Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Pornographic Memory
Dec 17, 2008

Install Windows posted:

Taking a shot at him is a great way to go immediately to federal prison.

Well yes, nobody with any sense of self-preservation would attempt to assassinate a major political figure. I'd like to see him be tried for war crimes too, but I guess the sad truth is that George W. Bush will live the rest of his life a free and increasingly well-liked man, painting dogs and proving with his continued unmolested existence that there's no justice in the world.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

Swagger Dagger posted:

My "favorite" exchange was when they were talking about the spread of "enhanced interrogation" techniques from Guantanamo Bay to Iraw and Afghanistan, and how Rumsfeld didn't know anything about it. Morris says something like "What, stuff just happens" and Rumsfeld just goes "Yeah, you know, wars evolve as they go along."

That's how he engages with literally everything. "Stuff just sorta happens, you know?"

quote:

Zaphod's just this guy, you know?

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe

Pornographic Memory posted:

Well yes, nobody with any sense of self-preservation would attempt to assassinate a major political figure. I'd like to see him be tried for war crimes too, but I guess the sad truth is that George W. Bush will live the rest of his life a free and increasingly well-liked man, painting dogs and proving with his continued unmolested existence that there's no justice in the world.

Considering where he left off, it's hard not to be increasingly well-liked. :v:

Job Truniht
Nov 7, 2012

MY POSTS ARE REAL RETARDED, SIR
Reminder that the 2008 campaign literally consisted of candidates listing reasons they were not going to be George Bush and accusing the other side of continuing his policies.

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Reminder George W. Bush was underestimated, was the underdog throughout his life, and in general the only people who opposed him in 2000 were smarmy know it all liberals that work for Huffington Post now.

got any sevens
Feb 9, 2013

by Cyrano4747

eggyolk posted:

Institutionalized "affluenza" is certainly a big step towards literal class warfare.

We need to invent "poorfluenza" to combat it.

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

effectual posted:

We need to invent "poorfluenza" to combat it.

It's called affirmative action.

Ofaloaf
Feb 15, 2013

Nonsense posted:

Reminder George W. Bush was underestimated, was the underdog throughout his life, and in general the only people who opposed him in 2000 were smarmy know it all liberals that work for Huffington Post now.
Except for the bit where he was Governor of Texas, and then President of the United States.

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

effectual posted:

We need to invent "poorfluenza" to combat it.

jesus, it's poorlio, you clod

Barudak
May 7, 2007

Ofaloaf posted:

Except for the bit where he was Governor of Texas, and then President of the United States.

And owned a baseball team. And went to one of the best schools in the country despite getting gentleman Cs. And being born into 3rd generation of fantastical wealth to an already incredibly accomplished statesman and veteran father.

Boo fuckin hoo I wish I was a George Bush underdog.

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Barudak posted:

And owned a baseball team. And went to one of the best schools in the country despite getting gentleman Cs. And being born into 3rd generation of fantastical wealth to an already incredibly accomplished statesman and veteran father.

Boo fuckin hoo I wish I was a George Bush underdog.

Latte liberals called him dumb, allow me to go into why he was not dumb, you see

Relentlessboredomm
Oct 15, 2006

It's Sic Semper Tyrannis. You said, "Ever faithful terrible lizard."

SedanChair posted:

Who does? And we were talking about the Vietnam War, not the beginning of our involvement. If I was talking about the start of our involvement with Iraq, we'd also be talking about Eisenhower instead of Bush.

I blame LBJ for a lot of Nam. Not the entirety of course since Nixon did a ton of terrible things as well. In fact I would say my feelings on LBJ are wildly different based on whether we're discussing his domestic or foreign policies.


All that said I mostly blame the French for Vietnam. loving French and their ineptitude at Dien Bien Phu along with constantly underestimating General Giap and their general inability to handle their own loving affairs.

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

Relentlessboredomm posted:

I blame LBJ for a lot of Nam not the entirety since Nixon did a ton of terrible things as well. In fact I would say my feelings on LBJ are wildly different based on whether we're discussing his domestic or foreign policies.


All that said I mostly blame the French for Vietnam. loving French and their ineptitude at Dien Bien Phu along with constantly underestimating General Giap and their general inability to handle their own loving affairs.

The fourth French Republic was spectacularly terrible. They were invaded by their own colony.

MarsDragon
Apr 27, 2010

"You've all learned something very important here: there are things in this world you just can't change!"

SedanChair posted:

Do people hate Johnson for starting the Vietnam war?

My dad has never forgiven the Democrats in general for Vietnam.

That he was wholeheartedly behind Iraq was a hypocrisy I could pick up on even as a dumbass teenager. Wars sure are great when you're not fighting them, aren't they?

