Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
WickedHate
Aug 1, 2013

by Lowtax
This discussion keeps dragging on, and on, and on. You say conversations go rushing by, but it seems so slow to me.

WickedHate fucked around with this message at 01:04 on Aug 9, 2014

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

Teenage Fansub posted:

Seriously. 70% of episodes of The X-Files or Fringe (comparing as agents-against-monsters-of-the-week things) tower completely over this issue of Grayson in terms of dark tone and gross situations.

We do not need to worry about it.

Yeah but those are shows that have explicit horror elements, X-Files moreso than Fringe. There's a reason for them to have horrible poo poo in them.

Teenage Fansub
Jan 28, 2006

Based on two issues, I'd say Grayson does too. It's not allowed?

Literally The Worst posted:

Including a cannibal speedster does not make your super spy book a horror story.

No but it gives it horror elements, like the first issue did with the guy inflating and exploding with purple energy and the superhero organs Syral face guy keeps in jars.

In terms of actual tone, it's really one of the lighter comics.

Teenage Fansub fucked around with this message at 01:28 on Aug 9, 2014

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

Teenage Fansub posted:

Based on two issues, I'd say Grayson does too. It's not allowed?

Including a cannibal speedster does not make your super spy book a horror story. Also: It's a bad comic.

What does her being a cannibal actually add to the comic besides a quick "Oh, sick" moment?

lotus circle
Dec 25, 2012

Jushure Iburu
So don't worry
This discussion needs to die already because it's just going in complete circles at this point.

The point of the scenario was just to show the difference between Helena and Dick. Dick wanted to turn her in, Helena wanted to use her. There's nothing else to that scene other than highlighting the difference between their morals and methods when dealing with this threat. The speedster is a plot device to that end.

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!
Thanks for pointing out the obvious chief.

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747
Here's a discussion point: Tim Seely sucks. He writes bad comics. Grayson is no different.

SomeJazzyRat
Nov 2, 2012

Hmmm...
To thrown in my 2ยข, there is a very distinct difference between merely being grim and full on grimdark. For the most part it whether the thematic philosophy behind the story is either 'challenge and oppose the ideals of the hero' or 'throw hosed up poo poo at them to show how horrible it is, cue resolution' (e.g. the Geoff Johns school of event writing).

As for Grayson, I have not read it, and what little I know comes from the bickering in this thread. That said, from what it sounds like the story comes from the 'oppose the ideals' philosophy, but the content is inspired by the 'hosed up poo poo' line of writing. So while the content contained within may be objectionable, the actual comic could be less grimdark than expected. However, to repeat myself, I have not read the comic and this is not a for-certain judgement.

Aphrodite
Jun 27, 2006

I don't know what you're all so angry about, this is just Sharknado taken to its logical superhero extreme.

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

Aphrodite posted:

I don't know what you're all so angry about, this is just Sharknado taken to its logical superhero extreme.

So it's deliberately bad because it's easier to cash in on the gimmick of being poo poo than it is to make an original story and fail on your own merits?

Dark_Tzitzimine
Oct 9, 2012

by R. Guyovich

Literally The Worst posted:

So it's deliberately bad because it's easier to cash in on the gimmick of being poo poo than it is to make an original story and fail on your own merits?

Is pretty obvious that you've already made your mind and nothing will make you change it (and you guys said I was being unreasonable with my criticism towards Tynion) but I want to clarify something about Grayson.


Aphrodite posted:

I don't know what you're all so angry about, this is just Sharknado taken to its logical superhero extreme.

Is not even that, Seeley and King are just taking all the concepts introduced by Morrison and taking them to their logical extreme. The bit about a meta-enhanced-stomach turning someone into a cannibal speedster isn't grittier than the Heretic being born from a whale, Leviathan serving human meat to crime bosses or the Heretic himself.

Seeley and King Spyral isn't funcionally different to what we saw at the end of Inc. with the only differences being Kate Kane absence and Mr. Minos as the head of Spyral. The Otto Netz daughter is Spyral chief scientist/doctor, their tech is the mix of technobabble and mind fuckery so common on Morrison's Batman stories and they clearly building towards something so is way too soon to say that they're being gritty just because.

I'm honestly surprised at this forum reaction towards Grayson since Morrison is really well regarded here and that fact Seeley and King are taking Morrison concepts and doing something organic with them is always the highlight on every review I've seen.

