|
Full Battle Rattle posted:It's hard to believe that there are still people that believe gay is contagious.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 08:57 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 19:53 |
|
Full Battle Rattle posted:It's hard to believe that there are still people that believe gay is contagious. It's not so much that they think it's contagious: it's that they believe that sin is a sickness and a perversion. Normalizing it means that people predisposed to it will be more likely to engage in it rather than heroically overcoming it, and children with tendencies will be actively recruited. Thus we must not only disparage homosexuality, we must ban it to save people from damnation. It's basically the same reason that conservatives condemn greed, acquisitiveness, and the pursuit of wealth and constantly advocate for aggressive wealth redistribution to fight the hold that the sinful love of mammon has on society. Maybe you personally dislike force, but from their point of view it's all about saving souls.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 09:00 |
|
Hedera Helix posted:But... I thought that Christianity placed an ideal upon chastity, and that the ideal human would have no sexual desires of their own. Or is that just a misreading? Christianity says sex outside of marriage is sinful. Sex inside a marriage is okay. Paul says in one of his letters that people should try to stay unmarried because they can focus more on God that way, whereas a married person also has to think about their spouse. He then said if you have sexual desires then go ahead and get married so you won't sin. Chastity is considered a virtue and it's a good thing in the eyes of Christianity but the view is that like other gifts such as prophecy or speaking in tongues, it's not something every person is capable of or called to do. Morter posted:I think even though Jesus saves you of original sin, you still need baptism to get into Heaven. So you're just in purgatory. Purgatory isn't a place anyone is supposed to spend all of eternity, Purgatory is temporary and everyone in Purgatory eventually goes to Heaven after some amount of time. Purgatory is also pretty much a non-Protestant only thing, as Protestants believe Jesus' death on the cross paid the price for all sins and no further work needs to be done to get rid of sin. Unbaptized babies or ones that died in/before childbirth are sometimes stated to go to Limbo since they can't get into Heaven but have no reason to go to Hell as they didn't actually do any sinning. Some Catholics believe in it but its existence hasn't ever been official Catholic doctrine.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 09:21 |
|
Twelve by Pies posted:Purgatory is also pretty much a non-Protestant only thing, as Protestants believe Jesus' death on the cross paid the price for all sins and no further work needs to be done to get rid of sin. I'm only familiar with the Southern Baptist position on this, but even though Jesus paid the price for our sins you'll still be punished for them unless you accept Jesus as your savior. And baptism is a symbol of that acceptance. So I guess all those unbaptized fetuses are going straight to Hell? Even though they didn't really have time to commit sins...
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 09:35 |
|
Well it's their fault for being human. Original sin and all that.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 09:40 |
|
Vahakyla posted:You have to admit, that would be cool. Imagine the clandestine operations to sex up the highest ranks of anti-gay bigots and convert them to our cause.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 10:03 |
|
Twelve by Pies posted:
That is true, but I often got the vibe that to have no sex is the ideal, and like you said, sex within the context of marriage is not really viewed as 'great!', it is viewed as 'acceptable', or as you put it, 'okay'. I always thought that was really weird as a teen. It seemed obvious to me that never ever having sex was the ideal for some reason. This intrinsic hatred of sex (and usually women, dirty keepers of the sex that tempts us men) that is at the core of this belief really makes the hatred of homosexuality even more obvious. Having sex where procreation isn't even a possibility, that could even possibly be 'fun'! How terrifying. Edit: Oh, let us not forget the perfect woman: Had a baby without ever losing her virginity! What a thoroughly twisted ideal woman. Full Battle Rattle fucked around with this message at 10:18 on Jun 20, 2014 |
# ? Jun 20, 2014 10:11 |
|
Full Battle Rattle posted:That is true, but I often got the vibe that to have no sex is the ideal, and like you said, sex within the context of marriage is not really viewed as 'great!', it is viewed as 'acceptable', or as you put it, 'okay'. 1 Corinthians 7 is pretty much exactly this. Although a generous reading of could be implicitly giving the okay to gay marriage. Marriage is already a significant compromise. Indeed, the very reason it is (grudgingly) permitted is to avoid someone being overcome with passion from solitude and getting tempted by Satan; marriage is clearly about sex, not some higher union or procreation or whatever, and if that's the only justification it would be hard to say that gay marriage wouldn't have the same status. On the other hand, it uses the words "man" and "woman" so what can ya do.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 10:25 |
|
