|
uggy posted:I enjoy the elephant being the man and the donkey being the woman. Excellent Gotta love how he highlighted ME two different ways so you know that Obama only talks about himself.
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 19:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 08:45 |
|
|
Cat Face Joe posted:Branco is the worst and no one can convince me otherwise.  In recent years, the closest thing the team has had to an offensive line is "Hail to the Redskins." Now the guilt riddled left is hell-bent on taking that away. The least disruptive and most cost effective solution for the Skins, would be to replace the formidable proud American Indian profile with the humble redskin potato. That should shut the libs up until they realize that potatoes are members of the tobacco family. –Dale POSTED BY DALE 6 COMMENTS: LINKS TO THIS POST LABELS: POTATO, RACISM, SLUR, WASHINGTON REDSKINS
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 19:10
|
|
|
JaggerMcDagger posted:That should shut the libs up until they realize that potatoes are members of the tobacco family. –Dale  TOMACCO!
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 19:27
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 19:32
|
|
|
Rogers has really been on a hot streak. This one is beautiful and concise
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 19:34
|
|
|
 1That dog looks pretty harmless to me, even without the muzzle.  2The last panel has been happening for years already.  3God drat it you lazy rear end in a top hat.  4Because there is no such thing as an adverse reaction or allergies to oral birth control methods.  5Hateful even in victory.  6Hate to admit it, but that last panel is pretty good.  7
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 20:13
|
|
|
loquacius posted:The Supreme Court sucks. Sorensen knows. She knows, man. Pants Donkey fucked around with this message at 20:36 on Jul 1, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 20:15
|
|
|
Internet Webguy posted:
Okay I'm amending my 1040 and replacing every number with RFRA, will report back.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 20:17
|
|
|
Oh god I'm envisioning a little pair of sunglasses on the moon and some of those little neon-pastel squiggle-swirl things from the late 80's in the right panel I'm sorry RADICAL
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 20:19
|
|
|
Monkey Fracas posted:
Radical Islam: 
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 20:21
|
|
|
Monkey Fracas posted:
Did somebody say,  ?
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 20:22
|
|
|
Internet Webguy posted:
Ted Rall ruins it a couple times with his Rallness but this is almost a good comic about the poo poo corporations already get away with even if they lost this ruling.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 20:23
|
|
|
Monkey Fracas posted:
 
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 20:32
|
|
|
Internet Webguy posted:
Doesn't the decision only affect employee insurance plans? Are conservatives now arguing that regulation concerning compensation for work is a type of hand out? (Also, "the left" is an overweight, unattractive woman with hairy legs.)
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 20:37
|
|
|
Not that that isn't an awesome picture, but that dude's hat and outfit looks Orthodox to me. Am I just seeing things?
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 20:38
|
|
|
I'd love it if a Muslim lobbying group actually organized itself around this principle. Imagine sending CNN badly made video of your spiritual leader rollerblading while wearing venetian blind sunglasses. Commissioning Lisa Frank to make a really snazzy cover for your group's Korans. Threatening to send a group of your agents to infiltrate the crowd at Muscle City on the anniversary of 9/11 and shred some massive waves. Release a manifesto that's also a poorly conceived anti-drug PSA. Islamic Pog competitions. Halal Ecto-cooler and Fruit by the Foot.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 20:47
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:I'd love it if a Muslim lobbying group actually organized itself around this principle. Imagine sending CNN badly made video of your spiritual leader rollerblading while wearing venetian blind sunglasses. Commissioning Lisa Frank to make a really snazzy cover for your group's Korans. Threatening to send a group of your agents to infiltrate the crowd at Muscle City on the anniversary of 9/11 and shred some massive waves. Release a manifesto that's also a poorly conceived anti-drug PSA. Islamic Pog competitions. Halal Ecto-cooler and Fruit by the Foot. holy poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 20:53
