|
Ogmius815 posted:We didn't intentionally infect those people, we just lied to them about how they were being treated. It was still loving horrible, but not as bad as you are implying. Actually, wives of these men became infected over the course of the study, and their children were born with congenital syphilis. This was an obvious outcome of witholding treatment (or in some cases diagnosis!) and we did it anyway, so it's pretty accurate to say we intentionally infected people with syphilis.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2014 00:09 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 16:14 |
|
I'm a bit skeptical since the child got a shot and not the nasal spray, but I guess it's still possible for the kid to come down with Hypoxia via that method. It's been observed before with other vaccines with kids under a few years, so makes sense they'd ban its use for those under five. This is what I mean Sadly, seems like the kid got a poo poo card in life. Condolences to her and the family.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2014 00:13 |
|
Shakugan posted:So there was a story (here) in Australia in the last few days about the family of a girl who developed problems (around the time she got a vaccine, fluvax I think it was called) getting a massive payment awarded to them with the judge apparently saying that it was the vaccine that caused the problems. It sounds like complications from a fever caused by the vaccine. It seems particular to the production of the annual flu vaccine made in Australia that year and not anything to do with vaccination itself: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/virus-in-the-system/story-e6frg8h6-1226063484330
|
# ? Jun 9, 2014 00:26 |
|
In the US, that style of vaccine is generally prohibited for any patient as young as she was.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2014 00:32 |
|
Shakugan posted:So there was a story (here) in Australia in the last few days about the family of a girl who developed problems (around the time she got a vaccine, fluvax I think it was called) getting a massive payment awarded to them with the judge apparently saying that it was the vaccine that caused the problems. Bullshit or not one case of somebody getting ill thanks to a vaccine does not make all vaccination bad. If memory serves a tiny percentage of people are actually inadvertently killed by vaccines in general every year. They on a rare occasion have issues. Some people get sick or die. It happens. It's utter bullshit that this gets trotted out as an argument against vaccines because vaccination, as a general concept, prevents waaaaaaaay more death and illness than it actually causes. Maybe I'm crazy but I'd take "the polio vaccine killed two people this year" over "polio killed thousands this year and permanently crippled many more."
|
# ? Jun 9, 2014 04:16 |
|
Especially when it comes to polio, that's a huge argument for mandatory near-universal vaccination because if we wipe out the disease, no one will ever have to be vaccinated for it again. Isn't the smallpox vaccine the one with the highest risk of complications? And also, it's one of those times you have to force people, because even a simple game theory analysis will tell you that as more people are vaccinated and the disease incidence drops, skipping vaccination starts to become more desireable for an individual.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2014 04:52 |
|
Good news from the Empire State:NY Times posted:Judge Upholds Policy Barring Unvaccinated Students During Illnesses
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 17:34 |
|
quote:“Diseases have a way of finding our vulnerabilities,” Mr. Salmon said, “the kinks in our armor.” Misquote, or carefully avoiding the phrase "chinks in our armor"? Is this one of those "sounds similar and thus bad despite no linguistic relation" things like "niggardly"?
