|
Which version ya gettin? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Duck Hunt Dog |
|
412 | 18.24% |
| Duck Hunt Dog |
|
226 | 10.00% |
| Duck Hunt Dog |
|
433 | 19.17% |
| Waluigi |
|
1188 | 52.59% |
| Total: | 2259 votes | ||
|
Events beyond the players' control, such as item drops and stage hazards, have a significant and generally positive impact on the risk/reward structure of Smash. However, tripping is bad.
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 11:40 |
|
|
LOCUST FART HELL posted:Bomberman you say? I knew someone would post this and I hate you for doing it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:22
|
|
|
Color Printer posted:I knew someone would post this and I hate you for doing it. That bomberman owns.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:23
|
|
|
Bongo Bill posted:Events beyond the players' control, such as item drops and stage hazards, have a significant and generally positive impact on the risk/reward structure of Smash. However, tripping is bad. If you trip, you trip. End of discussion. There's no risk reward from that, no interesting gameplay, you just got hosed because the RNG decided you should get hosed.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:24
|
|
|
LOCUST FART HELL posted:Bomberman you say? Only if Mega Man has his box art version as an alternate skin.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:24
|
|
|
Endorph posted:I don't know how to tell you this, but Checkers wouldn't be able if there was a 1/100 chance of someone randomly slapping a piece off the board. Countblanc posted:He's saying that human error (execution, emotion, etc.) cause unpredictability already, and that the author seems to think that without forced randomization you can simply execute your gameplan with 100% accuracy all the time and there's no surprises. I would argue that that's ignoring his larger point though, as poorly expressed as it may be. The baseball/UFC analogy he makes is a good one, that while taking out all that stuff obviously doesn't eliminate the human error variable you're still eliminating as many as possible, and seeing that philosophy as flawed is a perfectly legitimate viewpoint. As said though it's a dumb thing to defend so I'll stop here. BOMBERMAN e: Endorph posted:If you trip, you trip. End of discussion. There's no risk reward from that, no interesting gameplay, you just got hosed because the RNG decided you should get hosed. As said though, that's life. Unlucky stuff like that happens all the time in sports and no one complains because it makes things interesting and the breaks even out. Monicro fucked around with this message at 02:31 on Jul 13, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:28
|
|
|
Bongo Bill posted:Events beyond the players' control, such as item drops and stage hazards, have a significant and generally positive impact on the risk/reward structure of Smash. However, tripping is bad. I agree.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:30
|
|
|
Monicro posted:I would argue that that's ignoring his larger point though, as poorly expressed as it may be. The baseball/UFC analogy is a good one, that while taking out all that stuff obviously doesn't eliminate the human error variable you're still eliminating as many as possible, and seeing that as flawed is a perfectly legitimate viewpoint. I don't really care what his "larger point" is, because ultimately he's still not actually doing any actual journalism like talking to the people he's speaking for. He's just saying his Gamer Feels about how he thinks people aren't playing right but hiding it in boring faux game design language.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:31
|
|
|
Monicro posted:As said though, that's life. Unlucky stuff like that happens all the time in sports and no one complains because it makes things interesting and the breaks even out.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:33
|
|
|
e: wait this post is dumb and combative so nevermind
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:34
|
|
|
ladyboy pancake posted:Come onnnnnnnn Chibi-Robo! This person has the correct opinion
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:35
|
|
|
well okay
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:36
|
|
|
LOCUST FART HELL posted:Bomberman you say? So was that game actually any good and just brought down by the horrible redesign, or was it terrible all around?
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:37
|
|
|
Cleretic posted:So was that game actually any good and just brought down by the horrible redesign, or was it terrible all around? It was bad in every area. The design just makes it legendarily bad.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:39
|
|
|
Cleretic posted:So was that game actually any good and just brought down by the horrible redesign, or was it terrible all around?
