Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Fried Chicken
Jan 9, 2011

Don't fry me, I'm no chicken!

Darth Walrus posted:

I think we've seen airbenders using anime-style 'razor wind' on inanimate objects before. So this wasn't even the fastest and most efficient way to kill someone with air.

yeah, Aang did it a bunch, and Zaheer did it to a barrel of water when they were breaking Ming-Hua out of prison

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Oh Snapple!
Dec 27, 2005

BrianWilly posted:

Wasn't there an entire episode where Tarrlok systematically oppressed non-benders? The Equalist perspective clearly deserved more attention in general, but I honestly had no problems with any of Book 1's narrative setup until at least the ninth or tenth episode.

The problem is that we only see this in response to the Equalists. We don't actually see anything that might have lead people to be sympathetic to the Equalist cause before then that could have served as reasoning for their creation. With the way poo poo ends, it's basically treated as if Amon just had a spell over everyone involved.

BrianWilly
Apr 24, 2007

There is no homosexual terrorist Johnny Silverhand
I agree; I think everyone kept hoping that would be explored at some point in those last three episodes of Book 1 -- because how could you possibly set up this particular story and not explore that? -- and to our great sorrow it just ended while brushing that (and a whole lot of other elements) aside.

I can't see Book 3 falling into the same hole because there's nothing quite as equally, pressingly important that needs to be addressed before it ends...but there's just this slight worrying sense of them having written themselves into an immaculate, intricate, incredibly well-crafted conflict of a corner...now how the heck are they gonna write themselves out of it?

ImpAtom
May 24, 2007

It's gonna be a deus ex machina. It's always a deus ex mechina, even in the original series. It just depends on how big of one it is.

X_Toad
Apr 2, 2011

BrianWilly posted:

I can't see Book 3 falling into the same hole because there's nothing quite as equally, pressingly important that needs to be addressed before it ends...but there's just this slight worrying sense of them having written themselves into an immaculate, intricate, incredibly well-crafted conflict of a corner...now how the heck are they gonna write themselves out of it?
I don't know, unlike in Book 1 and Book 2, I find the conflict in Book 3 to be quite easy to solve : get rid of Zaheer. His refusal to get into the light and take leadership of the larger revolution means that if he's taken out, there won't be a large body of supporters ready to fight for his ideals and goals. Compare that to Amon, who served a goal shared by thousands of other people, and Unalaq, who seemed to be, for some reason, rather popular in the Northern Water Tribe.

Resolving the situation in Ba Sing Se is important, but feels clearly separated from Zaheer.

Jackard
Oct 28, 2007

We Have A Bow And We Wish To Use It

ImpAtom posted:

It's gonna be a deus ex machina. It's always a deus ex mechina, even in the original series. It just depends on how big of one it is.
Bolin Learns Melt-albending

hiddenriverninja
May 10, 2013

life is locomotion
keep moving
trust that you'll find your way

I don't know how I would feel if lavabending ability came from having two earthbending and firebending parents.

On one hand, it makes sense that the secondary element would still have some influence on a person's bending, even passively.

On the other, it reeks of the whole "born more special" trope I dislike.

ImpAtom
May 24, 2007

hiddenriverninja posted:

I don't know how I would feel if lavabending ability came from having two earthbending and firebending parents.

On one hand, it makes sense that the secondary element would still have some influence on a person's bending, even passively.

On the other, it reeks of the whole "born more special" trope I dislike.

Well, to be honestly, Avatar is literally nothing but Born More Special, for good or ill. The Avatar themselves is born the most specialist of all but benders are born more special than non-benders. It's kind of the Harry Potter problem where an entire class of people just sort of are legitimately better.

Nihilarian
Oct 2, 2013


hiddenriverninja posted:

I don't know how I would feel if lavabending ability came from having two earthbending and firebending parents.

On one hand, it makes sense that the secondary element would still have some influence on a person's bending, even passively.

On the other, it reeks of the whole "born more special" trope I dislike.
If there's a link, I'm hoping it's a thematic link and not a bloodline link. Any earthbender can learn lavabending, but Bolin learns it because it reminds him of his mom or something.

SpiderHyphenMan
Apr 1, 2010

by Fluffdaddy

hiddenriverninja posted:

I don't know how I would feel if lavabending ability came from having two earthbending and firebending parents.

