|
Antioch posted:...from me, to myself. I set up a new DFS server last week, and over the weekend I started moving user data to it. Before I started the robocopy, I removed all the test folders. I forgot my actual user folder was in there too. And I don't have backups set up yet because I didn't have anything set up. No chance you had VSS set up on that file server?
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 14:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 13:42 |
|
|
Jorath posted:Question for any of you managing Chrome. I have copies of 35.0.1916.114 and 35.0.1916.153 I can throw up somewhere if you can't find anywhere else to get them.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 17:46
|
|
|
A button to lower the screen in a conference room is broken and that is apparently my problem now. To that I say nope, call the people who put it in.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 18:23
|
|
|
m.hache posted:No chance you had VSS set up on that file server? No, VSS is next on the list of things to pitch to my boss. Or it would have been, if I hadn't accepted a new position 2 weeks ago. I'm just cleaning up the last of this migration project, then it's the textbook definition of an SEP
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 18:35
|
|
|
I love when content filters throw false positives. Yes a farm's website is totally a porn site. I wonder how long it will take the MSP to get back to me about the change. And the NAV issues get even more fun. The user was finally able to get on and was subsequently kicked off due to the MSP employee "checking his connection":. Yes doing connection tests to a production server while people are using it is a great idea. EVP of Finance is not a happy camper 
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 19:20
|
|
|
pr0digal posted:Yes a farm's website is totally a porn site.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 19:26
|
|
|
pr0digal posted:I love when content filters throw false positives. this morning our IPS decided that the SAN replication traffic between two datacenters was botnet command&control
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 19:45
|
|
|
pr0digal posted:I love when content filters throw false positives. Yes a farm's website is totally a porn site. I wonder how long it will take the MSP to get back to me about the change. I support vets, so I know exactly how you feel. They were going to try a web filter and every single one we tried blocked the websites of the vets we supported (it was so we could grab their numbers in case our system didn't have it, it has a few gaps). Of course, google just tells you the phone number anyway, but we didn't tell the manager guys that. Being able to browse the forums while transferring things is nice.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 20:35
|
|
|
I had the same thing happen a few times with our fortigate. A weather site is adult content? Hmm... It's trivial to change that on our end though.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 20:50
|
|
|
Orcs and Ostriches posted:I had the same thing happen a few times with our fortigate. A weather site is adult content? Hmm... It's trivial to change that on our end though. It's an easy change...they just won't let me do it for whatever reason. I don't even know what the agreement we have with this MSP is...we just sort of inherited them. The network engineer showed up for one of our early buildout meetings and nobody mentioned he was a consultant. They must drop some serious cash to have a pet MSP who is pretty much on staff there.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 21:01
|
|
|
afflictionwisp posted:this morning our IPS decided that the SAN replication traffic between two datacenters was botnet command&control I had something similar happen when the "Heartbleed" bug was first publicized. The IDS/IPS at every branch location decided that a few packets of port 9100 network printer traffic where attempts to exploit the bug. The resulting corrupted print jobs caused several printers to spit out thousands of pages of garbage. To make things worse, we did not know this at first because in typical Sonicwall fashion there was a bug with the IPS rule. It was blocking these packets completely in silence despite it being set to do the opposite. It was not triggering any alerts, did not appear in any logs, etc.. It took several days to track down the source of the problem; we only found out the IPS was blocking the packets once Sonicwall support got involved and found it mentioned in some internal debug log.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 21:15
|
|
|
A while back our firewall administrator decided to block Google Drive, not the website, but the downloadable application. That's fine. But something got screwed up in the configuration. I'm not sure exactly how but one person's Google Drive managed to take up our entire network bandwidth and our ISP killed our connection because it looked like we were DDOSing someone. This was the same admin that accidentally promoted someone's desktop to a domain controller then blamed him when people stopped being able to access the internet.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 21:34
|
|
|
A friend just texted me. All the hardwired connections on his campus just went down at once it seems. Someone in the NOC is about to have a very fun evening.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 21:40
|
|
|
pr0digal posted:A friend just texted me. All the hardwired connections on his campus just went down at once it seems. Or they are already having a very fun afternoon. Can I just say Godaddy sucks so hard? In order to transfer emails from one account to another I have to delete the email accounts, pay for email hosting again, transfer the domain over to the new account, then attempt to recreate the emails. They promised me that the mailboxes should stay with all the content intact but I really don't believe them. The new email system is on Office 365 while the current email is their old platform. Time to cut this over on the weekend and pray it doesn't gently caress up.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 21:44
|
|
|
Behold, gentlemen! The most damaged iPhone I've ever seen. User claimed it had been dropped from his hand to a concrete floor. When it was delivered to me and I had a chance to see it first-hand I felt obliged to challenge his story. He then amended his tale so that the phone dropped to a concrete floor... and then tumbled down a flight of concrete stairs. I still don't believe him but there's nowhere left for me to go with this. Hope he enjoys that old iPhone 4 I gave him.  