|
# ? Jun 27, 2014 09:46 |
|
I've heard "kinks in our armor" many times before, so it's part of our lexicon even if it's technically wrong
|
# ? Jun 27, 2014 11:03 |
|
TapTheForwardAssist posted:Misquote, or carefully avoiding the phrase "chinks in our armor"? Yeah. A chink is like a ding or a notch. It's not a racist thing in the context it is being used, but a bunch of sports writers got in poo poo saying it that way a while back while discussing that really tall Chinese bball player who's name escapes me.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 03:03 |
|
Caros posted:Yeah. A chink is like a ding or a notch. It's not a racist thing in the context it is being used, but a bunch of sports writers got in poo poo saying it that way a while back while discussing that really tall Chinese bball player who's name escapes me. Well to be fair the optics of a big picture of a Chinese dude with "CHINK IN THE ARMOR?" under it aren't awesome. But yea I've heard kink in the armor too, not sure if it's self censorship or what but it's a valid phrase.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 03:05 |
|
I feel like the anti-anti-vaccination hysteria is probably somewhere between shark attacks and crack babies as the new mostly harmless thing to whip up smug anger about. A bunch of people can vent at some confused mothers while the country is looted and flying robots kill people overseas.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 03:19 |
|
harper is bisexual posted:I feel like the anti-anti-vaccination hysteria is probably somewhere between shark attacks and crack babies as the new mostly harmless thing to whip up smug anger about. A bunch of people can vent at some confused mothers while the country is looted and flying robots kill people overseas. Yeah. I absolutely positively have so much of my attention caught up with this, that I am incapable of doing anything else. Calling it "vent[ing] and some confused mothers" glosses over the health concerns and the dire public health consequences. I had a lot of people in my family who had to deal with these childhood illnesses (including my mother who was temporarily paralyzed by polio as a kid), so it's personally important to me, and this is a cause of concern in the third world as well, so it goes well beyond the US or even my own family history. However, if you feel it is not important enough, stick to the Middle East Politics thread or something; see nobody's forcing you to be exposed to a dangerous thread without access to the vaccine of not clicking on this thread.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 03:36 |
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:However, if you feel it is not important enough, stick to the Middle East Politics thread or something; see nobody's forcing you to be exposed to a dangerous thread without access to the vaccine of not clicking on this thread.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 03:45 |
|
So what do you do to fix the problem, and nothing else at all with your time because I assume like any moral person by your standards your life is dedicated to that task, oh enlightened sage?
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 03:49 |
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:So what do you do to fix the problem, and nothing else at all with your time because I assume like any moral person by your standards your life is dedicated to that task, oh enlightened sage?
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 03:54 |
|
harper is bisexual posted:Work to destroy the US government and replace it with a new worker's power that organizes society along socialist lines. Pretty obvious. Why are you wasting your time on the internet when this worthy goal awaits? Why talk about vaccines at all? Go, go, for the good of the world!
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 04:01 |
|
Jack Gladney posted:Why are you wasting your time on the internet when this worthy goal awaits? Why talk about vaccines at all? Go, go, for the good of the world! Because I have faith that God will provide.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 04:06 |
|
I remember when I was a small child. I lived on a place called Fort Belvoir. My family had just gotten back from being posted at several bases across Europe. I had to get vaccinations, along with most of the other kids. But three or four kids had parents who were massively anti-vaxxers and refused to get theirs vaccinated against the Big Ones- measles and what have you. So every single child in the school had to get boosters ASAP. This was problematic because I hated, and indeed still hate, needles. The only person who was for a very long time able to even approach me with a needle without me being drugged as hell or restrained was my mother. I'm going to gloss over the reaction by the non-anti-vaxx mothers (have you ever seen a hundred angry mothers crowding a room? I have. I saw high ranking officers hiding in their offices- men whose jobs it is to decide who lives and who dies- hiding in fear of these mostly women, and a small handful of househusbands. They were piiiisssseeeeed) Well mommy had to work that day, and the doctor, bless his heart, did everything he could to convince me that I absolutely had to have the booster. He even promised me a pizza. But as the day wore on he eventually was forced to call in my mother, and she had to take time from her busy government work to come down to the school and give me the shot as per the doctor's instructions. I was not happy about it but I did not fight her much because I am a colossal momma's boy. When all was said and done pretty much every kid in the school was pissed off enough to projectile defecate broken glass. The doctors however were good on their word and most of our classes got a pizza treat as a reward for tolerating ANOTHER set of goddamned shots. And the families of those kids whose parents refused? Ker-Gone'D. Transferred elsewhere and given orders to make it snappy. They were gone before the weekend and it was Wednesday, I think. Maybe Tuesday. Good times, amirite?
