|
Dear god hitting one year olds.
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 17:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 16:38 |
|
|
I just can't get over "I definitely will try to not leave bruises."  Reginald Bush, you are under arrest for the negligent injury to a child. But officer, I didn't try to leave any of those bruises!
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 17:23
|
|
|
What could a 1 year old possibly do to deserve a beating of any kind? Cry in the car? Poop it's diaper? Not like I expect Reggie Bush to be changing any diapers ever for it to matter.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 17:25
|
|
|
Gumbel2Gumbel posted:"Hey Matt, I heard this off color joke the other day." Clearly you didn't see Hard Knocks this season, Matt Ryan told a risque joke. football fuckerman posted:Shouldn't have told us to close our eyes, I dozed off  Bigass Moth posted:What could a 1 year old possibly do to deserve a beating of any kind? Cry in the car? Poop it's diaper? Not like I expect Reggie Bush to be changing any diapers ever for it to matter. I was listening to NPR a few years ago and, if I recall correctly, a child psychologist mentioned using physical discipline (spanking not beating) only in cases where a child does something truly life threatening like try to grab the stove or run into the street. If she's closer to 24 months than 12 you might be able to make a case for a light spanking for something along those lines, but I doubt that is what Bush is talking about.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 17:28
|
|
|
Dvlos posted:I do think that Tannehill has had some great throws just dropped (Hartline/Wallace toe tap drat you!/Miller wtf Can't CatcH Miller) but reading this has changed my opinion on the guy a bit. I think he is 50/50. He had some amazing throws dropped, two of which were touchdowns (backup tight end drop, Wallace drop) and he's had some big 3rd downs dropped (clay, Landry) That's fine. He's also overthrown a wise open miller. He's missed a crossing Gibson. He throws behind more than you'd like. I'm seeing year 1 problems still. Scares me.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 17:32
|
|
|
Mike Pouncey is practicing for the second day in a row. He is in full pads today.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 17:37
|
|
|
I dunno, I'm conflicted, a young kid who can't yet logic things out I'm fine with using super light physical discipline to keep them from repeating a bad action. As soon as they get old enough to logic things out themselves, it's dumb to use physical force to enforce your rules, as in order to affect them as they grow up you have to escalate, and the second they get old/strong enough to defy you, your ability to enforce be a parent is over, as they never really respected so much as feared you.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 17:37
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:No one wants to watch a movie about two desk jockeys, nerd. football fuckerman posted:Shouldn't have told us to close our eyes, I dozed off  There's nothing wrong with a two grown men reenacting a Hardy Boys investigation!
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 17:38
|
|
|
old dog child posted:
"Joe, I'm gettin' worried about you. You been staying up past 9, your shirt's untucked, and I caught you riding a skateboard last week."
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 17:51
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:I know I'm going to get That's bullshit. You don't know that Peterson's kid wasn't high on cocaine at the time of the spanking. Maybe that's WHY he was getting the whoopin.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:10
|
|
here but this is not the same as the Rice and Peterson situations at all.
|
old dog child posted:
The first time Joe Flacco has ejaculated, ever
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:11
|
|
|
"Y'know Matt, this wonderbread is really spicy!"
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:13
|
|
|
Dexo posted:I dunno, I'm conflicted, a young kid who can't yet logic things out I'm fine with using super light physical discipline to keep them from repeating a bad action. That's why you keep hitting the gym And then your kids 
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:14
|
|
|
three posted:That's bullshit. I mean being high on blow doesn't give someone the right to beat the hell out of you (unless it's two guy friends and Jesus dude it was either I did it or those five guys) but Nicole holder barely has any credibility compared to rice and Peterson.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:16
|
|
|
Matt Ryan breaks into the evidence room to steal a pocket protector so he can infiltrate his old math club.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:33
|
|
|
BobbyK posted:Yeah you gotta be quite the homer to think they have a talent level in the top 10 that's just some how being held back by Capers. Caper's a nice scapegoat for Packer's fans to focus on when they want to ignore the horrible depth and talent at key defensive positions and all but I just wasn't sure why an ex, middle of the road linebacker saying "unleash clay and peppers" somehow constituted a smoking gun to show how bad Capers is. Bro how come half this forum has trouble reading posts clearly? I said the cornerbacks are close to a top 10 squad in the league, not the entire Packers defense. And posting a couple tweets and griping about Dom Capers is hardly a "smoking gun". I'm calling you subliterate, just so we can spell it out clearly for your benefit.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:34
|
|
|
According to FO the Eagles are 6th...in defensive DVOA  http://www.footballoutsiders.com/dvoa-ratings/2014/week-2-dvoa-ratings What is this strange new world?
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:35
|
|
|
axeil posted:According to FO the Eagles are 6th...in defensive DVOA You played the Jaguars week 1.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:36
|
|
|
DupaDupa posted:
Look, I know Adrian Peterson did this thing that has potentially ruined his career, but let me explain why they way I do it is ok
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:37
|
|
|
axeil posted:According to FO the Eagles are 6th...in defensive DVOA One with a top five defenses that includes Washington, the Lions and the Patriots.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:39
|
|
|
Bort Bortles posted:You played the Jaguars week 1. They were 10th last week, which implies their performance in week 2 was good enough to move them up. Yeah I dunno. Kalli posted:One with a top five defenses that includes Washington, the Lions and the Patriots. I didn't even notice that. I don't think early season DVOA is very useful...
