Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Bobo the Red
Aug 14, 2004
Lay off the marmot
Varys will get Tyrion out because Varys hasn't done anything this whole season except testify and feel bad. He won't watch another chill dude die; at some point, evasive pragmatism becomes resignation to the chaos.

Or, drat, maybe loving Tywin will do it. He won't pardon him publicly, but he'll let Tyrion go to keep Jaime pliable. He can't afford to actually kill him (though his hateboner may blind him to that).

Windfall posted:

Ned was not the cause of his own death.

Neither were the Lannisters. Go back and watch a lot of Season 1's details.

Ned got manipulated by Littlefinger to his death. Remember that Ned's whole motivation was to uncover a secret Lannister plot to take the throne. The seed was planted by Littlefinger in dialogue. Then it became impossible to ignore with Lysa's letter to Cat. It accused them of poisoning the previous Hand and of trying to put an incest pure-blood Lannister in the line of succession, a letter that was prepared by Littlefinger who himself was the poisoner. Littlefinger gloats over his knowledge of the incest to the Queen. He immediately becomes aware of when Ned follows his lead to the "boring book" about ancestry.

Jamie and Cersei had no such plans about the throne after all, they turn out to be waay too incompetent and disorganized to think of that. They were just trying to keep Joffrey safe from being found out.

Then the attempted assassination on Bran, done by Littlefinger with Littlefinger's knife and blamed on the Lannisters as a "cover up" of some greater plot. When John Arryn's squire is killed under suspicious circumstances, the Lannisters again catch the blame for drawing the straws as if to cover something up, but there was nothing *for* them to cover up about Jon Arryn.

All this time Cersei and Jamie have no loving idea why Ned has such a giant bug up his rear end for them. They assume he's trying to play the game with them, and the queen calls him out on it in a chat where she interrogates what his goal even is in King's Landing and where they exchange threats, "I've been trained to kill my enemies," "So have I".

They never knew that Ned was just perfectly reasonably acting on clues about an eminent danger to his and Robert's life. So they were left to conclude that he was on the attack and ambitious.

Oh yeah and let's not forget the whole :siren: BETRAYAL AT KNIFEPOINT :siren: after personally convincing him to stand up to Joffrey and the Queen when they tried to claim the throne, and subsequently being the guy who arrested him. Dude wanted Ned dead bad.

This also serves as a really good summation of why Littlefinger is the reason Cat (and everyone else) is dead. This whole thing came from him, in a way that's hard to see when watching the episodes piecemeal. If anyone has a big, wrathful death coming to him, it's Petyr Baelish.

I really hope it's Sansa that sends him on his merry way.

Bobo the Red fucked around with this message at 06:22 on Jun 3, 2014

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

the
Jul 18, 2004

by Cowcaster
Baelish is my favorite character at this point, because he flew so hilariously under the radar from everyone watching this show, yet he was instrumental (and often directly responsible) for the deaths of all of the major characters in the show.

bubblelubble
Feb 26, 2013

scribbled out the truth,
paying in naivety.
"Don't leave me alone in this world."
"Never."

When Obie died, my heart looked like his head. gently caress.

Happy Thread
Jul 10, 2005

by Fluffdaddy
Plaster Town Cop
I doubt Baelish played any part in the Red Wedding and killing his beloved Cat since he turned on the Lannisters right after it, going as far as killing Joffrey. That doesn't mean he won't catch any blame for it once Arya bumps into him in a few minutes and remembers who she saw him meeting with last.

Hexel
Nov 18, 2011




Windfall posted:

I doubt Baelish played any part in the Red Wedding and killing his beloved Cat since he turned on the Lannisters right after it, going as far as killing Joffrey. That doesn't mean he won't catch any blame for it once Arya bumps into him in a few minutes and remembers who she saw him meeting with last.

So if Cat was all he ever wanted in this world who does he seek vengeance upon? Bolton and Frey?

And does he have a perverted hardon for Sansa because shes all he has left of Cat?

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames
So even accounting for GRRM "realism" or "justice" or whatever you call it, who can we use metatextual knowledge to reasonably assume is safe for a while?