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:39
|
|
|
Imagine bomberman where everything controlled like poo poo, the visuals were way too loud, and placing bombs had a tangible delay. And then stop imaging that, and go play some Bomberman '94 on Wii Ware because we're all bums here and bought it, be real.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:41
|
|
|
Cleretic posted:So was that game actually any good and just brought down by the horrible redesign, or was it terrible all around? It had none of the neat innovations and new ideas from the SNES and PS1-era Bomberman games. There was basically nothing to it and it was super boring.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:41
|
|
|
Cleretic posted:So was that game actually any good and just brought down by the horrible redesign, or was it terrible all around? The main game was a 99-floor roguelike-like dungeon. No saves. No checkpoints. One life.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:42
|
|
|
Waffleman_ posted:The main game was a 99-floor roguelike-like dungeon.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:43
|
|
|
Waffleman_ posted:The main game was a 99-floor roguelike-like dungeon. This kind of sounds awesome though?
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:52
|
|
|
Sade posted:This kind of sounds awesome though? Yes but if you combine it with this: Countblanc posted:Imagine bomberman where everything controlled like poo poo, the visuals were way too loud, and placing bombs had a tangible delay. It's bad.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:53
|
|
|
Only thing I faintly recall is every time the girl bomberman(???) died there was this hellish screech. It was bad.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 02:58
|
|
|
LOCUST FART HELL posted:Bomberman you say? This was an actual design for Bomberman? What? I feel like I'm missing a terrible joke.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:03
|
|
|
Sire Oblivion posted:This was an actual design for Bomberman? What? I feel like I'm missing a terrible joke. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:04
|
|
|
That dude has been left hanging for too long, someone high five him
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:04
|
|
|
Sire Oblivion posted:This was an actual design for Bomberman? What? I feel like I'm missing a terrible joke. Google Bomberman: Act Zero, and despair.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:04
|
|
|
Bomberman Act Zero was pretty much based on the NES cover art and manual story. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:05
|
|
|
Rudoku posted:Impact! stage hazard. No no no. Impact is Goemon's Final Smash. He appears, does an attack, then changes the stage music for the rest of the match. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEE66AMzGNg
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:05
|
|
|
Sire Oblivion posted:This was an actual design for Bomberman? What? I feel like I'm missing a terrible joke. Yes, it was a joke. But the joke was on us. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:05
|
|
|
There was also a first person mode, but it was actually a third person mode behind the character.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:06
|
|
|
Waffleman_ posted:Bomberman Act Zero was pretty much based on the NES cover art and manual story. I had no idea Bomberman was actually just Samus.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:08
|
|
|
No, this can't be real. gently caress that's stupid.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:14
|
|
|
I hope you're all proud of yourselves
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:15
|
|
|
I had completely forgotten that this exists: So yeah, we should totally get Bomberman in Smash 4. His newcomer video can have him and Wario facing off. ...gently caress, I actually would really like to see this now.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:42
|
|
|
Going on a tangent, what has been everyone's favorite trailer/reveal so far? Mine's Little Mac. It's just so cool how it just builds up with the music and Mac's training. All classy. Second would be Pac-Man. Dang, really wish the trailer had been aired for a big audience. The yellow circle build up and the wakka sound would've made an auditorium go mad.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:48
|
|
|
It's still gotta be the reveal trailer + Mega Man. That poo poo was just the perfect storm of hype.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:55
|
|
|
Yeah, that first trailer was probably the best with it seeming like it was wrapping up and then jumping to the Mega Man portion.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:57
|
|
|
Either Megaman or Pac-Man. Pac-Man just exceeded all expectations.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:57
|
|
|
Calaveron posted:Going on a tangent, what has been everyone's favorite trailer/reveal so far? Mine's Little Mac. It's just so cool how it just builds up with the music and Mac's training. All classy. Pac-Man would have been great to see during a livestream or something, yeah. I'd have loved to see the response to that real-time. But like Waffleman said, the initial reveal of the game followed by Mega Man was kind of the big one-two punch that launched all this madness and it's still pretty exciting stuff. Everyone knew a Wii U version was coming but the 3DS stuff blind-sided everyone and then showing how good the game looks in HD was pretty amazing. Pac-Man's trailer has some really well done build-up to his reveal though. And great music. Palutena's trailer is the weakest of the bunch. The anime thing is kind of nice but it's very slow compared to the other reveals. She looks awesome in-game but it took way too long to get to the action. Love the banter at least. Rosalina's takes much less time to get to the reveal but still has a long buildup, it's Palutena's trailer done right in terms of pacing it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 11:40 |
|
|
In Act Zero, they decided to give the girl Bombermans (Bomberwomen?) jiggle physics.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2014 03:59
|
|
