|
Agean90 posted:50 not dollars on a sound effect error. TAN SAM Short Arrow, the unit I love, hate, love and then hate some more. I swear to god it either hits every missile, heli or plane, or it misses every missile. Either way, I wondered about why it sounded that way. I never really put two and two together and realised it was a tank gun noise, since I thought that was way too stupid to still be in the game. The more you know I guess.
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 01:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 02:57 |
|
|
http://alb-replays.info/rdbeta/php/api.php?download=882 Epic replay on D-Day; Johann, Drinks and myself beat a team of 100% win ratio pubstompers... with Scandinavian national decks. We were actually down almost 500 points before turning the game around with our goofy antics. Totally worth watching!
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 02:52
|
|
|
Amazing game, think we found a new way to play nato.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 03:25
|
|
|
Any word of when the last DLC/balance patch will be dropping?
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 22:57
|
|
|
None yet  But it looks to be very close.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 22:58
|
|
|
This game desperately needs a map editor. A lot of the maps aren't terrible, but slight changes are really needed on most of them to make them actually good. Either that, or I'm just far too bitter about being placed on lovely side of D-Day 3 out of every 4 games.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 00:24
|
|
|
Dandywalken posted:None yet Cool, looking forward to having a definitive version of uralgraznomod.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 00:31
|
|
|
 What on earth is this? I'd look in the unit of the day thread except nobody is talking about the units being revealed and the last 3 pages were all some dumb argument.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 13:12
|
|
|
xthetenth posted:Cool, looking forward to having a definitive version of uralgraznomod. I know right? Finally the loving mod updating can cease, and modders can rest!
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 13:16
|
|
|
Elukka posted:
IKV-105 I'd say
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 13:17
|
|
|
Looks like an uparmored swedish tank destroyer.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 14:50
|
|
|
Dandywalken posted:I know right? Finally the loving mod updating can cease, and modders can rest! Rude. Accurate but rude. It's more that push up  hill that's needed.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 20:37
|
|
|
xthetenth posted:Rude. Accurate but rude. It's more that push up Dude I mod too, I know how much of a loving pain it is :P I meant the comment in a good way, because modders can finally not have to worry about big fixes that would make their past work incompatible. A final, stable version of the game that doesnt need any huge fixes in core-mechanics is a great thing for us all, because Modders can go flat-out and not have to worry about implementing complex things that they cant be arsed to do after the next patch release that fixes tiny things.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 20:44
|
|
|
I would give a reasonably complete set of redundant or unnecessary organs that might even be mine for Eugen to release a patch that's just updated maps (or better a mapmaking toolkit), a guide to how to convert models into their format, and either their compiler and spreadsheets or the units archive with a shedload of empty unit spaces. Seriously though I'd bet five bucks that an even passable 40k mod would sell a bunch of copies. xthetenth fucked around with this message at 21:53 on Nov 2, 2014 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 21:39
|
|
|
xthetenth posted:I would give a reasonably complete set of redundant or unnecessary organs that might even be mine for Eugen to release a patch that's just updated maps (or better a mapmaking toolkit), a guide to how to convert models into their format, and either their compiler and spreadsheets or the units archive with a shedload of empty unit spaces. Battletech.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 01:29
|
|
|
Hubis posted:Battletech. That would probably sell a lot of copies too, and not necessarily to the same people. Bonus!
