|
Read to the players:quote:You enter the room. There is a Human man sitting in a chair (Chris Hansen: NG, Human, Wizard/12, Bard/3, Anchor/5), with a set of chairs facing him and goblin carrying a box with a lens on it behind him. As the party enters the room, the goblin trains the lens-box on you.
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 19:38 |
|
Attorney at Funk posted:that spell absolutely does not appear on the cleric list
|
![]() |
|
lol the nazi anime girl card game got funded with almost 100k out of a 10k goal. god is hitler's human being indeed https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1662858658/barbarossa-anime-card-game-from-japan
|
![]() |
|
Knitted Art posted:lol the nazi anime girl card game got funded with almost 100k out of a 10k goal. god is hitler's human being indeed god is hitler's human being indeed ![]()
|
![]() |
|
Wales Grey posted:god is hitler's human being indeed new thread title
|
![]() |
|
Knitted Art posted:lol the nazi anime girl card game got funded with almost 100k out of a 10k goal. god is hitler's human being indeed welcome to the new normal
|
![]() |
|
crime fighting hog posted:is this real It's just as stupid and spergy as most of the poo poo Trollman comes up with.
|
![]() |
Knitted Art posted:lol the nazi anime girl card game got funded with almost 100k out of a 10k goal. god is hitler's human being indeed Be fair... God didn't give any money to this kickstarter. Nerds are hitler's faggots.
|
|
![]() |
|
Mystic Mongol posted:[i]Nerds[\i] are hitler's faggots. new title
|
![]() |
|
dwarf74 posted:No, this is stupid sperglord interpretations about D&D Next, using old packets. Business as usual
|
![]() |
|
Knitted Art posted:lol the nazi anime girl card game got funded with almost 100k out of a 10k goal. god is hitler's human being indeed WHHHHHYYYYYYY. ![]()
|
![]() |
|
Ratoslov posted:WHHHHHYYYYYYY. If smilies could go into thread titles I vote this
|
![]() |
|
Knitted Art posted:lol the nazi anime girl card game got funded with almost 100k out of a 10k goal. god is hitler's human being indeed i wonder how they'll play when the cards start sticking together
|
![]() |
|
EightFlyingCars posted:i wonder how they'll play when the cards start sticking together looks like someone missed out on the 'machine-washable non-stick card covers' stretch goal
|
![]() |
|
quote:@Nervosix First off, kudos on your community interaction. Second, I've been wondering if there will be specific dual wield rules in Next? The bit about fireball under water is particularly funny because one thread, I think it might have been the previous twitter thread, was overrun with talk about whether one can cast fire spells under water. Particularly Fireball. With people claiming that you could not in previous editions, or that you couldn't before 4e and that is another thing 4e got wrong. With other people showing that actually the rules did allow one to cast fireball underwater in previous editions, and that 3.5 was just as accommodating with that as 4e. It got so bad that that thread was closed. And a new thread all about if one can cast Fireball underwater was started.
|
![]() |
|
metamagic feat: greek fire spell
|
![]() |
|
Ryuujin posted:The bit about fireball under water is particularly funny because one thread, I think it might have been the previous twitter thread, was overrun with talk about whether one can cast fire spells under water. Particularly Fireball. With people claiming that you could not in previous editions, or that you couldn't before 4e and that is another thing 4e got wrong. With other people showing that actually the rules did allow one to cast fireball underwater in previous editions, and that 3.5 was just as accommodating with that as 4e. It got so bad that that thread was closed. And a new thread all about if one can cast Fireball underwater was started. http://www.theonion.com/articles/area-man-passionate-defender-of-what-he-imagines-c,2849/ This, but with D&D.
|
![]() |
|
So can you do it or what don't leave us hanging
|
![]() |
|
why couldn't you. being hindered by context is exactly the sort of thing you go through wizard college to avoid
|
![]() |
|
Exactly. It lets you combine fishing and cooking skills into one spell
|
![]() |
|
I love how wizards can break reality but oh god can't let someone dual wield longswords let alone bastard swords.
|
![]() |
|
Vire posted:I love how wizards can break reality but oh god can't let someone dual wield longswords let alone bastard swords.
|
![]() |
|
Halloween Jack posted:Magic is supposed to break reality, so it doesn't have to be realistic. Magic can do anything. it got crowley all sorts of tang irl so i guess it really can do anything
|
![]() |
|
Tang is science-fiction, not fantasy.
|
![]() |
|
Halloween Jack posted:Tang is science-fiction, not fantasy.
|
![]() |
|
Wizards: Quantum Bullshit
|
![]() |
|
Attorney at Funk posted:being hindered by context is exactly the sort of thing you go through wizard college to avoid
|
![]() |
|
i mean how different would D&D really be if you replaced wizards with 'mad scientists', magic with 'SCIENCE!!!!!!!!!!!', and spell components with a slurry of nanomachines? you'd still track the specific number of shots a ranger has for his ranged weapon but wizards get a free pass on their bag of infinite cyber-bat poop Wales Grey fucked around with this message at 20:39 on Apr 24, 2014 |
![]() |
|
i'm a nano, i use my intellect to cast powerful esoteries to damage or disable my foes
|
![]() |
|
Wasn't Anarchy Online a scifi MMO where everyone had "nanos" but the players just called them spells?
|
![]() |
|
Ferrinus posted:i'm a nano, i use my intellect to cast powerful esoteries to damage or disable my foes my favorite part about that is that from the word go their staple "attack" thing has the option of just ignoring all armor, as long as the opponent isnt mindless + you dont mind dealing a little less damage meanwhile in martial-land...
|
![]() |
|
Halloween Jack posted:Wizards: Quantum Bullshit Wizards: Quadratic Bullshit
|
![]() |
|
More infodump transcribed by someone from a live event.http://www.twitch.tv/wotc_dnd posted:
|
![]() |
|
So the best thing about their rules is that I don't have to use them I agree
|
![]() |
|
ritorix posted:Just like Apples-2-Apples and Cards Against Humanity, the rules are full of ways to combine random flavor things to create unique stories. hahahahahaha
|
![]() |
Someone told me they brought back hit dice. Is that true?
|
|
![]() |
|
SunAndSpring posted:Someone told me they brought back hit dice. Is that true?
|
![]() |
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Yeah. If you play D&D Next I will hit you with dice, nerd. u mad
|
![]() |
|
Ryuujin posted:The bit about fireball under water is particularly funny because one thread, I think it might have been the previous twitter thread, was overrun with talk about whether one can cast fire spells under water. Particularly Fireball. With people claiming that you could not in previous editions, or that you couldn't before 4e and that is another thing 4e got wrong. With other people showing that actually the rules did allow one to cast fireball underwater in previous editions, and that 3.5 was just as accommodating with that as 4e. It got so bad that that thread was closed. And a new thread all about if one can cast Fireball underwater was started. It's like how one of the common criticisms of 4e was that Fireball can't light things on fire like it could in every other edition... except that the 4e core rules say that fire spells can start fires if the DM allows it, whereas 3e explicitly says in the DMG that spells with a duration of "instantaneous" don't set things on fire or otherwise create lasting effects unless the spell description specifically says so.
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 19:38 |
|
gtrmp posted:It's like how one of the common criticisms of 4e was that Fireball can't light things on fire like it could in every other edition... except that the 4e core rules say that fire spells can start fires if the DM allows it, whereas 3e explicitly says in the DMG that spells with a duration of "instantaneous" don't set things on fire or otherwise create lasting effects unless the spell description specifically says so. In neither case did anyone A) Read the rules B) Go to the rules first before making a decision
|
![]() |