Characters who are sufficiently big deals and whose arcs have not in any way become anywhere close to finished so they are safe:

Arya
Dany
Stannis
Jon
Bran
Sansa
Littlefinger


Characters whose arcs could be considered finished but the way the show and press work are almost certainly not going away:

Tyrion
Jaime
Brienne
Cersei
Theon/Reek
Yara


Characters the story needs whether they have arcs or not:

Varys
Jorah
Sam
Grey Worm apparently (ugh)
Daaaaaaaario (maybe)

So, who is not on any of those lists?

Tywin
The Hound
Gendry (probably not dying though since what the gently caress man he's not even in this season)
Davos
Melisandre

Probably any of those five are next up on the Get hosed list.

ironlung
Dec 31, 2001

No More Heroes posted:

And does he have a perverted hardon for Sansa because shes all he has left of Cat?

Yes, equal parts "the daughter I should have had with Cat" and "a younger verson of Cat that's a bigger babe than she ever was"

the
Jul 18, 2004

by Cowcaster

precision posted:

So even accounting for GRRM "realism" or "justice" or whatever you call it, who can we use metatextual knowledge to reasonably assume is safe for a while?

Characters who are sufficiently big deals and whose arcs have not in any way become anywhere close to finished so they are safe:

Arya
Dany
Stannis
Jon
Bran
Sansa
Littlefinger

-Ned Stark
-Catlyn Stark
-Rob Stark
-King Geoffrey

ironlung
Dec 31, 2001

Has any dead character had their "arc" finished before they died?

IncendiaC
Sep 25, 2011

ironlung posted:

Has any dead character had their "arc" finished before they died?

Maester Luwin maybe?

I'm still sad that he's dead. that guy was cool :smith:

Maarak
May 23, 2007

"Go for it!"

precision posted:

Characters the story needs whether they have arcs or not:

Varys
Jorah
Sam
Grey Worm apparently (ugh)
Daaaaaaaario (maybe)

Why does the story need them?

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames

the posted:

-Ned Stark
-Catlyn Stark
-Rob Stark
-King Geoffrey

Rob and Joffrey's arcs were finished. Rob's was finished the moment he married for love, Joffrey's was finished when he was crowned king. It's not like anyone expected him to become anything other than a complete psychopath.

Ned Stark's arc was finished before the show even started. You might be trying to say his story wasn't finished, but that's not the same thing. Ned didn't even have an arc. And since we're talking meta-text, there was every reason to believe Ned wouldn't last very long; people may have been swerved because he died SO soon, but casting Sean Bean meant he was never going to finish out the series at least.

Catelyn? I don't think she really had an arc either.

Grizzled Patriarch
Mar 27, 2014

These dentures won't stop me from tearing out jugulars in Thunderdome.



Yeah there's no way they kill Tyrion off. If it happens in the book I hope HBO just tells GRRM to gently caress off or something because Dinklage is without question the best actor on this show by a landslide.

Xander77
Apr 6, 2009

Fuck it then. For another pit sandwich and some 'tater salad, I'll post a few more.



Can someone explain Oberyn's plan to me? He and the Dornish are apparently already convinced of the version of events he told Tyrion when first introduced.

Let's say he took The Mountain down, crucified him, and finally badgered him into outright going "It was me who did it - but it was Tywin Lannister wot gave me the specific order to do so, in writing".

What was the expected outcome? Tywin going "you got me dead to rights yer honor, guess I best go take The Black for my crimes of all my crimes"? Tywin's cronies doing the equivalent?

Lycus
Aug 5, 2008

Half the posters in this forum have been made up. This website is a goddamn ghost town.
Joffrey's arc was "be as big a poo poo as possible to everyone until someone finally says 'gently caress it' and kills you".

Bobo the Red
Aug 14, 2004
Lay off the marmot

Windfall posted:

I doubt Baelish played any part in the Red Wedding and killing his beloved Cat since he turned on the Lannisters right after it, going as far as killing Joffrey. That doesn't mean he won't catch any blame for it once Arya bumps into him in a few minutes and remembers who she saw him meeting with last.

He didn't plan it, and obviously would not have, but the fact that it happened is definitely on him. The whole war is. Every casualty is on him, Cat just happens to be the only one he might care about. I just wonder if he's willing to face that.

precision posted:

So even accounting for GRRM "realism" or "justice" or whatever you call it, who can we use metatextual knowledge to reasonably assume is safe for a while?