On one hand, it makes sense that the secondary element would still have some influence on a person's bending, even passively.

On the other, it reeks of the whole "born more special" trope I dislike.
I agree, it's stupid. Which is why it's better to just look at it as a high level Earthbending technique that few have the ability or ingenuity to pull off.

Now, thinking about Zaheer and what he's done, I find myself going back to a conversation between Tenzin and Korra from the first episode of the season

quote:

Korra: Did I ruin everything by leaving the spirit portals open?

Tenzin: You didn't ruin anything. You did what you thought was best for the World, and now things have changed. Change can be good or bad. Depending on your point of view.

Korra: I know the people's point of view. It's bad.

Tenzin: You're not the President, Korra. Your job isn't to fix the daily problems of every person in Republic City. Your responsibility is to bring balance to the entire World. And that means no matter what you do, some people are not going to be happy about it.

Korra: Great.

Tenzin: In the other hand, some people will be very happy. Like me. What you did during Harmonic Convergence may have brought back the Air Nation. And that can only be good for restoring balance. That is the act of a great Avatar.

Korra: It's scary. I have all this power and all these people depending on me, but I don't know what I'm supposed to be doing half the time. It seems like I should be... wiser.

Tenzin: True wisdom begins when we accept things as they are. You started a new age, Korra. There's no going back to the past.
Really, the same dilemma is happening with Zaheer. He's doing what he thinks is best for the world, and now Ba Sing Se has changed forever. And even though right now there are rioters and looters, the simple fact is that the Earth Queen is no longer in power, and that can only be good. And with Zaheer's belief that his mission is to bring balance to the world, comes his knowledge that means that no matter what he does, some people are going to hate him.
The key difference between Zaheer and Korra is that nothing gives Zaheer pause. He believes fully in everything he does. His ideology cannot fail, it can only be failed.

I am desperately hoping for a Zaheer/Tenzin fight/debate.

MatildaTheHun
Aug 31, 2011

here's the thing donovan, I'm always hungry

ImpAtom posted:

Well, to be honestly, Avatar is literally nothing but Born More Special, for good or ill. The Avatar themselves is born the most specialist of all but benders are born more special than non-benders. It's kind of the Harry Potter problem where an entire class of people just sort of are legitimately better.

Again, the biggest problem of Season 1 is that I sympathized with the Equalists. Could you imagine being some farmer that moved to the city for a job but can't get one because you aren't a bender?

hiddenriverninja
May 10, 2013

life is locomotion
keep moving
trust that you'll find your way

TheModernAmerican posted:

Again, the biggest problem of Season 1 is that I sympathized with the Equalists. Could you imagine being some farmer that moved to the city for a job but can't get one because you aren't a bender?

You can always sell cabbages!

Xelkelvos
Dec 19, 2012

SpiderHyphenMan posted:

I am desperately hoping for a Zaheer/Tenzin fight/debate.

I can just picture them quoting philosophy in between and during strikes and gales

Sydin
Oct 29, 2011

Another spring commute

SpiderHyphenMan posted:

I am desperately hoping for a Zaheer/Tenzin fight/debate.

Considering how much they've set up Zaheer as a foil to Tenzin I'm not just desperately hoping for it, I'd be out and out appalled if it didn't happen. Not to mention it'd be a complete waste of a golden opportunity to finally have a pure airbender vs airbender match.

SpiderHyphenMan
Apr 1, 2010

by Fluffdaddy
I love this fanbase sometimes, I really do.

Empress Theonora
Feb 19, 2001

She was a sword glinting in the depths of night, a lance of light piercing the darkness. There would be no mistakes this time.
I feel like an important thing to keep in mind with the Equalists is that they were taking advantage of the discontent and anger caused by Republic City's actual horrible class divides and wealth disparity and scapegoating the benders. Season One kind of hits the viewer over the head with the fact that a.) Republic City has a big class problem and b.) that those problems cut across the bender/nonbender line repeatedly-- i.e., how Bolin and Mako lived compared to how Hiroshi Sato lived, them making a big deal about how that underground community of hobos they hide out in during the last episode is benders and nonbenders living side-by-side, etc.