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 04:25 |
|
I guess I do agree that vaccines should be mandatory, as with regular blood donation and end-of-life organ donation. It's weird people have a choice about things that could save lives.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 04:36 |
|
Blood donation can be kinda tricky, which is a really big reason NOT to have it be mandatory. My blood for example isn't very useful because I'm anemic as hell, even though I'm O Neg. But you don't want anemic people blood.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 04:40 |
|
Reverend Catharsis posted:Blood donation can be kinda tricky, which is a really big reason NOT to have it be mandatory. My blood for example isn't very useful because I'm anemic as hell, even though I'm O Neg. But you don't want anemic people blood. Sometimes rules can have exceptions I suppose.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 04:43 |
|
We make plenty of exceptions on who can donate blood now, that pretty much defines the category of "useful blood". Organ donation should definitely be mandatory. You can make the argument it will cause a fair amount of distress or psychological discomfort to certain people to have to give blood, or some people may have beliefs about Just as you might respect a Jewish claimant's opposition to organ donation if they held to that article of faith, you might make exceptions, but yeah. Vaccination, more than those other things, should be mandatory because herd immunity. There isn't a threshold of organ donation where if you don't meet it, the need for organ donation suddenly goes out of control and kills more people than before.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 04:47 |
|
Indeed, Jibber. There's lots of exceptions to blood donation and organ donation that simply can never apply to vaccinations. It's just.. I mean okay. I see your fears, AVs. I understand them, even! I've personally assisted in the rearing of twelve children. Yes, it's okay to be afraid. But even if there WERE some link between autism and vaccination, even if in some mythological nonexistent world where it was true.. ..Wouldn't autism be kind of acceptable as opposed to "having dead or crippled-for-life children"?
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 05:02 |
|
Reverend Catharsis posted:..Wouldn't autism be kind of acceptable as opposed to "having dead or crippled-for-life children"? You'd think so, Rev. But apparently not! Which is...honestly kind of disturbing, when you think about it. These people are saying "I would rather my child be dead than autistic" - and, if you boil it down enough, "it is better to be dead than autistic". Which, um, no, quite happy being alive, kthxbai. I'm even doing pretty darn good - especially compared to how these people think I ought to be.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 05:52 |
|
tinytort posted:You'd think so, Rev. But apparently not! Which is...honestly kind of disturbing, when you think about it. These people are saying "I would rather my child be dead than autistic" - and, if you boil it down enough, "it is better to be dead than autistic". Which, um, no, quite happy being alive, kthxbai. I'm even doing pretty darn good - especially compared to how these people think I ought to be. Blame Autism Speaks for that, as I understand it they really really heavily play up the "AUTISM IS LITERALLY A TRAGEDY SO DEVASTATING THAT PARENTS CONSIDER MURDER-SUICIDE WITH THEIR KIDS" angle. IIRC they released some dumbass film way back when that had a mom talking about how she considered driving off the Golden Gate Bridge with her autistic kid in the backseat.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 06:01 |
|
While people who think thoughts like that are monsters and should be ashamed of themselves I imagine they are talking about cases of very sever autism not something on the lighter end of the spectrum like Aspergers.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 06:19 |
|
Gen. Ripper posted:Blame Autism Speaks for that, as I understand it they really really heavily play up the "AUTISM IS LITERALLY A TRAGEDY SO DEVASTATING THAT PARENTS CONSIDER MURDER-SUICIDE WITH THEIR KIDS" angle. That wasn't just a random Mom, that was a member of their *board*. The only thing that stopped her from killing her autistic child, and herself, was the thought of the 'normal' child locked away inside of it....Which doesn't exist. Here's some more fun facts about Autism Speaks: Autism Speaks does not have a single autistic member on their board. Autism Speaks only spends 3% of their budget on “family services”. Much of Autism Speaks’ money goes toward research, and much of that research centers on finding a way to eliminate autism, and thus, autistics (which will likely be done through a prenatal test, in the same way that the Down’s Syndrome test is conducted). Autism Speaks produces advertisements, small films, etc. about what a burden autistic people are to society. Autism Speaks is responsible for the atrocity known as “I am Autism”, a short film produced by the Academy Award Winning Alfonso Cuaron, who also directed the 3rd Harry Potter movie (yes, really) and features an ominous voice saying things like “I am autism…I know where you live…I work faster than pediatric AIDS, cancer, and diabetes combined…I will make sure your marriage fails.”
