|
I liked how they brought King Mabel out on one of those sedan chair/litter things, but it was way overbuilt and had like 8 visibly strained dudes carrying it. RIP Big Vis, you were too big and cool for this world.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 18:47 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 20:39 |
|
projecthalaxy posted:I liked how they brought King Mabel out on one of those sedan chair/litter things, but it was way overbuilt and had like 8 visibly strained dudes carrying it. I think I preferred him as Big Daddy V, but he wasn't bad for a huge fatass. That fat-rear end spinkick was neat. Why don't we have any more morbidly obese wrestlers?
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 19:09 |
|
Red posted:Why don't we have any more morbidly obese wrestlers? Well they had Chris Hero but they cut him This is my second time burning Hero today and I'm sorry but it's just so easy. I really like the guy though.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 19:12 |
|
BigRed0427 posted:As for myself I think my next day off i'm gonna really sit down and go through every ECW Hardcore TV they have up. To any of the goons who were ECW fans, has any of it held up over time? The early stuff is a bit of a treat when ECW was just a lovely indie with a hot crowd(93-94 looked like an AWA and JCP refugee camp). Some of the matches I fondly remember turned out being awful because you can see them blatantly setting up spots to pop the crowd. I can never not get enough Sabu, though.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 19:14 |
|
coconono posted:I can never not get enough Sabu, though. I was watching some Sabu last week, the guy is just so fascinating to watch. He just hurls himself into every match, it's hard to describe
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 19:16 |
|
Watching Sabu is like watching viral videos of bad accidents or nasty football hits. It's dumb and a little disgusting but you're still just like because it's so crazy.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 19:25 |
|
triplexpac posted:I was watching some Sabu last week, the guy is just so fascinating to watch. He just hurls himself into every match, it's hard to describe Dude's totally willing to eat poo poo on a move and its completely awesome.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 19:26 |
|
Red posted:I think I preferred him as Big Daddy V, but he wasn't bad for a huge fatass. That fat-rear end spinkick was neat.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 19:54 |
|
If only we'd got King Sabu. Opportunity missed.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 20:59 |
|
Viscera was really good in the Ministry (and usually ECW) when they would put him in tags and let the Acolytes or whoever do the work and then he comes in and just flattens dudes. I've always wondered how big/what size those amazing floor-length leather trashbag coats they had Vis wear were. I want to try one on.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 21:14 |
|
I was watching Nitro and on the second episode Sabu had his first ever match in WCW. He wins the match and then puts his opponent through a table for no reason, just narrowly missing smashing his own head on the guardrail. It was so sublimely Sabu that it was great.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 21:21 |
|
Minidust posted:I recently watched the Mabel vs Undertaker match from right after Taker put that mask on (December '95 In Your House I think?) and was shocked at how not-bad it was. Not a single rest hold and the pace/length was pretty much perfect. Just a simple big man match that was exactly what it needed to be. It was a quick match that played to the strengths of both, and the entire thing was still in the "Undertaker is an attraction, not a wrestler" arena. A month later, UT wrestled Bret at the Rumble in a pretty boring match, and the mask came off. I'm not sure if Bret and UT just never really gelled, or if UT wasn't ready to put on a wrestling match yet. The Bret/UT match from SummerSlam 1997 had a great finish that's really memorable, but the match was just kind of boring overall. Edit: I take it back, they had a really good match at IYH: One Night Only, or whatever the UK PPV was. Red fucked around with this message at 22:00 on Nov 17, 2014 |
# ? Nov 17, 2014 21:40 |
|
coconono posted:Dude's totally willing to eat poo poo on a move and its completely awesome. The genius of Sabu is that he created a character that keeps botches within kayfabe.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 21:58 |
|
My main desire for KotR is to have another midcard showcase, really. I realize that the Money in the Bank has kind of supplanted it in that role, but KotR works better because: 1. Money in the Bank is sort of stale at this point 2. It only really works for heels because surprise cash ins are the only thing that make it interesting 3. It's become a holding pattern rather than a career elevator because they're unwilling to let midcard talent really get a title shot, even if they have the briefcase. So they just fart around with it for months doing nothing. King of the Ring is better because it could elevate somebody and give them some spotlight time without them having to challenge for the belt, which WWE has proven unwilling or unable to give to a midcarder in such a way as it results in a real push recently.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 22:47 |
|