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 22:32
|
|
|
Dick Trauma posted:Behold, gentlemen! The most damaged iPhone I've ever seen. I imagine we are going to get a lot more of these now that the new iphones are announced. Lots of "accidents" are around the corner.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 22:36
|
|
|
Damage shows something rolling across the middle of that screen. Looks more like somebody rode a bike across it, especially with how it's bending.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 22:42
|
|
|
Yeah looks like it got ran over.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 22:44
|
|
|
Dick Trauma posted:Behold, gentlemen! The most damaged iPhone I've ever seen. This is covered by Apple Care, right? (lol)
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 22:48
|
|
|
Another vote for run over.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 22:52
|
|
|
Or possibly smashed against the edge of a table?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 22:56
|
|
|
It's stuff like that, that's made me glad we've switched to a BYOD model. We have allowances that are more than reasonable for the plans, but if people pull poo poo like that it's out of their pocket.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 23:00
|
|
|
SamDabbers posted:Or possibly smashed against the edge of a table? The damage shows the pressure on the device having moved from one point to another, rather than a sudden impact. I mean, the dude COULD have held it against something. If he's really heavy and it was in his back pocket when he leaned against the edge of a table, that MIGHT do it, but... most likely it was run over.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 23:06
|
|
|
Dick Trauma posted:Behold, gentlemen! The most damaged iPhone I've ever seen. A user in my office had a phone that was this bent but still functioned normally otherwise. He wanted me to replace the screen.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 23:23
|
|
|
An email came in!quote:HelloAlll,
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 23:36
|
|
|
plainswalker75 posted:An email came in!
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 23:39
|
|
|
KoRMaK posted:Life finds a way Only if the person in question produces a nice ascii representation of what is the problem. I can't see any problems here.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 00:35
|
|
|
Kurieg posted:
wait  ?
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 01:33
|
|
|
Dick Trauma posted:Behold, gentlemen! The most damaged iPhone I've ever seen. I first parsed those pictures as "he got it stuck in a wall??"
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 01:44
|
|
|
nzspambot posted:wait I know ? When you're all of a sudden responsible for a domain controller any competent worker in any field would automatically make sure their DHCP settings were correct.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 01:48
|
|
|
Kurieg posted:A while back our firewall administrator decided to block Google Drive, not the website, but the downloadable application. That's fine. But something got screwed up in the configuration. I'm not sure exactly how but one person's Google Drive managed to take up our entire network bandwidth and our ISP killed our connection because it looked like we were DDOSing someone. Well you see there is a lot wrong with that last part. Why are you installing windows server on desktops? How would promoting a server to a dc gently caress up peoples internet without added configuration? I am actually finding that whole scenario really hard to believe to be real. Sickening fucked around with this message at 01:50 on Sep 17, 2014 |
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 01:48
|
|
|
Sickening posted:Well you see there is a lot wrong with that last part. Why are you installing windows server on desktops? How would promoting a server to a dc gently caress up peoples internet without added configuration? I am actually finding that whole scenario really hard to believe to be real. We've got client server software where the server side actually requires windows server to be installed in some situations, and back before we had an actual virtualization server set up (E.G. a year and a half ago) we used to have to set up Server VMs on our local machines for configuration testing. And people didn't delete their perfectly functional VMs after the server got set up because our IT department hands out VM leases like they're golden tickets to the chocolate factory. I'm guessing somehow replication got turned on and people were still getting redirected after the VM got turned off.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 02:05
|
|
|
Kurieg posted:We've got client server software where the server side actually requires windows server to be installed in some situations, and back before we had an actual virtualization server set up (E.G. a year and a half ago) we used to have to set up Server VMs on our local machines for configuration testing. And people didn't delete their perfectly functional VMs after the server got set up because our IT department hands out VM leases like they're golden tickets to the chocolate factory. Sounds like a nightmare to administer. Also sounds like too much money is tied into server licenses instead of poo poo that makes sense.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 02:15
|
|
|
For the longest time our sole domain controller was a windows XP machine. I'm not sure how he pulled that off, but it was cheaper than buying an actual server license.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 02:20
|
|
|
Kurieg posted:For the longest time our sole domain controller was a windows XP machine. I'm not sure how he pulled that off, but it was cheaper than buying an actual server license. Samba on Cygwin maybe?
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 02:27
|
|
|
We discovered the hard way that is possible to change a global default for ClearCase by running a command on a client. A dev happened to run that command one day, resulting in every new view (local working copy) pointing at his box if the user did not specify where to store the tracking files. Needless to say, that one was tough to track down. I don't know if it was good or bad that he almost never rebooted, and left his machine on over the weekend. We certainly would have found the problem sooner, as I think it was that way for nearly a year. But having it up so consistently resulted in there seldom being user issues. I can only imagine how much more work that box did than every other workstation in his neighborhood before we found the problem.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 02:27
|
|
|
I just had to troubleshoot an issue for someone using AOL Desktop 9. I mean, I fixed it, but... 
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 03:37
|
|
|
Kurieg posted:And people didn't delete their perfectly functional VMs after the server got set up because our IT department hands out VM leases like they're golden tickets to the chocolate factory. So... they handed out eight leases, of which they each slowly failed through user error until they all failed?
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 13:10
|
|
|
Kurieg posted:For the longest time our sole domain controller was a windows XP machine. I'm not sure how he pulled that off, but it was cheaper than buying an actual server license. Huh? Maybe we aren't on the same page of what a "domain controller" is because I am pretty sure that's not possible. Just because a windows machine is running software to host DHCP or DNS doesn't make it a domain controller. Either way, it sounds like your shop has hit the wombo combo of having people make dumb infrastructure decisions as well as letting devs run wild.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 14:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 13:42 |
|
|
Collateral Damage posted:Nagios reports that the chiller inlet temperature is 512C. Either the environmental monitor is on the fritz, or the datacenter is on fire.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 14:27
|
|
