|
A woman is sueing the parents of a child she killed on a bicycle (accidentally, sounds like it was the child's fault). Anthony defends said woman for sueing the family. This is a gimmick right?
|
#
?
May 2, 2014 15:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 20:07 |
|
|
I was scanning FM radio this morning on my way to work and came in on the Todd Show in the middle of a phone scam. He dumped that "dibbydibbydibby" song. This upsets me greatly.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2014 15:27
|
|
|
TL posted:I was scanning FM radio this morning on my way to work and came in on the Todd Show in the middle of a phone scam. He dumped that "dibbydibbydibby" song. This upsets me greatly. Todd's never done an original thing in his life.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2014 15:51
|
|
|
Auron posted:A woman is sueing the parents of a child she killed on a bicycle (accidentally, sounds like it was the child's fault). It's kind of complicated and weird. The woman hit kids that were riding on a patch of highway at 1:30 in the morning without lights or proper reflector gear. She apparently wasn't drinking or anything, and she was going about 5mph over the speed limit; apparently she just didn't see them. When she was found not to be at fault, the families sued her for about a million dollars claiming she was "speeding, under the influence, or texting," just firing a bunch of accusations at her and hoping one would stick. She countersued, and now a lot of the reports on the subject kind of fail to mention the context of the situation.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2014 20:35
|
|
|
Wow, today Jim gave a sincere "I'm sorry for bitching about fake names online, I'l stop." It was in regard to the video game guy getting fired for saying Sterling's privacy was invaded.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2014 22:36
|
|
|
Cromulent posted:Wow, today Jim gave a sincere "I'm sorry for bitching about fake names online, I'l stop." It was in regard to the video game guy getting fired for saying Sterling's privacy was invaded.  The way he rants about that one I thought he would never come around. Especially since in his line of work he's about one of the only people who can spout poo poo freely without getting their rear end canned. Holy gently caress, listened to the call from South Africa today on the replay on my way home. My god man, they went on like fifty tangents, let the guy maybe say a total of ten words, then Opie called him boring and Anthony accused him of faking the whole thing because Anthony doesn't know how time zones work. God drat amazing. CrashCat fucked around with this message at 23:29 on May 2, 2014 |
|
#
?
May 2, 2014 22:54
|
|
|
Ochowie posted:It's because Opie likes her big red bush. I actually thought the show was pretty good today including that break but that's because I always like Bobby's dynamic with the guys. Anthony is the idiot old man that loves bushes, not Opie.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 07:35
|
|
|
TwistedNails posted:Anthony is the idiot old man that loves bushes, not Opie. Moved up an age bracket, did he?
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 09:01
|
|
|
Morter posted:Moved up an age bracket, did he? What?
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 13:12
|
|
|
TwistedNails posted:What? A swing and a miss 
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 14:08
|
|
|
Dude speak up your phone is crapping out. ( but seriously how does any fan still fall for that?)
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 14:19
|
|
|
Cromulent posted:Wow, today Jim gave a sincere "I'm sorry for bitching about fake names online, I'l stop." It was in regard to the video game guy getting fired for saying Sterling's privacy was invaded. Wait, which video game guy? Somebody got fired for saying that Sterling's privacy was invaded? Which...y'know, it kind of WAS?
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 15:58
|
|
|
BottledBodhisvata posted:Wait, which video game guy? Somebody got fired for saying that Sterling's privacy was invaded? Which...y'know, it kind of WAS?
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 16:02
|
|
|
BottledBodhisvata posted:Wait, which video game guy? Somebody got fired for saying that Sterling's privacy was invaded? Which...y'know, it kind of WAS? Ohhhh, I didn't realize These plus about 200+ responses to people calling him out on whatever he was looking for by opening that can of worms.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 16:58
|
|
|
Cory Lidle posted:Hmm, unpopular indeed This is insane. This got him fired? The gently caress exactly is wrong with our society? Is free speech only tolerated if YOU like it? I am too legit angry on this, I'm getting off the Internet.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 17:01
|
|
|
BottledBodhisvata posted:This is insane. This got him fired? The gently caress exactly is wrong with our society? Is free speech only tolerated if YOU like it? I am too legit angry on this, I'm getting off the Internet. Be sure to stomp around your room like a big baby while you're at it.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 17:16
|
|
|
Call Me Charlie posted:Doesn't everybody worry about being associated with the blacks in private? Oh, that's right...not everybody is a racist shitheel. Call Me Charlie posted:Eh, is it really any different than a sex tape or drunk voicemails leaking out? It's kind of goofy to expect there to be no consequences because you didn't intend for it to come out. Call Me Charlie posted:Be sure to stomp around your room like a big baby while you're at it. Shut up you literal fascist.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 17:19
|
|
|
BottledBodhisvata posted:Is free speech only tolerated if YOU like it? That's it in a nutshell. Someone is allowed to express their opinion as long as it's the right one.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 17:20
|
|
|
BottledBodhisvata posted:Shut up you literal fascist. I thought you were getting off the internet?
