|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 15:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 19:50 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 15:20
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcR9af_akCw Unacceptable. Unacceptable.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 15:29
|
|
|
God that looks familiar. Speaking of familiar, have some Nintendo 64 games.    
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 15:37
|
|
|
In case anybody's interested, that's Cherenkov Radiation, and it's  as gently caress.
Perestroika has a new favorite as of 16:36 on Jun 27, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 15:38
|
|
|
Perestroika posted:In case anybody's interested, that's Cherenkov Radiation, and it's I've always liked to think of Cherenkov radiation as stuff being pulled over for speeding.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 16:41
|
|
|
Descent?
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 16:53
|
|
|
keyboard vomit posted:Decent? It was all right.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 17:07
|
|
|
That's very mild in terms of vertigo inducing for Descent. I think level 10 had some awesome tunnels that would make great gifs, though.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 17:20
|
|
|
God Turok 1 was loving awesome. I remember using the all weapons cheat for the Chronoscepter and giving myself a migraine from all the screen flashes. And then the series went to absolute and utter poo poo. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 17:48
|
|
|
If anyone ever has a chance of seeing cherenkov radiation for real (a nuclear reactor or fuel rod storage in a pool), drop whatever you're doing and go and see it. I did, and I couldn't help but keep staring. Pictures or video doesn't do it justice... It's literally like seeing the future.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 18:00
|
|
|
GenericOverusedName posted:That's very mild in terms of vertigo inducing for Descent. I think level 10 had some awesome tunnels that would make great gifs, though. Fortunately I made one.  I still hate that they blew up the Pyro-GX at the beginning of Descent 3. The GL sucks. Edit: another one! 
Zeether has a new favorite as of 18:19 on Jun 27, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 18:08
|
|
|
Perestroika posted:In case anybody's interested, that's Cherenkov Radiation, and it's Do I understand this wiki correctly? Is Cherenkov radiation essentially the light equivalent of a sonic boom? A photonic boom, if you will? Because that's awesome.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 19:41
|
|
|
Say Nothing posted:Which way is this train moving? I'm guessing recognising the platform is cheating?
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 21:26
|
|
|
thanks!
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 21:34
|
|
|
thespaceinvader posted:Do I understand this wiki correctly? Is Cherenkov radiation essentially the light equivalent of a sonic boom? A photonic boom, if you will? Exactly! And it is awesome. Seconding the rec to go see it in person if you can, the way the matter itself glows is so hard to even describe. Like, with a fire, you can see what's burning; with a light bulb, you can see the filament. With Cherenkov radiation, all the metal and concrete stuff starts glowing from within and without, it is very much unlike sources of light we see everyday... Like I say, hard to describe. Where I used to work we never got to pulse our reactor, so we didn't get the flash-bulb effect you see in some videos, but we still got the lovely glow.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 22:14
|
|
|
Giflords, I have tried resizing this for a while and I can't get it to not look like rear end. Could someone make it avatar sized for me? The sides can be cropped a bit to make it more square.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 23:30
|
|
|
Not sure if this is what you meant by "not making it look like rear end" or not, but I resized it but it may be over the file size limit.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2014 23:50
|
|
|
Koivunen posted:Giflords, I have tried resizing this for a while and I can't get it to not look like rear end. Could someone make it avatar sized for me? The sides can be cropped a bit to make it more square. Quick test:  e.little less janky: 
Kennel has a new favorite as of 00:18 on Jun 28, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 00:10
|
|
|
Unfunny Poster posted:Not sure if this is what you meant by "not making it look like rear end" or not, but I resized it but it may be over the file size limit. Looks good, but unfortunately it's 115 KB. I couldn't get it below 70 without losing all definition. Kennel posted:Quick test: E: sorry didn't see your reply. The second one looks sweet, is there any way to get a tiny bit of movement in the gorilla dentist? Koivunen has a new favorite as of 00:32 on Jun 28, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 00:14
|
|
|
A sick part of me wants this as an avatar.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 00:27
|
|
|
  \ 
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 01:22
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 01:33
|
|
|
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPG2v6nLzdg
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 02:42
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 03:00
|
|
|
Robert Denby posted:You Only Move Twice Still the best episode of the simpsons ever.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 04:34
|
|
|
I require more owl gifs. So much cute!
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 07:09
|
|
|
PLANES CURE TOWERS posted:Still the best episode of the simpsons ever. Homer Badman  
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 09:59
|
|
|
PLANES CURE TOWERS posted:Still the best episode of the simpsons ever. Uhh, Last Exit to Springfield? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 10:13
|
|
|
Koivunen posted:E: sorry didn't see your reply. The second one looks sweet, is there any way to get a tiny bit of movement in the gorilla dentist? It's probably possible (my attempt was pretty low effort) but those are expensive frames as pretty much every pixel changes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 10:15
|
|
|
Really, it's Cape Feare. "... I think he's talking to you..." 
Mierenneuker has a new favorite as of 10:36 on Jun 28, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 10:34
|
|
|
Koivunen posted:Looks good, but unfortunately it's 115 KB. I couldn't get it below 70 without losing all definition. The avatar size limit is harsh : 
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 10:55
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 12:24
|
|
|
I'm sorry but I really need a source for this one
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 15:18
|
|
|
Cru Jones posted:I'm sorry but I really need a source for this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U75rQ4OE0os
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 15:46
|
|
|
Tsuru posted:If anyone ever has a chance of seeing cherenkov radiation for real (a nuclear reactor or fuel rod storage in a pool), drop whatever you're doing and go and see it. If you do, make sure it's not from the dust you've extracted from stolen radiotherapy equipment and spread all over your favela and family. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 17:08
|
|
|
Dillbag posted:If you do, make sure it's not from the dust you've extracted from stolen radiotherapy equipment and spread all over your favela and family. This is one of the incidents we use in my job to convince people to take the security of their radiological devices seriously. Another is the "El Cobalto" incident. Moral of the story; careful what you find in random places, kids. Cobalt, especially, is nasty poo poo. quote:December 6, 1983 – Ciudad Juárez, Mexico. A local resident salvaged materials from a discarded radiation therapy machine containing 6,000 pellets of cobalt-60. The transport of the material led to severe contamination of his truck. When the truck was scrapped, it in turn contaminated another 5,000 metric tonnes of steel to an estimated 300 Ci (11 TBq) of activity. This steel was used to manufacture kitchen and restaurant table legs and rebar, some of which was shipped to the U.S. and Canada. The incident was discovered months later when a truck delivered contaminated building materials to the Los Alamos National Laboratory drove through a radiation monitoring station. Contamination was later measured on roads used to transport the original damaged radiation source. Some pellets were actually found embedded in the roadway. In the state of Sinaloa, 109 houses were condemned due to use of contaminated building material. This incident prompted the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Customs Service to install radiation detection equipment at all major border crossings.[20] Now for some nanomachine gifs:     
Higgy has a new favorite as of 17:59 on Jun 28, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 17:54
|
|
|
Metanaut posted:The avatar size limit is harsh : Awesome! Thank you so much! Lowtax is $5 richer.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 18:25
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 18:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 19:50 |
|
|
Koivunen posted:Awesome! Thank you so much! Lowtax is $5 richer. That should take care of DB maintenance costs for the next year or so.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2014 18:58
|
|
