Calico Noose posted:If you find a way let me know, It's got that wonderfully gut deep sickening feeling that you're very clearly living a society governed by genuinely evil people who would be applauding the Nazi party if this was the 1930's and being unable to have a meaningful impact and the dream of earning enough to be able to leave a move somewhere not run by malignant scum is remote and made further dwindling by every single action they take to try and crush the workers to keep their snouts in the trough... and it's all so loving blatant, I don't understand how anybody can look at the current government and see anything but greed, fear and corruption yet this doesn't draw more than mild annoyance from the majority of the nation. Oh, I don't think they would be just applauding the Nazis so much as they would be part of the Nazis, the ones implementing and coming up with Nazi policy. Actually, at least the Nazis had an actual, for real financial collapse as a bad excuse, the dog fuckers running things in Australia? Not so much. As for reasons? It gets them votes, votes are power, and power is things like free scholarships for your kids and comfy, well payed positions in government and industry for you and your buddies, and they only need pay for it with a little refugee blood and the ruination of Australia's social safety net, so why not? As for why it gets them votes... Well, racism is my answer.
|
|
#
?
Jul 2, 2014 19:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 02:13 |
|
|
Ugh, Janet Albrechtsen has officially been appointed to the board that oversees ABC and SBS board appointments. The oversight board was established by Rudd so that Australia would no longer see blatantly partisan appointments to the boards of our public broadcasters, such as the appointment of Janet Albrechtsen to the ABC board by Howard.
|
|
#
?
Jul 2, 2014 20:55
|
|
|
How's that whole 'changing Labor policy from within' thing going. We can't forget this is partly their fault. You know, when we put these monsters on trial for literal crimes against humanity.
|
|
#
?
Jul 2, 2014 23:29
|
|
|
Fruity Gordo posted:I would not feel bad if she was cyber bullied enough that she killed herself out of shame. People like that never kill themselves out of shame, but I hope she's an exception. I would cyber bully that woman happily right now. You're my kind of people Fruity.
|
|
#
?
Jul 2, 2014 23:51
|
|
|
Konomex posted:How's that whole 'changing Labor policy from within' thing going. We can't forget this is partly their fault. You know, when we put these monsters on trial for literal crimes against humanity. gently caress trials IMO, they can afford the best lawyers and went to school with the judges.
|
|
#
?
Jul 2, 2014 23:53
|
|
|
Mr Chips posted:The military aren't running immigration facilities on Manus Island, but sure, let's deploy a theatre communications system in our concentration camps. It'll be ok, SA forums poster hypation likes to take time to politely answer interview questions. Well apparently: adamantium|wang posted:Immigration department officials screen asylum seekers at sea 'via teleconference' Which means on the navy and customs patrol boats that intercepted them, which already (presumably) have VSAT communications capabilities. But hey, I'm allegedly IWC so whatever...
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 00:09
|
|
|
No, you're just a moron that routinely farts loudly then leaves, satisfied that you have once again brought peace and balance to Auspol with your ringing attempts to defend the indefensible.quote:On-water asylum screening plan 'shelved amid fears it could be unlawful'
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 00:16
|
|
|
Fruity Gordo posted:I would not feel bad if she was cyber bullied enough that she killed herself out of shame. People like that never kill themselves out of shame, but I hope she's an exception. I would cyber bully that woman happily right now. You know, I used to take issue with this sort of thing, but not any more. poo poo has literally become so stupid that I don't care if the people responsible for our toxic culture choose to kill they are selves. I'm sure that makes me a horrible person.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 00:16
|
|
|
In the first 90 seconds of the video she gives her name so go hog wild.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 00:19
|
|
|
Tommofork posted:In the first 90 seconds of the video she gives her name so go hog wild. Can you please keep me updated on the hopefully public naming/shaming she's receiving?