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 02:59
|
|
|
Is whoever owns FASA now more litigious than Games Workshop?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 03:00
|
|
|
Hubis posted:Battletech. I'd play that. Gameplay would be pretty much straight up the same with mechs filling in the role of tanks+. Add the ability to hot-drop into the cockpit for direct control and watch the dollars flow. LRMs could be rapid fire MLRS and SRMs could be rapid fire ATGMs.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 03:03
|
|
|
Trimson Grondag 3 posted:Is whoever owns FASA now more litigious than Games Workshop? GW is fine iirc as long as it's totally GW IP.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 03:11
|
|
|
Fair enough I thought they jumped on anything that looked like a 40k mod. I'd be happy with some unit backfill to the Korean War - the engine issues and I suspect a lot of the balance issues would be alleviated by having a pre 60 or 55 bracket with no precision artillery, ifv death machines, super AA etc
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 03:17
|
|
|
If we're talking fantasy mods, I want to see a mod where you play the defense minister of a generic fictional third-world country and you can mix and match monkey model Soviet and NATO kit. Let me recreate the various Arab/Israeli and Arab/Persian wars. 40k mod would be cool, too. Marines could hit hard in drop pods with armor 1 infantry, but need serious resupply to stay effective over time.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 03:49
|
|
|
Mange Mite posted:If we're talking fantasy mods, I want to see a mod where you play the defense minister of a generic fictional third-world country and you can mix and match monkey model Soviet and NATO kit. Let me recreate the various Arab/Israeli and Arab/Persian wars. Take all my money. It would be like tropico but better.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 03:56
|
|
|
I really want a Cuito Cuanavale / Toyota War expac.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 04:15
|
|
|
Would a 50s or 60s Wargame want to include towed AA and arty?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 04:29
|
|
|
You could, or you could just put it on truck and say they did that once so whatevs. I agree you'd need to bring field guns in somehow.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 07:30
|
|
|
Infantry in transports are already treated by the engine as vehicles inside vehicles (ditto obviously for vehicles in landing craft). Field artillery would be best modeled as a very slow unit that comes in transports.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 12:04
|
|
|
DOCTOR ZIMBARDO posted:I really want a Cuito Cuanavale / Toyota War expac. All they'd need to add is a Toyota model and maybe a few of the goofier South African weapons. I mean there's already RR and HMG jeeps + the British Centurion so it would mostly just be model swaps. I take it Eugen is going to abandon the Wargame series and do some other RTSs now, right? OXBALLS DOT COM fucked around with this message at 14:25 on Nov 3, 2014 |
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 14:23
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2014 00:12
|
|
|
I remember back during EE days that the rumor was Eugen was looking at the Suez Crisis to expand the game's scope. I bet that would have worked better than Asia in the 90's.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2014 02:03
|
|
|
Baek -Kukake
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2014 02:35
|
|
|
Still nothing?
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2014 06:00
|
|
|
poo poo, random dude came and made a Mod tool for campaign BG listings. Thats a loving gigantic help. Can finally do poo poo like get rid/change the Tor's and T80's in the Chinese campaign in like... 5 minutes. Used to take loving forever to search and find the proper stuff!
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2014 08:57
|
|
|
Dandywalken posted:poo poo, random dude came and made a Mod tool for campaign BG listings. Thats a loving gigantic help. Can finally do poo poo like get rid/change the Tor's and T80's in the Chinese campaign in like... 5 minutes. Used to take loving forever to search and find the proper stuff! Do you have a link? I kind of wanted to play that campaign but when I heard about all of the ridiculous toys the Soviets had I said forget it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2014 15:55
|
|
|
I wish there were more pre 1980 servers. I had a blast playing 4v4 pre 80. I'd kill for a 10v10 pre 80
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2014 16:07
|
|
|
Minenfeld! posted:I remember back during EE days that the rumor was Eugen was looking at the Suez Crisis to expand the game's scope. I bet that would have worked better than Asia in the 90's. Day 1: "the Americans have not deployed to support you. Do you wish to hold your ground or withdraw?" Whatever you choose another box pops up reading "Empire Over".
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2014 18:52
|
|
|
Fil5000 posted:Day 1: "the Americans have not deployed to support you. Do you wish to hold your ground or withdraw?" You mean, "World falls to serfdom."
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2014 19:17
|
|
|
Lockmart Lawndart posted:I wish there were more pre 1980 servers. I had a blast playing 4v4 pre 80. I'd kill for a 10v10 pre 80 I wish there was a 1970 toggle.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2014 23:17
|
|
|
Today's unit is this thing: Which is cool and all (it's a twin barreled 12 cm mortar on a Strf 90 chassis), but it's a post-2000 prototype which was originally planned to enter service in 2008 and was then put on hold indefinitely. 1995 prototype cutoff, guys 
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2014 14:50
|
|
|
The sad thing is I'm not even sure that's the most egregious case of them violating their own timeframe.
Mortabis fucked around with this message at 16:14 on Nov 10, 2014 |
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2014 16:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 02:57 |
|
|
Kane started prototyping the obelisk of light in the late 90s redfor is getting poo poo on.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2014 19:38
|
|