Characters whose arcs could be considered finished but the way the show and press work are almost certainly not going away:

Tyrion
Jaime
Brienne
Cersei
Theon/Reek
Yara


Characters the story needs whether they have arcs or not:

Varys
Jorah
Sam
Grey Worm apparently (ugh)
Daaaaaaaario (maybe)

So, who is not on any of those lists?

Tywin
The Hound
Gendry (probably not dying though since what the gently caress man he's not even in this season)
Davos
Melisandre

Probably any of those five are next up on the Get hosed list.

I don't follow. None of the Lannister children have had a completed arc. Cersei has not come crashing down from her mighty place of insanity; Jaime has not been redeemed, and Tyrion has not stepped out of the shadow. Brienne hasn't completed her mission, and Theon has been in a pit longer than he ever was anywhere else. Yara didn't do anything yet.

The story may need Varys, as the unseen force that keeps everything from falling apart, but why on earth does it need Grey Worm and Daario? Even Jorah and Sam don't have much going for them (where the hell is Jorah even gonna go?)

The Hound is also somewhat incomplete, though that doesn't mean he can't die (please no). Gendry dying now wouldn't track (and no one knows who or where he is). I kinda hope he just stays gone; a Baratheon bastard is rapidly losing any purpose.

Davos, Melisandre, and Tywin all do have possible deaths soon. Well, Davos OR Melisandre (or both in a trade), depending on which way Stannis breaks. Tywin is just too much of a force, Cersei, Jaime, Tommen, pretty much all of King's Landing character development is on hold until he clears out, and there's probably only one way that happens.

Bobo the Red fucked around with this message at 07:29 on Jun 3, 2014

Jedimastafez
Jun 5, 2005

The Stanley Cup has been kidnapped by Gary Bettman! Are you a bad enough dude to rescue it?

Bobo the Red posted:



Yeah. They're gonna clear all that smoke out. It just looks better for the Warden of the North to be ruling from Winterfell (not that I see the Northmen bending the knee easily).



Winterfell sure has been burning for a long time...

oswald ownenstein posted:



I want to know where the gently caress Thoros of Myr and Beric Dondarrion are, though. Those were two of my favorite characters and they've been MIA all season long.

Same with Varys who was last seen at the Purple Wedding. Oh wait he was at Tyrions trial my bad.

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames

Maarak posted:

Why does the story need them?

Varys is a walking Deus Ex Machina. He's probably literally a God in human form for all I know.

Jorah has served very little purpose and his sending-off serves absolutely no purpose if he just dies or is never seen again. Again, think metatextually.

Same with Grey Worm. There would have been no introduction of his ~love story~ if he weren't going to be around for a little bit. Otherwise it's just literally wasting screen time when there is an army of zombies and poo poo.

Dario hasn't really done anything yet but is a big enough deal to assume will eventually do something.

Sam has "done things" but they've been blundering. There is absolutely no reason for him to be alive or dead at this point, yet a considerable amount of screentime has been devoted to him and to making sure we know that his wildling waifu and adopted son are still alive. This is television 101 here, he's not dying any time soon because there is an obvious place for him in the story.

Hexel
Nov 18, 2011




precision posted:

Varys is a walking Deus Ex Machina. He's probably literally a God in human form for all I know

Guys I think I understand the mind of GRRM. The show is really about Littlefinger and Varys and the Game between them. They're like God and the Devil. Yin and Yang. Everyone else are just bit players!

cock hero flux
Apr 17, 2011



precision posted:

Same with Grey Worm. There would have been no introduction of his ~love story~ if he weren't going to be around for a little bit. Otherwise it's just literally wasting screen time when there is an army of zombies and poo poo.

It's to give him some characterization and make it sadder when he catches an axe to the head the next time something interesting happens in his vicinity, which is to say not any time soon.

Dolphin
Dec 5, 2008

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Xander77 posted:

Can someone explain Oberyn's plan to me? He and the Dornish are apparently already convinced of the version of events he told Tyrion when first introduced.

Let's say he took The Mountain down, crucified him, and finally badgered him into outright going "It was me who did it - but it was Tywin Lannister wot gave me the specific order to do so, in writing".