Pythagoras a trois
Feb 19, 2004

I have a lot of points to make and I will make them later.

hobbesmaster posted:

The fourth French Republic was spectacularly terrible. They were invaded by their own colony.

Didn't that just happen to us over a bunch of cows?

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe

Cheekio posted:

Didn't that just happen to us over a bunch of cows?

When did we colonize Racist White People?

Gen. Ripper
Jan 12, 2013


Install Windows posted:

When did we colonize Racist White People?

1865 :v:

JonathonSpectre
Jul 23, 2003

I replaced the Shermatar and text with this because I don't wanna see racial slurs every time you post what the fuck

Soiled Meat

MarsDragon posted:

My dad has never forgiven the Democrats in general for Vietnam.

That he was wholeheartedly behind Iraq was a hypocrisy I could pick up on even as a dumbass teenager. Wars sure are great when you're not fighting them, aren't they?

Baby Boomers, 1973: "No loving WAY will we ever be bullshitted into a racist war built on straight-up lies and started mainly to enrich the President's friends!"

Baby Boomers, 2003: "Well, the Foxnews says he has a mobile bio-weapons lab, we've got to get behind our war leader and protect the Homeland!"

Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss. It's so depressing.

SubponticatePoster
Aug 9, 2004

Every day takes figurin' out all over again how to fuckin' live.
Slippery Tilde

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

Congress reinstated lifetime coverage in 2012.
I'm surprised the Republicans let that happen. You'd think they'd vote for terminating it the minute whomever is sworn in January 2017.

beatlegs
Mar 11, 2001

JonathonSpectre posted:

Baby Boomers, 1973: "No loving WAY will we ever be bullshitted into a racist war built on straight-up lies and started mainly to enrich the President's friends!"

Baby Boomers, 2003: "Well, the Foxnews says he has a mobile bio-weapons lab, we've got to get behind our war leader and protect the Homeland!"

Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss. It's so depressing.

Don't forget, 9/11 was instrumental in turning people to the dumb side. To this day I don't get why it made so many people lose their common sense. I always thought Americans were made of stronger stuff, but... I guess not.

Relentlessboredomm
Oct 15, 2006

It's Sic Semper Tyrannis. You said, "Ever faithful terrible lizard."

JonathonSpectre posted:

Baby Boomers, 1973: "No loving WAY will we ever be bullshitted into a racist war built on straight-up lies and started mainly to enrich the President's friends!"

Baby Boomers, 2003: "Well, the Foxnews says he has a mobile bio-weapons lab, we've got to get behind our war leader and protect the Homeland!"

Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss. It's so depressing.

I wonder how much of that is going from being an outsider looking in on the group with the power to being the part of the group with the power. When you're benefitting the most from the current system its very difficult to heavily criticize it. Or so it seems. Perhaps we'll find out the hard way when we're loving poor people out of their final dollars and cutting welfare entirely to fund our social security.

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

beatlegs posted:

Don't forget, 9/11 was instrumental in turning people to the dumb side. To this day I don't get why it made so many people lose their common sense. I always thought Americans were made of stronger stuff, but... I guess not.

They kind of had the perfect set-up, though. Multiple media conduits enabled the politicization of factual reality. That was reinforced by the admin's PR, who eventually tied 9/11 into it. Global warming became the purvey of al-Qaeda, Tax cuts fought the terrorists, and why in the hell would you vote against cutting food stamps when THOSE TOWERS BURNED

Samurai Sanders
Nov 4, 2003

Pillbug
I don't know if any possible theoretical America could have stood up against the rah rah USA USA blitz after 9/11.

edit: some weeks after the incident, I remember reading an article about a Yankees game where the ref made a bad call against the Yankees and people started shouting USA!! USA!!! at him. That's when I realized that this country had lost its loving mind and it wouldn't be back for a long time.

Samurai Sanders fucked around with this message at 10:18 on May 3, 2014

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

Samurai Sanders posted:

I don't know if any possible theoretical America could have stood up against the rah rah USA USA blitz after 9/11.

I think it's less that and more the fact that we didn't loving snap out of it.

Homura and Sickle
Apr 21, 2013

FAUXTON posted:

I think it's less that and more the fact that we didn't loving snap out of it.

While we haven't managed to break away from the security state and foreign policy that 9/11 created, at the very least one of our major parties is so unpatriotic and treasonous it's difficult to argue that we're still in the "rally around the flag" state :suicide:

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

Jagchosis posted:

While we haven't managed to break away from the security state and foreign policy that 9/11 created, at the very least one of our major parties is so unpatriotic and treasonous it's difficult to argue that we're still in the "rally around the flag" state :suicide:

We are, it's just twisted. They're the ones rallying around the flag, and people aren't straight up sending the fuckers to Angola prison because we never snapped out of that post-9/11 deer-in-headlights fugue.

