|
Read to the players:quote:You enter the room. There is a Human man sitting in a chair (Chris Hansen: NG, Human, Wizard/12, Bard/3, Anchor/5), with a set of chairs facing him and goblin carrying a box with a lens on it behind him. As the party enters the room, the goblin trains the lens-box on you.
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 04:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 20:14 |
|
|
Attorney at Funk posted:that spell absolutely does not appear on the cleric list
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 05:00
|
|
|
lol the nazi anime girl card game got funded with almost 100k out of a 10k goal. god is hitler's human being indeed https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1662858658/barbarossa-anime-card-game-from-japan
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 05:12
|
|
|
Knitted Art posted:lol the nazi anime girl card game got funded with almost 100k out of a 10k goal. god is hitler's human being indeed god is hitler's human being indeed 
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 05:26
|
|
|
Wales Grey posted:god is hitler's human being indeed new thread title
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 05:30
|
|
|
Knitted Art posted:lol the nazi anime girl card game got funded with almost 100k out of a 10k goal. god is hitler's human being indeed welcome to the new normal
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 05:38
|
|
|
crime fighting hog posted:is this real It's just as stupid and spergy as most of the poo poo Trollman comes up with.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 06:19
|
|
|
Knitted Art posted:lol the nazi anime girl card game got funded with almost 100k out of a 10k goal. god is hitler's human being indeed Be fair... God didn't give any money to this kickstarter. Nerds are hitler's faggots.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 06:21
|
|
|
Mystic Mongol posted:[i]Nerds[\i] are hitler's faggots. new title
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 06:22
|
|
|
dwarf74 posted:No, this is stupid sperglord interpretations about D&D Next, using old packets. Business as usual
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 07:02
|
|
|
Knitted Art posted:lol the nazi anime girl card game got funded with almost 100k out of a 10k goal. god is hitler's human being indeed WHHHHHYYYYYYY. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 07:03
|
|
|
Ratoslov posted:WHHHHHYYYYYYY. If smilies could go into thread titles I vote this
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 07:22
|
|
|
Knitted Art posted:lol the nazi anime girl card game got funded with almost 100k out of a 10k goal. god is hitler's human being indeed i wonder how they'll play when the cards start sticking together
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 08:15
|
|
|
EightFlyingCars posted:i wonder how they'll play when the cards start sticking together looks like someone missed out on the 'machine-washable non-stick card covers' stretch goal
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 17:52
|
|
|
quote:@Nervosix First off, kudos on your community interaction. Second, I've been wondering if there will be specific dual wield rules in Next? The bit about fireball under water is particularly funny because one thread, I think it might have been the previous twitter thread, was overrun with talk about whether one can cast fire spells under water. Particularly Fireball. With people claiming that you could not in previous editions, or that you couldn't before 4e and that is another thing 4e got wrong. With other people showing that actually the rules did allow one to cast fireball underwater in previous editions, and that 3.5 was just as accommodating with that as 4e. It got so bad that that thread was closed. And a new thread all about if one can cast Fireball underwater was started.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 18:34
|
|
|
metamagic feat: greek fire spell
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 18:48
|
|
|
Ryuujin posted:The bit about fireball under water is particularly funny because one thread, I think it might have been the previous twitter thread, was overrun with talk about whether one can cast fire spells under water. Particularly Fireball. With people claiming that you could not in previous editions, or that you couldn't before 4e and that is another thing 4e got wrong. With other people showing that actually the rules did allow one to cast fireball underwater in previous editions, and that 3.5 was just as accommodating with that as 4e. It got so bad that that thread was closed. And a new thread all about if one can cast Fireball underwater was started. http://www.theonion.com/articles/area-man-passionate-defender-of-what-he-imagines-c,2849/ This, but with D&D.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 19:41
|
|
|
So can you do it or what don't leave us hanging
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 19:55
|
|
|
why couldn't you. being hindered by context is exactly the sort of thing you go through wizard college to avoid
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 19:56
|
|
|
Exactly. It lets you combine fishing and cooking skills into one spell