ImpAtom
May 24, 2007

Very few people can do Morrison as well as Morrison can. Simply going "well, they're trying to be Morrison" doesn't make people like it. I actually read a friend's copy of the book and it honestly isn't very good and not even remotely Morrisonesque so I'm not sure where you're getting that..

Dark_Tzitzimine
Oct 9, 2012

by R. Guyovich

ImpAtom posted:

Very few people can do Morrison as well as Morrison can. Simply going "well, they're trying to be Morrison" doesn't make people like it. I actually read a friend's copy of the book and it honestly isn't very good and not even remotely Morrisonesque so I'm not sure where you're getting that..

Well I'm not Morrison biggest fan (actually I didn't like Inc at all) so my perspective is a little skewed but is pretty clear that Seeley has an honest affection for his work and wants to follow on his ideas.

In any case, I'm enjoying Grayson way more than Eternal's bullshit.

ImpAtom
May 24, 2007

Dark_Tzitzimine posted:

Well I'm not Morrison biggest fan (actually I didn't like Inc at all) so my perspective is a little skewed but is pretty clear that Seeley has an honest affection for his work and wants to follow on his ideas.

In any case, I'm enjoying Grayson way more than Eternal's bullshit.

That's some faint praise there!

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

Dark_Tzitzimine posted:

Is pretty obvious that you've already made your mind and nothing will make you change it

Some rich poo poo coming from you.

Aphrodite
Jun 27, 2006

Literally The Worst posted:

So it's deliberately bad because it's easier to cash in on the gimmick of being poo poo than it is to make an original story and fail on your own merits?

Well I was just talking about something that moves fast, makes a lot of wind and eats people. But yeah that might work too.

Teenage Fansub
Jan 28, 2006

ImpAtom posted:

not even remotely Morrisonesque so I'm not sure where you're getting that..

The Hood, Spyral, the girl's school. It's quite literally picking up on Batman Incorporated.
e: I dunno if there's a goal to be Morrisony beyond playing in a lot of the concepts he left. I'd say some horror/fun vibe is carried.

So, anyone read the end of Lemire's Green Arrow? ANY OTHER BOOK!!

Teenage Fansub fucked around with this message at 06:44 on Aug 9, 2014

ImpAtom
May 24, 2007

Teenage Fansub posted:

The Hood, Spyral, the girl's school. It's quite literally picking up on Batman Incorportated.


So, anyone read the end of Lemire's Green Arrow? ANY OTHER BOOK!!

Yes, it is picking up the things but it isn't writing them the same way.

Dash Magnum
Jul 25, 2007

That's no moon...
It's a Face Station!

ImpAtom posted:

You're making a crazy disingenuous argument here. There's a real significant difference between "lighthearted character is murdered and retconned-raped by another character usually portrayed as lighthearted" and "an evil amusement park run by an evil god."

It isn't carrying my logic out to its conclusion at all unless you ignore the actual context of the characters involved.

As for why this is worse: Because there is no context in which it makes sense. It is putting cannibalism into a situation to make it more grim and dramatic instead of because it makes sense even via comic book logic. Wally West needed to eat a lot of calories too but he never took chunks out of his supervillains. There are a lot of ways you could portray a super-speedster as horrific without her taking a bite of Dick Grayson's arm.

Hey, if I ever gave you the impression that I think Identity Crisis isn't Grimdark, then I'm sincerely sorry, because that's the opposite of what I think. Like I said before, Identity Crisis was Meltzer trying to fix the "silly" DC universe by making it more "mature". That poo poo is dumb as it gets.

(Wait, aren't you the guy who was saying earlier that Identity Crisis wasn't trying to be edgy and cool with all of it's nonsense? What the hell are you even trying to say then?)

My point is if you're going to call a bad guy cannibal grimdark, then the word starts to lose it's meaning. I mean, sure, we could sit here and argue all night whether or not it makes sense, or whether or not she could have eaten something other than people to charge her powers, but I think it misses the point that, outside of a starvation situation, most cannibals are not good people. Again you're right, Wally West wouldn't eat people; he's a good guy. This new person? The story gives every impression they're of highly dubious morality. The last thing you see her do is compliment a mad scientist on their work.

Maybe that isn't enough context to make it sit right with you, but it seems fairly evident to me that a potential new villain is being set up. Maybe not. Maybe nothing more will come of it, and it'll be a dumb one-off thing with no pay-off. It just doesn't seem like enough to make me jump on the Grimdark Bandwagon.