Mornacale
Dec 19, 2007

n=y where
y=hope and n=folly,
prospects=lies, win=lose,

self=Pirates

SubponticatePoster posted:

I'm surprised the Republicans let that happen. You'd think they'd vote for terminating it the minute whomever is sworn in January 2017.

The last thing the Republicans (the ones in Congress, anyway) want is for Obama to be assassinated. If he's murdered in office, that just puts the Presidency in the hands of Diamond Joe. If he's murdered afterward, it keeps him from making a few speeches and dedicating a library. Either way, it'd be extremely likely that he's killed by someone on the far right, and quite likely a white supremacist at that. Not only does that give a huge boost to the Democrats, but it also is one hell of a crack in the "racism is over" facade.

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

Mornacale posted:

The last thing the Republicans (the ones in Congress, anyway) want is for Obama to be assassinated. If he's murdered in office, that just puts the Presidency in the hands of Diamond Joe. If he's murdered afterward, it keeps him from making a few speeches and dedicating a library. Either way, it'd be extremely likely that he's killed by someone on the far right, and quite likely a white supremacist at that. Not only does that give a huge boost to the Democrats, but it also is one hell of a crack in the "racism is over" facade.

If something that horrific happened I hope to all things good and holy it's leveraged as much as possible to crush those loving conservative filth into unrecoverable dust.

SavageBastard
Nov 16, 2007
Professional Lurker
Sometimes this thread is amazing and sometimes I feel like I'm reading a Freep thread with liberal enemies swapped for conservative ones.

*edit* seplling

SavageBastard fucked around with this message at 12:51 on May 3, 2014

Magres
Jul 14, 2011
Sometimes it's a slow news day :shrug:

So what's this about France being invaded by one of its colonies? That sounds hilarious and my history is pretty bad

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

SavageBastard posted:

Sometimes this thread is amazing and sometimes I feel like I'm reading a Freep thread with liberal enemies swapped for conservative ones.

In the political maps thread people are bemoaning (half seriously) how the losers of the Civil War should have been exterminated.

Jagchosis posted:

While we haven't managed to break away from the security state and foreign policy that 9/11 created, at the very least one of our major parties is so unpatriotic and treasonous it's difficult to argue that we're still in the "rally around the flag" state :suicide:

Things are wayyyy different from now, and I'm speaking as someone who was about 10 when we invaded Iraq. Back then people would get suspicious if someone with a niqab showed up, now it's just an odd curiosity.

Great_Gerbil
Sep 1, 2006
Rhombomys opimus

computer parts posted:

In the political maps thread people are bemoaning (half seriously) how the losers of the Civil War should have been exterminated.

I'm not gonna delve into that quagmire cuz it sounds like a helluva mess but I do wish the Southern elites and former Confederates had spent more time being tried for treason than being elected to national office. I also wish their votes in the House and Senate had been deemed non binding for twelve years or more so the Union could have done more unhindered.

Chokes McGee
Aug 7, 2008

This is Urotsuki.

Magres posted:

So what's this about France being invaded by one of its colonies? That sounds hilarious and my history is pretty bad

The only thing close to this I can think of is Algeria, which was less "invasion" and more "get the gently caress out." :shrug:

Mr Ice Cream Glove
Apr 22, 2007

Those liberal atheist universities censor Republicans

quote:

Condoleezza Rice Decides Not To Speak At Rutgers Commencement


NEW BRUNSWICK, N.J. (AP) — Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has backed out of delivering the commencement address at Rutgers University following protests by some faculty and students over her role in the Iraq War.

Rice said in a statement Saturday that she informed Rutgers President Robert Barchi that she was declining the invitation.

"Commencement should be a time of joyous celebration for the graduates and their families," Rice said. "Rutgers' invitation to me to speak has become a distraction for the university community at this very special time."

The school's board of governors had voted to pay the former secretary of state under President George W. Bush and national security adviser $35,000 for her appearance at the May 18 ceremony.

But some students and faculty had protested, staging sit-ins and saying Rice bore some responsibility for the Iraq War as a member of the Bush administration. Barchi and other school leaders had resisted the calls to disinvite Rice, saying the university welcomes open discourse on controversial topics.

In her statement, Rice defended her record, saying that she was honored to serve her country and that she had "defended America's belief in free speech and the exchange of ideas." But she said she didn't want to detract from the spirit of the commencement ceremony.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/03/condoleezza-rice-rutgers-commencement_n_5259180.html

Mr Ice Cream Glove fucked around with this message at 15:57 on May 3, 2014

JonathonSpectre
Jul 23, 2003

I replaced the Shermatar and text with this because I don't wanna see racial slurs every time you post what the fuck

Soiled Meat

beatlegs posted:

Don't forget, 9/11 was instrumental in turning people to the dumb side. To this day I don't get why it made so many people lose their common sense. I always thought Americans were made of stronger stuff, but... I guess not.