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:I'd love it if a Muslim lobbying group actually organized itself around this principle. Imagine sending CNN badly made video of your spiritual leader rollerblading while wearing venetian blind sunglasses. Commissioning Lisa Frank to make a really snazzy cover for your group's Korans. Threatening to send a group of your agents to infiltrate the crowd at Muscle City on the anniversary of 9/11 and shred some massive waves. Release a manifesto that's also a poorly conceived anti-drug PSA. Islamic Pog competitions. Halal Ecto-cooler and Fruit by the Foot. This may be one of the best posts I have ever read.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 20:58
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:I'd love it if a Muslim lobbying group actually organized itself around this principle. Imagine sending CNN badly made video of your spiritual leader rollerblading while wearing venetian blind sunglasses. Commissioning Lisa Frank to make a really snazzy cover for your group's Korans. Threatening to send a group of your agents to infiltrate the crowd at Muscle City on the anniversary of 9/11 and shred some massive waves. Release a manifesto that's also a poorly conceived anti-drug PSA. Islamic Pog competitions. Halal Ecto-cooler and Fruit by the Foot. I am intrigued by your ideas and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 21:00
|
|
|
Edible Hat posted:Are conservatives now arguing that regulation concerning compensation for work is a type of hand out? Also pretend I'm crass enough to have made a 13th amendment joke.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 21:00
|
|
|
If I were a radical Muslim I would totally use that logo on the right. It's kickin' rad.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 21:08
|
|
|
Cat Face Joe posted:Branco is the worst and no one can convince me otherwise.  1 2 3 4 5I can sure as hell try.  I think the difference for me is that Branco, the McCoys, Lester, and even/especially Allie will do trollish cartoons that aim specifically to "Piss off the Libs", but I can't think of anything they've done that's as mainstream offensive as Ramirez's Challenger cartoon and/or the Benghazi-9/11 one. On Cagle and even on Ramirez's own turf, the Investor's Business Daily website, there were conservative commentors basically saying "Dude, I hate Obamacare too, but using the Challenger explosion and the deaths of seven people like that is not cool." (Although there were still  )Sorry for combining so much hate into one post, but that's what you get with Ramirez. Two loving Pulitzers!
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 21:11
|
|
|
Also keep in mind Two Pulitzers and Ramirez is printed in actual newspapers. Newspapers that real people read.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 21:13
|
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:I am intrigued by your ideas and wish to subscribe to your newsletter. Sadly putting the idea into practice isn't particularly meaningful unless it comes from, y'know, actual muslims. Otherwise it's just basically a blackface routine.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 21:13
|
|
|
Edible Hat posted:Doesn't the decision only affect employee insurance plans? Are conservatives now arguing that regulation concerning compensation for work is a type of hand out? (Also, "the left" is an overweight, unattractive woman with hairy legs.)
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 21:21
|
|
|
Internet Webguy posted:
If these people are legitimately invested in preventing abortions, why the gently caress are they trying to create circumstances where more will necessarily happen?
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 21:29
|
|
|
Stroop There It Is posted:
It's not about abortion, it's about punishing women for having sex.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 21:32
|
|
Stroop There It Is posted:The kind I used to get cost more than $9 per month with good insurance (obviously YMMV, but $9 is pretty drat low). Not to mention, something like an IUD that has virtually no possibility of improper use (like forgetting to take pills or even not taking them at the same time daily) is significantly better at preventing unwanted pregnancies than most other methods... and those cost hundreds of dollars without insurance. It was free with mine. The treatments at issue in Hobby Lobby were viewed by the plaintiffs as a form of abortion, so it was as bad as the more conventional form of the practice.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 21:32
|
|
|
Rorus Raz posted:It's also funny because the right winger meme is "liberal women are dour fat trolls that will never be married" yet they are also sex fiends that demand we pay for their birth control. It's this weird view of the world where people mix Dr. Jekyll, She-Hulk and the Madonna-Whore Complex where dowdy, hairy-legged spinsters SUDDENLY TRANSFORM into virile baby-making sperm-jacking seductresses, even if they're "one of the good ones". And it's drat disgraceful.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 21:34
|
|
|
Yeah, my wife's BC was upwards of $60 per month, WITH insurance. What's this Cadillac-plan $9 false equivalence poo poo?
