|
Snapchat A Titty posted:they should hunt gun instructors instead Oh come on, that's so easy a kid could d...
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2014 22:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 12:26 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2014 22:14
|
|
|
lorf at all things, great and small
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2014 22:31
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:Oh come on, that's so uzi a kid could d...
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2014 22:33
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:Oh come on, that's so easy a kid could d...
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2014 23:53
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2014 00:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2014 00:13
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2014 00:45
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:Oh come on, that's so easy a kid could d...
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2014 01:41
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/mapr/status/504396977556041728
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 03:44
|
|
|
nice av
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 03:55
|
|
|
gently caress off
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 03:56
|
|
|
quote:GOOGLE'S SELF-DRIVING CAR CAN'T NAVIGATE HEAVY RAIN OR MOST ROADS they are such a loving joke of a company
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 11:05
|
|
|
fffffffart
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 11:19
|
|
|
ufarn posted:they are such a loving joke of a company to be fair there's still plenty of uses for this kind of vehicle even if it can only navigate along a fixed route containing major thoroughfares
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 15:25
|
|
|
if it rains or anything at all changes from the mapped data you crash and possibly kill someone
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 15:27
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:to be fair there's still plenty of uses for this kind of vehicle even if it can only navigate along a fixed route containing major thoroughfares you just described a train
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 15:28
|
|
|
poty posted:if it rains or anything at all changes from the mapped data you crash and possibly kill someone just make it fly and you'll get billions from the us government
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 15:30
|
|
|
Just-In-Timeberlake posted:you just described a train a train for Americans, yes
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 15:31
|
|
|
ya and we already have relatively autonomous trains
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 15:31
|
|
|
right but these would run in regular interstate traffic so you get all the disadvantages of public transit with all the disadvantages of driving your own car
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 15:34
|
|
|
well it costs 0 while setting up a new train line is roughly a million trillions
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 15:41
|
|
|
poty posted:if it rains or anything at all changes from the mapped data you crash and possibly kill someone and there isn't a personal injury lawyer alive that doesn't get a little tingle down below at the prospect of nailing google for the liability, even if just for the fame. i still think they would be quite good for special applications such as retirement communities or even golf courses. but publicly targeting lucrative edge cases doesn't feed the internalized "we're changing the world here!" *disruption* narrative. sure most of the bullshit apps and services coming out of the tech bubble only serve the small edge case of rich single men living in San Francisco but they don't admit that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 16:21
|
|
|
you are riding in your google self driving car, going at the speed limit, as mandated by law. suddenly a pedestrian steps into the street. the car observes the pedestrian and calculates it has 200 ms to react. there is insufficient time to apply the brakes with any effect. the car has three options: 1) run the pedestrian over, 90% probability of pedestrian fatality. you are expected to survive. 2) cross into oncoming traffic. there is an oncoming car that will hit you. 40% probability of fatality to you, unknown for other driver. 3) drive off the road. the terrain is not sufficiently mapped so injury probability unknown. what does your car do?
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 17:16
|
|
|
The Management posted:you are riding in your google self driving car, going at the speed limit, as mandated by law. suddenly a pedestrian steps into the street. the car observes the pedestrian and calculates it has 200 ms to react. there is insufficient time to apply the brakes with any effect. the car has three options: lock up the brakes, same as a person driver should do
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 17:19
|
|
|
depends on what ur rider profile says if ur a white money manager then lol there aint nothin happening to u so plow on through
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 17:25
|
|
|
hit the pedestrian, because there isn't a jury that'd convict it's a ~perfect immortal machine~, obviously the pedestrian was at fault for jaywalking
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 17:27
|
|
|
Progressive JPEG posted:depends on what ur rider profile says conviction of two misdemeanors sure is nothing
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 17:27
|
|
|
The Management posted:you are riding in your google self driving car, going at the speed limit, as mandated by law. suddenly a pedestrian steps into the street. the car observes the pedestrian and calculates it has 200 ms to react. there is insufficient time to apply the brakes with any effect. the car has three options:  
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 17:31
|
|
|
decapitate the pedestrian?
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 17:37
|
|
|
Last Chance posted:decapitate the pedestrian? well i guess we can put the car on stilt things like inspector gadgets car had
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 17:39
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:lock up the brakes, same as a person driver should do a human can't make split second decisions with any kind of intelligence, our minds don't work that fast. the car has fully understood the situation and made the decision to kill the pedestrian when it could have avoided it. it has decided that the almost certainty of killing the pedestrian is better than risking your life at an unknown probability. it doesn't have the survival instinct we do, it calculated who lives and dies and somehow your life is worth more than the pedestrian's. when they review the accident and discover that going off the road would have resulted in minimal damage, does that mean the car is guilty of manslaughter?
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 18:08
|
|
|
you can't have laughter without manslaughter
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 18:09
|
|
|
what's the balance for when the car risks your life to save someone else's? 0%? with humans nothing is quantifiable so it's all a gray area. once you have hard numbers, things become a lot more complex.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 18:10
|
|
|
is the pedestrian a thinkfluencer and-or entrepreneur y/n?
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 18:19
|
|
|
ufarn posted:is the pedestrian a thinkfluencer and-or entrepreneur y/n? the forth prime directive says a google car cannot harm a google officer.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 18:26
|
|
|
The Management posted:a human can't make split second decisions with any kind of intelligence, our minds don't work that fast. the car has fully understood the situation and made the decision to kill the pedestrian when it could have avoided it. it has decided that the almost certainty of killing the pedestrian is better than risking your life at an unknown probability. it doesn't have the survival instinct we do, it calculated who lives and dies and somehow your life is worth more than the pedestrian's. when they review the accident and discover that going off the road would have resulted in minimal damage, does that mean the car is guilty of manslaughter? the computer isn't omniscient either, 200ms is still a very short amount of time for the sensors to get an accurate picture of the situation. just like trains and other already autonomous stuff the first reaction should always be to stop this is why we're still a very long away from fully autonomous manned aircraft - when drones get confused they just crash. they crash a lot, even the fancy UAVs the USAF flies
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 18:29
|
|
|
also fun fact: the big UAVs the airforce fly need a chase car on take off/landing because they actually have no idea whats going on so a human has to be in the loop with an abort button
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 18:30
|
|
|
The Management posted:the forth prime directive says a google car cannot harm a google officer. how do you have four prime directives?
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 18:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 12:26 |
|
|
The Management posted:the forth prime directive says a google car cannot harm a google officer. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2014 18:34
|
|
