|
does C# not have a generic sqlite engine? you should use that unless you're making an mmo
|
# ? Oct 5, 2014 19:54 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 03:11 |
|
system.data.sqlite would also be an option yes VS comes with SQL express but I have server 2014 anyway for other things so my SQL server is on my host PC. I want to connect to it from my guest VM. I do this with Windows and password auth currently but is there a way to do it with only windows auth and not need a second password without a domain controller on my network? cause I'm not doing that
|
# ? Oct 5, 2014 20:22 |
|
there is also sql embedded which is basically a db file w/ a library for reading it (no server). i guess that's more like SQLite.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2014 20:24 |
|
MeruFM posted:does C# not have a generic sqlite engine? you should use that unless you're making an mmo Entity Framework is the .NET clone of Core Data, I'm pretty sure there's been some equivalent to the SQLite persistent store for standalone app use since the first version. there's also an actual SQLite backend for it
|
# ? Oct 6, 2014 02:37 |
|
Shaggar posted:write procs in your db and call the procs from ur code. EF will let you use them as function imports which works ok but is not great.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2014 08:44 |
|
eschaton posted:Entity Framework is the .NET clone of Core Data now we know why it's terrible
|
# ? Oct 6, 2014 13:20 |
|
entity framework is fine for quick prototyping but lol if you think that prototype won't end up in production
|
# ? Oct 6, 2014 15:38 |
|
actually I found that to be utterly untrue. I spent more time fighting EF than I would have spent just writing the db stuff myself
|
# ? Oct 6, 2014 15:39 |
|
Is there any kind of tool I can use to check validity and formatting of my django templates? Normal tools don't cut it as they want to add lots of random tags because of the django template code
|
# ? Oct 6, 2014 16:59 |
|
OK finally got CTCI. Are O'Reilly books good for a specific language or stack? I need to deshitbird myself.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2014 17:30 |
|
Valeyard posted:Is there any kind of tool I can use to check validity and formatting of my django templates? Normal tools don't cut it as they want to add lots of random tags because of the django template code build a time machine and go to 2010 try asking there
|
# ? Oct 6, 2014 17:39 |
|
Depends on the book. I encountered some real disappointing ones, but I've never regretted my Safari subscription.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2014 17:39 |
|
more like dICK posted:Depends on the book. I encountered some real disappointing ones, but I've never regretted my Safari subscription. i had a safari subscription for a few years -- it's expensive, but worth it
|
# ? Oct 6, 2014 17:50 |
|
gently caress them posted:OK finally got CTCI. poo poo i forgot to reply to you. i am a bad person. probably not tonight but tomorrow.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2014 18:03 |
|
we did it yospos i made money off the windows store
|
# ? Oct 6, 2014 21:15 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:we did it yospos
|
# ? Oct 6, 2014 21:17 |
|
gently caress them posted:OK finally got CTCI. oreilly is among the best tech publishers (along with pearson) but they still publish a ton of second-rate poo poo alongside instant classics. that's just how tech publishing works the oreilly online offering has essentially oreilly and pearson's entire back catalogues so that's fun. if you run across a shitbird text you are out nothing more than the time spent figuring out it sucks
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 02:55 |
|
is there a library that will let me read XML using dot notation through the dynamic type like the newtonsoft JSON library? e: XML is stupid and this probably isn't possible but whatever Luigi Thirty fucked around with this message at 07:32 on Oct 7, 2014 |
# ? Oct 7, 2014 06:03 |
|
XML::Farse
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 06:08 |
|
boost
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 07:27 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:is there a library that will let me read XML using dot notation through the dynamic type like the newtonsoft JSON library? doesn't linq to xml let you do this?
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 08:34 |
|
~Coxy posted:doesn't linq to xml let you do this? it's kinda wacky but it'll do also thankfully it turns out the thing i'm working with can actually output things other than xml so nevermind
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 08:45 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:oreilly is among the best tech publishers (along with pearson) but they still publish a ton of second-rate poo poo alongside instant classics. that's just how tech publishing works Where does Learning Python by mark lutz fall on the suck spectrum? I'm currently 30% in and while I'm learning a lot (like in-space changes!) it's also very technical and a fair bit goes over my head. It's also spergily in-depth, particularly for a beginner programmer.
