|
It's not too hard to tell the before and after. http://izismile.com/2013/03/08/porn_stars_before_and_after_their_makeup_makeover_93_pics.html
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 00:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 21:05 |
|
|
Zogo posted:It's not too hard to tell the before and after. Holy gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 01:05
|
|
|
Zogo posted:It's not too hard to tell the before and after. There are some things man was not meant to see.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 01:56
|
|
|
some of those girls look completely meth'd out
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 01:59
|
|
|
Most of them look perfectly fine without makeup (at least relative to what they look like with makeup), with a few huge exceptions.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 02:05
|
|
|
In the world of porn, beauty isn't skin deep. It's 1" thick makeup. Lot of acne, I wonder if it's from all the makeup.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 02:52
|
|
|
Elle Alexandra looks pretty drat cute without the makeup. There are a few that have some issues, but honestly most of them look just like normal girls without makeup, and several look just great without it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 03:02
|
|
|
If you're a guy you probably aren't used to seeing almost anybody but your SO without makeup (lets face it goons, there's no SO, only your mother), so any woman without makeup is a bit of a shock. Most of them look normal/good, although there are definite exceptions. Question related to this: how has the advent of all HD all the time changed makeup budgets/schedules and whatnot? Do you have to do body makeup in addition to facial stuff? Is it getting harder to hide things?
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 03:49
|
|
|
On the topic of makeup, I really don't like how performers put on such thick makeup. I remember thinking that Mack was a completely different girl because she looks so different even just last year.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 05:16
|
|
|
Red_October_7000 posted:You know nothing of fighting with your parents I'll keep this short and sweet as it's off topic, but basically you keep the business end moving quick enough that any attempt to take it risks meeting mom in an unpleasant fashion. Ideally the lady would have had a garden shed or basement with a cherished memories collection which could cripple or kill in one good second. The salient point is not specifically that i did not come back to fight some more, the salient point is that someone was being bored to death and apparently dad did nothing at all. This kid is inhuman indeed
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 13:12
|
|
|
BiggerBoat posted:Relevant: What's with MMA fighters dating porn stars anyway? Plus, attractively muscled dudes like attractive women? and vice-versa?
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 20:24
|
|
|
FilthyImp posted:Plus, attractively muscled dudes like attractive women? and vice-versa? There aren't any attractive dudes who don't beat the poo poo out of people or attractive women who don't guzzle cum for a living? I think it has more to do with the tangential relationship between sex and violence and what society considers "attractive" but I'm not sure how to word it and don't want to play backseat psychologist with the whole thing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 21:08
|
|
|
Zogo posted:It's not too hard to tell the before and after. Is it weird that I only recognize ~10% of those? (Not counting the several duplicates.) Landsknecht posted:Question related to this: how has the advent of all HD all the time changed makeup budgets/schedules and whatnot? Do you have to do body makeup in addition to facial stuff? Is it getting harder to hide things? A critical disadvantage of HD....
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 06:28
|
|
|
BiggerBoat posted:There aren't any attractive dudes who don't beat the poo poo out of people or attractive women who don't guzzle cum for a living?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 07:21
|
|
|
FilthyImp posted:Jenna Jameson had a very glowing review of Tito Ortiz' ... uh.... prowess in one of her books.  http://i.imgur.com/oYpfZ.jpg
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 13:24
|
|
|
Atomizer posted:Is it weird that I only recognize ~10% of those? (Not counting the several duplicates.) No, I don't think many would know many.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 00:29
|
|
|
Zogo posted:It's not too hard to tell the before and after. Holy mother of God, all these years pornography has been LYING to me and selling me some fantasy bullshit!
