|
Randler posted:BECOME A SINGLE ISSUE VOTER LIKE US. TURN OUT FOR WHAT. Also the exactly what issue you'd think they'd turn out for at first glance. OK here's a controversial question that I'm afraid to broach to my two gay roommates. What's up with the "flaming effeminate" affectation of gay men? Where does that come from?
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 16:38 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 05:23 |
|
I mean I get that it's probably selection bias. If 10% of gay men wore a big red feather on their heads then you'd notice them more and you'd say, hmm all gay people wear red feathers, but it's just you aren't noticing the 90% of gay men that don't wear a feather. Of my roommates, you'd only guess one was gay if you met them both, but for those who affect the "stereotypical gay" persona, again, what's up with that?
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 16:41 |
|
zoux posted:Also the exactly what issue you'd think they'd turn out for at first glance. as a gay man idk, but i think it had something to do with that if gay men were feminine and ridiculous it was less threatening? i feel like i read that somewhere. edit: full disclosure, my grindr profile does not say masc only
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 16:42 |
|
You like those smooth twink boys huh.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 16:44 |
|
not necessarily but i just think it's hella rude to say "masc only, no fems, no blacks, no fatties" on your profile. like if those are your preferences fine but you don't have to broadcast it. it's not like you're required to respond to messages.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 16:45 |
|
"No fatties" isn't actually a statement about preferences (because fatties are less prefered by default ) but a statement by the user about how he is so much better than the rest of the apps pool and don't you ever forget it.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 16:49 |
|
Randler posted:"No fatties" isn't actually a statement about preferences (because fatties are less prefered by default ) but a statement by the user about how he is so much better than the rest of the apps pool and don't you ever forget it. yeah this too.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 16:50 |
|
zoux posted:I mean I get that it's probably selection bias. If 10% of gay men wore a big red feather on their heads then you'd notice them more and you'd say, hmm all gay people wear red feathers, but it's just you aren't noticing the 90% of gay men that don't wear a feather. Of my roommates, you'd only guess one was gay if you met them both, but for those who affect the "stereotypical gay" persona, again, what's up with that?
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 17:17 |
|
zoux posted:Here's a tip NIDA and all the other federal anti-drug agencies lie all the time. That's, um, not true.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 17:18 |
|
SubponticatePoster posted:I'm a lesbian so I can't definitively speak for all my homo brothers, but in some cases that's just how they are. Sometimes it's exaggerated for effect. Like maybe you're a little bit swishy and then push it to full combustion so there's no mistaking the gayness. And yeah, you probably notice it more because acting like anything other than what we define as "a man" is going to stand out. Well my question for you is what's up with ultra butch lesbians who try to emulate every societal marker for "masculinity".
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 17:19 |
|
Kristov posted:So... you're saying I should cash in my 401k and go on a self-destructive drug bender that will untimately end my life? What do you mean esoteric
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 17:21 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:That's, um, not true. Shut the gently caress up.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 17:23 |
|
mdemone posted:How can that 25% figure possibly be true? It seems way too...high. Could be, let's parse out the descriptors though to cover our bases: 25% of all -Drug Related -Fatal Accidents -involved Marijuana Does the 'involvement' of marijuana explicitly mean that marijuana had anything to do with the accident?
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 17:28 |
|
huffpo.jpg
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 17:30 |
|
zoux posted:Well my question for you is what's up with ultra butch lesbians who try to emulate every societal marker for "masculinity". Seriously, probably a lot of the same. Like, I don't find most women's clothing or makeup appealing in the slightest. I refuse to wear dresses. I like traditionally masculine things (sports, cars, videogames, etc) but I don't consciously think about my preferences in the context of smashing the patriarchy or whatever. I like what I like, these things just happen to be what we consider masculine tastes. Also in cases of the extremely butch where the worst aspects of traditional masculinity are being aped, I think it may be a case of societal conditioning where "femininity" is considered to be inferior and bad and that message has been internalized.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 17:36 |
|
I imagine it's like the normal people I've seen only spend a couple years in Texas and come back with a drawl. They say its a more comfortable way of speaking. I don't think anyone's ever accused a transatlantic accent of being 'comfortable'.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 17:51 |
Doctor Butts posted:Could be, let's parse out the descriptors though to cover our bases: Yeah it's something like this. I bet what they do is they take all the fatal accidents where anyone has any drugs in their toxicology report (alcohol isn't a drug for this purpose), and find that in 25% of those cases marijuana is present. Which makes sense, because marijuana is probably the most common drug besides alcohol. I'm surprised this doesn't lead to a higher percentage, actually.
|
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:05 |
|
They do this bullshit with alcohol too. Did you have 2 drinks at dinner, then get T-boned by someone texting on your way home? Congratulations! Your accident is now "alcohol-related."
