|
speaking of, i have a bunch of mail from 2001 where the character encoding got messed up at some migration or other. whats the easiest way to fix the encoding?
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 12:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 15:06 |
|
|
Google’s revenue for the quarter was $15.96 billion, an increase of 22 percent over the year-ago quarter. Net revenue, which excludes payments to the company’s advertising partners, was $12.71 billion, up from $11.1 billion last year. Analysts expected gross revenue of $15.6 billion. Net income in the second quarter rose nearly 6 percent to $3.42 billion, or $4.99 a share. Excluding the cost of stock options and the related tax benefits, Google’s profit was $6.08 a share. Analysts had expected $6.23 a share, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Shares of Google’s stock rose about 1 percent in after-hours trading to $589.25. Despite Google’s continuing mobile dilemma, its advertising competitors are still small in its rearview mirror. Google accounted for nearly 32 percent of online global ad spending in 2013, according to estimates from eMarketer. Facebook is in second place, accounting for nearly 6 percent of 2013’s $120.05 billion online global advertising market.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 14:47
|
|
|
which are the good seasons of the simpsons?
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 15:37
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:speaking of, i have a bunch of mail from 2001 where the character encoding got messed up at some migration or other. whats the easiest way to fix the encoding? Encode::Guess. this is not a joke, it really is close to your only option. if your codings got mangled that means you were sending non-ascii mail w/out mime. you're in a world of pain
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 15:37
|
|
|
Granbar posted:which are the good seasons of the simpsons? watch rick and morty
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 15:39
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:Encode::Guess. this is not a joke, it really is close to your only option. i meant more like, how do i actually do it. theyre all sitting around in a gmail account & in mail.app so i guess maybe i download them with Net::IMAP, feed them through that guesser & put them back up? ugh that seems like way more effort than im willing to put into it
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 15:44
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:i meant more like, how do i actually do it. theyre all sitting around in a gmail account & in mail.app so i guess maybe i download them with Net::IMAP, feed them through that guesser & put them back up? ugh that seems like way more effort than im willing to put into it use net::imap to download each one, guess its encoding, reformat as mime, and upload again. a lot of them will not survive the mime conversion 100% intact, but mostly-intact beats totally unreadable
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 16:28
|
|
|
theyre mostly readable as is, its basically just æøå that got messed up theyre probably macos roman mistakenly parsed as ascii or unicode Carthag Tuek fucked around with this message at 16:46 on Jul 18, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 16:44
|
|
|
Granbar posted:which are the good seasons of the simpsons? first eight some episodes from nine, i think
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 16:45
|
|
|
Granbar posted:hey can i export all my old gmail mail to my icloud mail in an easy manner super easy. open up your favorite non-web-based mail client. load both account on there. drag emails from one to the other. done.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 16:54
|
|
|
The Management posted:super easy. open up your favorite non-web-based mail client. load both account on there. drag emails from one to the other. done. ya this sole remaining use case for thunderbird
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 16:58
|
|
|
use imapfilter on a vps with good network connectivity it works really well for migrating accounts and you can code up custom rules if you want something fancier
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 17:33
|
|
|
Granbar posted:which are the good seasons of the simpsons? 3 to the first ep of 9, the latest seasons in this range being the peak
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 17:48
|
|
|
and its up and down from there, mostly just down down down down WACKY HOMER
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 17:48
|
|
|
poty posted:3 to the first ep of 9, the latest seasons in this range being the peak Lisa's Sax is the 3rd episode of season 9 and is easily one of the better episodes. It just follows the most hated episode ever
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 18:07
|
|
|
prefect posted:first eight they had an underappreciated second wind in like seasons 15-18 (to no small part because a number of the competitors that people left and started around season 9 had failed and they got some good writers back)
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 18:10
|
|
|
tractor fanatic posted:Lisa's Sax is the 3rd episode of season 9 and is easily one of the better episodes. It just follows the most hated episode ever agreed but you have to draw the line somewhere
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 18:23
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/davidbauer/status/490164619269660673 «Edward Snowden, do you use Google?» – «HAHAHAHAHA. No.» http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/jul/17/edward-snowden-video-interview … [8:30]
