|
They have a whole subforum for meetups. Sometimes in real life.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2014 12:50 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 00:39 |
|
The names of these covens are just too good. If I was trying to mock tv tropes I couldn't come up with things this absurd. -13-15 year old losers, i mean kids unite! -Covert Nightmare Fetishists! -Atheist/Anti-theist/Agnostic Troper Group -Those Who Are Fond of Fedoras -Those who hate fedoras (although this one got locked because "Nope. This will be a complaining thread and we don't want those.") -Auties, Aspies, and other CloudCuckooLanders! And the list goes on.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2014 13:07 |
|
Tracula posted:-Auties, Aspies It's Autists! Goddamn can tropers do nothing right!
|
# ? Jul 14, 2014 13:16 |
|
Samurai Quack posted:It's Autists! Goddamn can tropers do nothing right! Well, they can exist, but even that seems to be wrong. So I guess the only thing they can do right is fail at life. Because if they couldn't do that, then they'd be successful.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2014 13:56 |
|
Tracula posted:-Auties, Aspies, and other CloudCuckooLanders! Haha yes neuroatypical people are cloudcuckoolanders awesome, great. gently caress you TVTropes.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2014 15:12 |
|
WickedHate posted:Haha yes neuroatypical people are cloudcuckoolanders awesome, great. No, no, no, *wacky* Neurotypicals are cloudcuckoolanders. You know, for if you want all the glitz, glamor, and glory of being an Aspie, but the mean old doctor won't give you the diagnosis Can't he see you're just different from others and totally don't get other people???? And you're wacky?????
|
# ? Jul 14, 2014 15:52 |
|
Tracula posted:
This is actually real. Incredible.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2014 16:05 |
|
I remember some old photo of Eddie and Madrugada at some meetup way back.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2014 17:15 |
|
Well. Slowbeef has been playing Crimzon Clover (and he's so happy about it ), and was having trouble figuring out how to unlock the secret ship. I was curious as well, so I looked it up. First result on google. naturally, was TVTropes, with helpful tropes like.quote:Cap: Averted. You can score over 1 trillion in Unlimited Mode, but the counter won't stop going up. In 1.01, when this occurs, the game automatically switches over to World notation for score. Thank you, important literary resource TvTropes, for informing me when a game does not have a score cap.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2014 19:32 |
|
No Export for Youquote:None of the Alice Soft games will ever make it in the US due to their controversial nature. AliceSoft even blocked off their website to any and all foreigners. First entry on the Video games page. Nicely done Tropers, that might be your best anime rape game to paragraph ratio ever. quote:Sam and Max Hit the Road has never gotten another American re-release aside from the CD-ROM re-release in 1995 (and as a pack-in in an otherwise unrelated LucasArts game, Armed & Dangerous). However, it did get a 2007 re-release in Europe, the country in which the series is critically panned. Europe is a country. gently caress this, that is just brain shatteringly stupid. quote:No importing RapeLay for you! Despite being a rather under-the-radar sandbox-style 3D-ero (a.k.a. "Hentai") game from 2006, It was imported intentionally by several American feminist organizations specifically to be offended by it — groups that are now working with far right protesters in Japan to pressure the Japanese government to ban "Abuse Games". Amazon and other importer-friendly stores have banned the sale of the game, retail markets in Japan are working at pulling it from shelves, and even the maker has purged their website of all mention of it.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 11:31 |
|
I shouldn't be surprised, but the guy who wrote that really, really likes rapelay.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 11:36 |
|
I'm thinking the fact a ban on abuse games covers 40% or all ero games may be a poor reflection on said ero games rather than on ambiguous legal wording.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 11:42 |
|
One of the stupidest things about tropers is that the only reason they dislike Shintaro Ishihara is because of his opposition to pedophilic rape anime, of all things. Also, they think pornographic rape games are "a part of Japanese culture." Do they think pornography is a part of Western culture? Like, do they know what culture is? EDIT: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=14053106080A76099400&page=0 posted:Is it bad that my main characters do not fit into the Five Man Band trope? This is how TV Tropes teaches you to write. This is a writing resource. EDIT 2: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13761541380A04470300&page=0 posted:Writing a Proper Girls Night Out Episode... and Friendship Beep boop what is a woman? How does this being function? Also, a Skinship Grope is when, according to Tropers, women grope eachother's breasts as a sign of affection. Or, as they put it: TV Tropes: Skinship Grope posted:In a highly hierarchical society, communal bathing is seen as a great equalizing social event, healthy in establishing a close relationship with peers and family. I can safely guarantee that this does not happen at all outside of pornography. quote:And while this almost always works in anime, suggesting it in Real Life is not a good idea. Kids, Don't Try This at Home unless you're on really, really good terms with the other person. Only on TV Tropes is this warning necessary. All the examples bar three are from obscure anime or