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 06:21 |
|
Jesus. I knew they were a bunch of ignorant self-absorbed assholes but Jesus Christ.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 06:31 |
|
E-Tank posted:Autism Speaks is responsible for the atrocity known as “I am Autism”, a short film produced by the Academy Award Winning Alfonso Cuaron, who also directed the 3rd Harry Potter movie (yes, really) and features an ominous voice saying things like “I am autism…I know where you live…I work faster than pediatric AIDS, cancer, and diabetes combined…I will make sure your marriage fails.” I am Autism, in turn, is (according to Wikipedia) patterned after Taming the Crippler, a movie dedicated to the horrible disease known as... poliomyelitis, and the vaccine which finally made it possible to fight it. Here's an earlier radio show featuring the same idea of poliomyelitis as The Crippler: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgJjmrkKlm4
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 06:33 |
|
E-Tank posted:
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 06:43 |
|
Not the same at all actually.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 06:49 |
|
SedanChair posted:Jesus. I knew they were a bunch of ignorant self-absorbed assholes but Jesus Christ. She was Alison Tepper, their Executive Vice President at the time. She's now Alison Tepper Singer, and she later founded the Autism Science Foundation after she left or was kicked out of Autism Speaks for opposing research into the thoroughly debunked Autism/Vaccine link. ~ My friend who knows far more about this than I ever will. Here are a few other terrible things that Autism Speaks has done recently. This woman’s job offer was rescinded after she asked Autism Speaks for accommodations in caring for her autistic son. They refused, and she made necessary accommodations for childcare, but they withdrew her offer anyways. Autism Speaks shared the news of Google removing hate speech regarding autistics from Google’s autofill feature, completely erasing any mention of autistic people’s flashblogs having anything to do with the change. It was only after a member of the autism community (and not a parent, but an autistic person themselves) spoke with a reporter about the flashblog and a statement was released to the media that Google decided to make this change. Autism Speaks highlighted AAC use, while erasing those those who actually use AAC devices to communicate. The focus was on the caretakers, not on the autistic people themselves. (The attached link has a link to a rebuttal by a nonspeaking autistic person, Amy Sequenzia). Autism Speaks has violated copyright and has profited off an autistic advocate’s writing for three years. Source: http://thecaffeinatedautistic.wordpress.com/so-what-is-the-problem-with-autism-speaks/
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 07:48 |
|
harper is bisexual posted:Sometimes rules can have exceptions I suppose. Yes, reasonable exceptions such as "don't give vaccinations to kids who have deficient immune systems" is fine. "I don't want my child to have vaccines because I don't understand them, I don't care what the doctors say" is not an exception that should be respected
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 09:12 |
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:Well to be fair the optics of a big picture of a Chinese dude with "CHINK IN THE ARMOR?" under it aren't awesome. Oh I'm not saying it wasn't stupid as gently caress, but I also think that it was an unfortunate choice of words. I can't say I disagree with firing the guy, its just one of those unintended and lovely side effects of racism being as pervasive as it was.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 09:19 |
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:Not the same at all actually. Uh, yeah, are we not all on the same page that it would be better if kids didn't have autism?
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 09:21 |
|
Benedick Cuckold posted:Uh, yeah, are we not all on the same page that it would be better if kids didn't have autism? Yeah. Not to be offensive since I know poo poo about the subject, but wouldn't it be beneficial to society and to parents if they could know in advance whether their child would be autistic. Especially if they could determine where on the range they might fall? I know a lot of people love their autistic siblings or children, but at the same time they struggle deeply with the fact that especially low functioning people with autism can be a tremendous burden.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 09:25 |
|
Caros posted:I know a lot of people love their autistic siblings or children, but at the same time they struggle deeply with the fact that especially low functioning people with autism can be a tremendous burden. Congrats, you're parroting speaking points from Autism Speaks.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 10:26 |
|
If only we could come up with a solution that would get rid of this burden. A solution that would solve our problems once and for all...
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 10:38 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 16:14 |
|
I don't know, this sounds like the start of an interesting thread. What is the line between reproductive choice and eugenics?
|
# ? Jun 28, 2014 12:45 |