|
The man was walking with his dick out in front of his squad car, in fulm view of the dash cam and the audio of body mic. What the hell was he expecting?
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 03:01 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 14:04 |
Hey look, here's an article about more cops doing a bunch of illegal stuff, but this time one of the cops actually testifies against the others:quote:Former SF cop testifies against partners in federal corruption trial http://www.sfexaminer.com/sanfrancisco/former-sf-cop-testifies-against-partners-in-federal-corruption-trial/Content?oid=2912271 Plenty of details, but the article left out the part where they helped in an investigation at a drug dealers home in a neighboring county, and then stole heroin and $30,000 that were buried in the back yard. Anyways, it's another nice SFPD corruption/incompetence story to add to the others, such as "feral cat infested evidence warehouse", or "let's beat/threaten people who saw us beat/threaten those other people", or "let's beat up some guys for their fajitas, and then try to cover it up", or "oops we shot innocent bystanders!", or "I'll rob a bank when I'm off duty!", or "I don't have to actually investigate this murder, looks like a suicide to me", or "the dead body that we were pretty sure was in that van, but never checked for, actually was in that van, and has been sitting in our impound lot all along, while the suspects escaped to Mexico!". And can't forget the classic "let's doctor violent crime statistics!"
|
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 03:30 |
|
Rah! posted:Hey look, here's an article about more cops doing a bunch of illegal stuff, but this time one of the cops actually testifies against the others: He will likely be pariahed and Seripco'd by the rest of the force until he retires or comes to an unfortunate accident.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 04:50 |
|
Berk Berkly posted:He will likely be pariahed and Seripco'd by the rest of the force until he retires or comes to an unfortunate accident. Being fired in 2012 probably takes some of the worry out of that.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 04:55 |
Berk Berkly posted:He will likely be pariahed and Seripco'd by the rest of the force until he retires or comes to an unfortunate accident. Well he was already fired two years ago for falsifying timecards, so I don't think becoming a pariah or getting Serpico'd will be a problem for him. That still leaves him open for an "unfortunate accident" though, I guess. Blender malfunction. edit: beaten like a cop who wants to testify
|
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 04:58 |
|
Dum Cumpster posted:Being fired in 2012 probably takes some of the worry out of that. Didn't notice that part. But its never too late for some retro-active police brutality.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 05:12 |
|
Berk Berkly posted:Didn't notice that part. Of course. I said some intentionally
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 05:18 |
|
Vahakyla posted:The man was walking with his dick out in front of his squad car, in fulm view of the dash cam and the audio of body mic. What the hell was he expecting? This may stun you but there are a lot of really dumb cops. If you want to sit down and breathe into a bag or something, I understand. Take your time.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 16:24 |
|
Rent-A-Cop posted:Come on. Who wouldn't want to see this guy's dick? Why is it photoshopped
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 16:25 |
|
http://www.policeone.com/police-products/body-cameras/articles/7830358-Mans-request-for-body-cams-has-Wash-PDs-rethinking-use/ i'm curious what you guys think of this. I'm 100% in favor of body cameras for everybody all the time, but how do you protect peoples privacy in situations like this? I know from my own experience that some people will be less likely to report things if they knew that video of them talking to the cops could be obtainable fairly easily.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 16:33 |
|
The way I figure it, if I am speaking to a cop my privacy has already been compromised. I'd much rather have continuous, unedited video of the interaction than the cop's recollection/misinterpretation/deliberate lies about it.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 16:37 |
|
Branis posted:http://www.policeone.com/police-products/body-cameras/articles/7830358-Mans-request-for-body-cams-has-Wash-PDs-rethinking-use/ Blaming public records requests is such a BS issue. You comply, charge them up the wazzu, and make them pick it up in person.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 21:27 |
|
I don't really think public records should be withheld from a person who can't pay the sometimes ridiculous fees like we saw ferguson doing though.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2014 01:28 |
|
Branis posted:I don't really think public records should be withheld from a person who can't pay the sometimes ridiculous fees like we saw ferguson doing though. True, but its also not workable for taxpayers to foot the entire bill, especially for requests such as the afore mentioned "every day I will request every single police document or recording created". And to use that as an excuse to not create records/documentation is absurd.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2014 02:26 |
|
Trabisnikof posted:True, but its also not workable for taxpayers to foot the entire bill, especially for requests such as the afore mentioned "every day I will request every single police document or recording created". And to use that as an excuse to not create records/documentation is absurd. Is there a police department somewhere that's just swamped and unable to do their jobs due to constant FOIA requests or something?