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:41
|
|
|
Kalli posted:One with a top five defenses that includes Washington, the Lions and the Patriots. Funny, one of these teams played the Jaguars week 2. axeil posted:They were 10th last week, which implies their performance in week 2 was good enough to move them up. Thats just strange and wrong 
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:41
|
|
|
axeil posted:According to FO the Eagles are 6th...in defensive DVOA Jaguars and nice (and disputed) takeaway at the end of the colts game. It will be around league average I suspect. Also for some reason Luck was against throwing.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:41
|
|
|
I always felt like team DVOA was hard to take seriously until about week 4-5 because by then teams have showed their true colors, after week 2 we might still be in unknown fluke territory.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:45
|
|
|
They basically tell you to not even pay attention to DVOA until at least week 4.FO posted:We do not include opponent adjustments in our numbers until Week 4 because this early in the season, it is hard to tell which results are "real" and which results are "fluky." Our research has suggested that we have enough data to start doing opponent adjustments after four games. After Week 4, we do the opponent adjustments at 40 percent their usual strength, and then that goes up by 10 percent each week until we reach full strength after Week 10.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:46
|
|
|
axeil posted:
Yeah, just tiny sample sizes. Aside from the Jaguars, the Patriots committed unholy acts against a Matt Cassel led attack that lost their best player the day before the game. Somehow I doubt Seattle will be the 21st ranked defense once they're not playing Rodgers and Rivers. It'll be lower, because here comes a throbbing Peyton
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:46
|
|
|
Ozu posted:They basically tell you to not even pay attention to DVOA until at least week 4. Yeah, that's also why they use that previous season stat (DAVE) for the first chunk of the season to normalize data.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:51
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:Clearly you didn't see Hard Knocks this season, Matt Ryan told a risque joke. What an awkward scene, whether or not you have heard the joke
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 18:54
|
|
|
DupaDupa posted:
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 19:08
|
|
|
538 Week 3 ELO Playoff predictions. AFCS and NFCN are the most competitive. Cardinals moving up slowly  
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 19:12
|
|
|
Bengals are the best team in the North but not by that much and they play a much harder schedule than the rest of the division.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 19:15
|
|
|
Qwijib0 posted:538 Week 3 ELO Playoff predictions. AFCS and NFCN are the most competitive. Cardinals moving up slowly Giants way too high.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 19:16
|
|
|
DupaDupa posted:
To be fair pretty much every other football player has managed to not say the obvious dumb thing in the current media climate. There's just always a few idiots who can't help themselves. Then again, a man who is talking about not leaving bruises on a one year old probably doesn't have a ton of self awareness.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 19:17
|
|
|
The Puppy Bowl posted:Bengals are the best team in the North but not by that much and they play a much harder schedule than the rest of the division. Hey now don't sell yourself short you probably are still a little bit better than the Browns.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 19:21
|
|
|
Fortunately he does not actually hit his one-year-old child, thank goodness.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 19:24
|
|
|
According to Uniwatch, the NFL is going to downplay pink October this year and trump up camo and support for veterans. Apparently this isn't related to anything specific but planned for a while. quote:Yesterday afternoon I took part in a panel discussion as part of an NYU sports business class. One of the other panelists was the buyer for a well-known chain of sporting goods stores — let’s call him Mr. Buyer — and he had some very interesting things to say, chief among them the news that the NFL will be dialing back the throttle a bit this year on Pinktober. This has nothing to do with the recent domestic violence issues that have been in the news — Mr. Buyer said the league had already planned to soft-pedal the pink months ago. There’ll still be some pink, but not as much. It won’t be used for any nationally televised games, for example.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 19:24
|
|
|
Kalli posted:a throbbing Peyton Man, its a shame I'm not a broncos fan and recently changed my name already.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 19:24
|
|
|
Flikken posted:Hey now don't sell yourself short you probably are still a little bit better than the Browns. Only at QB but that's a pretty important spot. Suppose we'll see on Sunday.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 19:24
|
|
|
So when he said that he tries not to leave bruises on her, he meant that literally as in he does not hit her at all that's kinda funny
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 19:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 16:38 |
|
|
Qwijib0 posted:538 Week 3 ELO Playoff predictions. AFCS and NFCN are the most competitive. Cardinals moving up slowly It's really interesting how the Panthers are a 67% chance to win the division, yet are +150 at most sportsbooks for winning the division. For comparison, these Elo rating have the Broncos at only a 62% chance to win their division (5% less than the Panthers) but are freakin -700 to win the AFC West. I guess Vegas has more faith in the Saints/Falcons than they do the Chargers, but I figure Elo's forecasts would also have taken that into account. Time to place a bet on the Panthers to win their division
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 19:26
|
|