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 22:07
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:I'd love it if a Muslim lobbying group actually organized itself around this principle. Imagine sending CNN badly made video of your spiritual leader rollerblading while wearing venetian blind sunglasses. Commissioning Lisa Frank to make a really snazzy cover for your group's Korans. Threatening to send a group of your agents to infiltrate the crowd at Muscle City on the anniversary of 9/11 and shred some massive waves. Release a manifesto that's also a poorly conceived anti-drug PSA. Islamic Pog competitions. Halal Ecto-cooler and Fruit by the Foot. I have to agree with the other posters, you're making Islam sound rad as hell.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 22:13
|
|
|
OAquinas posted:Yeah, my wife's BC was upwards of $60 per month, WITH insurance. What's this Cadillac-plan $9 false equivalence poo poo? I didn't actually know it was that expensive, I was also under the false impression it was relatively cheap. $60 bucks is my entire luxury budget for the MONTH. That changes things dramatically.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 22:18
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 22:22
|
|
|
Stroop There It Is posted:The kind I used to get cost more than $9 per month with good insurance (obviously YMMV, but $9 is pretty drat low). Not to mention, something like an IUD that has virtually no possibility of improper use (like forgetting to take pills or even not taking them at the same time daily) is significantly better at preventing unwanted pregnancies than most other methods... and those cost hundreds of dollars without insurance. It was free with mine. If it's just 9 bucks per month per full time employee (who is apparently being paid fourteen bucks per hour), then I guarantee you that the bad publicity from this decision is going to cost them more than just putting up with it and paying for the pills would ever do. How the gently caress can they justify this decision to their shareholders?
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 22:23
|
|
|
A 5-4 decision hardly amounts to the entire SC spanking Obama. That's just expected SC poo poo these days. Now the recess appointments decision--that would have been appropriate for this comic, but I guess that one's less exciting to McCoy or something.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 22:24
|
|
|
I usually hate Rall, but I have to give credit where credit is due: this is a good cartoon.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 22:24
|
|
|
Somfin posted:If it's just 9 bucks per month per full time employee (who is apparently being paid fourteen bucks per hour), then I guarantee you that the bad publicity from this decision is going to cost them more than just putting up with it and paying for the pills would ever do. How the gently caress can they justify this decision to their shareholders? The entire company is owned by the one crazy family. That's the only reason this case was ever brought.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 22:26
|
|
Banana Tapestry posted:I have to agree with the other posters, you're making Islam sound rad as hell. Thanks, but again, it's only meaningful if it's Muslims who are doing it. Otherwise it looks like we're dressing up another cultural group with our own attributions for entertainment, which feels a bit like a blackface performance. Somfin posted:If it's just 9 bucks per month per full time employee (who is apparently being paid fourteen bucks per hour), then I guarantee you that the bad publicity from this decision is going to cost them more than just putting up with it and paying for the pills would ever do. How the gently caress can they justify this decision to their shareholders? They don't because the company is closely held. That means a very small number of people hold the majority of the shares (the specifics of what kinds of company fall under the decision are debated).
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 22:26
|
|
|
Somfin posted:If it's just 9 bucks per month per full time employee (who is apparently being paid fourteen bucks per hour), then I guarantee you that the bad publicity from this decision is going to cost them more than just putting up with it and paying for the pills would ever do. How the gently caress can they justify this decision to their shareholders? The foundation of the ruling is that they don't really have shareholders. The owners company are willing to pay extra for all the labor it takes to avoid barcodes, which they believe to be the Mark of the Beast. I don't think they'll have trouble with losing money over not murdering poor little zygotes.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 22:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 08:45 |
|
|
Poopy Palpy posted:The foundation of the ruling is that they don't really have shareholders. The owners company are willing to pay extra for all the labor it takes to avoid barcodes, which they believe to be the Mark of the Beast. I don't think they'll have trouble with losing money over not murdering poor little zygotes. Holy loving poo poo is that why they're like that? I just assumed they were too cheap to buy scanners and modern inventorying technology.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2014 22:31
|
|