pornographic Japanese video games. Okay I don't know about the obscurity or the pornography, but like gently caress am I checking. It gets worse, boys and girls, because this Trope has a Real Life section. Skinship Grope: Real Life posted:Japanese schoolgirls, at least, really do seem to do this to one another on occasion. They also tend to glomp each other in more generally suggestive ways in public; they even call it sukinshippu ("skinship"). "I've never met a Japanese schoolgirl, but all my pornogrophy suggests that Japanese schoolgirls groping eachother is standard." This is TV Tropes after Google has forced it to clean up its act. Also, its notable that nobody on the thread that led me to this bullshit is calling out the OP on being a stupid gently caress who thinks that women casually grope eachother as a sign of friendship. MinistryofLard fucked around with this message at 12:28 on Jul 15, 2014 |
# ? Jul 15, 2014 11:54 |
|
MinistryofLard posted:One of the stupidest things about tropers is that the only reason they dislike Shintaro Ishihara is because of his opposition to pedophilic rape anime, of all things. If anything, the money's on them agreeing with his homophobia and anti-black racism and Japanese ultranationalism and a fuckton of the other unsavory views he has, but even then, being mad about him being a broken clock and thinking that lolicon is gross is definitely hating him for the wrong reason. Jerry Manderbilt fucked around with this message at 15:14 on Jul 15, 2014 |
# ? Jul 15, 2014 15:11 |
|
Jerry Manderbilt posted:If anything, the money's on them agreeing with his homophobia and anti-black racism and Japanese ultranationalism and a fuckton of the other unsavory views he has, but even then, being mad about him being a broken clock and thinking that lolicon is gross is definitely hating him for the wrong reason. Can we not do the "We imagine terrible things tropers might do instead of cataloguing hilarious things they do, in fact, do? quote:Kana: Little Sister (Kana ~Imouto~) is a visual novel depicting the story of 15-year-old Kana, a girl who suffers from a chronic life-threatening disease and her older brother, Takamichi (Taka), who supports her and cares for her. The game deals with the relationship between both siblings, which gets more and more intense as time progresses. There is a clear incestuous element later, but which goes far beyond mere physical attraction. Kana: Little Sister. You will cry. And masturbate. Mostly to underage girls.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 15:47 |
|
quote:what i do not understand is how girls always seem to manage to gather an armful of bought items. also, i guess they'd rather pillage than shop and would prefer weapons and accessories over clothes (this is practicalt, and simply subverts the usual "dresses, shoes, and diamonds" Schtick if you consider Death of the Author. What is this supposed to mean? Does this person somehow misunderstand Death of the Author more than the average troper?
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 16:46 |
|
Does anyone have a link to the article talking about some showrunner getting a bunch of poo poo on the internet for killing off a character but had it turn out to be only three people?
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 19:22 |
|
Destroy anime and arrest weeaboos/otakus. It's the only way to be sure.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 21:20 |
|
Ague Proof posted:What is this supposed to mean? Does this person somehow misunderstand Death of the Author more than the average troper? Death of the Author refers to a fandom or readership rejecting whatever intent the author states about a work. You remove the creator's views and biases in order to enjoy something you might otherwise not. A common example is enjoying the novel Ender's Game for its contributions to science fiction and its uncanny predictions with social media and strategy games, while ignoring the fact that the author Orson Scott Card is a racist homophobic rear end in a top hat who regularly donates money to anti gay collections. Tropers use Death of the Author to ignore whatever the author was actually trying to say and replacing it with their insane fan theories and headcanon.
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 03:21 |
|
Arcsquad12 posted:Death of the Author refers to a fandom or readership rejecting whatever intent the author states about a work. You remove the creator's views and biases in order to enjoy something you might otherwise not. A common example is enjoying the novel Ender's Game for its contributions to science fiction and its uncanny predictions with social media and strategy games, while ignoring the fact that the author Orson Scott Card is a racist homophobic rear end in a top hat who regularly donates money to anti gay collections. I know what it is. It's just that I can't even see how their botched misunderstanding applies to whatever he was talking about.
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 03:34 |
|
Arcsquad12 posted:A common example is enjoying the novel Ender's Game for its contributions to science fiction and its uncanny predictions with social media and strategy games, while ignoring the fact that the author Orson Scott Card is a racist homophobic rear end in a top hat who regularly donates money to anti gay collections. This has nothing to do with death of the author, and he certainly didn't predict games that already existed when the story was published. And saying it predicted social media is really a stretch.
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 04:42 |
|
Ninjasaurus posted:Destroy anime and arrest weeaboos/otakus. It's the only way to be sure. But that means destroying any chance of more JoJo. Do you really want to deprive the world of fabulous?