I feel like it's hard to shoehorn benders into being an analogy for any particular real world issue, since in the real world nobody has magic powers they're born with. I do feel like it's worth noting that within the recent history of the world, although the ruling class of the Fire Nation were obviously benders themselves, benders from other nations occupied by the Fire Nation were often singled out for persecution above and beyond the persecution everyone else got-- the entirely-bending Air Nomads were wiped out, the Southern Water Tribe's benders were systematically killed or taken away, and all the earthbenders in that one town were sent away to that offshore metal prison.

MLKQUOTEMACHINE
Oct 22, 2012

Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice-skate uphill

SpiderHyphenMan posted:

I love this fanbase sometimes, I really do.


A lot of things need more political cartoon-style fan art, if only to better communicate how ridiculous most political cartoons are in reality.

Jimbot
Jul 22, 2008

It's not quite political. They tend to exaggerate features, embiggen them and use visual metaphor rather than state "this guy is a communist" and "These are the peoples". I'd love to see some fan art like that.

Killer robot
Sep 6, 2010

I was having the most wonderful dream. I think you were in it!
Pillbug

Rincewind posted:

I feel like an important thing to keep in mind with the Equalists is that they were taking advantage of the discontent and anger caused by Republic City's actual horrible class divides and wealth disparity and scapegoating the benders. Season One kind of hits the viewer over the head with the fact that a.) Republic City has a big class problem and b.) that those problems cut across the bender/nonbender line repeatedly-- i.e., how Bolin and Mako lived compared to how Hiroshi Sato lived, them making a big deal about how that underground community of hobos they hide out in during the last episode is benders and nonbenders living side-by-side, etc.

I feel like it's hard to shoehorn benders into being an analogy for any particular real world issue, since in the real world nobody has magic powers they're born with. I do feel like it's worth noting that within the recent history of the world, although the ruling class of the Fire Nation were obviously benders themselves, benders from other nations occupied by the Fire Nation were often singled out for persecution above and beyond the persecution everyone else got-- the entirely-bending Air Nomads were wiped out, the Southern Water Tribe's benders were systematically killed or taken away, and all the earthbenders in that one town were sent away to that offshore metal prison.

Also the whole deal with the bending Triads. Organized crime never pulls its muscle from privileged classes, since they're not the people who only have street crime to turn to for wealth and status. On the other hand, in a situation like Republic City where poor benders (sometimes employed by wealthy non-benders as we've seen) prey upon middle/working class non-benders, it's really easy to create an anti-bender narrative like Amon did, without really even bringing up the root issues.

pentyne
Nov 7, 2012

Jimbot posted:

It's not quite political. They tend to exaggerate features, embiggen them and use visual metaphor rather than state "this guy is a communist" and "These are the peoples". I'd love to see some fan art like that.

It's in the style of The Onion's cartoonist, who he himself is a savagely brilliant parody of regular cartoonists.

MLKQUOTEMACHINE
Oct 22, 2012

Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice-skate uphill

Killer robot posted:

Also the whole deal with the bending Triads. Organized crime never pulls its muscle from privileged classes, since they're not the people who only have street crime to turn to for wealth and status. On the other hand, in a situation like Republic City where poor benders (sometimes employed by wealthy non-benders as we've seen) prey upon middle/working class non-benders, it's really easy to create an anti-bender narrative like Amon did, without really even bringing up the root issues.

I mean, poo poo, I'm surprised that there's not more anti-bender sentiment all across the world considering that its because of benders and their fuckery that a 100 year war erupted across the known world, which probably resulted in tremendous loss of life and livelihood. Like, really, sit and think about how awful and broke down society would get if we fought a war for 100 years. Heck, we don't even have to because we can just look to something like the Hundred Years' War (though, to be fair, that wasn't a constant conflict) to see that France and England were massively depopulated because of the conflict (and occasional outbreaks of plague).

Empress Theonora
Feb 19, 2001

She was a sword glinting in the depths of night, a lance of light piercing the darkness. There would be no mistakes this time.
Is it really fair to say that the Hundred Year War happened because of "benders", though? The ruling family of the Fire Nation was all benders, of course, but benders in the other nations were on the chopping block as much or more than everyone else, and the Fire Nation as a whole wasn't just benders. The issues were just plain old nationalism and imperialism and racism, not benders vs. nonbenders.

