|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:Play it totally straight with no mention of Hitler whatsoever. This reminds me of my favorite script idea ever: 2012 Black List posted:“Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil, and Vile” by Michael Werwie: 31 mentions It's Ted Bundy!
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2014 05:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 10:10 |
|
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:Alright, who'd be the overenthusiastic Jodorowsky figure? An elderly Leni Reifenstahl, except she'd be pretending to be someone else.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2014 07:36
|
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:This reminds me of my favorite script idea ever: Oh my God, is that real? I would love to read that screenplay.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2014 21:20
|
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:It's Ted Bundy! Is this presented as a twist then?
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2014 22:09
|
|
|
They'll call him Theodore Budansky up until the end of the movie when they reveal who he is. e: I know that's not his real last name, I was just being a silly. ruddiger fucked around with this message at 01:12 on Sep 3, 2014 |
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2014 22:15
|
|
|
ruddiger posted:They'll call him Theodore Budansky up until the end of the movie when they reveal who he is. That isn't his real name though, is it? How's it presented?
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2014 22:20
|
|
PriorMarcus posted:That isn't his real name though, is it? How's it presented? Bundy's birth name was actually Theodore Cowell, "Bundy" is the surname of his adoptive father, so they might go that way with it.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2014 22:56
|
|
|
I can see you...       
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 02:10
|
|
|
...there was a remake of Patrick with Charles Dance in it?
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 05:47
|
|
|
It seems like it's a yes: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2147459/ And they put the ugly floating heads poster in imdb
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 05:56
|
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:This reminds me of my favorite script idea ever: Holy poo poo. I wish I hadn't read the spoiler because that would have been absolutely amazing to watch unfold onscreen.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 07:36
|
|
|
lelandjs posted:Holy poo poo. I wish I hadn't read the spoiler because that would have been absolutely amazing to watch unfold onscreen. There was no way that the movie would be made and marketed without that being either obvious or just outright stated.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 15:04
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 15:05
|
|
|
muscles like this? posted:There was no way that the movie would be made and marketed without that being either obvious or just outright stated. Eh, all the great "twist" movies managed to make it through marketing unscathed (Sixth Sense, The Prestige, Fight Club... Hell, I don't think any reviewers even spoiled The Lego Movie).
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 16:40
|
|
|
Desperado Bones posted:I can see you... Man, I wish this movie was like 1/1000th as good as this poster.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 17:29
|
|
|
axleblaze posted:Man, I wish this movie was like 1/1000th as good as this poster.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:25
|
|
|
Slugworth posted:Said every person ever who has watched any horror movie ever. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 22:05
|
|
|
To be fair most horror movies do have kick-rear end posters. It's hard to live up to the hype sometimes.  I should KNOWN it wouldn't be as good. Why do I ALWAYS get so excited over the covers in the video shop?
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 23:07
|
|
|
Yeah, it was meant as a playful bash against a genre that I enjoy. It just holds true a lot, especially in the direct to video market.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 23:13
|
|
|
Lasher posted:To be fair most horror movies do have kick-rear end posters. It's hard to live up to the hype sometimes. They missed such a good opportunity to call it Ghoulies: Number Two
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 23:15
|
|
|
 How did this movie get made. How. HOW. and since we're on the subject of Gremlins rip-offs, we all know about Critters and Ghoulies, but I always loved this little-known movie. 
ruddiger fucked around with this message at 01:14 on Sep 4, 2014 |
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 01:08
|
|
|
If we're talking about Gremlins how could we forget this MST3K classic:
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 02:01
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 02:09
|
|
|
All I see is 9/11
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 02:11
|
|
|
 Somehow Critters is awesome in my book.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 02:14
|
|
|
That's because Critters is great.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 02:14
|
|
|
Yeah, those old horror movies loving rule!
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 04:46
|
|
|
Fuzzbee Morse would make a good band name.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 04:58
|
|
|
This is probably the most respectful mention of an actor who became a star AFTER the movie on a cover ever. As opposed to just making a cover that is a close-up of the big celeb (probably a publicity shot in which he/she looks nothing like in the movie) with the title above it in a large font and some of the other things in the movie in the background somewhere, who gives a poo poo, eh? However I can't help but think they wouldn't have shown this restraint if he wasn't a child at the time. Mierenneuker fucked around with this message at 08:35 on Sep 4, 2014 |
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 08:32
|
|
|
Crazy-Eyes Poster, UNITE!    Worst. Cyclops. Ever. (Mildly NWS for poorly-drawn nipple) 
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 08:38
|
|
|
It's the 20th Anniversary...
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 08:58
|
|
|
Distorted Kiwi posted:Crazy-Eyes Poster, UNITE! 
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 09:00
|
|
|
CaptainHollywood posted:It's the 20th Anniversary... Somehow they all ended up significantly better than 99% of grown child actors you see.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 09:02
|
|
|
Wow, that dog hasn't aged a day! ubergnu fucked around with this message at 11:45 on Sep 4, 2014 |
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 09:03
|
|
|
Haha, the one with the glasses changed the least. He has the same expression and they even give him the same hair. Someone can probably make a before and after poster for the original cast but we're way past page 666 now.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 10:43
|
|
|
Well gently caress no, not if I see he's calling.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 10:52
|
|
|
CaptainHollywood posted:It's the 20th Anniversary... That one guy's hair flipped to his jaw
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 10:54
|
|
|
slightly better quality
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 11:36
|
|
|
I've not seen it but I'll have to assume that it's a taxidermied dog in the original.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 13:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 10:10 |
|
|
uuuuuggggggghhhhhh
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 16:38
|
|