|
ColoradoCleric posted:So you don't have people who give their card and ID to someone else so they can purchase it illegally. But places like bars and dispensaries card before you walk in.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 22:51 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 04:03 |
|
Tight Booty Shorts posted:But places like bars and dispensaries card before you walk in. So then what's the point?
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 22:53 |
|
If they card you when you walk in then you could just use a vending machine instead of demanding the time of an employee. It's just self checkout.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 22:55 |
|
DeadmansReach posted:If they card you when you walk in then you could just use a vending machine instead of demanding the time of an employee. It's just self checkout. You're also losing the ability to talk about the variety of strains offered or have any recommendations offered to the customer and will have significantly less variety offered.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 22:57 |
|
ColoradoCleric posted:You're also losing the ability to talk about the variety of strains offered or have any recommendations offered to the customer and will have significantly less variety offered. So?
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 22:58 |
|
Yeah the only benefit to the customer here is obviously convenience. The vendor has the greatest interest in getting these machines out to be sure.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 22:59 |
|
If the problem is you can't process customers fast enough you're gonna be better off just opening up another register.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:00 |
|
ColoradoCleric posted:You're also losing the ability to talk about the variety of strains offered or have any recommendations offered to the customer and will have significantly less variety offered. There exists a type of person who doesn't want variety and just wants comfort food/weed/etc. A vending machine would work well for them and it would free up employees to help people who are genuinely curious. e: Hey, it's my first red title.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:00 |
|
DeadmansReach posted:Yeah the only benefit to the customer here is obviously convenience. The vendor has the greatest interest in getting these machines out to be sure. Pretty much just comes across as a gimmick unless your target market is some sort of autistic that can't handle any human interaction whatsoever. ColoradoCleric fucked around with this message at 23:04 on Apr 15, 2014 |
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:02 |
|
ColoradoCleric posted:You're also losing the ability to talk about the variety of strains offered or have any recommendations offered to the customer and will have significantly less variety offered. Sometimes I want to discuss expensive foreign cheeses with a cheese monger who owns their own specialized shop in which there's a lot of discussion and recommendations. Sometimes I want to grab a giant brick of cheddar cheese at the local grocery story and take it quickly and conveniently through self checkout. Thankfully both options exists and I'm not forced to choose between one or the other for life.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:05 |
|
If your target market wants to look at all your weed like a big candy store then it might be a bad investment. That or your cashier is really bad at getting people through the line.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:07 |
|
Also depending on your municipality/medical marijuana law it may be required that you have a separate room for dispensing and only allowed 1 customer in it at a time so you're just going to have your customer fumbling with a vending machine will your bud tender just sits there.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:23 |
|
Yes, just like ATMs, these awkward and soulless machines will never appeal to the pot smoking public.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:33 |
|
Why do we need ATM's when we have banks e: only autistic people would ever use an ATM, because everyone else just goes to a teller and chats them up while they count their cash
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:36 |
|
The merits of pot vending machines seems like an argument well worth having!
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:38 |
|
Yes I'm sure pot vending machines will be in every building and every street corner like alcohol vending machines.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:39 |
|
How far along is the movement for marijuana as legal tender?
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:40 |
|
How are u posted:The merits of pot vending machines seems like an argument well worth having! You're right, it's stupid. Have a lovely article instead! quote:
Mexicans?
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:41 |
|
Yes I'm sure extortion is going to be a problem in a state with as open gun laws as we have.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:43 |
|
The cartels are all over the southwest, owners of plenty of glitzy restaurants and night clubs these pols attend every weekend. What a poo poo article.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:45 |
|
Also if you keep calling it marijuana you're contributing to the drug war propaganda by using a term that's historically been tied to racism. It's called Cannabis.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:49 |
|
quote:Eventually, he said, "It's either going to be the cartels or it's going to be the tobacco industry. There's a lot of concern about that. You don't think some of the tobacco companies aren't looking at this as the next tobacco industry?" Haha, if there's anything America absolutely will not stand for, it's allowing giant corporations to exist. I wonder if it would be a problem if weed became the next alcohol industry?
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:49 |
|
cafel posted:Haha, if there's anything America absolutely will not stand for, it's allowing giant corporations to exist. I wonder if it would be a problem if weed became the next alcohol industry? Which popular contemporary song will be used in the first Super Bowl commercial?
