|
So these guys have never heard of anti-trust regulations? Cause I'm pretty sure that the government mandating that farmers use only one company's products...
|
# ? May 12, 2014 19:24 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 07:50 |
|
What sort of lovely business plan involves sterilizing everyone so that nobody eats your product after a couple of generations because they're all dead.
|
# ? May 12, 2014 19:28 |
|
karl fungus posted:What sort of lovely business plan involves sterilizing everyone so that nobody eats your product after a couple of generations because they're all dead. A right wing one, obviously.
|
# ? May 12, 2014 19:29 |
|
More from the desk of Mr. "Spend Money Make Money gently caress YOU PATRIOTS YOU COST ME $1000 YESTERDAY" It's like, I don't know how you can have gone through college during the economic crash and grown up in Hawaii with its astronomical and unrealistic real estate prices and still get taken by this poo poo. It's safe to invest in property without money!
|
# ? May 12, 2014 19:32 |
|
The White Dragon posted:More from the desk of Mr. "Spend Money Make Money gently caress YOU PATRIOTS YOU COST ME $1000 YESTERDAY" How do I sign up for 145k / year of passive income? Because I think I'd enjoy that. Does it involve writing books about real estate investments?
|
# ? May 12, 2014 19:49 |
|
FrozenVent posted:How do I sign up for 145k / year of passive income? Because I think I'd enjoy that. I have this investment opportunity for you. For every $1 you give me I'll give you $0.50 back in pure profit.
|
# ? May 12, 2014 19:51 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2014 20:02 |
|
Glad to see that someone else has the same level of maturity as me.
|
# ? May 12, 2014 20:17 |
|
Aren't people getting a little too old to be using "the dictionary states....." when arguing/writing? I remember using that crap when I was back in HS and still thought of it as a pretty lazy line. I hope I'm not the only one who thinks this.
|
# ? May 12, 2014 20:56 |
|
casual poster posted:Aren't people getting a little too old to be using "the dictionary states....." when arguing/writing? I remember using that crap when I was back in HS and still thought of it as a pretty lazy line. I hope I'm not the only one who thinks this. I mean there are times where someone has an outright wrong interpretation of the word but when it comes to rhetoric it's absolutely loving useless. It's really only an argument to be deployed when you're drunk with friends and trying to piss each other off.
|
# ? May 12, 2014 20:58 |
|
casual poster posted:Aren't people getting a little too old to be using "the dictionary states....." when arguing/writing? I remember using that crap when I was back in HS and still thought of it as a pretty lazy line. I hope I'm not the only one who thinks this. Actually while "the dictionary states" might be a bit stupid it's vitally important in any kind of argument to make sure all parties are using the same definitions for any given term. It isn't strictly wrong to try and come to an agreement on that kind of thing, though a lot of times it ends up just being a smokescreen to throw the argument off and get out of it.
|
# ? May 12, 2014 21:26 |
|
RyuujinBlueZ posted:Actually while "the dictionary states" might be a bit stupid it's vitally important in any kind of argument to make sure all parties are using the same definitions for any given term. It isn't strictly wrong to try and come to an agreement on that kind of thing, though a lot of times it ends up just being a smokescreen to throw the argument off and get out of it. Yeah this is true, but for the love of god people should not phrase it as "the dictionary says this." It works far better as a dialog or someone just saying "this is what I mean when I say this, fyi." Breaking out a dictionary definition comes off as massively pedantic which is generally not going to help your case.
|
# ? May 12, 2014 21:33 |
|
God works in mysterious ways, like totally punching out some pussy-rear end aclu bleeding-fart liberal.
|
# ? May 12, 2014 22:10 |
|
The gently caress dude, I thought God was omnipotent? Also that sounds like a great blow-off class.
|
# ? May 12, 2014 22:14 |
|
Beef Jerky Robot posted:Now I'm just a simple American who doesn't know much about European song contests, but didn't a bunch of monsters win one year? Who cares if a lady with a beard won? http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3622373 More ontopic: I'm glad I keep a tight leash on my facebook, As Dutch person (we came in 2nd) the most negative thing I've seen is that without the politics we would have won. Everybody agreed it was nice to support a statement though.
