|
Stairs posted:I used to live in Peachtree City GA and it was awful the amount of people that would come in asking where to get peaches. On the other hand, there are more than enough golf carts.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2014 02:16 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 23:07 |
|
what the gently caress is grocery shopping? what is servings?
|
# ? Oct 26, 2014 07:01 |
Daniel Bryan posted:what the gently caress is grocery shopping? what is servings? I don't understand how you can so blatantly ignore that each part that's listed can be used for more than one meal.
|
|
# ? Oct 26, 2014 07:03 |
|
What if he really uses $3.69 of mayo on every hamburger?
|
# ? Oct 26, 2014 07:48 |
|
Chomp8645 posted:What if he really uses $3.69 of mayo on every hamburger? This but with mayo: http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view2/3524626/simpsons-lighter-fluid-o.gif
|
# ? Oct 26, 2014 07:52 |
|
Fil5000 posted:This but with mayo: So this
|
# ? Oct 26, 2014 07:55 |
|
Mr E posted:I don't understand how you can so blatantly ignore that each part that's listed can be used for more than one meal. "What do you mean, serving size? A serving is as much as i can cram into my cavernous gullet in one sitting"*downs 5 hungry man TV dinners a week for a decade, dies of CHD at age 35*
|
# ? Oct 26, 2014 09:12 |
|
Wait, so I wasn't supposed to use *all* the slices of cheese for just one burger?
|
# ? Oct 26, 2014 09:28 |
|
Even if he eats 2 burgers and an entire box of macaroni per meal, he still gets almost 2 meals for the price of 1 if he buys and prepares them himself (assuming that $5 burgers is a pack of 4 or more burgers). Does he seriously think that you just get one burger in the box or something?
|
# ? Oct 26, 2014 10:16 |
|
DrProsek posted:Even if he eats 2 burgers and an entire box of macaroni per meal, he still gets almost 2 meals for the price of 1 if he buys and prepares them himself (assuming that $5 burgers is a pack of 4 or more burgers). Does he seriously think that you just get one burger in the box or something? That presumes 1 patty per burger.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2014 10:25 |
|
Riot Food posted:Isn't this just a wizard of oz reference rather than lack of geography knowledge, and he's just missed the joke? Or is that in itself That's what I thought the joke was. "You're not in Kansas anymore" being synonymous with "Don't get comfortable, you're not home anymore". If that's the case, it tickles me how many people got so indignantly upset over a pop culture reference they didn't get.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2014 12:59 |
|
Kavak posted:That presumes 1 patty per burger. It also presumes he's not buying some lovely precooked patties from a box that you microwave to "cook".
|
# ? Oct 26, 2014 14:23 |
|
House Rabbit posted:That's what I thought the joke was. "You're not in Kansas anymore" being synonymous with "Don't get comfortable, you're not home anymore". If that's the case, it tickles me how many people got so indignantly upset over a pop culture reference they didn't get. That was the joke, but they made it because the Royals play in Kansas City. I guarantee everybody here got it.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2014 20:42 |
|
My feed is currently blowing up with "Say no to Halal meat!". It's pretty hilarious because I work in the industry and all the people that have liked or posted a "Say no to Halal meat!" thing all work in Halal accredited meat works so they are directly benefiting from Halal meat. It's the most thing ever.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 00:00 |
|
Oh man. No screenshots cause mobile, but what do you even say when someone sharts "feminism had its place when women couldn't vote" onto the table? And then goes on to say about how feminism doesn't care about men raped by women, etc?
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 01:07 |
|
M42 posted:Oh man. No screenshots cause mobile, but what do you even say when someone sharts "feminism had its place when women couldn't vote" onto the table? And then goes on to say about how feminism doesn't care about men raped by women, etc?
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 01:09 |
|
You don't say anything, because that person is not going to listen to anything you say and you will just be wasting your time.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 01:10 |
|
Aside from that. There are so many arguments that crowded into my head immediately, my brain BSOD'ed and I'm just sittin here slackjawed. e: yeah, you guys are probably right.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 01:10 |
|
Can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into. Gonna have to accept that some of your friends are bad people I've had to silently sever with a few people because I don't want to deal with their profound intellectual laziness and have my kids exposed to toxic dogwhistle bullshit before they're old enough to know better.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 01:17 |
|
M42 posted:Aside from that. There are so many arguments that crowded into my head immediately, my brain BSOD'ed and I'm just sittin here slackjawed. No matter how good your arguments get, they can always fall back on brick walls like "you're just brainwashed by the liberal media." There's no arguing with them because they have to be willing to critically examine their own ideas.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 02:03 |
|
Dear god!