Your argument just seems to boil down to: a really bad person did a really bad thing, but they could have not done the bad thing, therefore grimdark.

Dash Magnum fucked around with this message at 08:23 on Aug 9, 2014

AFoolAndHisMoney
Aug 13, 2013

Teenage Fansub posted:


So, anyone read the end of Lemire's Green Arrow? ANY OTHER BOOK!!

I'm really sad to see it end as it was easily one of my favourite DC books behind only Swamp Thing and Wonder Woman. I thought it was a little rushed and slightly anticlimactic in the end but it was a solid story with some cool rogues that I'd love to see Ollie tangle with more often- plus Emiko is the best sidekick and basically does Damian's shtick way better quite frankly. I hope the Future's End issue serves as a nice coda to the character.

I just hope the Arrow writers don't poo poo the bed considering their usual track record with comics. I like Arrow but it still has plenty of issues and even at its peak wasn't nearly as well written as Lemire's run. Also Daniel Sampere will be a poor replacement to Sorrentino's amazing art.

Edge & Christian
May 20, 2001

Earth-1145 is truly the best!
A world of singing, magic frogs,
high adventure, no shitposters

Dash Magnum posted:

My point is if you're going to call a bad guy cannibal grimdark, then the word starts to lose it's meaning. I mean, sure, we could sit here and argue all night whether or not it makes sense, or whether or not she could have eaten something other than people to charge her powers, but I think it misses the point that, outside of a starvation situation, most cannibals are not good people. Again you're right, Wally West wouldn't eat people; he's a good guy. This new person? The story gives every impression they're of highly dubious morality. The last thing you see her do is compliment a mad scientist on their work.

Maybe that isn't enough context to make it sit right with you, but it seems fairly evident to me that a potential new villain is being set up. Maybe not. Maybe nothing more will come of it, and it'll be a dumb one-off thing with no pay-off. It just doesn't seem like enough to make me jump on the Grimdark Bandwagon.

Your argument just seems to boil down to: a really bad person did a really bad thing, but they could have not done the bad thing, therefore grimdark.
I don't know, cannibalism (especially like at the point where you show a person eating a person) is pretty straight-up gross. "Grimdark" is a stupid phrase and I hate reading it so I'm going to use gross as a substitute.

Darkseid wanting to enslave the entire human race and building a torture-park? Super evil, but not very gross.
A supervillain wanting to enslave a single person and being shown cutting off their fingers or something on-panel? Evil on a smaller scale, but SUPER gross.

Doctor Doom could order the execution of a thousand dissidents and we could see some corpses covered by blankets and it would be less gross than one panel of the Blob (or Sabretooth or Killer Croc or whoever else they decide are cannibals) eating a human being.

There's also a slight corollary that bothers me in modern comics (especially modern DC comics) that I guess you could call "in for a penny, in for a pound." Obviously action genre stories need bad guys. But for decades in superhero comics you had different scales of bad guys. Some were just thieves or mercenaries, some were soldiers or hired killers, some had very specific goals for revenge or otherwise. Some wanted to rule their neighborhood or city or country or world, and a very small portion wanted to destroy the world.

But at some point a lot of superhero comics started to operate on the assumption that I mean, they're bad guys, so obviously once you make the decision to rob a bank, you're fully prepared to murder a bunch of guards and then try to track down and murder the family of the superhero who thwarted your bank robbery, and then kill the prison guards and break free and murder everyone in the diner you stumbled into, then set up a bomb to try to blow up the hospital to effect your escape, then drop a bomb on a neighboring city, then sign up for a crew who plan to wipe out 99% of humanity. I mean, they're all bad guys things, right? You're probably cool with rape and cannibalism and child molestation too, I mean, you're BAD GUYS. That is super gross.

When Darkseid, God of Evil, does epic acts of evil, that's a proper sense of scale. When a literal Evil Empire in Star Wars decides to wipe out entire planets, that's a proper sense of scale. When a henchman bumps into the Penguin accidentally and in retaliation Penguin orders the drugging and raping and murdering of his entire extended family and frames him for the crime, that's gross.