FourLeaf posted:I'm only familiar with the Southern Baptist position on this, but even though Jesus paid the price for our sins you'll still be punished for them unless you accept Jesus as your savior. And baptism is a symbol of that acceptance. The thing about Purgatory is that Catholics, like a few Protestant denominations, believe in Original Sin, that every human is sinful even if they haven't actually sinned yet. It's a state of being, the soul is stained by sin or whatever. So Jesus dying on the cross is basically saying "Yeah the price has been paid for your sins, so they're covered, even though you're still sinful." Purgatory is where the sinful nature of the soul is destroyed. Since your sins have to be forgiven to enter Purgatory, you won't enter Purgatory if you didn't obtain salvation (through whatever means; unlike most Protestants, Catholic doctrine states you might not have to say the "magic words" of accepting Jesus to be saved). Purgatory isn't some sort of "lesser Hell" even though it's probably supposed to be painful. But yeah Protestants just say that asking for forgiveness purifies the soul right then and there and thus there's no need for it to be purified before it enters Heaven, though of course then there's a further split between the ones who say faith alone is enough to enter, and the ones who say baptism is required in addition to faith. Baptism would somewhat be analogous to Purgatory in the denominations that say baptism is necessary for salvation (though without the pain part). At any rate usually even Protestants who believe in the concept of Original Sin will usually say unbaptized babies or infants who die go to Heaven because the soul has to go somewhere and they realize it's pretty hosed up to say a baby that doesn't know any better is going to burn in Hell for eternity. A Bag of Milk posted:The answer to this will depend on who you ask, but I believe Calvinists would say they go to hell. Original sin + no praying for forgiveness = cya. Although a question I wondered is, in what capacity would an aborted fetus perceive the afterlife? It may not even have a brain, let alone a collection of experiences with which to create a sense of self. A quick google search revealed that there's differences in opinions in Calvinism about this. Some pretty much say yeah all babies that die go to Hell because of their sinful nature, sucks but God is righteous and just and above the understanding of humans. Some believe that even though they have a sinful nature, they still haven't actually sinned and thus can't be punished for it, and so God has to regenerate them so they go to Heaven. Some take a "truth is in the middle" position and say that some babies are considered to be elect and thus regenerated but others aren't, but if the parents of the baby are elect then the baby is probably elect too and will be in Heaven (but if the baby was born to unbelievers then it's probably out of luck). ...oh...uh...yeah. Marriage thread! Still waiting for that VA decision. I hope it comes soon. Like I said, heard it was supposed to happen in June but I'm still hoping it's not the very end of June.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 11:41 |
|
Yesterdays event was sponsored by Washington Times but even they could not fudge the numbers after the low turnout Here is a great contrast Mr Ice Cream Glove fucked around with this message at 15:12 on Jun 20, 2014 |
# ? Jun 20, 2014 14:34 |
|
In yet another victory, the Presbyterian Church USA has voted today by a large margin that "Gay Marriage is Christian." They join the United Church of Christ in being the only two mainline American Protestant sects to openly support and recognize marriage equality. The Episcopalians and Lutherans have also been moving towards equality but haven't full on endorsed it yet. Since Presbyterianism is democratic and works sort of like a federal system its still up to the individual presbyteries if they want to perform marriages, but this move allows them to perform them if the elected members of the local presbytery approve. There's a chance the more conservative ones split off, but when about 75% of the delegates vote to change the definition of marriage to allow same-sex marriage, its probably not going to be that contentious. http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/gay-marriage-christian-says-presbyterian-assembly TPM posted:
edit: And on religion chat, PCUSA took a very...open interpretation to what people thought of everything. To get confirmed you have to write out a statement of faith and present it to the church elders (think local legislative body). They basically accepted anything so long as you logically thought it out. So for example, someone could write "literally everyone goes to heaven because its messed up if Jesus died for everyone's sins but people who couldn't/didn't find out go to Hell." Or you could argue that Hell didn't exist. They are really, really open minded. Or at least they were in my presbytery before I gave up the religion. axeil fucked around with this message at 15:40 on Jun 20, 2014 |
# ? Jun 20, 2014 15:25 |
|
I feel like that is a response to the backlash for defrocking a priest who officiated his son's wedding last year. That was particularly dumb because apparently the marriage ceremony was in 09 or 10 but some awful person told the church leadership about it last year resulting in him losing his job.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 15:40 |
|
FlamingLiberal posted:I feel like that is a response to the backlash for defrocking a priest who officiated his son's wedding last year. That was particularly dumb because apparently the marriage ceremony was in 09 or 10 but some awful person told the church leadership about it last year resulting in him losing his job. It might explain why the vote was so overwhelming, but the Church had been moving in that general direction for quite a while.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 15:41 |
|