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 02:48 |
|
Woman posts how her daughter is moving out and then why. Comments are supportive, and she explains more of her situation, then someone comes in with a big bag of nothing to offer. Speaking of cold replies, I forgot I saved this one. That70sHeidi has a new favorite as of 03:01 on Oct 27, 2014 |
# ? Oct 27, 2014 02:54 |
|
House Rabbit posted:That's what I thought the joke was. "You're not in Kansas anymore" being synonymous with "Don't get comfortable, you're not home anymore". If that's the case, it tickles me how many people got so indignantly upset over a pop culture reference they didn't get. agreed but I think it was more that they thought it was supposed to be a double entendre and it kinda wasnt... Still pretty clever.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 03:10 |
|
MAKE NO BABBYS posted:agreed but I think it was more that they thought it was supposed to be a double entendre and it kinda wasnt... Still pretty clever. Even if they were right and the Royals were actually in Kansas, it's still a pretty old and really common expression. Cute, but not clever. Instead they just look really dumb.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 03:30 |
|
So why loving post it, then?
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 04:02 |
|
MAKES YOU THINK
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 04:51 |
|
If Family Guy blows your mind, you may want to re-evaluate your life.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 05:26 |
|
Garrand posted:Even if they were right and the Royals were actually in Kansas, it's still a pretty old and really common expression. Cute, but not clever. Instead they just look really dumb. By "clever" I meant the people making the joke, but yeah it's probably more cute than clever
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 05:55 |
|
Apropos of nothing, her's a query: What's going on with Titanic guy? Or that guy who was super enthused about becoming a Fireman? I miss those happy chappies.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 05:56 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:
Also, big companies will totally abandon long-term income for a short-term boatload of income. Especially if it shifts the balance of power in the industry.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 08:22 |
|
BonHair posted:Also, big companies will totally abandon long-term income for a short-term boatload of income. Especially if it shifts the balance of power in the industry. As someone who lives in a place where tourism and resource extraction is at war over land use, and resource extraction wins every time, you're 100% right.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 08:27 |
|
BonHair posted:Also, big companies will totally abandon long-term income for a short-term boatload of income. Especially if it shifts the balance of power in the industry. Seriously, if a pharmaceutical company developed a reliable and safe cure (with few side effects) for even one of the more fatal cancers, they could print money on name recognition alone. "New from the people who loving cured this cancer - Placebex! It doesn't loving do anything, but if you pretend it does, it might!"
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 08:38 |
|
Nah we'll just sit on this poo poo, not patent it and wait around until a rival company or independent scientist inevitably makes the same discovery and reaps all the profit and glory
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 08:50 |
|
BonHair posted:Also, big companies will totally abandon long-term income for a short-term boatload of income. Especially if it shifts the balance of power in the industry. Besides, having a cure doesn't mean that you don't have a vaccine. People would still continue to get cancer, and a legit cure for it would sell for approximately infinity money.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 11:39 |
|
Kugyou no Tenshi posted:Seriously, if a pharmaceutical company developed a reliable and safe cure (with few side effects) for even one of the more fatal cancers, they could print money on name recognition alone. "New from the people who loving cured this cancer - Placebex! It doesn't loving do anything, but if you pretend it does, it might!" I'd buy it. I mean poo poo, they cured loving cancer.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 12:14 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:
This is what my mom believes on cancer so it's great seeing good arguments against it. It's still sad that she doesn't think that they'd come out with a cure for a cancer if they had it because of Big Pharma wanting to keep making money. But I'm starting to think she might be going a little dumb about doctors in general now. She's got Fibromyalgia and recently went to an acupuncturist. Is acupuncture an actual legitimate thing? It hasn't been really helpful the last times she went either. RareAcumen has a new favorite as of 13:00 on Oct 27, 2014 |
# ? Oct 27, 2014 12:58 |
|
RareAcumen posted:This is what my mom believes on cancer so it's great seeing good arguments against it. It's still sad that she doesn't think that they'd come out with a cure for a cancer if they had it because of Big Pharma wanting to keep making money. It's been studied and most experiments have found insufficient evidence that acupuncture provides anything more than a short-lived placebo effect. Any evidence suggesting it is better than sham acupuncture (basically "fake" acupuncture used as a placebo/control in testing) is inconsistent at best.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 13:15 |
|
Bertrand Hustle posted:It's been studied and most experiments have found insufficient evidence that acupuncture provides anything more than a short-lived placebo effect. Any evidence suggesting it is better than sham acupuncture (basically "fake" acupuncture used as a placebo/control in testing) is inconsistent at best. Right there! That's the problem with your reasoning.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 13:17 |
|
Bertrand Hustle posted:It's been studied and most experiments have found insufficient evidence that acupuncture provides anything more than a short-lived placebo effect. Any evidence suggesting it is better than sham acupuncture (basically "fake" acupuncture used as a placebo/control in testing) is inconsistent at best. While that's true, I wouldn't necessarily discourage your mum from getting acupuncture, if she can easily afford it. The placebo effect is a significant effect, sometimes have an average effect size of 0.4. So even if it's not an effect specific to acupuncture, it can still be clinically effective.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 13:19 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 23:07 |
|
Goosed it. posted:While that's true, I wouldn't necessarily discourage your mum from getting acupuncture, if she can easily afford it. The placebo effect is a significant effect, sometimes have an average effect size of 0.4. So even if it's not an effect specific to acupuncture, it can still be clinically effective. Especially with a diagnosis of FM. There really is no set cure or course of treatment for it so if something helps her, then it helps her.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2014 13:27 |