|
# ? Nov 22, 2014 02:32 |
|
I'm sure Mr. and Mrs. Nightly Drunken Domestic are going to be thrilled they, their house, their kids, their IDs and Social Security Numbers, and their problems will be uploaded unedited nightly to YouTube. But hey the first time the 30 year old son who lives in parents basement, is off his adhd meds, and smoking weed again against parents wishes call is put up for all to see D&D gonna throw a fit. Popcorn ready.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2014 03:26 |
|
Untagged posted:I'm sure Mr. and Mrs. Nightly Drunken Domestic are going to be thrilled they, their house, their kids, their IDs and Social Security Numbers, and their problems will be uploaded unedited nightly to YouTube. Of course, that's not how freedom of information requests work when PDs do their jobs. Pope Guilty posted:Is there a police department somewhere that's just swamped and unable to do their jobs due to constant FOIA requests or something? The above linked article has a PD "rethinking" cameras because someone has made a consistent and broad freedom of information requests. Its a BS justification.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2014 05:10 |
|
Untagged posted:I'm sure Mr. and Mrs. Nightly Drunken Domestic are going to be thrilled they, their house, their kids, their IDs and Social Security Numbers, and their problems will be uploaded unedited nightly to YouTube. You aren't really this big of an idiot right? I mean, this is just roleplaying one, I assume? Not that there isn't probably thousands of hours of smartphone and various cam recordings of domestic problems already on the internet. No one gives a poo poo for the most part. This is stuff COPS(the TV show) and goons like Jerry Springer and the like has been doing for decades. This is 2014. Everything can be on the internet, probably already IS on the internet. And often uploaded by people voluntarily. Like Cops give two shits about protecting people and their privacy anyway. And I sort of doubt the 'concern' over wanting to make information act are the assholes that body/dash cams are supposed to keep in check. That is obviously not really what they care about, only keeping their rear end out of the fire. VVVV: That doesn't change anything. The footage can't be of a can't be of a criminal or civil case and the request can be narrowed. The whole point is to force police to actually look at and release their footage and not sit on it like it doesn't exist. Berk Berkly fucked around with this message at 05:59 on Nov 22, 2014 |
# ? Nov 22, 2014 05:27 |
|
You didn't read that article did you? It's ok. I'll paraphrase: It takes too many hours to review each and every tape for each instance of private information. So either the requests need to be amended or they have to give out that information. That or take years to complete just the one request at considerable expense. Also lol at the request of having it all directly uploaded to YouTube.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2014 05:48 |
|
I would think the police would be all for a thing to help protect their officers against false accusations by providing an incontrovertible recording of what happened.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2014 06:06 |
|
katlington posted:I would think the police would be all for a thing to help protect their officers against false accusations by providing an incontrovertible recording of what happened. What are you implying? That an officer's word isn't currently incontrovertible proof of what happened?
|
# ? Nov 22, 2014 06:08 |
|
Untagged posted:You didn't read that article did you? It's ok. I'll paraphrase: It takes too many hours to review each and every tape for each instance of private information. So either the requests need to be amended or they have to give out that information. That or take years to complete just the one request at considerable expense. Also lol at the request of having it all directly uploaded to YouTube. Thus the point of charging the requestor for the amount required to review those tapes rather than not having cameras at all. If they want to pay for the full-time staff to respond to their request, let them!
|
# ? Nov 22, 2014 06:19 |
|
KILLOLOGY! loving lol.quote:This week, it was revealed by local KRQE News 13 that a retired Albuquerque Police Officer was teaching a class that was seemingly designed to instruct other cops on how to be more aggressive. Surely this is just some dumb wanna-be thing that the officer in Albuquerque found, right? How common could this type of indoctrination be? http://killology.com/trainer_police.htm
|
# ? Nov 23, 2014 04:06 |
|
Sharkie posted:KILLOLOGY! loving lol. David Grossman had some minor infamy a while back for being on the "video games will turn your children into mass murderers" bandwagon, and was famously immortalized as a literal talking rear end in one of the Jeff K frontpage bits.
|
# ? Nov 23, 2014 05:30 |
|
criminal justice is weird when it comes to idiots like on one hand, the stuff ive seen with criminal justice education is refreshingly sane and practical poo poo. it tends to be pretty heavily influenced by sociology and the thought that maybe most criminals arnt actually rabid dogs, and at worst its just pretty mushy about making judgements on "controversial" yet stupid stuff like the war on drugs. overall the thought behind questions like reasons for crime tends to focus more on unmet needs and societal disorganization rather than some ingrained hatred of law, and the conventional wisdom in the field about things is more or less "being an authoritarian poo poo is stupid, hating criminals is stupid and wrong, everyone is a criminal on some level, corporate crime does more damage to society than many other crimes", rather than people saying like "COPS SHOULD BE LIKE MARINE KILLERS HOORAH" or some poo poo but then whenever an "expert" emerges from police organizations / prosecutors office or whatnot, its invariably a Very Serious Person who is deeply concerned about rap music and grand theft auto giving points for cop murder. or someone that comes in and talks about using polygraph tests and then spins around in awkward circles when its pointed out that its pseudoscience. or otherwise the sort of person you could picture arguing that its okay to shock a suspects genitals as long as youre pretty sure theyre guilty kind of irritating
|
# ? Nov 23, 2014 09:44 |
|
Tiler Kiwi posted:criminal justice is weird when it comes to idiots I think that's explained by a high variation in criminal justice education, a lag time in people being properly educated actually filling in the ranks, and a tendency for police to not require a criminal justice degree in order to be a police officer (mostly the last two).
