|
bisticles posted:I feel like they'd all have their place in the correct context. An alternating grey and lighter-grey forum doesn't always make the best frame for portraits I've seen in here, but that doesn't mean they aren't exactly what's needed for a particular project. Yeah, I see what everyone means with the hands. Directing people is hard for me; I never can really think of what I want them to do; and with quick grabs, which many of these are, I also feel like I'm stealing someone's time. I freeze up and just take a few frames. I need to get over that. The gelled lights aren't diffused, but they're largeish hotlights, so a bigger source than one mgiht expect. The minimum amount of fill and tiny catchlights were provided by a hotshoe mini LED bank. I'm curious to hear what people mean by the 'flat' tones in the first black and white. What's making it flat? I usually hear that term applied to frontal light, where dimension is hard to see. Is it because the light is so diffused (open shade)?
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 16:03 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 09:24 |
|
alkanphel posted:
Maybe I'm missing something, why is he so underexposed?
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 16:17 |
|
thetzar posted:Yeah, I see what everyone means with the hands. Directing people is hard for me; I never can really think of what I want them to do; and with quick grabs, which many of these are, I also feel like I'm stealing someone's time. I freeze up and just take a few frames. I need to get over that. Part of it is the diffusion, but I think more people are looking at the relative lack of contrast in the image which to me has to do with what you did in post (unless this is Flickr loving with the black point of the image).
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 16:46 |
|
triplexpac posted:Maybe I'm missing something, why is he so underexposed? Not sure either, but at least nobody can say "the background is blown out and it ruins the pic!"
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 17:36 |
|
The guy is actually properly exposed, he is that dim in real life.
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 18:54 |
|
Subyng posted:The guy is actually properly exposed, he is that dim in real life. drat sorry, I didn't mean to exposure shame
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 20:31 |
|
triplexpac posted:drat sorry, I didn't mean to exposure shame Would you F-ng stop already.
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 20:40 |
|
Candid portrait photography (with manual focus) is hard widunder fucked around with this message at 21:13 on Jul 29, 2014 |
# ? Jul 29, 2014 21:04 |
|
widunder posted:Candid portrait photography (with manual focus) is hard God, those are sharp as gently caress. Well done. What body is that?
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 21:36 |
|
Neowyrm posted:God, those are sharp as gently caress. Well done. What body is that?
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 22:09 |
|
widunder posted:Candid portrait photography (with manual focus) is hard This one is beauty. Since I got the Fuji X-T1 I've been loving adapting FD lenses. widunder posted:An old Canon FD 50mm adapted to X-E1. A 50mm (f/3.5 macro, though) is next on the list. Rot fucked around with this message at 23:32 on Jul 29, 2014 |
# ? Jul 29, 2014 22:24 |
|
VendaGoat posted:Would you F-ng stop already. Ugh, I shuttered at that one.
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 22:39 |
|
Subyng posted:Ugh, I shuttered at that one. I SO TIRED OF ALL DEES JOKES
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 22:43 |
|
There's no need to flip out over it.
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 23:02 |
|
I hate all of you so much.
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 23:19 |
|
Well it really was that dim at 7 in the morning, and sadly I can't push the shadows much with Provia.