Baby Babbeh posted:2. It only really works for heels because surprise cash ins are the only thing that make it interesting I dunno, surprise cash-ins can work great if it's a face done correctly. Like when Punk came out and took the title from Edge it was fun, since it was a babyface screwing over a heel who deserved it. I mean I'm sure we ranted for pages about "Who is the REAL heel here" but still it was a fun moment.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 22:53 |
|
Someone else needs to do what RVD did and just use it get a title shot they normally wouldn't get and use it at a PPV. The "cashing in to steal the title" was great, especially the first time with Edge, but it's been done to death at some point using it like the Summerslam equivalent of winning the Royal Rumble seems like the obvious place to go.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 22:59 |
|
Big Coffin Hunter posted:Someone else needs to do what RVD did and just use it get a title shot they normally wouldn't get and use it at a PPV. The "cashing in to steal the title" was great, especially the first time with Edge, but it's been done to death at some point using it like the Summerslam equivalent of winning the Royal Rumble seems like the obvious place to go. The problem is that I'm not sure how you book someone like that and not have them look stupid. They've conditioned us to think of MITB as a "win the title for free card" for so long, doing anything else seems foolish.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 23:02 |
|
triplexpac posted:The problem is that I'm not sure how you book someone like that and not have them look stupid. Only heels want a free title. A real wrestler wants to prove himself. It's really not as bad as you make it sound and practically writes itself.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 23:04 |
|
Big Coffin Hunter posted:Someone else needs to do what RVD did and just use it get a title shot they normally wouldn't get and use it at a PPV. The "cashing in to steal the title" was great, especially the first time with Edge, but it's been done to death at some point using it like the Summerslam equivalent of winning the Royal Rumble seems like the obvious place to go. Since the Elimination Chamber PPV is going away, but they're keeping the match, I wonder when it's happening next? It would be awesome to see Rollins wait outside the chamber, grinning at the last two people left while he holds up the briefcase.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 23:06 |
|
Baby Babbeh posted:My main desire for KotR is to have another midcard showcase, really. I realize that the Money in the Bank has kind of supplanted it in that role, but KotR works better. Why don't they just do a KotR Money in the bank tournament. Every match of the tournament would be a ladder match.* *that must include a flippy guy.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 23:14 |
|
omgomgomg posted:Why don't they just do a KotR Money in the bank tournament. Every match of the tournament would be a ladder match.* And what would they do after they injure half the roster?
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 23:15 |
|
Blasmeister posted:And what would they do after they injure half the roster? Push John Cena?
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 23:17 |
|
Blasmeister posted:And what would they do after they injure half the roster? whatever they normally do to use time on Superstars?
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 23:17 |
|
The briefcase as a plot device is loving horrible. I also don't know how they can possibly get rid of it when MitB is one of their big ticket events now and the matches are unique/fun.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 23:31 |
|
I still think Mania should kick off every year with a multiman ladder match for the IC belt. MITB really added a lot to the show and this is a way to get that back without another case
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 23:35 |
|
Fat Lowtax posted:The briefcase as a plot device is loving horrible. I also don't know how they can possibly get rid of it when MitB is one of their big ticket events now and the matches are unique/fun. Change the rules of the briefcase. Like, it only guarantees a title match in the Summerslam main event, or the holder has to announce their cash in ahead of time. Even if you don't have a good guy win who wants to use it the "right" way like I was saying earlier, this is just a way to hard code into the rules that "we're getting rid of the surprise cash in because it's been done a billion times." Of course, again, I just say have a face win it and announce his cash in like RVD.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 23:35 |
|
Yeah, I love the MITB matches, but I'm kind of over the whole surprise cash-in kind of thing- I think they've pretty much gotten all they can out of that device. Maybe just give the holder the right to insert himself into an upcoming PPV title match/main event? IDK.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 23:40 |
|
Red posted:Since the Elimination Chamber PPV is going away, but they're keeping the match, I wonder when it's happening next? They could easily have a bunch of dudes come out to complain about being screwed over in the past. Bam, elimination chamber. Wait sorry that would require continuity.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 23:55 |
|
Judgement Day 2000 is a pretty good PPV aside from Taker returning in his absolute worst gimmick.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2014 00:03 |
|
He was "Mean" Mark Callous at Judgment Day?