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 09:06 |
|
It's a really good book that is too in depth to be useful for someone actually learning python for the first time.
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 13:52 |
|
Whats a good resource for learning functional stuff? I saw that objc.io just put out a functional book in swift(their blogs are always really good so I imagine it's p good) but the price is a lil steep.
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 17:35 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:is there a library that will let me read XML using dot notation through the dynamic type like the newtonsoft JSON library? yo that's gross. xml is fine but either way just deserialize it into a real object instead of doing dynamic crap
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 17:37 |
|
Papes posted:Whats a good resource for learning functional stuff? I saw that objc.io just put out a functional book in swift(their blogs are always really good so I imagine it's p good) but the price is a lil steep. http://learnyouahaskell.com/
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 17:50 |
|
The Eclipse developers should probably find their way to this thread, judging by the regression bugs I've been filing against Luna.
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 18:35 |
|
Papes posted:Whats a good resource for learning functional stuff? I saw that objc.io just put out a functional book in swift(their blogs are always really good so I imagine it's p good) but the price is a lil steep. llleeeaaarrrnnnn yooouuu aaa haaassskkeeelllll
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 20:14 |
|
CPColin posted:The Eclipse developers should probably find their way to this thread, judging by the regression bugs I've been filing against Luna.
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 20:22 |
|
ok: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=445708 Nothing like adding a unit test for a bug fix, then having the next release regress the bug because the unit test disappeared? Edit: Oh I guess Eclipse was looking at a different version of its annotations package. Because of course it ships with multiple versions. CPColin fucked around with this message at 22:27 on Oct 7, 2014 |
# ? Oct 7, 2014 20:42 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:we did it yospos that is cool, congratulations you are inspiring me to maybe possibly work on a windows store app or something
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 21:28 |
|
CPColin posted:ok: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=445708 are they ever gonna redo rcp in something newer than java 1.4?
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 23:03 |
|
Careful Drums posted:that is cool, congratulations it's a lot easier than I thought it would be once I figured out how to do everything and the certification turnaround time for my updates is about an hour unlike Crapple. problem is nobody uses the win8 store lol. like my brother has used windows 8 for a year and he didn't even know the store existed. so my next question: if I want to do bar charts and pie charts in WPF or metro, what's a good library I can use? there's a bunch I found and they're all terrible.
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 23:08 |
|
the reason the turnaround is so fast is no human looked at ur app lol.
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 23:14 |
|
Shaggar posted:the reason the turnaround is so fast is no human looked at ur app lol. *raises paw containing playbook and z10 given for manually curated non-functional blackberry app*
|
# ? Oct 7, 2014 23:18 |
|
code:
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 00:07 |
|
My experience doing (.NET) MVC was with knockout.js handling viewModels that I'd throw around myself, and using razor to sometimes generate static things - but mostly AJAX poo poo. Needless to say, when I come to a "MVC job" and they asked me about tempdata/viewdata I went "I didn't use that, but I'm guessing it's storing the state of the controls on the page?" and I'm told "Yes, but one is view to view the other is controller to controller." I was then passed over. What's a good primer for "proper MVC" - just get on MSDN and read? I'm down to get a book if someone has one in mind. Or a website. Anyone can just google "interview questions" - I did - but I'd like to really know what they expect. Doing some ko MVVM was some good fun and it just "clicked" to be sure, but not everyone does that. Meh. Also I've almost talked myself into a relocation to a real market I might get to Raleigh before the leaves change.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 00:47 |
|
you should've told them only idiots use temp and view data because most websites that aren't poo poo are load balanced and shared state is poo poo
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 00:52 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 03:11 |
|
https://education.github.com/pack/ This owns, they are giving away some cool stuff for being a student. Saves me the bother of trying to convince my university to sign up for the UE4 education stuff
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 00:54 |