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 11:40
|
|
|
Red_October_7000 posted:You know nothing of fighting with weapons. I'll keep this short and sweet as it's off topic, but basically you keep the business end moving quick enough that any attempt to take it away risks meeting the business end in an unpleasant fashion. Ideally the lady would have had a garden shed or basement with an axe or shovel which could cripple or kill in one good swing. Nonetheless, as I said, if he were in no shape to fight (beaten bad enough, or had no weapon to hand), why did he not call for help??? The salient point is not specifically that he did not come back to fight some more, the salient point is that someone was being beaten to death and he apparently did nothing at all. You're talking about an athlete who fights at one of the highest levels of competition. I mean, as far as UFC fighters go, he's kind of garbage, but you know, he actually made it to the UFC and Bellator. Also, he's a pretty big guy; if he fought at 170 lbs, that mean's he walks at nearly 200. He's also mentally unstable and obviously completely willing to hurt or kill someone. Do you really think that just because a regular joe grabs a baseball bat, he is now the superior combatant? War Machine hits people about as hard as an average person hits people with a baseball bat. To back that up, his fight record shows that he's won about half of his fights by TKO or KO, and half by submission, never by decision. And to further prove his disregard for his own safety, making him more dangerous, of his 4 submission losses, 3 were technical submissions. That means the guy doesn't tap out when he knows he's beat, he'd rather be put to sleep.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2014 04:13
|
|
|
VulgarandStupid posted:You're talking about an athlete who fights at one of the highest levels of competition. I mean, as far as UFC fighters go, he's kind of garbage, but you know, he actually made it to the UFC and Bellator. Also, he's a pretty big guy; if he fought at 170 lbs, that mean's he walks at nearly 200. He's also mentally unstable and obviously completely willing to hurt or kill someone. Do you really think that just because a regular joe grabs a baseball bat, he is now the superior combatant? War Machine hits people about as hard as an average person hits people with a baseball bat. To back that up, his fight record shows that he's won about half of his fights by TKO or KO, and half by submission, never by decision. And to further prove his disregard for his own safety, making him more dangerous, of his 4 submission losses, 3 were technical submissions. That means the guy doesn't tap out when he knows he's beat, he'd rather be put to sleep. Seconding this, you're not going to be able to take down Brock Lesnar with a baseball bat. And Brock's in a healthier relationship than War Machine.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2014 04:48
|
|
|
I dunno if you're coming back. But I wanted to know your thoughts on the 'sistergate' that happened a few years ago with the 'Romain' sisters doing a scene together. Brazzers released a trailer, then never released the movie. Do you think the industry went a little too far with that or is it just moral panic?
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2014 09:00
|
|
|
You mentioned that you've stuntcocked before. How does that work? Do you bang the girl for a bit, or just whack off on her face or what? I really don't know how to ask questions to a pornographer and not make it sound weird!
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2014 03:34
|
|
|
ante posted:You mentioned that you've stuntcocked before. I imagine it works the way it worked in the excellent feature film "Orgasmo" by Trey Parker and Matt Stone.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2014 04:45
|
|
|
Zogo posted:It's not too hard to tell the before and after. Whoever invented makeup is my hero.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2014 16:53
|
|
|
Is there an only-anal performer? And then after a couple of years she released her "first vaginal" vid?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2014 22:53
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:Is there an only-anal performer? And then after a couple of years she released her "first vaginal" vid? Kimber James did something close to that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2014 23:13
|
|
|
Nikki Blue?
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2014 00:03
|
|
i like nice words
|
Aurora Joile
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2014 00:54
|
|
|
CAPT. Rainbowbeard posted:I imagine it works the way it worked in the excellent feature film "Orgasmo" by Trey Parker and Matt Stone. I guess what I'm asking is, how amenable are the girls to other people "jumping in" mid-scene, or is it more "this is your contract, this is your dude".
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2014 02:00
|
|
|
ante posted:I guess what I'm asking is, how amenable are the girls to other people "jumping in" mid-scene, or is it more "this is your contract, this is your dude". It's up to the girl if she wants some other mope to jerk off on her, porn is one of the few industries where women have a ton of power. Sometimes they'll use Cetaphil as a semen substitute along with clever editing. Sometimes you can see when they did the stunt cock swap; magically disappearing tattoos, obvious time shifts, the last third of the scene being only closeups. I've shot amateur porn on the east coast; unreliable boners is pretty much the name of the game.