Little_wh0re posted:Is it? Howso? From a bit back but I don't think any other Jewmo answered this. That thing he's blowing is a Shofar, it's a sacred object in the Jewish faith that is mentioned in nearly every holy text we have. It historically was used often in our religious services and festivals. It's a fascinating instrument that can make many sounds, and considered a key part of Jewish culture, to the point that many Jewish groups fund 'Shofar studies' and such to teach people to play it, as each sound has a special meaning. It's basically the Jewish version of holy trumpeting (though we love us some trumpets too, and frequently combine them with Shofar blasts because poo poo yea everyone's gonna hear us). Nowadays there's more specific uses for it but it's still a common thing in most all the big days (it for example blows for the end of fasting and such) and of course for Rosh Hashanah. Along with that, the ACT of blowing it is a great honor, something that when a community or temple or the like chooses one to be a blower it has to have approval of most of the community. It's straight up said that "The one who blows the shofar on Rosh Hashanah . . . should likewise be learned in the Torah and shall be God-fearing; the best man available." Using the Shofar even for secular use (there are Israeli/Jewish musicians who use it in their work) must be treated with respect, and it's generally considered that if you're putting your lips on it you better be a pretty decent guy even if it's for a band's gig, just out of basic respect for the instrument and its history. Also just on trivia since I brought up the wiki page to find that quote, the position normally called the 'Blaster' basically, but sometimes also refereed to as 'Master of the Blast' which is a pretty fuckin sweet title. And this pigfuck is blasting away at a hate rally, one that most Jews don't even agree with to boot.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 17:58 |
|
zachol posted:1 Corinthians 7 is pretty much exactly this. If you like it, put a wig on it?
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 18:05 |
|
My favorite interpretation of limbo is that original sin keeps unborn from truly experiencing paradise but it is as close as you can get and hey it isn't like fetuses know the difference. That or you can get old school on the matter and believe fetuses don't have a human soul until like the second trimester.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 18:09 |
|
I thought it was even later classically. Like several months after birth.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 18:12 |
Tatum Girlparts posted:From a bit back but I don't think any other Jewmo answered this. Yeah I'm not even observant but that picture irritated the *gently caress* out of me.
|
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 18:15 |
|
Nostalgia4Infinity posted:I thought it was even later classically. Like several months after birth.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 18:17 |
|
SubponticatePoster posted:According to the Bible the soul enters the body on the baby's first breath. I thought that was how the thetans get in?
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 18:19 |
|
SubponticatePoster posted:According to the Bible the soul enters the body on the baby's first breath. Cite?
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 18:43 |
|
silvergoose posted:Yeah I'm not even observant but that picture irritated the *gently caress* out of me. Also the part where he's wearing a tallis, a Jewish religious shawl. Which you're only supposed to wear during prayers. And generally the over the head thing is only done by the ultras. And even they tend to reserve it for people making a serious study of Torah. Basically, that picture is the Jewish religious equivalent of wearing blackface.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 18:49 |
|
I grew up in a Baptist household and the way I was told regarding babies and salvation. A baby is unable to accept Jesus into their heart but God says that they go to heaven.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 18:54 |
|
SubponticatePoster posted:According to the Bible the soul enters the body on the baby's first breath. Well that's a ridiculous interpretation. You should abandon that and believe something that makes sense: like God enjoys hoarding 60% of the souls He creates, so He puts the soul in when sperm meets egg, and makes sure that over half of pregnancies lead to spontaneous miscarriages. He needs to make sure his Divine Rank always stays ahead of Lucifer's and getting the lion's share of souls is the way to do it.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 18:54 |
|
Worthless loving fascists. I'd gladly take up arms against these loving bastards. http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2014.../3001403219919/
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 18:58 |
|
VitalSigns posted:Well that's a ridiculous interpretation. Ahem; clearly there's no soul if the woman doesn't even realize they miscarried
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 19:02 |
|
joat mon posted:Cite? I believe these are the passages generally used to support that: Genesis 2:7 posted:And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. Man did not become a living soul until the breath of life was given to him. Fetuses don't breathe. Ezekiel 37:5-6 posted:5 Thus saith the Lord God unto these bones; Behold, I will cause breath to enter into you, and ye shall live: In this passage, the being which God is restoring to life, is not alive until it breathes again for the first time. This, combined with Exodus 21:22-25 : quote:22 If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. Seem clearly to indicate that fetuses in the bible are not considered people. Causing a miscarriage carries a fine, causing the woman to die carries punishment of death. Kidnapping someone is punishable by death. Hitting your parents is punishable by death. Hell, simply cursing your parents is punishable by death. Causing a miscarriage, though? Just a fine.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 19:03 |
