|
RIP Bert Lahr
|
# ? Jun 29, 2014 15:57 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 21:30 |
|
Boris Galerkin posted:
I know it says Marjorie, but at first glance I swear I thought it said Mayonnaise. I guess I'm hungry. For content, some horrible scarification grossness. I didn't want to search through GIS scarification to find the image without text.
|
# ? Jun 29, 2014 16:43 |
|
Boris Galerkin posted:He's also very very very proud that all of these are done "freehand" whatever that means. I was in a bar a few weeks ago and this guy was showing me his tattoos (he would have fit in here with many of them), but he was like "these are all freehand" and I was like "you don't say"
|
# ? Jun 29, 2014 17:08 |
|
I guess they mean the "artist" tattooed them with no pre-drawn sketch in pen or a stencil of any kind. Which just seems dumb and unnecessarily risky. Unless you're at a famous tattoo place getting original art from a renowned tattoo artist and even they do a rough sketch on the body first. Even if I knew my artist as a friend and talented professional, I'd still ask them to draw it on first. Just to make sure it's right. It IS permanent after all.
|
# ? Jun 29, 2014 17:34 |
|
Buggiezor posted:For content, some horrible scarification grossness. I know nothing about scarification, so I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. But is that the final product ? Will it look like that forever ? Or is it still in a healing phase ?
|
# ? Jun 30, 2014 03:45 |
|
It looks like it's still healing, But it also looks poorly done and possibly on the way to infection.
|
# ? Jun 30, 2014 05:28 |
|
The White Dragon posted:Agreed. That's some goddamn art right there. I mean, it'll probably be perfect material for this thread in ten years, maybe a decade and a half, but until then? Doesn't fit in here at all. Yeah truthfully I'd pay for it to hang it on my wall. Too big of a commitment to put it on my body, but it's beautiful artwork.
|
# ? Jun 30, 2014 05:32 |
|
Buggiezor posted:I guess they mean the "artist" tattooed them with no pre-drawn sketch in pen or a stencil of any kind. Which just seems dumb and unnecessarily risky. Unless you're at a famous tattoo place getting original art from a renowned tattoo artist and even they do a rough sketch on the body first. Even if I knew my artist as a friend and talented professional, I'd still ask them to draw it on first. Just to make sure it's right. It IS permanent after all. Freehand generally means that the tattooist has drawn the design onto your skin either with a pen or a sharpie rather than transferring a stencil onto the skin. It is normally done to ensure that the tattoo design will flow with the curves and contours of the body or when somebody wants a design either bigger or smaller than the existing flash. I haven't ever seen somebody tattoo straight onto skin without some kind of drawing first but I wouldn't put it past some of the geniuses featured in this thread.
|
# ? Jun 30, 2014 05:33 |
|
|
# ? Jun 30, 2014 16:14 |
|
This is awesome.
|
# ? Jun 30, 2014 16:24 |
|
Yep, owns.
|
# ? Jun 30, 2014 16:57 |
|
You think they would have some kind of 3D plotter for tattoos by now. Not the Starship Troopers kind where a design just gets blasted at once, but still.
|
# ? Jun 30, 2014 19:00 |
|
Laserjet 4P posted:You think they would have some kind of 3D plotter for tattoos by now. Not the Starship Troopers kind where a design just gets blasted at once, but still. They do...well sort of. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2598996/The-3D-Printer-TATTOO-Students-hack-machine-volunteer-inking-robot.html
|
# ? Jun 30, 2014 19:33 |
|
I'm about to spend half a year abroad with the guy that just got this:
|
# ? Jun 30, 2014 20:42 |
|
http://i.imgur.com/K4tq2ns.jpg
|
# ? Jun 30, 2014 22:32 |
|
Jesus loving Christ.
|
# ? Jun 30, 2014 22:39 |
|
Are you both that stupid? It's loving paint.
|
# ? Jun 30, 2014 22:54 |
Yeah that looks a lot like paint.
|
|
# ? Jun 30, 2014 22:55 |
|
Now Kith!
