant gerrymandering - stuff is all over the place and they aren't going to go down without a dirty, nasty fight. Granted the right wing nut jobs also won't shut up about saving America from the dictatorship of those awful leftists and have a lot of gun nuts so who knows what might happen in the next 50 years. Maybe they'll just shrivel and die slowly and quietly, maybe they'll go out with a gigantic explosion that scours the surface clean of all life.

turnip kid
May 24, 2010
I keep seeing things on twitter about Eric Cantor aligning with BIG LABOR and betraying Americans. I looked into it and it's because he is speaking at a coalition of moderate conservatives. They're definitely on a suicide mission, these Republicans. I think they bought into the idea that America is full of "radical" ideologues after all the time they've spent accusing Obama and the Democrats of being such.

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/9/eric-cantor-falls-hard-from-good-graces-of-conserv/

quote:

Mr. Cantor, meanwhile, is coming under additional fire this week from L. Brent Bozell III, chairman of ForAmerica, who is calling on the Virginia Republican to turn down an invitation to attend a conference hosted by the Republican Main Street Partnership PAC, a group of moderate Republicans that regularly battles conservative groups in primary races.

Mr. Boehner will not attend the event because of a scheduling conflict.

“If your position is that grassroots conservatives and Tea Party supporters no longer belong in the Republican Party then it will permanently destroy any credibility you have left with conservatives,” Mr. Bozell said. “Without conservatives, the GOP will also collapse.”

Mr. Bozell’s comments underscore the feud between some grass-roots groups and Republican leaders on Capitol Hill over spending and the national debt.

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

FMguru posted:

Yep, and they still lost by several percentage points. :toot:

Gotta say I'm all in favor of the GOP responding to changing demographics by thinking that they need to get even whiter and more conservative. Excellent plan guys, can't see how it could possibly fail.

But this has been their strategy for the last 20 years and it's only recently not working.
Getting out the base rather than expanding the base has been the GOP MO and one of the reasons for the wall to wall obamascare tactics.

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

HootTheOwl posted:

But this has been their strategy for the last 20 years and it's only recently not working.
Getting out the base rather than expanding the base has been the GOP MO and one of the reasons for the wall to wall obamascare tactics.

If by only recently you mean "10 of the last 18 years".

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

computer parts posted:

If by only recently you mean "10 of the last 18 years".

If by only recently I mean "06-10." The Republicans controlled congress from 94-06, took back the house in 2010, and are poised to gain full control again this year.

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

HootTheOwl posted:

If by only recently I mean "06-10." The Republicans controlled congress from 94-06, took back the house in 2010, and are poised to gain full control again this year.

You're talking about congressional elections, the topic was Presidential elections.

moths
Aug 25, 2004

I would also still appreciate some danger.



ToxicSlurpee posted:

They also hang on by rigging the system, which isn't going to be an easy thing to root out. Preventing people from voting, rampant gerrymandering - stuff is all over the place and they aren't going to go down without a dirty, nasty fight.

I'm actually wondering just how burdening the voting process is going to affect the elections. Doesn't the lion's share of GOP support come from single-issue working poor voters? (Ie: The same people they're trying to block from the polls.) When all this voter ID crap started, I know lots of work went into getting ID for elderly and poor Democrats, but I didn't see anything like that happening on the right.

djent
Nov 28, 2013

It's metal to like clowns
yea all this hulabaloo about voter id sure is some crap, why wouldn't we require people to show a photo ID to vote?

you need one to drive, to fly, to enter a federal building, why not to vote?

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold
I wasn't aware that those three were in the constitution.

Raskolnikov38 fucked around with this message at 16:02 on Apr 12, 2014

VideoTapir
Oct 18, 2005

He'll tire eventually.
Is there some way we can make a due process by which not having an ID puts one on the wrong side of it re: losing your right to vote?

Mc Do Well
Aug 2, 2008

by FactsAreUseless
How does voter id prevent voter fraud? An elaborate vote rigging conspiracy could produce fake IDs to allow someone to go from one polling place to another. People should dip their fingers in ink at the polls so they can't vote more than once. This costs less money and isn't a barrier to entry.

Huckabee: I love the 80'S!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00prsxs

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."

djent posted:

why not to vote?
Why?

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

djent posted:

yea all this hulabaloo about voter id sure is some crap, why wouldn't we require people to show a photo ID to vote?

you need one to drive, to fly, to enter a federal building, why not to vote?

Because it is a ruse designed to suppress Democratic turnout. There's no other reason for it. "Why not" is not a reason.