TheKingofSprings
Oct 9, 2012

TheModernAmerican posted:

Again, the biggest problem of Season 1 is that I sympathized with the Equalists. Could you imagine being some farmer that moved to the city for a job but can't get one because you aren't a bender?

On the other hand I would probably enjoy having access to electricity courtesy of said benders, and probably would not want to have a masked man remove their abilities if doing so meant I was going back to candles for lighting.

MLKQUOTEMACHINE
Oct 22, 2012

Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice-skate uphill

Rincewind posted:

Is it really fair to say that the Hundred Year War happened because of "benders", though? The ruling family of the Fire Nation was all benders, of course, but benders in the other nations were on the chopping block as much or more than everyone else, and the Fire Nation as a whole wasn't just benders. The issues were just plain old nationalism and imperialism and racism, not benders vs. nonbenders.

I get that, but what I'm saying is that it would be really easy to jump from 'We Just Fought A 100 Year War' to 'Because Of Those loving Benders' if you're some disenfranchised non-bender who is getting pushed around by a bending gangster types. It's not that much of a mental leap at all, especially for an aggrieved public.

SpiderHyphenMan
Apr 1, 2010

by Fluffdaddy
Could it be that the only reason we were disappointed in Amon being revealed to be a fraud was because we wanted to believe in his scapegoating solely because it made for a more interesting moral dilemma in a fantasy series for bending to truly be an inequality of sorts, rather than any evidence in the actual show?
I say yes.

Meanwhile, the mere existence of the Earth Queen is proof enough that the way the ruling class works in the Avatar universe is not balanced, so while Zaheer's methods and end goals are too far, there is that seed of truth behind his arguments, unlike with Amon.

SpiderHyphenMan fucked around with this message at 03:25 on Aug 11, 2014

Killer robot
Sep 6, 2010

I was having the most wonderful dream. I think you were in it!
Pillbug

nutranurse posted:

I get that, but what I'm saying is that it would be really easy to jump from 'We Just Fought A 100 Year War' to 'Because Of Those loving Benders' if you're some disenfranchised non-bender who is getting pushed around by a bending gangster types. It's not that much of a mental leap at all, especially for an aggrieved public.

Yeah, it's really easy to do that, even if the war itself was entirely out of a cultural and technological divide, the sort which could (did) happen in a world without any objective splitting up of humanity by magic powers. It's a very natural sort of thing for a charismatic and manipulative "revolutionary" to support.

Babygravy
Jun 12, 2014

I am the gravy

ETB posted:

I don't know, I have a feeling Gyatso used some form of vacuum creation against the comet-enhanced Firebenders during the Air Nation invasion...

Yeah especially since he took out a room full of fire benders turbo charged on Sozin's Comet power... Had to be something extraordinary.

hiddenriverninja posted:

I don't know how I would feel if lavabending ability came from having two earthbending and firebending parents.

On one hand, it makes sense that the secondary element would still have some influence on a person's bending, even passively.

On the other, it reeks of the whole "born more special" trope I dislike.

Oh god combo benders would be like the next evolution in bending.. Water and fire benders... Steam.. But that's already been done sigh.

Fried Chicken
Jan 9, 2011

Don't fry me, I'm no chicken!

Jimbot posted:

It's not quite political. They tend to exaggerate features, embiggen them and use visual metaphor rather than state "this guy is a communist" and "These are the peoples". I'd love to see some fan art like that.

It's along the lines of the political cartoons that run for The Onion, the Kelley cartoons (really done by Ward Sutton). They are fantastic and you should read them every monday

Fried Chicken fucked around with this message at 03:53 on Aug 11, 2014

Fried Chicken
Jan 9, 2011

Don't fry me, I'm no chicken!
The thing is, independent of all the problems Season 1 has in itself, it also suffers for the real world conditions impacting how it is viewed. Mako gets a job at the power plant. It is grueling work leaving him sweat soaked, and shows that benders are instrumental in how the world works, not just exploiting nonbenders. Except Mako is able to just walk on a job by dint of birth and make a living wage able to support him and his brother. Not to be all Thomas Friedman and "In Today's Economy" but seriously, how are we (the 17-21 viewing age of this show) supposed to sympathize with that? We are trying to get jobs ourselves now, and are competing against people who can just walk on because of how they were born. The viewer contrasts it with their real world experience and it shifts from "benders and non benders work alongside equally" to "even if inherited privilege doesn't protect you from everything, it still gives you a massive loving leg up"