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 18:54
|
|
|
Granbar posted:which are the good seasons of the simpsons? seasons ~3 up through ~9, as mentioned also KOTEX GOD OF BLOOD posted:watch rick and morty
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 20:44
|
|
|
lol google's chief business officer has left for softbank chief business officer is almost as laffo as twitter's chief revenue officer
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2014 21:16
|
|
|
does twitter have such a position
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2014 00:27
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:does twitter have such a position yeah but it's hard to keep employees who have to sit upside down all day
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2014 00:56
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2014 01:30
|
|
|
cremnob posted:twitter's chief revenue officer hey this is just business realism. twitter has plenty of revenue. there's all kinds of revenue to manage and report on. pretty charts and graphs. armies of spreadsheets about revenue. what they lack is profit. tons of revenue but they operate at a loss. a chief financial officer would yell at them. so here's the new shiny position that denies financial gravity: a chief revenue officer who never pouts about their utter inability to earn a legitimate profit. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2014 06:31
|
|
|
how do i quote
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2014 07:12
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2014 09:19
|
|
|
the huge manatee
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2014 09:29
|
|
|
google, the company that answers those "wouldn't it be cool if..." questions. turns out answer is no most of the time.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2014 09:40
|
|
|
Google is promising to fix a bug in Chrome for Windows that has been draining laptop batteries for years. The problem was first reported in 2010, but a recent investigation by Forbes has bumped the issue to the top of Google’s Chrome bug report list. Chrome’s battery drain problem affects Windows users as Google sets a parameter for processor-intensive tasks much lower than Microsoft recommends. The result means laptop processors are waking up far more often than they should when Chrome is open on Windows and a webpage is idle. Internet Explorer and Firefox don't exhibit the same battery drain problem. http://www.theverge.com/2014/7/18/5914975/google-chrome-windows-laptop-battery-drain-fix
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2014 10:55
|
|
|
googlespurg disaster
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2014 11:51
|
|
|
Athletic Footjob posted:googlesperg disaster
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2014 13:00
|
|
|
Cardboard Box A posted:Google is promising to fix a bug in Chrome for Windows that has been draining laptop batteries for years. The problem was first reported in 2010, but a recent investigation by Forbes has bumped the issue to the top of Google’s Chrome bug report list. Chrome’s battery drain problem affects Windows users as Google sets a parameter for processor-intensive tasks much lower than Microsoft recommends. The result means laptop processors are waking up far more often than they should when Chrome is open on Windows and a webpage is idle. Internet Explorer and Firefox don't exhibit the same battery drain problem. so shaggar was right about chrome after all?
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2014 13:21
|
|
|
i thought shaggar was saying that the reason chrome is poo poo on mac os wasnt the fault of google for being bad programmers
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2014 13:28
|
|
|
Cardboard Box A posted:Google is promising to fix a bug in Chrome for Windows that has been draining laptop batteries for years. The problem was first reported in 2010, but a recent investigation by Forbes has bumped the issue to the top of Google’s Chrome bug report list. Chrome’s battery drain problem affects Windows users as Google sets a parameter for processor-intensive tasks much lower than Microsoft recommends. The result means laptop processors are waking up far more often than they should when Chrome is open on Windows and a webpage is idle. Internet Explorer and Firefox don't exhibit the same battery drain problem. see, forbes isn't completely worthless after all
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2014 13:42
|
|
|
known but completely ignored for four years, only acted on when it hits mainstream news. sounds about right.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2014 14:26
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:known but completely ignored for four years, only acted on when it hits mainstream news. pretty much
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2014 14:36
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:i thought shaggar was saying that the reason chrome is poo poo on mac os wasnt the fault of google for being bad programmers its poo poo everywhere because webkit is poo poo. the difference between chrome and safari is the multithreading hack in chrome that eats cpu/battery
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2014 15:40
|
|
|
the best browsers are safari and ie on their respective platforms
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2014 17:39
|
|
|
what about on linux
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2014 19:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 15:06 |
|
|
why would you want to browse websites on a server?
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2014 19:18
|
|