Fear is a hell of a drug.

On Terra Firma
Feb 12, 2008


You know for all the reasons she could have given for not wanting to do that, this is among the better ones. I don't care for her, but at least she gave a very sensible reason for backing out.

Putin It In Mah ASS
Nov 12, 2003

Omni-gel superlube is great stuff!

Magres posted:

So what's this about France being invaded by one of its colonies? That sounds hilarious and my history is pretty bad

I think this? http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Op%E9ration_R%E9surrection

Not exactly being invaded by a colony, but it's the closest event to it I guess.

Syjefroi
Oct 6, 2003

I'll play it first and tell you what it is later.
Here's a fun slow news day piece:

Death threats stop gun store from selling 'smart' gun. Why?

quote:

The White House has urged gun companies to invent safety technology that could limit a gun’s use to its owner. But two gun shops decided not to sell such guns after receiving death threats.


ATLANTA

Andy Raymond, a Rockland, Md., firearms dealer, found out how much some people who love guns and the Second Amendment really hate some guns, causing the owner of Engage Armament this week to reverse his plan to sell the Armatix iP1, the nation’s first “smart” gun.

The German-made Armatix iP1 won’t fire unless it’s in proximity of a special watch, thus making it useless if stolen. Gun control advocates, including Attorney General Eric Holder, have cited such technology as potential life savers.

But the NRA and many gun owners say it’s a government Trojan horse intended to open the door for laws that will mandate “smart” technology in new guns in order to identify gun owners – a notion that’s widely seen by gun owners as a threat to Second Amendment rights.

When Mr. Raymond said he’d sell the Armatix, he was deluged with complaints and threats against his life, even the life of his dog. Before relenting on Thursday, Raymond lashed out against his critics in a YouTube video.


“That’s the antithesis of everything that we pro-gun, pro-Second Amendment people should be,” he said. “You are not supposed to say a gun should be prohibited. Then you are being no different than the anti-gun people who say an AR-15 should be prohibited.”

The optics of politically motivated gun owners threatening the lives of other citizens over their business activity will likely prove off-putting to a lot of Americans, especially given wide-ranging concerns about the armed standoff between government agents and rancher Cliven Bundy in Nevada over grazing rights and fees. Armed militiamen are still patrolling Bunkerville, Nev., after Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid called them “domestic terrorists.”

But fears that smart guns will lead to more gun ownership restrictions aren’t completely unfounded, either.

In Congressional testimony last year, Mr. Holder defended a budget request for gun safety grants by saying that “bracelets” can be used to make sure guns are “used only by the person who is lawfully in possession of the weapon.”

After noting that smart gun technology was discussed in a White House meeting after the Sandy Hook massacre, Holder noted that, “It’s those kinds of things that I think we want to try to explore so that we can make sure that people have the ability to enjoy their Second Amendment rights.”

Politifact, the fact-checking service, noted that Holder is not pursuing any policy to help the government track gun owners. But in her speech to the NRA last weekend, former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin took note of Holder’s “bracelet” testimony and his suggestion that technology could “identify” gun owners, and said, “Hey … you don’t want to go there, buddy.”

But even more specifically, New Jersey lawmakers have passed legislation that all handguns in the state be “personalized” three years after smart guns become available. Some US lawmakers are mulling similar legislation, according to the Washington Post.

After the events in Maryland, New Jersey state Sen. Loretta Weinberg, the sponsor of the gun bill, said she’d work to defang that law if the NRA stops fighting “smart gun” technology. According to Fox News, the NRA’s legislative director, Chris Cox, said the organization will only be happy with a “full repeal.”

Smart guns have been in development for a decade, but the iP1 is the first one to sniff the US market. After the Sandy Hook massacre, a conglomerate of California investors launched a $1 million contest to push smart-gun technology.

Mostly European gunsmiths are exploring technologies like RFID chips, rings, fingerprint sensors and even voice recognition to incorporate into new generation firearms.

Whether they’ll ever make it onto US gun store shelves is now the open question. Last year, Oak Tree, a California gun shop, stopped selling the Armatix after similar protests. The shop later insisted that it had never offered the iP1 for sale.

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

Putin It In Mah rear end posted:

I think this? http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Op%E9ration_R%E9surrection

Not exactly being invaded by a colony, but it's the closest event to it I guess.

Corsica counts as France.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Octatonic
Sep 7, 2010

hobbesmaster posted:

Corsica counts as France.

Tell that to a Corsican

  • Locked thread