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 23:42 |
|
SoundMonkey posted:I hate all of you so much. I guess you aren't Leicing these puns? In my opinion they're the highlight of this thread. But I guess some would consider such posts to just be noise. Subyng fucked around with this message at 01:38 on Jul 30, 2014 |
# ? Jul 30, 2014 01:36 |
|
Subyng posted:I guess you aren't Leicing these puns? In my opinion they're the highlight of this thread. But I guess some would consider such posts to just be noise. Please do not post.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2014 11:02 |
|
1st AD posted:Part of it is the diffusion, but I think more people are looking at the relative lack of contrast in the image which to me has to do with what you did in post (unless this is Flickr loving with the black point of the image). Gotcha. Here's what the image looks like straight from the raw, for anyone who's curious: http://imgur.com/nxDWz7B This one is entirely unrelated: under the wave by thetzar, on Flickr
|
# ? Jul 30, 2014 13:47 |
|
thetzar posted:Gotcha. Here's what the image looks like straight from the raw, for anyone who's curious: http://imgur.com/nxDWz7B It's a nice photo. I kind of like it straight from the camera.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2014 14:35 |
|
ISO a good pun. Contact me if you have one.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2014 18:03 |
|
I'll get you back to camera pun chat in a flash, but first, here's something I did last night with another local photographer. Just trying out some new lighting and processing options.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2014 20:51 |
|
bisticles posted:I'll get you back to camera pun chat in a flash, but first, here's something I did last night with another local photographer. Just trying out some new lighting and processing options. Would you share your lighting setup? There's something... funny happening with that strap of light around his chin.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2014 20:56 |
|
Look at the catchlights and shadows from the glasses. I think it's just a bit of an awkward double chin.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2014 01:51 |
|
Lighting was a gridded 22" silver beauty dish 3' out and just high enough to shoot under, and another strobe with a 9" reflector and 15° grid about 12' back. Background is just gelled speedlites. I think what you're seeing is light bouncing off of his upper chest, at least on the left side of the image. On the right, it's the rimlight. It looks smoother in the native file, imgur strikes again on subtle details.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2014 14:40 |
|
Untitled by 8th-samurai, on Flickr
|
# ? Jul 31, 2014 16:59 |
|
A couple recent shots: Kehli by kschruder, on Flickr Vicky by kschruder, on Flickr
|
# ? Jul 31, 2014 17:47 |
|
triplexpac posted:Vicky by kschruder, on Flickr This one feels really weird, it's oddly unbalanced on the left.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2014 18:30 |
|
It's weird because that girl is freakishly skinny.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2014 18:40 |
|
More hand in face action
|
# ? Jul 31, 2014 19:00 |
|
widunder posted:More hand in face action Try to catch him before he's smoked it down to the filter next time, it wasn't even obvious it was a cigarette in the thumbnail.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2014 00:35 |
|
widunder posted:More hand in face action RIP in peace Phillip Seymour Hoffman. (I like it)
|
# ? Aug 1, 2014 23:11 |
|
SoundMonkey posted:Try to catch him before he's smoked it down to the filter next time, it wasn't even obvious it was a cigarette in the thumbnail. He hasn't smoked it to the filter, it's just foreshortening.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2014 01:04 |
|
I saw a co-worker sitting like this during a meeting, giving someone this face. I asked her to duplicate the look after the meeting was over. Untitled by thetzar, on Flickr
|
# ? Aug 2, 2014 13:22 |
|
thetzar posted:I saw a co-worker sitting like this during a meeting, giving someone this face. I asked her to duplicate the look after the meeting was over. Shoes/bare feet make it. Good stuff.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2014 13:41 |
|
I'm THIS close to purchasing an oliphant backdrop for my portraiture. What does everyone think about them? Overrated? Worth it? You're crazy somnambulist? I want cake? Look how beautiful this isssss I dunno what to do
|
# ? Aug 3, 2014 04:19 |
|
somnambulist posted:I'm THIS close to purchasing an oliphant backdrop for my portraiture. What does everyone think about them? Overrated? Worth it? You're crazy somnambulist? I want cake? holy poo poo that's nice
|
# ? Aug 3, 2014 04:22 |
|
It's between that one and something like this I wish they were cheaper or I'd get both. They make amazing poo poo. somnambulist fucked around with this message at 04:30 on Aug 3, 2014 |
# ? Aug 3, 2014 04:27 |
|
somnambulist posted:It's between that one and something like this If it were me I'd go with the first one.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2014 04:30 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 09:24 |
|
SoundMonkey posted:If it were me I'd go with the first one. I linked the wrong one, what do you think of the one i just edited?
|
# ? Aug 3, 2014 04:30 |