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 05:00 |
|
Death of the Author is a type of literary analysis that does not take the identity or intentions into account when examining the "meaning" of a work. Tvtropes has a great example on their page. quote:Subverted by Pablo Picasso who, when asked how to distinguish between his genuine works and the numerous fakes that were circulating, he answered simply, "If it's good, it's mine. If it's bad, it's a fake."noteMakes you wonder since Picasso said "Good artists copy, great artists steal."
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 06:11 |
|
Improbable Lobster posted:Death of the Author is a type of literary analysis that does not take the identity or intentions into account when examining the "meaning" of a work. Jesus Christ, that's loving stupid.
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 08:28 |
|
corn in the bible posted:Jesus Christ, that's loving stupid. It's not totally stupid, all the concept is really saying is that a reader's interpretation of the story can be as valid as an author's interpretation. Basically a story's meaning is created by the reader, not the author. For example, Tolkien frequently said that Lord of the Rings was not an allegory for WWII - and yet, the story reads pretty well as one. A person could easily support an argument that Lord of the Rings is a WWII allegory, even if it wasn't intended as one. Authors can also change their own views on what the book was about after it was written. If you take authorial intent to be the only legitimate reading, then how do you decide which of the author's interpretations is the "correct" one? It's a legitimate literary analysis technique, but it does need to be supported by what's in the book. Most people don't grasp that point and go straight to the "those two characters are snogging offscreen just because they talked to each other on one page I'm right because death of the author!"
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 09:11 |
|
I meant their example.
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 09:45 |
|
I agree, the Picasso anecdote is only really tangentially related to the idea of 'death of the author' and doesn't really illustrate the point at all. If tropers had demonstrated any actual writing skill, using a bad example to poorly illustrate a concept in literary analysis was some sort of meta-example of the concept would be a neat little "I Get It!" moment, but let's be realistic here: they used all that time they saved by just going "eh, good enough" to not write genre fiction and work on their anime boob charts.
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 17:35 |
|
The Death of the Author page doesn't allow examples, so instead the article itself is a bloated rambling mess with shoehorned-in not-really-examples because those obviously have to go somewhere
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 18:38 |
|
So my orson scott card example isn't really an example? Huh, my mistake. Actually now that I've thought about it some more, I think I do have a good example. The film Grave of the Fireflies is rather explicitly described by the director isao takahata as not being an anti war film. That hasn't stopped people outside of japan from seeing the film as one.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2014 18:57 |
Arcsquad12 posted:So my orson scott card example isn't really an example? Huh, my mistake. Actually now that I've thought about it some more, I think I do have a good example. Wait, it's not?
|
|
# ? Jul 17, 2014 19:05 |
watho posted:Wait, it's not? I'm vaguely remembering him saying something about how it was aimed at what he felt was a rather delinquent youth in Japan at the time it was made. Basically "stop bitching, you've no idea how good you've got it", though I could be misremembering.
|
|
# ? Jul 17, 2014 19:18 |
Regalingualius posted:I'm vaguely remembering him saying something about how it was aimed at what he felt was a rather delinquent youth in Japan at the time it was made. Basically "stop bitching, you've no idea how good you've got it", though I could be misremembering. Oh yeah, I got it mixed up. It's not an anti-war movie as it's a movie about how spoiled brats don't know how life was during the war or something.
|
|
# ? Jul 17, 2014 19:27 |
I've found that the most clear example of DotA in action is The Shining, which is basically about King's addictions destroying himself and his family, even though he had no idea it could be interpreted that way until someone read the book on release and asked him about it.
|
|
# ? Jul 17, 2014 19:27 |
So death of the author is just interpretations that weren't intentional?
|
|
# ? Jul 17, 2014 19:29 |
|
mr. stefan posted:I've found that the most clear example of DotA in action is The Shining, which is basically about King's addictions destroying himself and his family, even though he had no idea it could be interpreted that way until someone read the book on release and asked him about it. i agree, DotA is an addiction that destroys lives
|
# ? Jul 17, 2014 19:46 |
|
watho posted:So death of the author is just interpretations that weren't intentional? "Death of the Author" is the concept in literary (+cinema, etc.) critique that an interpretation of a work cannot be invalidated just by statements made by the author(s) of the work in question.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2014 20:54 |
|
Remember in high school literature and your teacher would propose these funny theories about the author's work and you'd sit there and think "This is stupid, the author just wrote about this thing"? DotA means no one gives a poo poo what the author meant, and that any interpretation is valid.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2014 20:58 |
|
Death of the Author is a tool that has been used constructively about 5% of the time and as an uncontrolled bullshit generator for the other 95. I'm pretty sure that it's also fallen out of the academic vogue over the past couple of decades because of this.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2014 21:05 |
|
Basically, for the purpose of criticism, the author died the moment he finished his work.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2014 21:06 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 00:39 |
|
Death of the author singlehandedly keeps English departments open.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2014 21:31 |