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 17:21
|
|
|
If the b b b b b boys presented all the facts on air then that community manager story is super hosed up and ridiculous. It's absolutely reasonable to question the legality of the recordings while not being a crazy racist.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 17:22
|
|
|
The Dave posted:If the b b b b b boys presented all the facts on air then that community manager story is super hosed up and ridiculous. It's absolutely reasonable to question the legality of the recordings while not being a crazy racist. That sounds like something a racist would say.... I'm now going to call your employer and try to get you fired.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 17:26
|
|
|
It's really sad that in a modern age, if you try and present the slightest semblance of rationale in any direction that isn't in support of the current "Most Oppressed Subculture", you're openly marked for losing your livelihood and your entire internet presence being destroyed. A virtual, amorphous lynch mob enforcing "If you're not with us, you're against us (and should be removed from everything ever)" in 2014. This is what most of the Internet has become. Meanwhile, let's get in some cam girls
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 17:30
|
|
|
Freedom of speech in its essence is the right to express any thought, free from government censorship. Repercussions from individuals or private organisations just aren't covered by that right. The Computer guy said some odd stuff which may have been a poorly worded expression of his opinion, but he did it in a public forum which very directly links to the company he works for. The other definitely racist guy as far as I know said what he did in private, as unacceptable as it was. The bottom line is money for the associated organisations in both instances. Stotty fucked around with this message at 17:40 on May 3, 2014 |
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 17:33
|
|
|
Stotty posted:Freedom of speech in its essence is the right to express any thought, free from government censorship. I disagree because I'm a literal child who only understands absolutes. Nuance is for politically correct fascists.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 18:17
|
|
|
Hey let's all discuss the Constitution and free speech some more like it's a new and interesting debate, please, thanks.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 18:24
|
|
|
PK loving SUBBAN posted:I disagree because I'm a literal child who only understands absolutes. Nuance is for politically correct fascists. Well you're right about the first part at least. But hey, the ends justify the means, and these drat dirty racists won't be doing their racism anymore! High fives, yeah, yeah, we burned them witches good.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 18:28
|
|
|
BottledBodhisvata posted:Well you're right about the first part at least. You don't get the irony of telling me to shut up and calling me a fascist because we have different opinions? Or acting like other people are hysterical faggots when you made a "I'm so mad I'm getting off the internet" post only to  the thread?
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 19:00
|
|
|
Call Me Charlie posted:You don't get the irony of telling me to shut up and calling me a fascist because we have different opinions? Or acting like other people are hysterical faggots when you made a "I'm so mad I'm getting off the internet" post only to The difference is that I'm not of the opinion that people's privacy should be violated if they're racist, yes, or that people should be fired for questioning whether a clandestine recording published by TMZ should be completely allowed (and not questioned AT ALL) because gently caress racism? The difference of opinion being that people's lives should be destroyed for opinions they hold rather than actions they take? But hey don't take my word for it, you can have a real life black person chime in. http://time.com/79590/donald-sterling-kareem-abdul-jabbar-racism/
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 19:08
|
|
|
BottledBodhisvata posted:The difference is that I'm not of the opinion that people's privacy should be violated if they're racist, yes, or that people should be fired for questioning whether a clandestine recording published by TMZ should be completely allowed (and not questioned AT ALL) because gently caress racism? The difference of opinion being that people's lives should be destroyed for opinions they hold rather than actions they take? gently caress your opinion, mmmmk?
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 19:23
|
|
|
First they came for the racists...
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 19:43
|
|
|
I don't appreciate the use of the other f word in this argument.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 20:20
|
|
|
BottledBodhisvata posted:The difference is that I'm not of the opinion that people's privacy should be violated if they're racist, yes, or that people should be fired for questioning whether a clandestine recording published by TMZ should be completely allowed (and not questioned AT ALL) because gently caress racism? The difference of opinion being that people's lives should be destroyed for opinions they hold rather than actions they take? Did I say that a person's privacy should be violated if they're a racist or did I say that a person shouldn't expect for there to be no consequences when something negative leaks out about them? And that's strange you know what I think about the community director guy when I never brought it up. (The community director guy didn't deserve to get fired since he's a nobody but, if you put yourself out there publicly, you have to be prepared for potential blow back. A company isn't obligated to stand by you, whether you're some guy poorly trying to make a point or some dumb bitch in Dunkin Donuts acting like the worst person ever) And, for some reason, I don't think you read past the first paragraph of that Kareem Abdul Jabbar article. He not only doesn't try to excuse Sterling's actions but he says that Sterling should have been publicly shamed years ago. Granted, he makes the same flawed NSA comparison that Jimmy did but there's a gigantic difference between the government recording somebody else's phone call/leaking it and somebody recording a conversation they're apart of/leaking it. One's absolutely wrong while the other is morally shady.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 22:01
|
|
|
Amy Schumer is getting steam for this speech about body issues she did at some gala or whatever. Here. Take special note of who she's posing with in that picture. Think the boys will go anywhere near this?
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 22:16
|
|
|
Stokes posted:Amy Schumer is getting steam for this speech about body issues she did at some gala or whatever. Here. Take special note of who she's posing with in that picture. Think the boys will go anywhere near this? Why would they? Because Gabourey Sidibe just happened to be there and Amy took a photo with her? Her speech was interesting, but how deep could they go with "she took a photo with precious"?
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 22:29
|
|
|
Stokes posted:Amy Schumer is getting steam for this speech about body issues she did at some gala or whatever. Here. Take special note of who she's posing with in that picture. Think the boys will go anywhere near this?
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 22:42
|
|
|
TheRationalRedditor posted:Probably won't come up at all. I do enjoy a thorough precious-bashing though, because there is nothing righteous, glamorous or empowering about being a morbidly hyper-obese monster who will be dead by age 38. Reported to employer.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2014 23:28
|
|
|
Kiss the rings fags
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2014 00:14
|
|
|
therealjon_ posted:I don't appreciate the use of the other f word in this argument. What, french?
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2014 00:37
|
|
|
PK loving SUBBAN posted:What, french? No, freedom.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2014 01:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 20:07 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2014 04:27
|
|