I know there are schools of criticism that say you shouldn't consider the work in the context of the age it is viewed in, but doing so is still valid and probably one of the more common ways (eg Huckleberry Finn controversy)

Rincewind posted:

Is it really fair to say that the Hundred Year War happened because of "benders", though? The ruling family of the Fire Nation was all benders, of course, but benders in the other nations were on the chopping block as much or more than everyone else, and the Fire Nation as a whole wasn't just benders. The issues were just plain old nationalism and imperialism and racism, not benders vs. nonbenders.

Yeah, but a lot of that was tied in with bending supremacy, specifically fire bending supremacy

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Fried Chicken posted:

The thing is, independent of all the problems Season 1 has in itself, it also suffers for the real world conditions impacting how it is viewed. Mako gets a job at the power plant. It is grueling work leaving him sweat soaked, and shows that benders are instrumental in how the world works, not just exploiting nonbenders. Except Mako is able to just walk on a job by dint of birth and make a living wage able to support him and his brother. Not to be all Thomas Friedman and "In Today's Economy" but seriously, how are we (the 17-21 viewing age of this show) supposed to sympathize with that? We are trying to get jobs ourselves now, and are competing against people who can just walk on because of how they were born. The viewer contrasts it with their real world experience and it shifts from "benders and non benders work alongside equally" to "even if inherited privilege doesn't protect you from everything, it still gives you a massive loving leg up"

Not really. Most benders probably have to train to have any sort of actual skill, although the show tends to present the opposite view since every important bender character is a genius and therefore absurdly skilled.

Fried Chicken
Jan 9, 2011

Don't fry me, I'm no chicken!

SpiderHyphenMan posted:

Could it be that the only reason we were disappointed in Amon being revealed to be a fraud was because we wanted to believe in his scapegoating solely because it made for a more interesting moral dilemma in a fantasy series for bending to truly be an inequality of sorts, rather than any evidence in the actual show?
I say yes.

Meanwhile, the mere existence of the Earth Queen is proof enough that the way the ruling class works in the Avatar universe is not balanced, so while Zaheer's methods and end goals are too far, there is that seed of truth behind his arguments, unlike with Amon.

Yeah, I have to agree. I think a lot of us were looking at the world post great recession and applying that framework to the show. It makes, I suppose, for an unfair criticism of it. There is plenty else to criticize about it, that it doesn't frame equalists v benders like the 99% v 1% us us trying to read something never intended into it.

I mean, addressing classism and stuff could be awesome (there are still several other weak points with season 1) but they didn't set out to do it. Given the stratified nature of things now people were imposing that on the show, so that it wasn't hits double hard

Fried Chicken
Jan 9, 2011

Don't fry me, I'm no chicken!

Genocyber posted:

Not really. Most benders probably have to train to have any sort of actual skill, although the show tends to present the opposite view since every important bender character is a genius and therefore absurdly skilled.

Could you unpack this more so I don't respond to something you don't mean? Like are you arguing against comparing benders with the connected people because benders have to train and ou think I am arguing that the connected people don't? Are you saying that benders getting jobs is a reflection of meritocracy because they have to train? Something else entirely?

The Bee
Nov 25, 2012

Making his way to the ring . . .
from Deep in the Jungle . . .

The Big Monkey!
If there is some sort of combo bender, it'd be best if it was less from bloodline and more from cross-cultural contact. We already see it with Korra, where her force of personality breaks the standard Avatar cycle of elemental learning struggles by giving her the most difficulty with Air, not Fire as would be expected. If the arts diversified for groups like the Foggy Swamp Tribe and the Sandbenders, I don't see how every bending culture suddenly coming into contact wouldn't produce some new outlooks on bending.

Babygravy
Jun 12, 2014

I am the gravy
Suddenly everyone can bend all 4 elements..and travel the spirit world through the open portals... Does the avatar become redundant?

ImpAtom
May 24, 2007

Babygravy posted:

Suddenly everyone can bend all 4 elements..and travel the spirit world through the open portals... Does the avatar become redundant?