|
Kalman posted:Also the part where he's wearing a tallis, a Jewish religious shawl. Which you're only supposed to wear during prayers. And generally the over the head thing is only done by the ultras. And even they tend to reserve it for people making a serious study of Torah. Haha totally forgot about that I was so annoyed at the horn. Yea he's just all gussied up to spit on basically every aspect of the Jewish faith. Like, there's poo poo like kosher where we debate and argue and us filthy reforms straight up ignore unless it's a holiday or the like, but the shawl and horn are basically universal icons, it's like the KKK wrapping themselves in the cross, no matter what branch you follow that poo poo should make you angry if you believe in the faith at all.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 19:07 |
|
joat mon posted:Cite? e: beaten like NOM in the courts
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 19:13 |
|
Thanks for the Exodus 21:22 cite. Hopefully this won't derail. (ditto) joat mon fucked around with this message at 19:44 on Jun 20, 2014 |
# ? Jun 20, 2014 19:38 |
|
joat mon posted:Hopefully this won't derail. I am holding my tongue like crazy right now.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 19:42 |
|
Little_wh0re posted:Is it? Howso? In other words, he's equating that little hate rally with the High Holy Days, which is just... how loving dare you. I got beaten on the explanation, but still.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 20:46 |
|
VitalSigns posted:It's not so much that they think it's contagious: it's that they believe that sin is a sickness and a perversion. Normalizing it means that people predisposed to it will be more likely to engage in it rather than heroically overcoming it, and children with tendencies will be actively recruited. Thus we must not only disparage homosexuality, we must ban it to save people from damnation. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Thank you, I needed a good laugh
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 20:54 |
|
FlamingLiberal posted:I feel like that is a response to the backlash for defrocking a priest who officiated his son's wedding last year. That was particularly dumb because apparently the marriage ceremony was in 09 or 10 but some awful person told the church leadership about it last year resulting in him losing his job. If you're talking about Frank Schaefer then he was United Methodist. I've actually been following that pretty closely since I grew up in the UMC (even though I parted ways with christianity a decade ago)
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 20:59 |
|
CapnAndy posted:He's blowing a shofar, which can be used for secular purposes (but frequently isn't, since it's not that versatile an instrument). In this case, though, he's doing it not only wearing a tallit, he's covering his head with it. You only do that during prayer, and the only time a shofar is used during prayer is on Rosh Hashanna or Yom Kippur. That guy with the shofar and tallit is lucky that my former chassidic rabbi didn't live to see that. He'd be in a world of hurt.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 22:17 |
|
I heard a soundbite of Rick Santorum speaking at this event, and claiming that "Gay Marriage has helped destroy the economy" Which..confuses me a great deal. Like...how? Are Gays the new "JEWS!!!" for White Republicans?
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 23:19 |
|
quote:One of the women, Katie Donoghue -- who asked to be identified by her middle name because she had taken off work to attend the rally -- paused and shook her head. "I'm fearful of these incremental steps," she said. "They're teaching young children about bestiality now." http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5515276/
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 23:43 |
|
Man where are these sex ed classes? Because you can't even mention gay sex in schools here or ya get fired.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2014 23:47 |
|
quote:Nearby, a 12-year-old girl named Jordan unfurled a rolled-up poster, revealing a phrase she had heard over and over that day and seen on hundreds of other signs: "Every child deserves a mom and a dad."
|
# ? Jun 21, 2014 00:10 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 19:53 |
|
quote:"That child won't have a chance to live the way God intended us to live," Andujar said. "They will just keep the chain going and going. It will lead to no human race [or] reproduction." UuuuuUUUUUUUUUUUGHHH! I don't loving get this logic at all! I'm not asking for it to be explained, I just don't get how blind you have to be to understand that there are too many people not living the way as "God intended" for reasons beyond their control. Has God abandoned them? Should they not live a holy life if they have been forsaken by only having one parent (or maybe neither)? Is gay marriage being legal the one thing that will disable everyone's natural instinct to reproduce?? I'm really not anti-theistic, but this is pure insanity that lends itself to a lack of critical thinking--as well as lack of basic human empathy--promoted by the same herd-like mentality that makes people hoop and holler when someone behind a podium says "Jesus Saves". Sorry for getting worked up. Morter fucked around with this message at 00:16 on Jun 21, 2014 |
# ? Jun 21, 2014 00:13 |