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2014 04:55
|
|
|
So what do you guys do if a scene needs extras? I mean, I imagine it doesn't come up that often, but do you just use people already in the industry or do you draw from the general talent pool? I guess most actors outside the industry probably wouldn't want to have a porno on their resume even if it was Dude in Background who shot his scene and then left before the sex started.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2014 07:51
|
|
|
FilthyImp posted:Hey, remember that LA County bill that was passed that required the use of condoms for any adult scene filmed in Los Angeles? It is not statewide. There was an attempt to make it statewide recently, but it died in the California legislature.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2014 17:47
|
|
|
Forceholy posted:So Nevada then? I do get busy, but I always come back.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2014 17:47
|
|
|
Best Friends posted:Nevada is ran by the mob, eccentric multibillionaires who care very much about the state's image, and unions. At least 2 of those have very good reasons to be annoyed by the porn industry. There was a story on MikeSouth.com about some porn studio that tried to relocate to Vegas got repeatedly raided by police and then told to get the gently caress out, and they moved back to California after that. Highly inaccurate and why tabloid style blogs should be taken with a grain of salt. Several majors production companies have been in Vegas shooting for some time now. One of them has been out there for years. The issue you refer to is with Naughty America having an issue with a neighbor in the location they had acquired. There was never any issue with them shooting porn, they just went about production in a counter productive way. Even if you have a permit, you still have to keep peace with your neighbors. That crew was disbanded and a new crew now continues to shoot in Las Vegas.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2014 17:52
|
|
|
Sulik posted:Hey Darkpriest, I've read all four of these cover to cover and I think my favorite parts are your thoughts on where the industry is heading. 1) It exists already. It will never be stopped. For the safety of all those involved it should be legalized in certain areas and taxed. 2) With AB1576 dying in the California Legislature two weeks ago, I don't see a mass exodus from California just yet. I think the industry will become decentralized over the next year. There will probably some production in SoCal, some in Las Vegas and some in Miami with no major city being the home base any longer. Condoms do not sell. There are lots of companies that tried to move all condom and it basically killed them. The only company that has been able to pull it off over the years is Wicked Pictures, which has primarily been a high end feature company that are heavy on story. Condoms also greatly increase the time on set. I produce content for Wicked as well the condoms are very difficult for the performers. It easily takes twice as long to shoot a scene, which raises the cost of production greatly. 3) No I never watch her scenes. I'm not sure why I would. Between shooting 20 scenes a month and editing I think I watch more then enough sex.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2014 18:56
|
|
|
I know she only does solo/g-g stuff, but have you ever met or worked with Shyla Jennings? She's adorable.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2014 19:10
|
|
|
Have you worked at all with Alexis Texas? That woman has a certain magic in the way she can move her rear end. Anything you can tell us about her? Can you explain why people will shoot a scene with a girl that has razor rash all over her crotch (or something similar)? That is not attractive.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2014 20:45
|
|
|
Who has rear end implants?
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2014 20:46
|
|
|
McFunkerson posted:Can you explain why people will shoot a scene with a girl that has razor rash all over her crotch (or something similar)? That is not attractive. Contracts are signed.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2014 21:19
|
|
|
McFunkerson posted:Have you worked at all with Alexis Texas? That woman has a certain magic in the way she can move her rear end. Anything you can tell us about her? This sometimes develops through friction / heat / reaction to products etc as the shoot goes on. You know what would end this? Is if the trend moved away from completely shaved genitals.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2014 02:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 21:05 |
|
|
luscious posted:This sometimes develops through friction / heat / reaction to products etc as the shoot goes on. You know what would end this? Is if the trend moved away from completely shaved genitals. The horror!!! How about waxing at least 3 days before a shoot with enough time for proper healing. Then we can keep our nice, clean, hairless vaginas. AlwaysWetID34 fucked around with this message at 05:07 on Aug 29, 2014 |
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2014 04:45
|
|