|
# ? Nov 18, 2014 00:30 |
|
When was the first time a promotion used the spot where a new face champion had all the other faces come out to congratulate him in the ring? WMX is the first in my memory but I'm sure it's probably not the first time it ever happened. E: poo poo sorry, meant this to go in the questions thread jesus WEP fucked around with this message at 01:46 on Nov 18, 2014 |
# ? Nov 18, 2014 01:08 |
|
St Evan Echoes posted:When was the first time a promotion used the spot where a new face champion had all the other faces come out to congratulate him in the ring? WMX is the first in my memory but I'm sure it's probably not the first time it ever happened. Dusty Rhodes in Championship Wrestling From Florida? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2c_vO4Zf2M
|
# ? Nov 18, 2014 01:11 |
|
Fat Lowtax posted:The briefcase as a plot device is loving horrible. I also don't know how they can possibly get rid of it when MitB is one of their big ticket events now and the matches are unique/fun. Dunno about it being a terrible plot device. Its been used poorly. Other than a hamfisted write in in a promo you never get the feeling that it really could be cashed in at anytime. For the first few weeks, they push that idea, then they forget about it. And then about the time you kinda get the feeling they're gonna spring the cash in, it doesn't happen. Then when they want to do the cash in, it feels really rushed because the build to the cash in has been deflated.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2014 01:53 |
|
coconono posted:Dunno about it being a terrible plot device. Its been used poorly. Other than a hamfisted write in in a promo you never get the feeling that it really could be cashed in at anytime. For the first few weeks, they push that idea, then they forget about it. And then about the time you kinda get the feeling they're gonna spring the cash in, it doesn't happen. Then when they want to do the cash in, it feels really rushed because the build to the cash in has been deflated. The stars all have to absolutely be in alignment, and I don't know how often that things would fall the right way, but having someone do a surprise cash and lose is totally doable: Face briefcase holder, heel champ. Heel goes over in his scheduled match, maybe even goes over clean, so long as he sells the match as having taken everything out of him. Face does the surprise cash, and either you have the heel go over again, maybe cheating, or have him escape for the count out at the absolute last moment. Heel can then run down the face (The bell rang, you blew your chance, never getting another one etc, etc...). Couple shows down the line, the face finally manages to win his rematch, and takes the title. You need all the elements to fall into place, admittedly, but it is possible. The only limitations are having that face who is ready to make the step up, and actually being willing to plan that far ahead.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2014 06:54 |
|
I didn't get the WWE Network for free, and that thing where they were letting people out of their contracts doesn't apply to me because I paid all at once and they won't give me a refund. I'd threaten to boycott the WWE over how awful they've treated me since the Network started (Awful customer service twice now, billing issues, ect) but I'm already paying for this garbage and look like a fool trying to boycott a contract I'm stuck in until March. And the WWE isn't getting better, but at least NXT is.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2014 15:36 |
|
sportsgenius86 posted:I still think Mania should kick off every year with a multiman ladder match for the IC belt. Yeah that would be awesome. But then again, they're probably afraid of hurting MITB which is one of the few PPV draws they have left. Mania will do fine on it's own with or without a fun ladder match, but MITB needs to be a spectacle. Actually as dumb as it was, I enjoyed the Andre the Giant Battle Royal as a match to help break up the pacing of Mania.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2014 16:05 |
|
I'm not a fan of Wrestlemania matches that are clearly a way to get everyone on the card so they get a WM payday. Seeing Zach Rider get thrown over the top rope of a battle royal, or Eva Marie throw a single punch and spend the rest of the match on the ground of an all divas invitational really does nothing for me if that time can be filled with a great 1 on 1 match.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2014 16:27 |
|
Astro7x posted:I'm not a fan of Wrestlemania matches that are clearly a way to get everyone on the card so they get a WM payday. Loads of dudes is part of the spectacle though. I see what you mean mind.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2014 16:32 |
|
Astro7x posted:I'm not a fan of Wrestlemania matches that are clearly a way to get everyone on the card so they get a WM payday. I guess my thinking is that whatever 1 v 1 lower midcard match they throw in there instead of a battle royal won't be very good. So I'd rather it be some kind of multi-man affair than yet another midcard 1 on 1 match in a 4 hour show. Edit: Oh yeah, I watched that Entrance Theme documentary the other day. Can't believe they didn't include Real American but I guess it was done at a time when they hated Hogan for being in TNA or something. Also no Bret Hart made me sad triplexpac fucked around with this message at 17:35 on Nov 18, 2014 |
# ? Nov 18, 2014 16:44 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 20:39 |
|
Flameingblack posted:I didn't get the WWE Network for free, and that thing where they were letting people out of their contracts doesn't apply to me because I paid all at once and they won't give me a refund. I'd threaten to boycott the WWE over how awful they've treated me since the Network started (Awful customer service twice now, billing issues, ect) but I'm already paying for this garbage and look like a fool trying to boycott a contract I'm stuck in until March. The free network was only meant for new subscribers. They've blatantly said this numerous times. You made the choice to purchase all 6 months at once, you get six months of service. This is how things work. You don't buy a year of PSN/Xbox Live and then yell at Microsoft because you only used 2 months of it, do you? Edit: Paypal is now processing WWE Payments as eChecks, meaning unless you explicitly cancel, leaving your account low on funds or attaching a junk card will not cancel the sub. Instead you'll eat an overdraft fee. Eldritch BiLast fucked around with this message at 18:08 on Nov 18, 2014 |
# ? Nov 18, 2014 18:03 |