FMguru
Sep 10, 2003

peed on;
sexually

HootTheOwl posted:

But this has been their strategy for the last 20 years and it's only recently not working.
Getting out the base rather than expanding the base has been the GOP MO and one of the reasons for the wall to wall obamascare tactics.
It's been their strategy since about five minutes after the 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed.

And getting out the base is an excellent strategy in midterm and off-year elections, it'd be nice if the Democrats focused on it.

But rallying out the base is a long-term losing strategy when that base is in irreversible demographic decline. They're going to have to confront the fact of America's changing nature sooner or later, and it looks like their 100% decided on dealing with it "later", and that's 100% A-OK by me. Like mr. meph said, they're blowing off an entire generation of voters - a huge one, one that's even bigger than the Boomers. If they want to align themselves with a voting bloc that will literally be dead in 10-20 years at the expense of a larger group of people that will be voting for another 50, I'm certainly not going to stop them.

Paul MaudDib
May 3, 2006

TEAM NVIDIA:
FORUM POLICE

FMguru posted:

If they want to align themselves with a voting bloc that will literally be dead in 10-20 years at the expense of a larger group of people that will be voting for another 50, I'm certainly not going to stop them.

Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.

esto es malo
Aug 3, 2006

Don't want to end up a cartoon

In a cartoon graveyard

Paul MaudDib posted:

Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.

Please proceed, governor.

Azuth0667
Sep 20, 2011

By the word of Zoroaster, no business decision is poor when it involves Ahura Mazda.

djent posted:

yea all this hulabaloo about voter id sure is some crap, why wouldn't we require people to show a photo ID to vote?

you need one to drive, to fly, to enter a federal building, why not to vote?

Probably because they already had to prove they had an ID when they registered to vote so this is useless cumbersome redundancy that only serves to disenfranchise and inconvenience voters.

Pohl
Jan 28, 2005




In the future, please post shit with the sole purpose of antagonizing the person running this site. Thank you.

djent posted:

yea all this hulabaloo about voter id sure is some crap, why wouldn't we require people to show a photo ID to vote?

you need one to drive, to fly, to enter a federal building, why not to vote?

Because voter fraud is a non issue? It happens, but mostly it happens at a structural level, not at an individual voting level. With the restrictions and deficiencies in some areas of this country, we could have open voting, and you still couldn't vote more than once. People in some areas stand in line for 6 or 7 hours to vote. Guess where those people are, and guess what color they are?

Mister Facetious
Apr 21, 2007

I think I died and woke up in L.A.,
I don't know how I wound up in this place...

:canada:

FMguru posted:

Like mr. meph said, they're blowing off an entire generation of voters - a huge one, one that's even bigger than the Boomers.

Is this as a percentage of population, or in sheer numbers? :raise:

Typical Pubbie
May 10, 2011

Warcabbit
Apr 26, 2008

Wedge Regret
That was, I admit, my first reaction to her hedgehog-dance. Which I still find hilarious. (that she looked like an Oz wicked witch)
(I have nothing but sympathy for Hillary, in regards to her semi-involuntary reaction to having a random object thrown at her. It's still a funny dance)

ProperGanderPusher
Jan 13, 2012




Once the number of old white men becomes minuscule enough, expect to see the GOP do an about face on most or some racial issues and hope everyone just forgets their policies from fifty years or so prior. There's a huge market of FYGM-minded people who aren't old white men to tap into. Hell, if they simply agreed to support a Student Loan Forgiveness Act and get over their hatred of non-rich young people for just two seconds, they could easily slow or even reverse their decline. Unfortunately, that would mean: 1) The FEDDLE GUBMINT doing a thing and 2) Moochers getting free stuff, so I wouldn't hold my breath.

ProperGanderPusher fucked around with this message at 21:46 on Apr 12, 2014

ex post facho
Oct 25, 2007
Regarding the ongoing talk of demographic shifts and the failure of the Republican party to adapt to them, I'm reminded of this joke told by Slavoj Zizek:


quote:

In the good old days of freely existing socialism, a joke was popular among dissidents. A joke used to illustrate the futility of their protests. In 15th century Russia, occupied by Mongols - so goes the joke - a farmer and his wife walk along a dusty country road. A Mongol warrior, on a horse, stops at their side, and tells the farmer he will now rape his wife.

He then states "But since there is a lot of dust on the ground, you should hold my testicles while I am raping your wife so they will not get dusty."