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 00:38
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:Can you please keep me updated on the hopefully public naming/shaming she's receiving? https://m.facebook.com/home.php?refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2F&refid=8&_rdr#!/sue.wilkins2?fref=nf You're welcome
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 00:43
|
|
|
e: nm
Those On My Left fucked around with this message at 02:06 on Jul 3, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 00:49
|
|
|
Dear SES, please tell your volunteers not to get on the terps and racially vilify people on the train, A. Goon
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 00:53
|
|
|
Public transport racists always seem to set everything on their profiles to public. Hell, she even has it set so any random person can comment on her posts.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 00:54
|
|
|
Literally hope she gets killed by a eucalypt branch next high wind
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 00:54
|
|
|
Someone with more time than I currently have needs to talk to the Anti Discrimination Board of NSW about whether or not this is a contravention of section 20C of the Anti-Discrimination Act, and how a complaint can be made about it. http://www.antidiscrimination.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/ http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/aa1977204/s20c.html quote:It is unlawful for a person, by a public act, to incite hatred towards, serious contempt for, or severe ridicule of, a person or group of persons on the ground of the race of the person or members of the group.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 01:02
|
|
|
Captain Pissweak posted:Uh but that's illegitimate because imo he can't just do that and we're not that bad. Oh, we're not the Nazis! Heavens to betsy. We're the people giving Jews back to the Nazis because, ew, don't want their type here.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 01:07
|
|
|
This is literally what we are.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 01:07
|
|
|
Gough Suppressant posted:https://m.facebook.com/home.php?refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2F&refid=8&_rdr#!/sue.wilkins2?fref=nf If this is the same person then she's gained a lot of weight and moved interstate in the last couple months
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 01:12
|
|
|
AVeryLargeRadish posted:Roughly 50% according to the government. Mithranderp posted:There's a pretty depressing article up on ABC about the "voluntary returns" being offered to asylum seekers. Small fries in the face of our intention as a nation to explicitly defy the Human Rights convention (To which we somehow remain a signatory) but it turns out Jacqui Lambie. Is not only an AJ but was part of the AJ Po Po, well until she: quote:We all had drinks one day and I took a swing at him. That got me charged. I wouldn't say it was worth it, because all I did was break my little finger. I lost a stripe for it. Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/the-underdog-bites-back-20140414-36m7y.html#ixzz36MQoIQY5 FFS Australia.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 01:31
|
|
|
Anemone Thief posted:If this is the same person then she's gained a lot of weight and moved interstate in the last couple months Rochester SES is near Kyabram. No way would she be commuting on a Newcastle to Sydney line. Try again goons.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 01:58
|
|
|
Cartoon posted:
This whole article is Burnie.txt
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 01:58
|
|
|
They all look the same to me
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 02:06
|
|
|
freebooter posted:Oh, we're not the Nazis! Heavens to betsy. I always assumed Morrison was basically Oscar Schindler except instead of successfully smuggling refugees out of the country to be used as slave labour, the train instead drops them off directly at Auschwitz.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 02:41
|
|
|
Tangentialchat. Recently, I've been working for a firm that sub-contracts training and motivational seminars in the JSA sector. In essence, they find the worst performing job network agencies in the JSA (who apparently have an average success rate of somewhere between 2% - 10% [per group of 10 - 20, groups determined by region] when it comes to transitioning long term unemployed into work) and offer to motivate, polish (haircuts, clothes, etc), and reverse market their clients to employers, which the job network agencies absolutely love because they are, broadly speaking, a bunch of all-stick-no-carrot slackarsed fucks who can barely remember their own names let alone successfully place someone into even the most casual work. The amounts of money involved are absolutely staggering. In ball park figures, there is a not inconsiderable (several thousand dollar) upfront fee paid by the government for placing someone into work, but for every person who stays in work for 13 - 26 weeks, the job network agency receives a 20k-30k payment. This doesn't include the wage subsidy program, wherein employing someone for 13 - 26 weeks on an award wage that is generally around $15 - $20 an hour nets you, the employer, lump sums at the 13 and 26 week marks equal to up to 90% of the wages you have paid out over that period (at maximum around $4k, but often around $2.5k).
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 02:43
|
|
|
Of course Sri Lanka is a peaceful country they're all Buddhists or some poo poo - T.Abs
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 02:45
|
|
|
tomkash posted:Would studying conservation and land management at tafe actually lead to employment or usable skills? It seems pretty interesting and I'd love to work in a field where I can actually do some good and enjoy my job. It's hard to find real information about it online though. Anecdotally there has been an increase in people paid for bush remediation, but that's local so it'll depend what your council is up to, on a wider scale the industry was growing when I was involved 5 years ago. Cert III + should be helpful. Consider that us peons that were involved in governments 'Greencorps' program and presumably the upcoming 'Green Army' are awarded either a Cert I or II in Conservation and Land Management as part of these programs. (nevermind that you'll learn a lot more)
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 03:16
|
|
|
Small Keating posted:Tangentialchat. This reminds me, don't those providers pretty much sit on their rear end more than usual for any people freshly on Newstart, since they can't get that sweet kickback money until the person becomes long-term unemployed?