|
# ? May 12, 2014 22:22 |
|
Lumberjack Bonanza posted:Yeah this is true, but for the love of god people should not phrase it as "the dictionary says this." It works far better as a dialog or someone just saying "this is what I mean when I say this, fyi." Breaking out a dictionary definition comes off as massively pedantic which is generally not going to help your case. Well, when the person is making a definitional argument in the first place ("Bigot is defined as"), pulling the "the dictionary says" argument is saying "no, you idiot, this is an actual definition, and your 'definition' is garbage". Under literally any other circumstances, I agree that it's utter poo poo - I just think in this case it comes across well because it's actually pulling a definition from a source rather than out of one's rear end.
|
# ? May 12, 2014 22:44 |
|
Kugyou no Tenshi posted:Well, when the person is making a definitional argument in the first place ("Bigot is defined as"), pulling the "the dictionary says" argument is saying "no, you idiot, this is an actual definition, and your 'definition' is garbage". Under literally any other circumstances, I agree that it's utter poo poo - I just think in this case it comes across well because it's actually pulling a definition from a source rather than out of one's rear end. Pretty much. She pretty obviously doesn't actually know what 'bigot' means and is misconstruing it for 'someone who disagrees' and the definition would need to be presented for any argument of substance to make sense.
|
# ? May 12, 2014 22:54 |
|
Kugyou no Tenshi posted:Well, when the person is making a definitional argument in the first place ("Bigot is defined as"), pulling the "the dictionary says" argument is saying "no, you idiot, this is an actual definition, and your 'definition' is garbage". Under literally any other circumstances, I agree that it's utter poo poo - I just think in this case it comes across well because it's actually pulling a definition from a source rather than out of one's rear end. Maybe but then you get into the problem of "well MY dictionary says THIS" and also that a dictionary isn't a great tool for discussing the intricacies of how people actually use language. Though ultimately, yeah, that moron needs a refresher on what "bigot" actually means if they think it's "anyone who disagrees with me".
|
# ? May 12, 2014 22:57 |
|
That wouldn't happen to be Ms. Metal, would it?
|
# ? May 12, 2014 23:18 |
|
Funosaurus posted:
There were a couple of good parodies of that floating around in the DnD version of this thread. quote:A liberal muslim homosexual ACLU lawyer professor and abortion doctor was teaching a class on Karl Marx, known atheist And my personal favorite: quote:"A United States Marine was attending some college courses between assignments. He had completed missions in Iraq and Afghanistan . One of the courses had a professor who was a vowed atheist and a member of the ACLU.
|
# ? May 12, 2014 23:34 |
|
Not really idiots on social media, as I'm sure this is a joke, but it just made me so hard:
|
# ? May 12, 2014 23:41 |
|
A United States Marine was taking college classes between his deployments to Afghanistan. One of the courses had a professor that was an atheist and a member of the ACLU. One day the professor shocked everyone by walking into class, looking up and stating, "God, if you are real I want you to come down and knock me off this platform. I will give you 15 minutes." Several minutes tick by in silence, and when the 15 minutes had almost expired, the Marine got up from his seat, approached the professor and punched him in the face, knocking him off the platform and out cold. The Marine simply went back to his seat. The professor came to, visibly shaken and was about to ask the Marine, "What the heck did you do that for?" but he wasn't able to because the other students in the class had called the police and reported the assault. The Marine had already been arrested and before long he was convicted in trial with the testimony of the numerous witnesses present at the incident. He is currently serving time in county and has earned the nickname "The Gaper" amongst his prison mates.
|
# ? May 13, 2014 00:42 |
|
e: nvm, shitpost
Mr. Bones has a new favorite as of 02:56 on May 13, 2014 |
# ? May 13, 2014 01:29 |
|
Way to be a heteronormative shithead. You should probably kill yourself.