What was the expected outcome? Tywin going "you got me dead to rights yer honor, guess I best go take The Black for my crimes of all my crimes"? Tywin's cronies doing the equivalent?
He wanted to kill the mountain, to confirm his suspicions about Tywin, and then to stir poo poo up in every other way possible. He already gained some leverage with his assignment to the small council, and he would likely bide his time until he could either kill Tywin himself or gain support for a war against the usurpers.

deadEd
Feb 20, 2001

Xander77 posted:

Can someone explain Oberyn's plan to me? He and the Dornish are apparently already convinced of the version of events he told Tyrion when first introduced.

Let's say he took The Mountain down, crucified him, and finally badgered him into outright going "It was me who did it - but it was Tywin Lannister wot gave me the specific order to do so, in writing".

What was the expected outcome? Tywin going "you got me dead to rights yer honor, guess I best go take The Black for my crimes of all my crimes"? Tywin's cronies doing the equivalent?

This is assuming someone like Oberyn even had a plan beyond "make him admit the truth and then kill him". Someone capable of making coherent plans with logical conclusions tend to include steps like "kill the realm-reknowned murderer at your feet instead of playing with him". Oberyn wasn't only arrogant, he was about as self-absorbed as it comes. He didn't give a gently caress about Tyrion, didn't give a gently caress about the realm, or politics or anything. All he wanted at that moment was a confession from the Mountain as part of the justice he was seeking, so that's all he sought, consequences and aftermath be damned. That's someone else's problem.

deadEd fucked around with this message at 08:03 on Jun 3, 2014

Dolphin
Dec 5, 2008

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Vehementi posted:

He wanted the confession to point to Tywin so he could proceed to dismantle them. Killing the proximate perpetrator is easy and not his ultimate goal.

Mountain lost the fight then pulled a "Scream" resurrection for troll value
Are you still on this schtick? We get it, you didn't like that the mountain got stabbed a couple times and could still move. Nothing gets past you bro, you're a sharpshooter.

kater
Nov 16, 2010

Littlefinger's arc could reasonably be considered finished. He started the show proclaiming his loyalty to Caitlyn and has finally made good on it. Plus the way he sets the stage for Robin and Sansa comes off as almost bowing out. Sure he could scamper off and return to twirl his mustache some more in the future, but he's at a reasonable end.

Dolphin
Dec 5, 2008

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

kater posted:

Littlefinger's arc could reasonably be considered finished. He started the show proclaiming his loyalty to Caitlyn and has finally made good on it. Plus the way he sets the stage for Robin and Sansa comes off as almost bowing out. Sure he could scamper off and return to twirl his mustache some more in the future, but he's at a reasonable end.
Littlefinger's most important arc is his relationship with Varys, which hasn't concluded.

Looten Plunder
Jul 11, 2006
Grimey Drawer

precision posted:

Rob and Joffrey's arcs were finished. Rob's was finished the moment he married for love, Joffrey's was finished when he was crowned king. It's not like anyone expected him to become anything other than a complete psychopath.

Ned Stark's arc was finished before the show even started. You might be trying to say his story wasn't finished, but that's not the same thing. Ned didn't even have an arc. And since we're talking meta-text, there was every reason to believe Ned wouldn't last very long; people may have been swerved because he died SO soon, but casting Sean Bean meant he was never going to finish out the series at least.

Catelyn? I don't think she really had an arc either.

That's a little cynical.

-Rob never even got to King's Landing or even fought against the main Lannister force
-Joffrey was King from like Episode 4. That wasn't his Arc. His Arc should have been "fresh boy-king" to "king"
-How is "Ward of the North becoming Hand of the King and managing everything that comes with it. Being the "good guy" and overthrowing the "bad guys" not an Arc?" The arc had only just started, but it's still an arc.
-Catlyn - "find herself after losing her husband, search for her lost kids and groom her son to be king" sounds like an arc.

Xander77 posted:

Can someone explain Oberyn's plan to me? He and the Dornish are apparently already convinced of the version of events he told Tyrion when first introduced.

Thinking about the real world, victims of crime want Justice. It's one thing to convince yourself, it's another to hear a killer say it.

Mr Beens
Dec 2, 2006

JibbaJabbaJimmy posted:

So how does Tyrion get out of the execution? His execution is the obvious thing so I think it's safe to assume its not going to happen right? Or maybe its a double GRMM fake-out?