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 03:23
|
|
|
drunkill posted:Are you a white, Australian male with a small penis? Well too bad, it seems you can only get asian girlfriends and are not good enough to have a white partner. What's the law in Aus regarding fighting words? Because even though I'm not a very aggressive guy I don't think I'd be able to hold back from giving her at least a shove once she starts flinging slurs around. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 03:24
|
|
|
It can't get any worse. *three seconds later* http://www.news.com.au/national/sou...4-1226976039490 SIX WEEK OLD BABY SENT TO CHRISTMAS ISLAND 
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 03:28
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:This reminds me, don't those providers pretty much sit on their rear end more than usual for any people freshly on Newstart, since they can't get that sweet kickback money until the person becomes long-term unemployed? That wouldn't surprise me. They seem like, by and large, some of the most discombobulated and corrupt fuckheads in existence. Several of them are apparently also forming their own RTOs so that they can funnel grant money from the government for the education and training of long-term unemployed candidates into their own pockets.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 03:36
|
|
|
Hang yourself you worthless cretin.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 03:38
|
|
|
Small Keating posted:Tangentialchat. Why, in your opinion, have job network providers become so shockingly bad at what they do?
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 03:40
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:This reminds me, don't those providers pretty much sit on their rear end more than usual for any people freshly on Newstart, since they can't get that sweet kickback money until the person becomes long-term unemployed? I signed up with a couple when looking for jobs and literally never got contacted by them. I asked why, and they said it's because they get enough responses through posting ads on Gumtree and seek, so there was no point messaging people individually. You have to remember that they don't give a poo poo about you. They are after corporate clients.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 03:43
|
|
|
Jumpingmanjim posted:Why, in your opinion, have job network providers become so shockingly bad at what they do? So far as I can tell: 1. They have poorly motivated and coordinated area management and sales staff, at best; at worst, they are lazy cretins. 2. They operate on badly understood and outmoded models for encouraging candidates into work, when they bother at all 3. They have hundreds of candidates to choose from, and have very loose requirements/target set by the government around their performance. From what I can tell the sales model runs on commissions, so these pricks spend most of the year flogging off the very best and most motivated candidates into jobs (and subsequently collecting massive government bucks) while ditching by the roadside anybody who might need even a modicum of assistance. At least, until the period between June and September, where they have to boost their star ratings to meet whatever vague assertions their contract with the government contains. At this point, they jack up to around 90% the lump sum payment employers can earn for employing a candidate from the JSA sector, and basically bribe their way in. Even then, their success rates are still poor which, given they are handing out free money, says something about the woeful quality of the sales consultants/reprehensible hacks. I should point out that the entire business model of the mob I am consulting with presently is to essentially take all the functions of the job network agency, away from the job network agency, in return for a cut of the eventual profits (about $1k per client plus more if they get placed and stay placed). We ring the clients up to place them in the course (also something the agencies suck at: when they place them, we get about 4 confirmed trainees; when we place them, we get 20), train them, give them a free Android laptop to job hunt and generally tool around with, clothe them, spit-polish them, do a resume build, do a speed interview session, and then call the employers and place them. The agencies fill in all the paperwork. Small Keating fucked around with this message at 03:54 on Jul 3, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 03:49
|
|
|
We are gleefully causing prepubescent children to self harm but how dare those SALTies photoshop a razor next to Tony Abbotts neck on the cover of Red Flag
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 03:53
|
|
|
Small Keating posted:I should point out that the entire business model of the mob I am consulting with presently is to essentially take all the functions of the job network agency, away from the job network agency, in return for a cut of the eventual profits (about $1k per client plus more if they get placed and stay placed). Sounds like these guys are actually doing some good work. It's disgusting that those useless providers are just skimming off the top for doing jack all. How come this firm can't just get all the government money directly for doing the same stuff?
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 04:03
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:Sounds like these guys are actually doing some good work. It's disgusting that those useless providers are just skimming off the top for doing jack all. How come this firm can't just get all the government money directly for doing the same stuff? There's apparently quite a bit of work/red tape involved in becoming a job network agency, whereas the paperwork involved in sub-contracting the training and sales element is fairly straightforward.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 04:09
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 04:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 02:13 |
|
|
Mattjpwns posted:It can't get any worse. Is it just me or does it look like Morrison is imagining chomping into the six-week old?
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2014 04:15
|
|