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 02:24 |
|
regularizer posted:I'm about to spend half a year abroad with the guy that just got this: judging by your avatar this is one of those self-depricating fishing for a compliment on your own tattoo deals yeah?
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 02:37 |
|
Sonic has been done... much worse. What's wrong with your hands? How many fingers do you have? I... I have nothing. Hand are hard? Pfft, arms are harder. Why not get two?
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 03:04 |
|
If someone could tell me what this is supposed to loving be, I would be grateful.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 03:28 |
|
Say Nothing posted:
It's either an eggbeater in a chokehold or a double decker hot ballon.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 03:31 |
|
Say Nothing posted:If someone could tell me what this is supposed to loving be, I would be grateful. Looks like a whisk with either a lightsaber or a sonic screwdriver for a handle. Nerd chef?
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 03:41 |
|
Say Nothing posted:If someone could tell me what this is supposed to loving be, I would be grateful. It's a lightsaber whisk. loving stupid way to mix nerd culture with your love of cooking.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 03:54 |
|
And the most ineffective culinary tool, at that. What doesn't a lightsaber, at the very least, eventually cut through?
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 04:04 |
|
kinmik posted:And the most ineffective culinary tool, at that. What doesn't a lightsaber, at the very least, eventually cut through? Other lightsabers.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 04:25 |
|
kinmik posted:And the most ineffective culinary tool, at that. What doesn't a lightsaber, at the very least, eventually cut through? Mandalorian Iron.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 04:28 |
|
Should've gotten the lightsaber bread knife from Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy instead.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 04:41 |
|
kinmik posted:And the most ineffective culinary tool, at that. What doesn't a lightsaber, at the very least, eventually cut through? A taozin
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 04:53 |
|
kinmik posted:And the most ineffective culinary tool, at that. What doesn't a lightsaber, at the very least, eventually cut through? The lifetime of regret that a tattoo like that begets?
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 05:19 |
|
kinmik posted:And the most ineffective culinary tool, at that. What doesn't a lightsaber, at the very least, eventually cut through? Kortosis and vibro blades.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 05:30 |
|
kinmik posted:And the most ineffective culinary tool, at that. What doesn't a lightsaber, at the very least, eventually cut through? Reality.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 05:34 |
|
I admit I laughed at most of those replies butMay Contain Nuts posted:A taozin Inzombiac posted:Kortosis and vibro blades. Why would anyone want to immortalize that travesty in their flesh? Papyrus font and apparently colored in with Crayola markers. Lovely.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 20:30 |
|
kinmik posted:
Maybe it's the reason Anakin killed the Younglings. They had terrible tattoos.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 23:40 |
Terrible handwriting aside, at least they spelled "angels" right.
|
|
# ? Jul 2, 2014 00:32 |
|
JoelJoel posted:
It's the same sonic he's just going really fast
|
# ? Jul 2, 2014 02:32 |
|
taiyoko posted:Terrible handwriting aside, at least they spelled "angels" right. I'm pretty sure they didn't on the first pass
|
# ? Jul 2, 2014 02:35 |
|
Countless reblogs on tumblr with "need" added in. One actual critique/comment out of 400 "want"s saying, "the toes are a little weird, but that doesn't take away from the awesome linework". Am I missing that this is some sort of semi-famous historical artwork, or can people just not see how poorly this is done?
|
# ? Jul 2, 2014 23:28 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 21:30 |
|
I couldn't tell you which piece of greek art its referencing but it is pretty accurate, even the long toes are a common part of the art. Here's something similar from a vase, it's Athena and some trojan fellas. I like it at its face value. Of course, someone more knowledgable on the subject will probably chime in saying its a depiction of the god of rape or something and make me look like an rear end but it seems pretty cool to me.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 01:03 |