I recommend everyone watch this for an example of how to avoid an execution in medieval times with cunning planning.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_(Blackadder)

Grizzled Patriarch posted:

Yeah there's no way they kill Tyrion off. If it happens in the book I hope HBO just tells GRRM to gently caress off or something because Dinklage is without question the best actor on this show by a landslide.

Yeah stupid books, lets just change things because an actor is cool. Should have done the same for Sean Bean in Season 1. Also it's loving dumb that Gollum dies at the end of lord of the rings, gently caress Tolkien, he should have relented and had Sam keep him as a pet or something.

Shwqa
Feb 13, 2012

There is really only one thing I want to see for the season finale. And that is for Barristan to do some fighting. Motherfucker is the greatest knight to ever live and we don't see him fight once. Him dying before we get to see him fight would literally the most dispointing thing that GRRM has ever done.

Jerusalem
May 20, 2004

Would you be my new best friends?

Dolphin posted:

Littlefinger's most important arc is his relationship with Varys, which hasn't concluded.

I actually thought the scene where Littlefinger revealed what he had done to Ros was a pretty good final "chat" between the two of them, as it finally revealed fully to Varys how hosed in the head Littlefinger actually is. All their little smug wordplay was kind of thrown aside as Littlefinger just reveled in his cruelty, when Varys has never appeared malicious.... hell, even when he had the guy who castrated him delivered to him in a crate he appeared restrained and controlled.

BlackJosh
Sep 25, 2007

Mr Beens posted:

Yeah stupid books, lets just change things because an actor is cool. Should have done the same for Sean Bean in Season 1. Also it's loving dumb that Gollum dies at the end of lord of the rings, gently caress Tolkien, he should have relented and had Sam keep him as a pet or something.

I mean, yeah totally. If it works. I don't get why nerds need their adaptations to be pure 1-1 interpretations of the source material. Peter Dinklage is awesome and gently caress GRRM if he kills off his character. I'd love it if the show runners kept a few characters around that died in the books and vice versa.

Accretionist
Nov 7, 2012
I BELIEVE IN STUPID CONSPIRACY THEORIES

Mr Beens posted:

Yeah stupid books, lets just change things because an actor is cool.

Literally yes. Why the hell not? If the show can be better than the books then why not?

Steve Yun
Aug 7, 2003
I'm a parasitic landlord that needs to get a job instead of stealing worker's money. Make sure to remind me when I post.
Soiled Meat

Shwqa posted:

There is really only one thing I want to see for the season finale. And that is for Barristan to do some fighting. Motherfucker is the greatest knight to ever live and we don't see him fight once. Him dying before we get to see him fight would literally the most dispointing thing that GRRM has ever done.
Barristan just fights with his words

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames

xcore posted:

That's a little cynical.

-Rob never even got to King's Landing or even fought against the main Lannister force
-Joffrey was King from like Episode 4. That wasn't his Arc. His Arc should have been "fresh boy-king" to "king"
-How is "Ward of the North becoming Hand of the King and managing everything that comes with it. Being the "good guy" and overthrowing the "bad guys" not an Arc?" The arc had only just started, but it's still an arc.
-Catlyn - "find herself after losing her husband, search for her lost kids and groom her son to be king" sounds like an arc.

I don't think you know what a character arc is. Rob's CHARACTER arc had nothing to do with the war and everything to do with the way he lived his life - concluded by him saying "gently caress common sense, I love this girl". Arc over.

Joffrey having an arc is really a kindness on my part. He didn't have one at all. He was a mewling evil dick from start to finish and nothing suggested he would even have an arc.

Ned, I don't know, maybe? I'd have to rewatch season 1 to see if it was really a character arc or if it was just "things happening".

Catelyn, you also may have a point on, but it's a stretch since hardly any of it was taking hold and Robb dying killed a big chunk of what you're saying her arc would have been.

Roland Jones
Aug 18, 2011

by Nyc_Tattoo

precision posted:

So even accounting for GRRM "realism" or "justice" or whatever you call it, who can we use metatextual knowledge to reasonably assume is safe for a while?

