|
LividLiquid posted:*snip* Forget it, Livid. It’s the Internet. It’s not about who’s closest to being correct, it’s who can shout the loudest. There have been a few…uncomfortable moments through the history of the show with regards to topics like race, sexism, equality – but they’ve either been accidental (The Talons of Weng-Chiang because of how many Oriental actors there were in 1970's Great Britain) or trying to make a point and having it go astray/not be presented properly (the closest I can come up off the top of my head is with Thatcher and The Happiness Patrol). The show has never been maliciously racist, sexist, or other appropriate for the conversation-ish. As I said, I don’t care if it’s a Chinese woman or a Pikey bloke or a Inuit playing the Doctor, as long as they are a GOOD Doctor. Just because a show has an opportunity to make a political/social statement doesn’t mean it should. Otherwise, you end up with The Newsroom.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 19:42 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 07:40 |
|
Bicyclops posted:It comes up occasionally in Doctor Who, as with some of the discussion regarding Journey to the Center of the TARDIS. For some reason, people groan whenever "that was a bit racist/sexist" stuff comes up, but it's just a comment. It doesn't mean the show or writers are suddenly evil bigots and the discussion would always be shorter if not for the four people who have to take up part of the conversation saying "Not this again, SJW tumblr nerds!" If that particular brand of discussion isn't your cup of tea, you can always wait a few pages at the most until the talk shifts to which person fits better into the Davros rubber mask they had to recycle and/or whether Moffat is the devil incarnate and who is buying a new Doctor Who coat. Yep. I think people have trouble sometimes understanding that calling a story racist/sexist/*ist isn't the same thing as saying that the writer hates black people/women/*.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 19:46 |
|
CobiWann posted:Forget it, Livid. It’s the Internet. It’s not about who’s closest to being correct, it’s who can shout the loudest. That's what makes me so great - I can do both! /six Diabolik900 posted:Yep. I think people have trouble sometimes understanding that calling a story racist/sexist/*ist isn't the same thing as saying that the writer hates black people/women/*. Or, in fact, that it's not the same as calling people who like it racist/sexist/bigoted.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 19:47 |
|
On that note, you will probably start wanting to avoid the word pikey.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 19:47 |
|
CobiWann posted:Forget it, Livid. It’s the Internet. It’s not about who’s closest to being correct, it’s who can shout the loudest. Peri Brown?
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 19:47 |
|
CobiWann posted:Oriental CobiWann posted:Pikey Hmm. CobiWann posted:Just because a show has an opportunity to make a political/social statement doesnt mean it should. Otherwise, you end up with The Newsroom. I don't know what The Newsroom is, but this is a weird thing to say. It's pretty much impossible to make a show that doesn't make some kind of social or political statement.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 19:48 |
|
Happiness Patrol and The Greatest Show in the Galaxy are the two hallmarks I can think of where Doctor Who was trying but was accidentally quite hilariously insensitive, off the top of my head. I think shows kind of make a social statement no matter what their intent is. That's arguably encoded into story and nothing exists in a vacuum. The RTD years were definitely actively trying to put some messages out there. Sometimes they did alright and sometimes it was embarrassing.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 19:48 |
|
marktheando posted:I don't know what The Newsroom is, but this is a weird thing to say. It's pretty much impossible to make a show that doesn't make some kind of social or political statement. It's not a weird thing to say if you know what The Newsroom is.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 19:50 |
|
In the spirit of the Oxxipation thread and J-Ru et al's reviews here, suggest an episode of Old Who and I will watch it and do an effort post on it
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 19:53 |
|
MrL_JaKiri posted:In the spirit of the Oxxipation thread and J-Ru et al's reviews here, suggest an episode of Old Who and I will watch it and do an effort post on it The Twin Dilemma.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 19:54 |
|
MrL_JaKiri posted:In the spirit of the Oxxipation thread and J-Ru et al's reviews here, suggest an episode of Old Who and I will watch it and do an effort post on it State of Decay.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 19:54 |
|
MrL_JaKiri posted:In the spirit of the Oxxipation thread and J-Ru et al's reviews here, suggest an episode of Old Who and I will watch it and do an effort post on it Carnival of Monsters! (Mostly because I'm about to start watching it and am curious what some one elses opinions would be)
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 19:55 |
|
Bicyclops posted:The Twin Dilemma. This.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 19:56 |
|
marktheando posted:State of Decay. It's this one as the first non-Twin Dilemma suggestion
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:00 |
|
MrL_JaKiri posted:It's this one as the first non-Twin Dilemma suggestion How dare you cheat at this completely voluntary thing you agreed to subject yourself to for our amusement!
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:08 |
|
DoctorWhat posted:Or, in fact, that it's not the same as calling people who like it racist/sexist/bigoted. Yes! This is actually probably even more important than what I said.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:09 |
|
Wait, what's wrong with Happiness Patrol? I thought it was a fairly cut-and-dry mockery of Thatcher?
