|
are there any indications at all that goog ever expected to turn driverless cars into a business?
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 19:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 20:39 |
|
|
it makes more sense than letting android owners buy and subsequently gently caress them up in public "GOOGLE CAR KILLS SEVEN"
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 19:19
|
|
|
rotor posted:are there any indications at all that goog ever expected to turn driverless cars into a business? no cause thats the whole point with these pie in the sky projects, u dont have to deal with hard things like the realities of figuring out how to create a viable business. 15 years out is too long a time frame for google's goldfish engineers/management to think about commercializing the technology. they'll probably have moved on to the next company 3 times by then.  if the clowns at google actually studied steve jobs' career this would all be blatantly obvious
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 19:29
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 19:44
|
|
|
google shutdown my phone while reading that post
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 19:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 19:48
|
|
|
i hope thats a real website
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 19:51
|
|
|
cremnob posted:no cause thats the whole point with these pie in the sky projects, u dont have to deal with hard things like the realities of figuring out how to create a viable business. 15 years out is too long a time frame for google's goldfish engineers/management to think about commercializing the technology. they'll probably have moved on to the next company 3 times by then. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 19:58
|
|
|
cremnob posted:i hope thats a real website work in progress
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 19:58
|
|
|
bootstrap 3 is nice
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 20:03
|
|
|
i used Jade and bootstrap for the first time and it was extremely quick to make the first draft. then i needlessly decided to make it database driven and yeah.
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 20:07
|
|
|
cremnob posted:no cause thats the whole point with these pie in the sky projects, u dont have to deal with hard things like the realities of figuring out how to create a viable business. 15 years out is too long a time frame for google's goldfish engineers/management to think about commercializing the technology. they'll probably have moved on to the next company 3 times by then. yes, steve jobs was noticeable for coming up with completely stupid ideas that wasted company time and didn't become successes, like the macintosh
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 21:47
|
|
|
im so tired of seeing bootstrap
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 22:17
|
|
|
but theres no other choice
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 22:18
|
|
|
pram posted:im so tired of seeing bootstrap I use bootstrap because it's unironically very good and I can't think of any viable alternatives.
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 22:24
|
|
|
Ocrassus posted:I use bootstrap because it's unironically very good and I can't think of any viable alternatives. foundation
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 22:53
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:yes, steve jobs was noticeable for coming up with completely stupid ideas that wasted company time and didn't become successes, like the macintosh fishmech uses wild attack! it's not very effective...
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 22:54
|
|
|
pram posted:im so tired of seeing bootstrap
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 22:56
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:foundation Had a look at this and going to use it for my new site. thanks
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 23:18
|
|
|
just write your own poo poo on top of backbone jaysus how lazy are u
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2014 23:54
|
|
|
rotor posted:are there any indications at all that goog ever expected to turn driverless cars into a business? they tried with android so its a good bet
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 01:23
|
|
|
theadder posted:they tried with android so its a good bet u could learn a lot from this guy cremnob
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 01:27
|
|
|
pram posted:im so tired of seeing bootstrap sorry next time i make a funny computer site i'll hand craft bespoke Style Sheets and accent the divs with lace, artisan spans and tasteful, organic line-heights.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 01:54
|
|
|
PleasureKevin posted:sorry next time i make a funny computer site i'll hand craft bespoke Style Sheets and accent the divs with lace, artisan spans and tasteful, organic line-heights. #include 219.css
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 01:58
|
|
|
isn't BOOTSTRA.386 the new hotness in stylesheet technology?
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 02:14
|
|
|
PleasureKevin posted:sorry next time i make a funny computer site i'll hand craft bespoke Style Sheets and accent the divs with lace, artisan spans and tasteful, organic line-heights. good
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 05:02
|
|
|
PleasureKevin posted:sorry next time i make a funny computer site i'll hand craft bespoke Style Sheets and accent the divs with lace, artisan spans and tasteful, organic line-heights. thx mate
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 06:59
|
|
|
pseudorandom name posted:isn't BOOTSTRA.386 the new hotness in stylesheet technology? lmao this owns
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 07:01
|
|
|
techcrunch calling out google's agenda on this right to be forgotten "controversy" they kicked up the past couple of days http://techcrunch.com/2014/07/04/digital-theatre/
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 07:06
|
|
|
so google the company that helps china censor the internet can't de-index a link?
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 07:31
|
|
|
flakeloaf posted:#include 219.css i don't know what this means
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 07:32
|
|
|
cremnob posted:techcrunch calling out google's agenda on this right to be forgotten "controversy" they kicked up the past couple of days ah-ha, it was not the articles but the comments that caused this: a youtube-commenter wants their name disassociated from a comment and in response google blackholes the whole article not only did google hurt the reforming youtube-commenter who's trying to pull their life back together - by risking their name to a whole lot of unwanted new exposure - they also hurt their customers by cutting the number of ad views they get and they hurt their users by making search worse good job being petulant children about a court ruling you don't like
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 10:55
|
|
|
https://support.google.com/orkut/answer/6033100?p=orkut&rd=1 those 6 people who use orkut are going to be furious
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 11:57
|
|
|
pram posted:im so tired of seeing bootstrap it's not bad but as soon as a page loads it's like "oh this is bootstrap" and it sours my opinion of a site cause everything uses it
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 12:11
|
|
|
Max Facetime posted:ah-ha, it was not the articles but the comments that caused this: a youtube-commenter wants their name disassociated from a comment and in response google blackholes the whole article they didn't even blackhole the article if you search on the public figure in the article, it still shows up in results if you search for the name of the private individual, the article does not show up so actually google did this 100% right but then told the article author who in turn wrote an article stating they had been black-holed when in fact they had not. this is exactly what google is hoping for, lots of FUD going around
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 13:48
|
|
|
Cold on a Cob posted:they didn't even blackhole the article I think google blackholed them completely at first, then emailed the bloggers or journalists who confirmed the articles being delisted, only to turn around to reinstate the links and do it properly once they got the publicity they wanted I mean, I hope google didn't reveal the names of the private individuals from whom the requests came to those who wrote the articles... that would have been a huge, huge breach of privacy... so nobody should be able to tell whether those names are or are not associated with the comments to be able to verify
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 14:14
|
|
|
Max Facetime posted:I think google blackholed them completely at first, then emailed the bloggers or journalists who confirmed the articles being delisted, only to turn around to reinstate the links and do it properly once they got the publicity they wanted which has caused a change from the initial round of "wtf this is stupid as poo poo" stories to all the media starting to pick up on the hamfisted attempt at malicious compliance. the media hates censorship but hates being used as a PR outlet (without being paid) even more. what do they hope to get out of this? do they think the eu is going to turn around and reverse years of personal privacy rules, enshrined in the european convention on human rights, just because of an out-of area monopolist throwing a blatant temper tantrum over being told the law actually applies to them? hell Eric Schmidt is on record as saying that in the glorious technofuture everyone will get a free name change to escape their online stupid teenage years past
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 15:33
|
|
|
what googl eexpects to get out of this is the satisfaction of being petulant children lol if you think there's an overarching strategy there, google doesn't have the attention span for that sort of planning
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 18:14
|
|
|
google is gonna get hosed by the EU and stunts like this are just gonna make it worse lmao. the anroid antitrust investigation is int he works
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 18:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 20:39 |
|
|
it's going to be rad when the eu orders google to stop holding back features of android from manufacturers who don't agree to include google services 
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2014 18:18
|
|