|
# ? May 13, 2014 01:33 |
|
Kajeesus posted:Can we not use that idiot dichotomy about forum posts, particularly outside of D&D? What killed that thread was that a couple MRAs bitched about feminism and the thread devolved into goons making GBS threads their pants at each other instead of posting context. Sorry, but that was the reason i put it in quotes. I know it was some group of people who 'we'(general forum audience) rail against(impotently argue about). All I remember is that it ended up being unironic mocking instead of ironic jabbing. Soviet Commubot posted:"A United States Marine was attending some college courses between assignments. He had completed missions in Iraq and Afghanistan . One of the courses had a professor who was a vowed atheist and a member of the ACLU. And that teacher was Satan incarnate. All hail our dark lord and master. P.S. We've been going out for 6 years since that day. We're getting married this fall!
|
# ? May 13, 2014 02:46 |
|
Clockwork Sputnik posted:That wouldn't happen to be Ms. Metal, would it? You are correct, though she mostly just seems a bit bemused by it. The sheer paranoia and comments about "I SHOULD BE ABLE TO FRIEND AS MANY POEPLE AS I WNAT WITHOUT FACEBOOK PUNISHING ME!!!!!" from her friends on the followup post were pretty entertaining though. Otana has a new favorite as of 03:53 on May 13, 2014 |
# ? May 13, 2014 03:44 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2014 08:17 |
That's a parody account.
|
|
# ? May 13, 2014 08:18 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2014 08:19 |
|
So loving stupid. Use patronus instead!
|
# ? May 13, 2014 09:40 |
|
Surely using "patronus" would be offensive to wizardkin
|
# ? May 13, 2014 09:55 |
|
Dear Prudence posted:So loving stupid. Use patronus instead! I remember a couple months ago, Wil Wheaton made a "___ is my spirit animal" joke, and Tumblr poo poo itself, and kept trying to make him seem racist, even after it was pointed out that Europeans have had spirit animals as part of their culture for thousands of years. So long before white people even knew Native American's even existed, we had spirit animals, but yet we are appropriating their culture if we say it now.
|
# ? May 13, 2014 10:35 |
|
In Shakira Law, all lawyers are hip because hips don't lie.
|
# ? May 13, 2014 11:08 |
|
Otana posted:You are correct, though she mostly just seems a bit bemused by it. The sheer paranoia and comments about "I SHOULD BE ABLE TO FRIEND AS MANY POEPLE AS I WNAT WITHOUT FACEBOOK PUNISHING ME!!!!!" from her friends on the followup post were pretty entertaining though. Of course, given that she runs 2 maxed out personal accounts. I've advised her against exactly that (advising instead to switch to a professional account), and I agree with your assessment of her Facebook stance. A friend of Ms. Metal is a friend of mine. Just saying it's a small world, is all :-) And if you're ever in North Hollywood, look me up at my bar, The Other Door! Goons get their first drink on me. Cheers.
|
# ? May 13, 2014 12:29 |
|
Dear Prudence posted:So loving stupid. Use patronus instead! I want a tumblr thread again so badly, because I need more of this. Someone I know has jumped hard on the social justice train, and it's infuriating. Everyone in these circles is so hellbent on individuality via special snowflake labels. The Greendale Human Being is true to life, and that's really depressing.
|
# ? May 13, 2014 13:28 |
|
Every post is like that though, an insipid homily of people trying to be more outraged and progressive. Listening to their circlejerk is as bad as our own, imo
|
# ? May 13, 2014 15:18 |
|
At least some of the people are trying to bring reason into it.
|
# ? May 13, 2014 16:38 |
|
Whoa, dude, that's Old Testament. That doesn't matter! *quotes Leviticus*
|
# ? May 13, 2014 16:48 |
|
The correct answer whenever someone tries to use the Bible (or any religious text) to criticize secular organizations or policy is "I don't give a gently caress."
|
# ? May 13, 2014 16:57 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 07:50 |
|
NotAnArtist posted:Every post is like that though, an insipid homily of people trying to be more outraged and progressive. Listening to their circlejerk is as bad as our own, imo Shaming is a pretty effective tactic for achieving social justice. The idea that shaming tactics should be used a lot is really dragging social justice down though, and not just on tumblr. The internet destroyed the barrier to entry for social justice advocates, and also softened the blowback received for mouthing off to the wrong people or saying something dumb, so the level of discourse has been brought down pretty significantly. Now you just have a lot of people who find nothing more pleasurable than tearing each other down viciously for minor, innocent infractions. Crabs in a bucket.
|
# ? May 13, 2014 17:34 |