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 20:01
|
|
|
I love how wizards can break reality but oh god can't let someone dual wield longswords let alone bastard swords.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 20:17
|
|
|
Vire posted:I love how wizards can break reality but oh god can't let someone dual wield longswords let alone bastard swords.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 20:20
|
|
|
Halloween Jack posted:Magic is supposed to break reality, so it doesn't have to be realistic. Magic can do anything. it got crowley all sorts of tang irl so i guess it really can do anything
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 20:22
|
|
|
Tang is science-fiction, not fantasy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 20:25
|
|
|
Halloween Jack posted:Tang is science-fiction, not fantasy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 20:33
|
|
|
Wizards: Quantum Bullshit
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 20:36
|
|
|
Attorney at Funk posted:being hindered by context is exactly the sort of thing you go through wizard college to avoid
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 20:36
|
|
|
i mean how different would D&D really be if you replaced wizards with 'mad scientists', magic with 'SCIENCE!!!!!!!!!!!', and spell components with a slurry of nanomachines? you'd still track the specific number of shots a ranger has for his ranged weapon but wizards get a free pass on their bag of infinite cyber-bat poop Wales Grey fucked around with this message at 20:39 on Apr 24, 2014 |
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 20:37
|
|
|
i'm a nano, i use my intellect to cast powerful esoteries to damage or disable my foes
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 20:42
|
|
|
Wasn't Anarchy Online a scifi MMO where everyone had "nanos" but the players just called them spells?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 20:43
|
|
|
Ferrinus posted:i'm a nano, i use my intellect to cast powerful esoteries to damage or disable my foes my favorite part about that is that from the word go their staple "attack" thing has the option of just ignoring all armor, as long as the opponent isnt mindless + you dont mind dealing a little less damage meanwhile in martial-land...
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 20:45
|
|
|
Halloween Jack posted:Wizards: Quantum Bullshit Wizards: Quadratic Bullshit
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2014 20:47
|
|
|
More infodump transcribed by someone from a live event.http://www.twitch.tv/wotc_dnd posted:
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2014 01:32
|
|
|
So the best thing about their rules is that I don't have to use them I agree
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2014 01:38
|
|
|
ritorix posted:Just like Apples-2-Apples and Cards Against Humanity, the rules are full of ways to combine random flavor things to create unique stories. hahahahahaha
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2014 01:41
|
|
|
Someone told me they brought back hit dice. Is that true?
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2014 01:42
|
|
|
SunAndSpring posted:Someone told me they brought back hit dice. Is that true?
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2014 01:42
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Yeah. If you play D&D Next I will hit you with dice, nerd. u mad
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2014 02:12
|
|
|
Ryuujin posted:The bit about fireball under water is particularly funny because one thread, I think it might have been the previous twitter thread, was overrun with talk about whether one can cast fire spells under water. Particularly Fireball. With people claiming that you could not in previous editions, or that you couldn't before 4e and that is another thing 4e got wrong. With other people showing that actually the rules did allow one to cast fireball underwater in previous editions, and that 3.5 was just as accommodating with that as 4e. It got so bad that that thread was closed. And a new thread all about if one can cast Fireball underwater was started. It's like how one of the common criticisms of 4e was that Fireball can't light things on fire like it could in every other edition... except that the 4e core rules say that fire spells can start fires if the DM allows it, whereas 3e explicitly says in the DMG that spells with a duration of "instantaneous" don't set things on fire or otherwise create lasting effects unless the spell description specifically says so.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2014 02:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 20:14 |
|
|
gtrmp posted:It's like how one of the common criticisms of 4e was that Fireball can't light things on fire like it could in every other edition... except that the 4e core rules say that fire spells can start fires if the DM allows it, whereas 3e explicitly says in the DMG that spells with a duration of "instantaneous" don't set things on fire or otherwise create lasting effects unless the spell description specifically says so. In neither case did anyone A) Read the rules B) Go to the rules first before making a decision
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2014 02:55
|
|
