|
AAAAAAALLLLLFFFFRREEEEDDDDDD!!! HOW DID I BECOME GARY BUSEY???
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 02:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 16:05 |
|
|
Now show how it was supposed to look.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 02:20
|
|
|
Phylodox posted:Now show how it was supposed to look. Original and fixed for the trade.  Eyelids mistaken for eyes. It was amazing. An example of the original pencils vs the terrible finishing. 
Teenage Fansub fucked around with this message at 02:57 on Sep 18, 2014 |
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 02:48
|
|
|
A great example of how the right colorist can make good art look great... or mediocre art look awful.quote:
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 03:09
|
|
|
AnonSpore posted:drat, the art has gotten a lot better since the days of crying Sloth-Batman. SlothBear posted:Link please. Really dropping the ball there, SlothBear.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 03:32
|
|
|
Teenage Fansub posted:An example of the original pencils vs the terrible finishing. Can someone explain why this is so bad? I see the weird leather strap on the left side of her face, but I've gotta be missing something.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 05:09
|
|
|
Why the finishing is considered bad? They eyes go skewed, eyelids are left out (e: or turned into the eye on her left), nostrils look worse, her left wrist cuff gets fishnets, mistakes the goggles strap for a bald patch. The eyes are the worst.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 06:23
|
|
|
In summary, I'm not entirely convinced the dude doing inks/colors wasn't one of those people who need glasses but stubbornly refuse to wear them. Those differences are like night and day, god drat
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 06:34
|
|
|
Hahaha, holy poo poo I did not see the eye thing, but now that you've pointed it out it's all that I can see. It's like those video edits where someone gives an actor googly eyes. I love it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 07:49
|
|
|
Elfquest #18:    
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2014 21:56
|
|
|
The entirety of Essex County
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2014 23:16
|
|
|
bobkatt013 posted:The entirety of Essex County This man right here. He knows what he's talking about.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 01:48
|
|
|
If you can please help me, I'd really appreciate it. I read a panel on here once about loss and how it was like being told you could never see the ocean again. How it didn't matter that it was there and you had memories of it, you'd never get to see it. My mom is not doing well, and I'd really like to see whatever comic that comic was from tonight. Thanks if you can help.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 00:22
|
|
|
Batman/Superman #14: Batman's been mindwiped by a god of chaos. He's been running around doing a little crimefighting (kind of humorously, he still remembers how to fight pretty much just off muscle memory), but accidentally got some people shot facing off against Scarecrow and had to run back to the Cave.   It's always so sad watching Alfred just trying to talk Bruce into quitting.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 05:56
|
|
|
Batman/Superman #15 followed up on that. Spoilers obviously. It's so heartbreaking because all he wants is for Bruce to be happy.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 15:49
|
|
|
McCloud posted:Batman/Superman #15 followed up on that. Spoilers obviously. '...and I can breathe in space.' I'm sorry, I just wanted to lighten the mood. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 18:14
|
|
|
Found this while browsing Imgur. It's apparently from a Croatian comic magazine, "Q." http://imgur.com/gallery/nUn8G        
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 03:52
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 14:43
|
|
|
I never liked it before, but I really don't like it after reading that comic. gently caress Lichtenstein and the art world at large.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 15:23
|
|
|
If you think that's bad, I hear the people photographed in Pulitzer-winning news photos don't get a dime!
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 15:37
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:If you think that's bad, I hear the people photographed in Pulitzer-winning news photos don't get a dime!
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 16:23
|
|
|
I "get" why Lichtentstein's poo poo was considered kosher, but it was also mean-spirited and snobby and even if there's nothing "wrong" with it (and even if we'd all do the same in his shoes) it's still really lovely to ride that to the bank.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 17:23
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:If you think that's bad, I hear the people photographed in Pulitzer-winning news photos don't get a dime! It seems closer to musical covers imo
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 21:14
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:If you think that's bad, I hear the people photographed in Pulitzer-winning news photos don't get a dime! And the person who won it gets $10k on top of a salary that is less than $50k on average. Not really the same ballpark as $4m.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 21:15
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:If you think that's bad, I hear the people photographed in Pulitzer-winning news photos don't get a dime! When you (you personally, not the ambiguous 'you') produce something original and then someone else copies it and sells it as their own work, you might develop a different outlook.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 08:28
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:If you think that's bad, I hear the people photographed in Pulitzer-winning news photos don't get a dime! That might make sense, I guess, if Lichtenstein's painting had been of Irv Novick, and not one of his drawings.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 16:47
|
|
|
McCloud posted:Batman/Superman #15 followed up on that. Spoilers obviously. Poor Alfred.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2014 22:55
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:It seems closer to musical covers imo If you're going to try and make money from a musical cover you have to pay a licensing fee to the original artist.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2014 03:53
|
|
|
Pigbog posted:If you're going to try and make money from a musical cover you have to pay a licensing fee to the original artist. That's what I was going for, I agree with the comic's sentiment.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2014 06:23
|
|
|
drat, I just did a little research and the whole Lichtenstein painting Irv Novick's panels is even worse than it sounds at first. Lichtenstein's process was just using a projector to trace and being lax with details, he didn't change anything but remove a speech bubble, copy a similar plane from a different panel and generally make it look worse. To add insult to injury, Lichtenstein claims he made it trying to find something that galleries wouldn't hang. The point of his 'art' is that the original panel isn't art. For reference, the original:  The copy:  Bonus, someone making fun of the copy: 
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2014 15:33
|
|
|
Does anyone have In Memoriam page of the Marvel 75th Special?
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2014 16:18
|
|
|
bobkatt013 posted:Does anyone have In Memoriam page of the Marvel 75th Special?  
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2014 14:19
|
|
|
It'd have been pretty hilarious had the Kirby lawsuit gone differently/not settled and they had not put his name on it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2014 14:28
|
|
Waterhaul posted:It'd have been pretty hilarious had the Kirby lawsuit gone differently/not settled and they had not put his name on it. Yeah it'd have been funny if this thing that wouldn't happen would've happened.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2014 14:30
|
|
|
Why are like six names bigger than everyone else's?
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2014 14:37
|
|
|
Comics always randomly bold words.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2014 15:19
|
|
|
Is the "In Memoriam" part spelled right? Isn't it supposed to be -am at the end, not -um?
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2014 19:21
|
|
|
My latin is beyond rusty but that might be latin conjugation. E: Nope, that's a misspelling. Lurdiak fucked around with this message at 19:27 on Nov 7, 2014 |
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2014 19:23
|
|
|
redbackground posted:Why are like six names bigger than everyone else's? I think those are the names of people whose careers were primarily at Marvel. (It sure would've been great if they'd spelled "Memoriam" properly.)
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2014 19:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 16:05 |
|
|
I wonder how much they messed with the design to get Jack Kirby's name right in the center above Cap's head.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2014 21:06
|
|