I wouldn't agree with all of this, but I've been applying some meta thinking to this as well, and I definitely agree that Dany, Bran, and at least one of the two Stark girls are probably safe for a while. Dany almost definitely because other than some season one mentions and causing Tywin to try to suck up to the Martells her whole story has had zero impact on anything. Likewise, Bran's story hasn't really gone anywhere yet so he probably won't die before something happens or else that was all a waste of time (unless Hodor or one of the Reeds become more important with his death). Sansa and Arya are in similar situations, but they're surrounded by people who, compared to Dany's and Bran's company, are relatively important, so their deaths could still catalyze something rather than just abort a plotline. Stannis is probably good too, really; thinking about it I'd put him closer to Dany than Sansa or Arya on the "probably not gonna die" list.

Tyrion and Jon I'd say are maybe safe, but I could see them dying. Latter in particular; the Wall falling means the Wildlings and later the White Walkers will be coming down into Westeros, and that's huge.

Others... Well I'm tired and have a headache so I'm going to stop rambling. Having trouble remembering some of my thoughts on this when I went over them with someone I know earlier today (or maybe yesterday, can't remember). But, yeah. While I think a metatextual analysis is valid, complete "arcs" aren't what you should go on for it.

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames
I don't think Jon will be dying any time before the final season/final few episodes, if then. Same with Tyrion, to a lesser extent.

I'm not saying the story will follow conventional fantasy happy ending tropes, but that if it follows even the most very basic of storytelling notions, Jon Snow has to live to see how it ends. He survived being shot full of arrows, and maybe he gets the Jaime treatment and loses a limb or something, but I very much doubt he'll bite it even if the Wall falls.

Traitorous Leopard
Jul 20, 2009

Shwqa posted:

There is really only one thing I want to see for the season finale. And that is for Barristan to do some fighting. Motherfucker is the greatest knight to ever live and we don't see him fight once. Him dying before we get to see him fight would literally the most dispointing thing that GRRM has ever done.

He killed that bug that time

Senor Tron
May 26, 2006


Blazing Ownager posted:

I kind of want the Night's Watch about to get overrun and that's when the huge-fuckoff-of-all-white-walker armies joins the party. Would make for an interesting.. change of situation.

I like that idea, I hope it isn't a book spoiler because it actually makes a lot of sense.

They keep on bringing up how outnumbered the Watch are.

They also made a point in the last episode of having a discussion about locking the tunnel through the wall down, and ultimately decided to keep it open.

Jon Snow was then put on watch on top of the wall, perfect place to see armies coming from both directions.

I can see them about to be swarmed by the Wildling army, when they realise White Walkers are advancing on the other side of the wall. The Watch opens the tunnel and White Walkers come through and start loving up the Wildlings.

Lycus
Aug 5, 2008

Half the posters in this forum have been made up. This website is a goddamn ghost town.

Senor Tron posted:

I can see them about to be swarmed by the Wildling army, when they realise White Walkers are advancing on the other side of the wall. The Watch opens the tunnel and White Walkers come through and start loving up the Wildlings.
Well, remember that the vast majority of the Wildling army is still on the North side of the Wall. The ones South are just a raiding party, that was originally gonna sneak attack Castle Black before Jon foiled that by getting away and going back.

BubbleGoose
Oct 15, 2007

There are so many amendments in the constitution of the United States of America--I can only choose one!

Accretionist posted:

Literally yes. Why the hell not? If the show can be better than the books then why not?

This is almost inconceivable in the mind of a book reader. One problem as a book reader is that you develop a very personal attachment to the story as it is told and to your interpretation of that story. In a film/tv adaption, the slightest digression from its source, from the the choice of actor to the minute technical details involved in transforming words on paper into flesh and blood individuals, is like stomping all over the connection a reader has already established with the story. For me, if I'm going to enjoy a film adaptation of a book I've read and enjoyed, I almost have to treat the book as a separate creature, if not forget it entirely.

BubbleGoose fucked around with this message at 09:13 on Jun 3, 2014

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames

BubbleGoose posted:

This is almost inconceivable in the mind of a book reader. One problem as a book reader is that you develop a very personal attachment to the story as it is told and to your interpretation of that story. In a film/tv adaption, the slightest digression from its source, from the the choice of actor to the minute technical details involved in transforming words on paper into flesh and blood individuals, is like stomping all over the connection a reader has already established with the story.

The film of American Psycho is immensely better than the book. Doubly so for Fight Club.

Adaptations can surpass and transform their source material. If they're good, that should be their goal in the first place.

  • Locked thread