After the Mongol finishes his job and rides away, the farmer starts to laugh and jump with joy. The surprised wife asks him "How can you be jumping with joy when I was just brutally raped?"

The farmer answers, "But I got him! His balls are full of dust!"

This sad joke tells of the predicament of dissidents. They thought they were dealing serious blows to the party nomenklatura, but all they were doing was getting a little bit of dust on the nomenklatura's testicles.

Is today's critical left not all too often in a similar position? We think we are doing something terribly subversive, we are just [hand motion referencing joke]...our task is to discover how to make a step further. Critical leftists have hitherto only dirtied with dust the balls of those in power.

The point is to cut them off.

Don't be too pessimistic here. I claim that if it were done in a proper, peaceful ideological struggle, they will not even be aware of it. They will still shout at us, but all of a sudden, their voices will get higher.

Republican voices have been getting more and more shrill lately, haven't they? :v:

Though I don't believe the Democrats really represent the critical left.

Alec Bald Snatch
Sep 12, 2012

by exmarx

ProperGanderPusher posted:

Once the number of old white men becomes minuscule enough, expect to see the GOP do an about face on most or some racial issues and hope everyone just forgets their policies from fifty years or so prior. There's a huge market of FYGM-minded people who aren't old white men to tap into. Hell, if they simply agreed to support a Student Loan Forgiveness Act and get over their hatred of non-rich young people for just two seconds, they could easily slow or even reverse their decline. Unfortunately, that would mean: 1) The FEDDLE GUBMINT doing a thing and 2) Moochers getting free stuff, so I wouldn't hold my breath.

Maybe when the old white guys and everyone else who desperately wishes they were an old white guy are gone, but that's not for another few decades.

beatlegs
Mar 11, 2001


Oh, GOP. Demonizing your opponent worked out so well last time. I guess there's no reason to change!

Pope Guilty
Nov 6, 2006

The human animal is a beautiful and terrible creature, capable of limitless compassion and unfathomable cruelty.
I remember realizing that the GOP had called every Presidential nominee by the Democrats the literal anti-Christ.

fade5
May 31, 2012

by exmarx

Warcabbit posted:

(I have nothing but sympathy for Hillary, in regards to her semi-involuntary reaction to having a random object thrown at her. It's still a funny dance)
Yeah, even though I like Hillary, throwing random items at people (as long is said object is dodged) is funny slapstick in general. It was funny with Bush, it was funny with Hillary, it's funny in classic Looney Tunes cartoons, it's funny in the Three Stooges, it's just funny in general.

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

ProperGanderPusher posted:

There's a huge market of FYGM-minded people who aren't old white men to tap into.

[citation needed]

At least for non-white people.

El Pollo Blanco
Jun 12, 2013

by sebmojo

fade5 posted:

Yeah, even though I like Hillary, throwing random items at people (as long is said object is dodged) is funny slapstick in general. It was funny with Bush, it was funny with Hillary, it's funny in classic Looney Tunes cartoons, it's funny in the Three Stooges, it's just funny in general.

NY Times posted:


Mr. Maliki’s security agents jumped on the man, wrestled him to the floor and hustled him out of the room. They kicked him and beat him until “he was crying like a woman,” said Mohammed Taher, a reporter for Afaq, a television station owned by the Dawa Party, which is led by Mr. Maliki. Mr. Zaidi was then detained on unspecified charges.

Other Iraqi journalists in the front row apologized to Mr. Bush, who was uninjured and tried to brush off the incident by making a joke. “All I can report is it is a size 10,” he said, continuing to take questions and noting the apologies. He also called the incident a sign of democracy, saying, “That’s what people do in a free society, draw attention to themselves,” as the man’s screaming could be heard outside.

This part is somehow less funny, if that is actually what occurred.

Nodelphi
Jan 30, 2004

We are all quite capable of believing in anything as long as it's improbable.

Ham Wrangler

computer parts posted:

[citation needed]

At least for non-white people.

Bobby Jindal.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

fade5 posted:

Yeah, even though I like Hillary, throwing random items at people (as long is said object is dodged) is funny slapstick in general. It was funny with Bush, it was funny with Hillary, it's funny in classic Looney Tunes cartoons, it's funny in the Three Stooges, it's just funny in general.

Yea it's dumb that people are going "HAHA WHAT A PUSSY SCARED OF A RANDOM FLYING OBJECT OUT OF NOWHERE" but it doesn't make it not pretty funny that some rear end in a top hat chucked a shoe at her and she made a pretty funny pose.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply