thatbastardken posted:In a couple of years I'm going to have to stand in front of the supreme court to be admitted as a solicitor and this whole farce is going to make it real hard to take the whole thing seriously. Why are you studying law in the year of our lord 2014?
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 10:58 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 02:05 |
|
Oh ABC Fact Check, how I love you.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 10:58 |
|
quote:Salvos detention centre workers recruited through Facebook
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:00 |
|
BB's response to soldiers holds as true for the Salvos as the regularly army
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:03 |
|
Nibbles141 posted:http://www.independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/we-really-must-talk-about-the-howard-and-costello-economic-disaster,5686 It doesn't specifically address the Howard legacy so much as show that even a dysfunctional ALP did better than the rest of the world.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:04 |
|
SMH has a different, and all the more disturbing, take on this story. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/liberal-senator-ian-macdonald-confronts-former-manus--worker-20140612-3a06n.html quote:Liberal Senator Ian Macdonald confronts former Manus worker
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:07 |
|
Cartoon posted:This is a great answer specifically but a picture is worth a thousand words (etc) Do you think if Australian went into recession post GFC, we'd be where we are today or better/worse? I mean, we did very well out of it and still have ended up with a bunch of tory austerity popping jerks. A bit of navel gazing, yes.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:11 |
|
Let's be clear about something, Swans fiscal stimulus policy didn't save us a lone - Chinese government fiscal stimulus also played a large role in keeping us out of the worst of it.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:18 |
|
Lid posted:SMH has a different, and all the more disturbing, take on this story. "Isn't it GREAT! Because we brutalise them through tactics we learnt from the golden age of piracy, now we don't have to brutalise them through tactics we learnt from repressive dictatorships!" What's loving next, they should be grateful we give them surplus sunrasia's so they aren't dying of dysentery?
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:23 |
|
IronicBeetCriminal posted:Do you think if Australian went into recession post GFC, we'd be where we are today or better/worse? I mean, we did very well out of it and still have ended up with a bunch of tory austerity popping jerks. As I have previously posted, I am of the opinion that the mood that enveloped the rest of the world, as a result of the GFC affecting others badly, has been infused into the Australian political narrative. This is why, despite all the evidence that it isn't true, we are having a budget emergency and must slash root and branch to appease the angry gods of fiscus. You'd laugh except for all the weeping. It is why we get so much US C/P propaganda. We dodged the bullet but are doing our very best to play dead. More pictures? Imagine what that is doing to revenue forecasts going forward? It's becoming a self fulfilling prophesy. We must slash so we can afford to slash more!
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:26 |
|
Milky Moor posted:Why are you studying law in the year of our lord 2014? Probably much the same reason I was studying journalism from 2010-2012: you probably aren't making that initial choice based on the strongest factual foundations.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:26 |
|
Bomb-Bunny posted:"Isn't it GREAT! Because we brutalise them through tactics we learnt from the golden age of piracy, now we don't have to brutalise them through tactics we learnt from repressive dictatorships!" Look he's probably doing what he thinks is best. It is typical leftist hysterics to paint him as some sort of moustache twirling villain when all he is doing is lauding the torture he supports over someone who had to deal with the consequences of it face to face without training while being intimidated against reporting it.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:27 |
|
Cleretic posted:Probably much the same reason I was studying journalism from 2010-2012: you probably aren't making that initial choice based on the strongest factual foundations. Go into retail, people will always buy things! *glances at consumer confidence trends*
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:29 |
|
Ler posted:Let's be clear about something, Swans fiscal stimulus policy didn't save us a lone - Chinese government fiscal stimulus also played a large role in keeping us out of the worst of it. mmmm, not as much as it is given credit for. In relation to mining far less of that money ends up in the economy then you think. It's all tied up in very few hands and many of them are international companies. Cartoon posted:Imagine what that is doing to revenue forecasts going forward? It's becoming a self fulfilling prophesy. We must slash so we can afford to slash more! Yeah, much of the first world economies now are based around consumption so if people stop spending, it really grinds things up. Conditions could relatively be the same but if we did have a recession banks tighten up, people spend less, interests rates rise and it all starts building upon itself. You could just have a dip of recession (two periods of negative growth) and then back to normal, but probably not. Look at the US just before it all collapsed and how many people were saying nothing to worry about, just keep going. It's musical chairs and as long as the music keeps playing everyone's winning.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:34 |
|
Cleretic posted:Probably much the same reason I was studying journalism from 2010-2012: you probably aren't making that initial choice based on the strongest factual foundations. I'm doing law in the misguided notion I'll end up in legal aid. lol
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:35 |
|
Vahtooch posted:So I couldn't really find a decent answer for this, but a few pages ago the GFC came up with the standard Australian's response to why we survived it being "Howard left us a surplus" to which someone said was wrong. I get the whole thing with Labor's stimulus package and how good all that was, but what can I use in an argument against someone for saying Howard didn't really help? 3 major points: a) The Howard government saw record terms of trade, which are not created by any government intervention. b) The Howard government used both the corporate tax revenues from the record ToT and the proceeds from the mining boom to finance major tax cuts, in particular a tax cut on upper income earners and a cut to the capital gains tax rate on property. c) The Howard government sold 90 billion dollars worth of assets, which by this point would have generated another 90 bn worth of revenue. The cumulative surplus the Howard government produced was roughly 30 billion overall. That's not what was left after paying off debt, mind you, that was simply the total of what was left over each year. There wasn't any "money in the bank," not least of all because that's a stupid phrase to use about government finances. We still had a significant sovereign debt (roughly 5% of GDP). So, essentially, in the midst of economic circumstances unheard of by this country and over ninety billion dollars in sold assets, Howard managed to squeeze out about thirty billion in total savings because he pissed the rest away on upper-class welfare. When Labor got in, the ToT were cooling, the tax cuts were still in place, the assets were no longer generating revenue, and then there was that whole GFC thing. Howard set Labor up to fail. Those tax cuts alone would have covered the entirety of Labor's 2010-2013 deficits.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:38 |
|
Blue Rupie posted:Message received from the USYD e-mail 'Those with the ability to pay should not be subsidised by those who cannot' Is he trying to say we should increase fees (and therefore the HECS loans initially covered by the government) because it will decrease the burden of tertiary education upon the taxpayer? I don't follow.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:46 |
|
ColtMcAsskick posted:'Those with the ability to pay should not be subsidised by those who cannot' I believe he is suggesting that we would give so much more charity(scholarships) if the government would get off our backs with taxes(fee ceilings)
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:50 |
|
That's how I read it. If fees are increased then rich people will pay for their kids and the poors can get the government assistance (and debt). Don't worry though, with all this cash we'll probably have more scholarships.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:51 |
|
Also the fact that the government doesn't think that enormous costs in the future would influence anyone's decision to study today is pretty indicative of the entirety of liberal party economic policy.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:53 |
|
Think of all the savings to the taxpayer if literally no-one goes to university unless they front the cost. What progress!
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:56 |
|
Milky Moor posted:Why are you studying law in the year of our lord 2014? I'm pretty dumb.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:56 |
|
Nibbles141 posted:I'm doing law in the misguided notion I'll end up in legal aid. lol Also this.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:56 |
|
ewe2 posted:I'd like an evaluation cy a lurker on the learning oulcomes from thie difcuzzinn cith a proll, ksasade ki sme arse fart iasolvet pee carcas woo Gerpelt Xmeekoltion Dickcs Yectse.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:57 |
|
Cartoon posted:What Ler says is also important in the broader scheme of the reality of our escape from the GFC but: Is that consumer confidence? The graph isn't labelled. edit: Also sorry to AdelGoons for missing the meet tonight, dentists appointment. Senor Tron fucked around with this message at 11:59 on Jun 12, 2014 |
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:57 |
|
Quantum Mechanic posted:c) The Howard government sold 90 billion dollars worth of assets, which by this point would have generated another 90 bn worth of revenue. Link? Last time I read something approaching a rigorous analysis, total asset sales from the Howard govt were a smidge under 72 billion, and net govt debt had decreased by 56 billion from 1996-2007.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:57 |
|
thatbastardken posted:I'm pretty dumb.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:57 |
|
Lid posted:SMH has a different, and all the more disturbing, take on this story.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 11:59 |
|
Only one person died as a direct result of us, that's surely better than 400 dying as an indirect result of us? Or are you some kind of racist?
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 12:01 |
|
When reading that I kept half-expecting to come across a line like: ...Senator Macdonald withdrew his erect member from his pants, and without ever breaking eye contact started slowly stroking...
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 12:04 |
|
Nibbles141 posted:I'm doing law in the misguided notion I'll end up in legal aid. lol Yeah, in my first year of law (2010), I did a course called "Law and Society" which was the most wishy-washy subject I've ever done, and I've done a class with "Dramaturgy" in the title. Our tutor asked us all why we were studying law and 3/4 of the class answered that they want to work for the UN or Legal Aid. The rest of the class was like "I got a good OP and didn't want to do med" or "my parents wanted me to". I was like "...I'm interested in Intellectual Property law" and everyone gave me the weirdest looks. By fourth year I knew enough newly-graduated students to have realised that I wouldn't make it a year in the legal industry. I'm a sixth year now so at this point I refuse to give up, and am determined to finish and basically end up with what has become the new general degree. At least I'll be qualified to be a public servant!
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 12:05 |
|
Senor Tron posted:When reading that I kept half-expecting to come across a line like: You're thinking of Morrison.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 12:06 |
|
Gough Suppressant posted:Look he's probably doing what he thinks is best. It is typical leftist hysterics to paint him as some sort of moustache twirling villain when all he is doing is lauding the torture he supports over someone who had to deal with the consequences of it face to face without training while being intimidated against reporting it. gently caress, that comment really got under your skin, didn't it? I wasn't saying it to in any way excuse the horrible poo poo that the Libs are doing. It's simply that by reducing the things that drive them to do pursue these policies down to "because they're evil fucks!" makes you less able to really understand what drives them and makes you less able to convince them (or more importantly their supporters) to change their mind. Know thy enemy and all that. If you disagree, can you explain how it differs from Americans who believe that al qaeda hates them for their freedom? For the record, one more time, I'm a greens supporter and have been for almost a decade. I don't know why I always feel the need to state that every time I say something that goes against the grain of this thread.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 12:06 |
|
Reminder that we are better suited for when Bill Shorten is the invisible man because when he does open his mouth things like this come out.quote:Decision to unwind offshore processing made Australia's waters among most dangerous: Shorten Things being bile.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 12:11 |
|
Captain Pissweak posted:You're thinking of Morrison. Sorry. ...Senator Macdonald withdrew the erect member from Scott Morrisons pants, and without ever breaking eye contact starting softly stroking...
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 12:11 |
|
Gough Suppressant posted:I believe he is suggesting that we would give so much more charity(scholarships) if the government would get off our backs with taxes(fee ceilings) Yeah and he's helpfully declined to point out that the fee ceiling repeal is policy while the scholarship increases is his good idea in an editorial piece. Somehow I get the feeling that his support for the former isn't contingent on the latter.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 12:13 |
|
Lid posted:Reminder that we are better suited for when Bill Shorten is the invisible man because when he does open his mouth things like this come out. God Labor are loving garbage.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 12:17 |
|
Senor Tron posted:Sorry. Noice.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 12:23 |
|
Ler posted:Let's be clear about something, Swans fiscal stimulus policy didn't save us a lone - Chinese government fiscal stimulus also played a large role in keeping us out of the worst of it. I'd argue that the RBA had more to do with it than the stimulus, the Chinese or Gina. People whinge about the whole 'government bailout' that they assume banks got (they didnt, essentially banks just paid a small premium to 'borrow' Australia's credit rating - which definitely helped), but they also bought heavily in the MBS/RMBS markets, massively expanded the exchange settlement facility (adding short term TDs rather than just overnight) and dropped the bar on collateral classes, which meant that we never came close to having the kind of liquidity issues that hit the US, Europe and the UK. Everything else flowed from that. Of course, it's ridiculous to expect the average punter to understand the implications of banks being able to self securitise their loans and then repo them... but Swan also did an absolutely shithouse job of selling it. And so, now TEH NARRATIVE is all about pink batts, gold plated school halls and HOWARDS SURPLUS. *edit* ooh, charts BrosephofArimathea fucked around with this message at 13:24 on Jun 12, 2014 |
# ? Jun 12, 2014 12:24 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 02:05 |
|
Tirade posted:gently caress, that comment really got under your skin, didn't it? I wasn't saying it to in any way excuse the horrible poo poo that the Libs are doing. It's simply that by reducing the things that drive them to do pursue these policies down to "because they're evil fucks!" makes you less able to really understand what drives them and makes you less able to convince them (or more importantly their supporters) to change their mind. Know thy enemy and all that. If you disagree, can you explain how it differs from Americans who believe that al qaeda hates them for their freedom? Just because they have a rationale that they can justify to themselves doesn't make that rationale real. We're talking about people who believe in a just world where wealth is a reward for moral goodness (see: 'unsuccessful' young should earn-or-learn) yet, somehow, that same doctrine doesn't apply to those coming here by boat, using their own ingenuity and resources to seek a new life. The same level of cognitive dissonance that says that white collar crime that bankrupts thousands and devastates lives earns you two to five, whilst murder lands you the same back again. The same cognitive dissonance that can say corporations are like extremely wealthy people when donating to political parties, but are just a humble man bargaining on equal terms with the worker across the table. They can justify each and every one of those arguments, hold them as equally sacrosanct to their cause, and fight for them. But each and every one achieves an indisputably despicable end that gives to the great from the hand of the small.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2014 12:26 |