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:12 |
|
which is even stupider with weed because THC stays in your system for weeks
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:15 |
|
The Ebola man died
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:15 |
|
zoux posted:The Ebola man died RIP. you tried to save them
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:18 |
|
VikingofRock posted:Yeah it's something like this. I bet what they do is they take all the fatal accidents where anyone has any drugs in their toxicology report (alcohol isn't a drug for this purpose), and find that in 25% of those cases marijuana is present. Which makes sense, because marijuana is probably the most common drug besides alcohol. I'm surprised this doesn't lead to a higher percentage, actually. That's not the methodology used. You lost the bet. (PDF with what they claim is their source (or rather, claim is there source in what they claim in as their source. Layers, man.)) Randler fucked around with this message at 18:33 on Oct 8, 2014 |
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:30 |
|
weed was only made illegal because blacks and mexicans liked it a lot. now we have to find goot post-facto justifications for why it should remain illegal like it makes teens disobey their parents and stay out all night
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:35 |
|
also denver is the capital of beer. i get to go to denver on business trips frequently and it is rad. denver is rad. good beer, legal pot. thanks denver
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:37 |
|
It'll get legalized eventually. I just think it's super disingenuous to say "Weed sends all these people to the hospital" which makes people think that it's dangerous, and they're going to the ER because of weed freak outs.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:37 |
|
The more noticeable risk of "drivers with weed" is that an extremely large chunk of them are actually "drivers with weed and alcohol at the same time". MISCHKONSUM!
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:38 |
|
Badger of Basra posted:no one ever shows up to my office hours guys Savor your freedom, do some readings or post more.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:42 |
|
zoux posted:Shut the gently caress up. I like to imagine that all of your posts are literally written by Laika. My Imaginary GF posted:Savor your freedom, do some readings or post more. Nobody goes to your office hours either, then?
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:46 |
|
It's not Laika.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:46 |
|
zoux posted:It's not Laika. What?! Then who is it?
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:49 |
|
My favy comics character
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:50 |
|
tbp posted:What do you mean esoteric I dunno, seems like your posts occasionally seem incomprehensible to me because I dont immediately recognize some of the acronyms you use. So the word 'esoteric' popped in my head as the word to describe them because my ego refuses to let me think thats my fault somehow.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:50 |
|
zoux posted:It'll get legalized eventually. yeah the only way weed can send you to a hospital is if you get too high and have panic attacks or end up doing something really stupid. in georgia there's some law "shane's law" where a kid named shane smoked way too much fake weed in a hot tub, passed out and drowned. IMO "don't dose on drugs in a body of water" should be taught in high school in terms of simple life hacks to not die stupidly
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:51 |
|
Kristov posted:I dunno, seems like your posts occasionally seem incomprehensible to me because I dont immediately recognize some of the acronyms you use. So the word 'esoteric' popped in my head as the word to describe them because my ego refuses to let me think thats my fault somehow. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj1DZKOeZhI&t=12s
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:51 |
|
that fake weed exists is probably one of the stronger arguments for its legalization "well we could legalize this thing with absolutely minimal health effects or we could not and let people smoke imported powder from China"
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:53 |
|
Oh they're illegalizing fake weed too.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:54 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:that fake weed exists is probably one of the stronger arguments for its legalization i once overdosed on a synthetic cannabanoid, realized i was too high to summon help for myself, and simply laid down waiting to die zoux posted:Oh they're illegalizing fake weed too. you have to make specific subtances illegal and organic chemistry is always quicker than legislation. this is just a feedback loop to cause people to buy even more insane powder off the internet
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:54 |
|
Fake weed is actually way more dangerous than real weed.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:55 |
|
yeah but then the whatever chemical companies in china are making the poo poo just throw some more elements or molecules on the end of it and the process starts all over again
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:55 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 05:23 |
|
Kristov posted:I dunno, seems like your posts occasionally seem incomprehensible to me because I dont immediately recognize some of the acronyms you use. So the word 'esoteric' popped in my head as the word to describe them because my ego refuses to let me think thats my fault somehow. idk i use a lot of acronym when typing online...i just kind of always did it that way
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 18:56 |