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:50 |
|
In a state with high emphasis on custom brewing of alcohol we will turn into a mass market corporate ownership of cannabis.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2014 23:56 |
|
ColoradoCleric posted:Also if you keep calling it marijuana you're contributing to the drug war propaganda by using a term that's historically been tied to racism. It's called Cannabis. Marijuana has lost all of its original racist connotations, and is now exclusively used as a neutral term to refer to a drug. "You're not allowed to say 'marijuana' because it was offensive 80 years ago" is just stupid.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 00:30 |
|
Also we don't need to stop using marijuana because words sounding slightly spanish no longer implies that such things are bad.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 00:32 |
|
Jeffrey posted:Also we don't need to stop using marijuana because words sounding slightly spanish no longer implies that such things are bad. You said it, chico.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 00:38 |
|
ColoradoCleric posted:Also if you keep calling it marijuana you're contributing to the drug war propaganda by using a term that's historically been tied to racism. It's called Cannabis. It's called weed, nerd. There's a shitload of Cannabis plants that ain't smokable.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 00:43 |
|
Install Windows posted:It's called weed, nerd. There's a shitload of Cannabis plants that ain't smokable. There are more weeds that you want to avoid smoking than cannabis flowers.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 00:45 |
|
'This colorado poo poo is really dank man' What seems to be the problem with this?
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 00:51 |
|
Only 2 states have legalized recreational use since this magazine came out. I wonder how many years or decades it will take for it to be legal in all states...
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 00:53 |
|
That's a bit of an odd metric to measure the success of legalization and it's rate of adoption. e: Also to be fair that article was written right before Nixon started the war on drugs to distract us all from how badly the war in Vietnam was going. Mirthless fucked around with this message at 00:57 on Apr 16, 2014 |
# ? Apr 16, 2014 00:55 |
|
Yeah, if I'm a historian, I'm looking at the legalizations in Colorado and Washington as the turning point in public perception of the drug. It's one thing to talk about legalizing, another to see it in action and working reasonably well.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 00:59 |
|
AYC posted:Yeah, if I'm a historian, I'm looking at the legalizations in Colorado and Washington as the turning point in public perception of the drug. It's one thing to talk about legalizing, another to see it in action and working reasonably well. Do you think public perception matters to American politicians? I moved out of the US last year, so I don't know which senators or congressmen are making this an important issue.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 01:08 |
|
Tight Booty Shorts posted:Do you think public perception matters to American politicians? I moved out of the US last year, so I don't know which senators or congressmen are making this an important issue. Considering that politicians are still voted into office by the public, yes, I do think public opinion ultimately matters to American politicians.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 01:11 |
|
Anyone have any good research on the "cannabis use (heavy or otherwise) increases mental health problems" argument?
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 01:11 |
|
Mirthless posted:Considering that politicians are still voted into office by the public, yes, I do think public opinion ultimately matters to American politicians. According to this study,"When the preferences of economic elites and the stands of organized interest groups are controlled for, the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy." http://www.princeton.edu/~mgilens/G...es%203-7-14.pdf quote:Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 01:21 |
|
ColoradoCleric posted:Anyone have any good research on the "cannabis use (heavy or otherwise) increases mental health problems" argument? That argument tends to be a misreading of the fact that smoking weed if you already have certain mental health issues can exacerbate symptoms (or simply be really unpleasant).
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 01:25 |
|
Tight Booty Shorts posted:You're right, it's stupid. Have a lovely article instead! Mexicans always try to steal US jobs. Also great to see that US pot is following the successful path set by the wine industry, USA USA!
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 01:25 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 04:03 |
|
ColoradoCleric posted:Anyone have any good research on the "cannabis use (heavy or otherwise) increases mental health problems" argument? The DSM was written by committee, and addiction medicine specialists are on that committee. Would you admit the primary driver for your employment (state enforced rehab) is harmless? I hate to be guy but really. Install Windows posted:That argument tends to be a misreading of the fact that smoking weed if you already have certain mental health issues can exacerbate symptoms (or simply be really unpleasant). This is true, I have bipolar disorder and have auditory hallucinations and paranoia when I'm manic. Weed makes that way worse. But it's not a long term effect by any measure and it certainly didn't cause my problems to coalesce into existence. Tight Booty Shorts posted:According to this study,"When the preferences of economic elites and the stands of organized interest groups are controlled for, the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy." The part you bolded is important. "Independent Influence". You and I don't do anything by writing a letter to our congressmen, we have almost no individual influence. But as a large group our influence on policy is huge, since at the end of the day it's the public that decides whether or not somebody gets elected. There's no denying that big money is the primary driver of policy in this country, largely because they spend unbelievable amounts of cash influencing the average citizen to think the same way they do.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 01:36 |