|
KARMA! posted:a billion pages about the awesome/vile duality of unicode yet nobody can explain to me why theres a poop emoticon glyph there's not one single good reason NOT to have a poop emoticon glyph 💩💩💩💩💩
|
#
?
May 24, 2014 22:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 23:24 |
|
|
my #1 gripe about java is that only characters in plane 0 are allowed in identifiers. public class 💩 is impossible
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2014 22:49
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ConScript_Unicode_Registry I'm kinda impressed that wikipedia doesn't have pages for most of these scripts.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2014 23:03
|
|
|
Kevin Mitnick P.E. posted:my #1 gripe about java is that only characters in plane 0 are allowed in identifiers. public class 💩 is impossible
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2014 23:11
|
|
|
Malcolm XML posted:cortex m0 son nah not low power enough if sleep is >0.1 uA i aint interested
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 00:46
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:the loving anglocentric unicode assholes unified all the poop so there's only one codepoint for it anyway. my code requires a number of subtly different poop emoticons to properly express its architecture actually, all of the emoji has two variant forms -- emoji form and glyph form
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 01:58
|
|
|
Bloody posted:nah not low power enough if sleep is >0.1 uA i aint interested current queen
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 02:09
|
|
|
Kevin Mitnick P.E. posted:http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2014/05/23/announcing-update-to-productivity-power-tools-2013.aspx i'm not sure i'm actually upset about this?
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 02:30
|
|
|
yeah, actually that sounds cool, and helpful for basically any language
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 04:07
|
|
|
Kevin Mitnick P.E. posted:http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2014/05/23/announcing-update-to-productivity-power-tools-2013.aspx they're totally right allman style owns and this tweak makes it easier to use. win/win
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 04:11
|
|
|
KARMA! posted:a billion pages about the awesome/vile duality of unicode yet nobody can explain to me why theres a poop emoticon glyph http://www.reigndesign.com/blog/love-hotels-and-unicode/
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 10:59
|
|
|
Bloody posted:nah not low power enough if sleep is >0.1 uA i aint interested deep sleep mode bitch
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 14:04
|
|
|
idk the lowest power arm i know deep sleeps at 5-10 uA
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 16:33
|
|
|
i like how one objection raised to emoji at the time was "hey this is a pretty big rabbit hole because there are pretty much infinite variations on an emotion and unlike Zapf Dingbats which are well-defined" and the proponents basically said "nah this is pretty much it since it supports every emoji supported by the japanese mobile companies though it would be cool if you encoded Webdings too" and then people started demanding more emoji anyway
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 16:57
|
|
|
Bloody posted:idk the lowest power arm i know deep sleeps at 5-10 uA deep power down is like 200nA
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 17:18
|
|
|
Bloody posted:idk the lowest power arm i know deep sleeps at 5-10 uA http://www.silabs.com/products/mcu/lowpower/Pages/efm32zg-zero-gecko.aspx deep sleeps at 0.9µA lol if that's not in your power budget. do you count cycles on everything you write to cut down the active time?
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 17:19
|
|
|
quote:Apple, Microsoft and Google ah
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 17:24
|
|
|
are colored emoji standardized or are they just an apple thing? i am asking cuz theyre gay as heck
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 17:47
|
|
|
Shinku ABOOKEN posted:are colored emoji standardized or are they just an apple thing? emojis are dumb in general.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 17:57
|
|
|
suffix posted:http://www.silabs.com/products/mcu/lowpower/Pages/efm32zg-zero-gecko.aspx actually yes
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 18:13
|
|
|
then again given how large the variance seems to be on specced sleep currents it's sometimes a bit of a mystery. ive got a chip sleeping at 55 nA that's specced at like 10x that should probably start pre-testing micros and selecting only the lowest power ones but lol thats starting to get too extreme
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 18:17
|
|
|
Bloody posted:then again given how large the variance seems to be on specced sleep currents it's sometimes a bit of a mystery. ive got a chip sleeping at 55 nA that's specced at like 10x that what are you doing with them
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 18:26
|
|
|
Kevin Mitnick P.E. posted:http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2014/05/23/announcing-update-to-productivity-power-tools-2013.aspx quote:It shrinks lines that contain neither letters nor numbers by 25% vertically, allowing more lines to be displayed in the editor this rules, i've wanted it for years and years, hope it becomes standard in all text editors
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 19:17
|
|
|
that line shrinking thing is insanely stupid. you might as well write code in a non-monospaced font. the solution to the problem of a bad brace style wasting lines is to use the right brace style
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 19:20
|
|
|
Malcolm XML posted:what are you doing with them mostly sleeping
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 19:20
|
|
|
Or use a language that doesn't need closing braces, like the one in the OP
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 19:22
|
|
|
Vanadium posted:Or use a language that doesn't need closing braces, like the one in the OP sure but afaik there aren't any good ones
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 19:24
|
|
|
id rather use python than php
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 19:32
|
|
|
Tiny Bug Child posted:that line shrinking thing is insanely stupid. you might as well write code in a non-monospaced font. the solution to the problem of a bad brace style wasting lines is to use the right brace style shrinking empty lines is a cool and useful thing no matter what your brace style is
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 19:50
|
|
|
six months of developer work and i already want to never touch a p-lang again.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 19:59
|
|
|
qntm posted:shrinking empty lines is a cool and useful thing no matter what your brace style is yeah, I was going to make a smug python comment before I realized this helps python too, just to a lesser degree than it helps languages with braces really it just owns a whole lot next up: make parentheses real big, so they can literally encompass the relevant code? actually I'm not sure that one is a good idea also. p-langs are unbearable without unit tests to catch dumb errors (lol that that's necessary, but it's true). you have good unit tests right?
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 22:24
|
|
|
nrook posted:yeah, I was going to make a smug python comment before I realized this helps python too, just to a lesser degree than it helps languages with braces unit tests are a poor man's type system a type system is a poor man's unit tests
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 22:27
|
|
|
nrook posted:also. p-langs are unbearable without unit tests to catch dumb errors (lol that that's necessary, but it's true). you have good unit tests right? nope. no staging environment either. deploy and pray (for death).
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 22:32
|
|
|
being a programmer is very profitable whatever lang you choose 
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 22:37
|
|
|
Malcolm XML posted:unit tests are a poor man's type system
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 22:46
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:except that you can still use unit tests for the things your type system doesn't catch. it just means you don't have to do so much work yourself. your type system obv isnt strong enough quote:Agda functions are not allowed to crash, so a function definition must coffeetable fucked around with this message at 22:49 on May 25, 2014 |
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 22:46
|
|
|
coffeetable posted:your type system obv isnt strong enough yo dog next time you start jerking me off with all this hot poo poo could you nibble my neck a little? also pop a thumb in my butt tia
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 22:50
|
|
|
fidel sarcastro posted:nope. no staging environment either. deploy and pray (for death). I wonder how many small modern/startup shops have unit tests I feel like the answer to this question would be really depressing or maybe unit tests are gonna become cool real soon! I gotta believe
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 23:01
|
|
|
hmm yes let me spend my time writing code that doesn't actually do anything. i'll get right on that
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 23:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 23:24 |
|
|
nrook posted:I wonder how many small modern/startup shops have unit tests real tests mean you actually have to design a thing so Tiny Bug Child posted:hmm yes let me spend my time writing code that doesn't actually do anything. i'll get right on that yeah if they even have them, they are probably worthless
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2014 23:13
|
|
