Avynte posted:

That is a lot of sluts.

Pug posted:

haha one of you guys got the top comment in the /r/news thread covering the banning of the subreddits

Tezzor posted:

reddit's commitment to :freespeech: lasts as long as it doesnt inconvenience the people in charge

Guy Fleegman posted:

Sire Oblivion posted:

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6CBqYxFcF4

Dude doesn't give a single gently caress.

LethalGeek posted:

I have to laugh at people having to grasp how to handle assholes in real life; ie ignore them.

DrPlump posted:

With the celebrity photo leaks, there is a big push underway to criminalize and stiffen the penalties for so-called "involuntary porn" or "revenge porn." There's going to be cries for more police resources, and even federal agencies to get involved in "revenge porn" allegations -- and this is very bad news for men.

Think about it. All an angry ex has to do is upload some nude, or even just suggestive pictures of herself and say that you did it. This is going to be one of those twisted scenarios where you have to prove your innocence, and that will be difficult. By that time the police will have already kicked down your door and confiscated your computers, phones, and tablets. Your name will be all over the six o'clock news, and your reputation in the community shot to hell.

Things will be even worse on college campuses where due process for accused men is a thing of the past. Are they going to risk their funding over possible Title IX infringements by assuming you are innocent and making the accuser prove it was you who "leaked" the photos? Hell no. Your academic career will be over, and good luck getting admitted to another campus.

It's coming, trust me. Angry women out there have thought about it and probably even tried it already. The only thing keeping this from becoming a weapon to be used against men is that legislators haven't gotten around to it yet. Right now it's still basically "you took nudes of yourself, assume some personal responsibility." And we all know how personal responsibility really isn't agreeable to the modern feminist.

Guy Fleegman posted:

"This occurred at a Slut Walk. For those not familiar with it, the Slut Walk is basically a peaceful protest seeking to eliminate the rape apologism so prevalent in society. The basis is that no woman is “asking for it,” with “it” being rape. It’s not a feminist protest; it’s a human rights protest.

Many of the protesters, as you can probably imagine, have dealt with sexual harassment or rape in their own lives. Many of them have structured their daily activities to avoid being raped. The gathering is supposed to be a place for them to feel empowered and able to recover in the company of those who understand what they’ve been through or who will not blame them.

Nobody at a Slut Walk will tell a survivor that it’s her fault. They will not ask what she was wearing to provoke her attacker. Nobody will say she had too much to drink. Nobody will tell the men in the group that they are inherently rapists themselves, and nobody will tell a male survivor that his experience “wasn’t really rape.”

Then, this fellow comes along. He sees this gathering of survivors and their supporters, and to him, it’s a joke. He sees feminazis. He sees girls who are taking “a bit of fun” too seriously. And what does he do? He exposes himself to this group of survivors and supporters - some of whom are, in fact, underage.

He sexually harasses literally hundreds of women in one act. Aside from public indecency, there was cruel intent in his actions. He wanted to make them uncomfortable. He wanted to “put them in their place.” Other photos from this event show him flipping the protesters off and laughing at their anger.

And there are still people defending his actions. There are those who still feel like these women were asking for itand that they deserved to be harassed for trying to claim they weren’t. There are those who feel that women should be taught a lesson this way, and they applaud this man’s actions.

So no, he didn’t pull out his dick in front of feminist protesters. He harassed dozens - if not hundreds - of rape survivors. The reaction to his actions alone outline the purpose of the Slut Walk.

For those of you still doubting whether what he did was wrong (and I do wonder if there’s something wrong with you, if you have doubts), let me give you an analogous situation. Imagine a gathering of black civil rights activists. Imagine Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, and all their colleagues gathered together to demonstrate that being black did not make them lesser people. That being black and living in the South did not mean they were “asking” to be the target of hate crimes."
________

I had forgotten all about this backstory being a misogynist and all.

ColdReaches posted:

Or you could, not have nude pictures?

ColdReaches posted:

Famous naked people look the same as non famous naked people.

I'm shocked.

Peppi posted:

4chan identified one of the women in this picture as a star of a brazillian horse porno.
There's a comparison pic floating around.

ColdReaches posted:

Or you could, not have nude pictures?

Sire Oblivion posted:

Please don't tell me it's the one in the black shirt. She has really nice tits.

DrPlump posted:

He was slut walking. Just because his penis was exposed doesn't mean he was asking for it.

vyst posted:

Famous boobs are the best. Quote this if you agree.

JoshGuitar posted:

If it's her, at least you'll get to see her tits! I now have "slut walk horse porn" in my Google search history .

Spanish Manlove posted:

Are you dorks still talking about this?

Spanish Manlove posted:

Are you dorks still talking about this?

Sheng-ji Yang posted:

poo say

Costello Jello posted:

It's taking so long to complete because I'm not using Elmer's glue. It's exhausting work.

ROFLSAWS posted:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-to-the-masses/

ROFLSAWS posted:

It looks like the backlash is starting on TheFappening organizer johnsmcjohn. He looks kind of looks like goon.jpg

https://twitter.com/johnsmcjohn