Not as long as they still have Raava, no. They'd still have the Avatar State and the memories of every Avatar since Korra.

achillesforever6
Apr 23, 2012

psst you wanna do a communism?

Jimbot posted:

It's not quite political. They tend to exaggerate features, embiggen them and use visual metaphor rather than state "this guy is a communist" and "These are the peoples". I'd love to see some fan art like that.
All it needs is a fat guy in the lower right corner saying a bad pun and it's a perfect Kelly,.

Zedd
Jul 6, 2009

I mean, who would have noticed another madman around here?



achillesforever6 posted:

All it needs is a fat guy in the lower right corner saying a bad pun and it's a perfect Kelly,.


:shepface:

Decius
Oct 14, 2005

Ramrod XTreme

Oh Snapple! posted:

The problem is that we only see this in response to the Equalists. We don't actually see anything that might have lead people to be sympathetic to the Equalist cause before then that could have served as reasoning for their creation. With the way poo poo ends, it's basically treated as if Amon just had a spell over everyone involved.

It is hard to imagine the Equalists gaining anything like a big foothold because of the simple fact that everyone's kid can potentially be a bender. It's easy to instill hate for a group that you can easily separate from the general population, but it is harder to do so if there is a good chance that you know someone or are related to someone who belongs to the group you are supposed to hate (see gay rights). That's what bugged me with all the Mutant hate by the population in the Marvel books.



TheModernAmerican posted:

Again, the biggest problem of Season 1 is that I sympathized with the Equalists. Could you imagine being some farmer that moved to the city for a job but can't get one because you aren't a bender?

Yes, happens all the time after all. I can't become a pilot because my eyesight isn't good enough. Others never will be gymnasts or window cleaners because the lack the body control or have a fear of heights. Some never will be bouncers because they are 1.50 m and 40 kg wet. Or watchmakers because they are clumsy people with far too fat fingers.
Water benders can't become power plant workers and fire benders can't become metal bending police unit members (but apparently lovely detectives). Said farmer just moving into city will also not be able to do a lot of non-bending jobs because he lacks the necessary skills or abilities. Some he might be able to train for, others he won't, independent from any bending.

X_Toad
Apr 2, 2011

Rincewind posted:

I feel like an important thing to keep in mind with the Equalists is that they were taking advantage of the discontent and anger caused by Republic City's actual horrible class divides and wealth disparity and scapegoating the benders.
I would agree with that a lot more easily if, out-of-universe, the creators hadn't somewhat insisted that there was a real discrimination against non-benders in Republic City. With that in mind, the fact that the poorest characters were benders and the wealthiest ones were (consistently) non-benders came off as dissonant.

Truthfully, the Equalists were never meant to be anything more than Amon's henchmen by the creators, but their pre-release comments really made it look like the struggle of the non-benders for equality would be a rather significant part of the world building, and it wasn't.

In a less cynical way, I was very surprised to learn that they saw Unalaq as having a restrained and precise fighting style reminiscent of a fencer, because it's basically the opposite of how he fought on screen.

Rincewind posted:

Is it really fair to say that the Hundred Year War happened because of "benders", though?
It's not fair, but it's probably easier to fit the Fire Nation into that narrative, I think, because the feeling of importance of the highest Fire Nation aristocracy seems to (in part) derive from their ability to firebend. Not to mention that the initial invasion was made possible thanks to a huge boost in power brought to firebenders by a cosmic event.

SpiderHyphenMan posted:

Could it be that the only reason we were disappointed in Amon being revealed to be a fraud was because we wanted to believe in his scapegoating solely because it made for a more interesting moral dilemma in a fantasy series for bending to truly be an inequality of sorts, rather than any evidence in the actual show?
That, and as I said, because the creators themselves made it look like it would be the case with some of their comments pre-release.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Baron Bifford
May 24, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 2 years!

ShadowCatboy posted:

Fun fact: In ancient China it was generally considered more desirable in executions to be strangled to death rather than beheaded. Though it's a slower, more agonizing way to die, strangulation left the body intact and preserved its sanctity for burial. :eng101:
I heard the Mongols executed nobles and other respected men by breaking their backs. Wouldn't that just turn them into a paraplegic?

  • Locked thread