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:12 |
|
Big Mean Jerk posted:Wait, what's wrong with Happiness Patrol? I thought it was a fairly cut-and-dry mockery of Thatcher? Magical Blues playing man.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:13 |
|
I had completely forgotten about that.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:21 |
|
Bicyclops posted:How dare you cheat at this completely voluntary thing you agreed to subject yourself to for our amusement! State of Decay was directed by Peter Moffatt, who went on to direct The Twin Dilemma
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:22 |
|
Sleep of Bronze posted:On that note, you will probably start wanting to avoid the word pikey. Can I chalk up my word choice to ignorance/poor planning and ask for forgiveness? And yeah, State of Decay should be an interesting choice, can’t wait to see what you think of it.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:24 |
|
I wish it were time to change my avatar to Four, but I want him to last for more than an hour if possible, so I suppose I should wait.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:26 |
|
MrL_JaKiri posted:In the spirit of the Oxxipation thread and J-Ru et al's reviews here, suggest an episode of Old Who and I will watch it and do an effort post on it I appear to be too late for this, but I'm going to set an RNG for between 1 and 155, and if anyone wants to pick it up, please watch... #146, Delta and the Bannermen.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:26 |
|
As an aside, I’m currently having an argument with my good friend, who has declared Into the Dalek the worst sci-fi episode of ANY series since Threshold from Star Trek: Voyager.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:40 |
|
CobiWann posted:As an aside, I’m currently having an argument with my good friend, who has declared Into the Dalek the worst sci-fi episode of ANY series since Threshold from Star Trek: Voyager. Your friend does not watch a lot of TV.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:43 |
|
CobiWann posted:As an aside, I’m currently having an argument with my good friend, who has declared Into the Dalek the worst sci-fi episode of ANY series since Threshold from Star Trek: Voyager. How did you meet the Comic Book Shop guy from the Simpsons?
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:44 |
|
CobiWann posted:As an aside, I’m currently having an argument with my good friend, who has declared Into the Dalek the worst sci-fi episode of ANY series since Threshold from Star Trek: Voyager. Nothing is worse than Threshold.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:48 |
|
marktheando posted:Because of the unique way the BBC is funded, they aren't supposed to care about profits, is the main point. And BBC worldwide is a completely separate thing from BBC Wales, who actually make the show. More profits for BBC Worldwide does not mean higher budgets for BBC Wales. As shown when the show was more popular than it is now at the start of Matt Smith's era, and got its budget cut. Actually, the BBC now refuses to say whether or not Doctor Who is co-funded by BBC Worldwide, and it's denied FOI requests about it. However, Worldwide has co-funded and co-produced episodes in the past, including the material rolled out for the 50th, and does cite Doctor Who as one of its most important brands. In fact, it cited Who's production troubles as a cause of significant revenue loss. So it's not that cut-and-dried. Doctor Who still does strong AI numbers, and strong ratings, and being able to make it more inexpensively due to outside funding is gonna be attractive.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:53 |
|
Trin Tragula posted:I appear to be too late for this, but I'm going to set an RNG for between 1 and 155, and if anyone wants to pick it up, please watch... You monster
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 20:59 |
|
CobiWann posted:As an aside, I’m currently having an argument with my good friend, who has declared Into the Dalek the worst sci-fi episode of ANY series since Threshold from Star Trek: Voyager. So has he not ever seen Asylum of the Daleks or
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 21:11 |
|
Burkion posted:So has he not ever seen Asylum of the Daleks or gently caress that, has his friend ever actually seen Threshold, or The Outrageous Okona or Miri or The Twin Dilemma or Profit & Lace or...
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 21:21 |
|
Burkion posted:So has he not ever seen Asylum of the Daleks or Huh? I thought Asylum was pretty good.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 21:21 |
|
Gynovore posted:Huh? I thought Asylum was pretty good. It was ok.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 21:23 |
|
Gynovore posted:Huh? I thought Asylum was pretty good. My reply is as follows: I did not.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 21:26 |
|
Man, I'd be waaay more hype for Robot of Sherwood if it was Shearman writing it you have no loving idea. Rob Shearman - Jacqueline Rayner, really - writing a story about the Doctor and his companion meeting a pseudo-historical mythic figure where the Doctor's being critical of "history" and legends while the companion has their own preconceptions? That's like the cool "history" bits of Jubilee meets the premise of The Marian Conspiracy! It'd be incredible! But instead Mark Gatiss wrote it. I haven't seen the workprint or read the script but there's no way that isn't a tremendous waste of story potential.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 21:28 |
|
The preview made it look pretty intentionally goofy, which I'm normally okay with, but I'm sort of hoping the whole thing isn't some embarrassing flirt-fest where something about Robin Hood's ladykiller smugness mirrors Clara's dating life with Danny or whatever.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 21:31 |
|
Gaz-L posted:gently caress that, has his friend ever actually seen Threshold, or The Outrageous Okona or Miri or The Twin Dilemma or Profit & Lace or... Sub Rosa? Operation Annihilate? Love and Monsters? I think an Asian or Black or female or even ginger Doctor is fine, just as long as there is never an American Doctor.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 21:33 |
|
Prison Warden posted:Sub Rosa? Operation Annihilate? Love and Monsters? I'd accept an American accent as long as it wasn't Yet Another White Dude. America is such a wonderful melting pot that it would be abominable to not reflect that. The diversity of Doctor cosplayers (although, unfortunately, not the diversity of Doctors) at the World Tour stop was fantastic! I'd take a thick Queens (NY) voice coming from a black or hispanic or asian or [culture/ethnicity I'm sure I'm forgetting] Doctor, but I'd burn my coat if the gave the role to a white dude with a Hollywood accent.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 21:40 |
|
DoctorWhat posted:Man, I'd be waaay more hype for Robot of Sherwood if it was Shearman writing it you have no loving idea. It's okay.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 21:47 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 07:40 |
|
GonSmithe posted:It's okay. I expect "okay". I want exemplary.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 21:48 |