Madkal
Feb 11, 2008

Fallen Rib
I actually read the Grayson comic and I liked it. There were light hearted moments in it (especially between Dick and Bruce at the end) and I am getting the feeling that the vibe is going for some 60's psychedelic spy vibe while keeping it with a darker edge. The whole Spyral and T.H.E.Y definitely feels almost like a spy/secret organisation parody.
I know people (who have actually read the book) complained about the book feeling too much like the first one, but I kind of like the idea of Grayson hunting down super powers while working on a bigger mystery. It feels very much like watching a tv show format in that regard.
As for Green Arrow, I am still trade waiting so seeing tha the second trade of Lemire's hasn't come out yet, I will have an opinion of the ending of the comic somewhere around the year 2018.

horsepeen
Sep 21, 2010

Christian Financial Adviser
Have we seen Shazam in Futures End yet? I was thinking maybe he's the Masked Superman, based on the cover for #22 in Oct.

http://i.imgur.com/faIF5UM.jpg

My other theory is that he's Val-Zod left over from whatever the Earth-2 War was.

Wendell
May 11, 2003

I just skimmed through Wonder Woman #33 again and that last page gave me chills. What a great loving book.

SomeJazzyRat
Nov 2, 2012

Hmmm...
Well this is a thing.

http://comicsalliance.com/gotham-by-midnight-ray-fawkes-ben-templesmith-dc-batman-mark-doyle/



Another Bat-series, Gotham By Midnight by writer Ray Fawkes and artist Ben Templesmith. Seems to be Gotham Central Dark. While I haven't read any of Fawkes' work, Templesmith working on a Gotham horror book has my interest peaked.

Was Taters
Jul 30, 2004

Here comes a regular
You'll find people discussing it over in the Bat thread.

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

SomeJazzyRat posted:

Well this is a thing.

http://comicsalliance.com/gotham-by-midnight-ray-fawkes-ben-templesmith-dc-batman-mark-doyle/



Another Bat-series, Gotham By Midnight by writer Ray Fawkes and artist Ben Templesmith. Seems to be Gotham Central Dark. While I haven't read any of Fawkes' work, Templesmith working on a Gotham horror book has my interest peaked.

This actually sounds cool and am actually excited for this one

Synthbuttrange
May 6, 2007

Neat. But uh, I guess the black dude was never the Spectre in nu52?

Dark_Tzitzimine
Oct 9, 2012

by R. Guyovich
Venditti and Jensen have just throw into the trash another great thing left by Johns...god loving dammit. At least Doomed continues to be great.

Endless Mike
Aug 13, 2003



The garbage is generally where Johns stuff should go. Maybe the toilet.

Senor Candle
Nov 5, 2008

Endless Mike posted:

The garbage is generally where Johns stuff should go. Maybe the toilet.

Come on now like half of his stuff is super good.

Unmature
May 9, 2008
Can someone tell my why everyone in the New52 is so goddamn shiny? Every page I see is covered in highlights and glare off costumes.

StumblyWumbly
Sep 12, 2007

Batmanticore!

Unmature posted:

Can someone tell my why everyone in the New52 is so goddamn shiny? Every page I see is covered in highlights and glare off costumes.

DC house style. They're starting to get more independent artists, look for Gotham Academy and the new Batgirl to see different art

MonsieurChoc
Oct 12, 2013

Every species can smell its own extinction.

Senor Candle posted:

Come on now like half of his stuff is super good.

Every time a new Johns comic is born, the gods toss the coin in the air and the world holds its breath to see how it will land.

Shameless
Dec 22, 2004

We're all so ugly and stupid and doomed.
Multiversity preview and holy crap this looks good

http://www.wired.com/2014/08/grant-morrison-multiversity-dc/#slide-id-1401261

Wachter
Mar 23, 2007

You and whose knees?

Oh my god. Oh my GOD. It's Final Crisis 2. :aaaaa:

Waterhaul
Nov 5, 2005


it was a nice post,
you shouldn't have signed it.



It's gonna be some good stuff. :hellyeah:

Rhyno
Mar 22, 2003
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

Dark_Tzitzimine posted:

Venditti and Jensen have just throw into the trash another great thing left by Johns...god loving dammit. At least Doomed continues to be great.

What? John and Fatality? Wasn't that all Tomasi?

Jiro
Jan 13, 2004

Senor Candle posted:

Come on now like half of his stuff is super good.

You could have probably said that like four years ago, now its more like a third or a fourth.

Also holy poo poo Multiversity looks to be super awesome, like the super weird parts of Morrison's Animal Man awesome.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Was Taters
Jul 30, 2004

Here comes a regular

Wachter posted:

Oh my god. Oh my GOD. It's Final Crisis 2. :aaaaa:

:negative:

  • Locked thread