|
# ? Nov 23, 2014 16:06 |
|
I don't know why this is in the german news at all, but this is being reported nationwide. Your cops somehow managed to kill a 12 year old holding a toy gun? http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/cops-kill-boy-12-carrying-airsoft-toy-gun-cleveland-n254251 Strange that this made breaking news in Germany
|
# ? Nov 24, 2014 00:36 |
|
Why are Americans so deeply scared of everything?
|
# ? Nov 24, 2014 00:41 |
|
E: nevermind not starting gun chat
|
# ? Nov 24, 2014 00:43 |
|
I saw the edit and it's relevant that there is a gun for every nine out of ten people in the US when you combine it with such things as the fact that our media is also fear driven, among many other factors.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2014 00:45 |
|
Hopefully the coverage will educate parents that they need to tell their kids not to play wth realistic toy guns in public.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2014 00:46 |
|
SedanChair posted:Hopefully the coverage will educate parents that they need to tell their kids not to play wth realistic toy guns in public. This type of thinking is in line with why McDonald's has to warn that their coffee is hot. Americans are also, as a whole, pretty loving stupid. So factor that into why we are scared of everything.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2014 00:48 |
demonicon posted:I don't know why this is in the german news at all, but this is being reported nationwide. Your cops somehow managed to kill a 12 year old holding a toy gun? It is kind of weird that specific incident is breaking news in Germany, because it happens all the time here, and it sounds like it was never breaking news in Germany before. The same exact thing happened in a suburb of San Francisco earlier in the year, for example. Step your fear-driven media game up, Germany. You're missing out!
|
|
# ? Nov 24, 2014 00:56 |
|
Cole posted:This type of thinking is in line with why McDonald's has to warn that their coffee is hot. I'll have to get pedantic here and bring up that the warning is a piece of cya put on there after a woman spilled McDonald's coffee in her lap and got third degree burns to her thighs and genitals and required skin grafts. You can look up the NWS pictures if you want. She won the lawsuit in part because McDonalds knew they were serving their coffee too hot, having settled several similar cases out of court.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2014 01:06 |
|
Also she was suing for medical expenses and was awarded more than that as punitive measures to McDonalds E: Picture from the lawsuit as gently caress, BE FOREWARNED. poo poo'S GROSS http://harmfuldruginfocenter.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/mcdonalds.jpg
|
# ? Nov 24, 2014 01:07 |
|
Sharkie posted:I'll have to get pedantic here and bring up that the warning is a piece of cya put on there after a woman spilled McDonald's coffee in her lap and got third degree burns to her thighs and genitals and required skin grafts. You can look up the NWS pictures if you want. She won the lawsuit in part because McDonalds knew they were serving their coffee too hot, having settled several similar cases out of court. I stand correct on the fact, but my point still stands.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2014 01:09 |
|
It loving tears me up to say this but I can't blame the cops here, assuming they're telling the truth about the incident. The dispatcher neglected to tell them that the caller thought the gun could be fake, the orange tip had been removed, and the kid actually reached for the gun. No, he didn't deserve to die, that's loving monstrous. But honestly, considering how many times we've heard about a kid shooting themselves or their brother/sister/friend while playing with the gun they found in their parents' closet, I can't just say "he was 12, how could they think he was a threat?" Maybe it'll turn out that the cops that shot him were racist as hell and thought he was a gangster, but I think it's more likely that they thought he was a kid playing with a gun. This is just a really lovely situation and I'd rather it be no one's fault than the fault of people who aren't going to see consequences for this.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2014 03:09 |
|
Cole posted:I stand correct on the fact, but my point still stands. No, it doesn't. McDonald's had to stop making their coffee so hot because it was way too goddamn hot, not because americans are stupid, and it has nothing to do with the kind of thinking that "maybe you shouldn't play with realistic looking guns in public" is an example of. Everything in your post is straight out wrong except "Americans are also, as a whole, pretty loving stupid" which is correct.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2014 03:13 |
|
Nathilus posted:No, it doesn't. McDonald's had to stop making their coffee so hot because it was way too goddamn hot, not because americans are stupid, and it has nothing to do with the kind of thinking that "maybe you shouldn't play with realistic looking guns in public" is an example of. Everything in your post is straight out wrong except "Americans are also, as a whole, pretty loving stupid" which is correct. Well that was literally my point... Which still stands. So you uh... Owned me by explaining my point. Congrats? Calm down buddy.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2014 03:21 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 14:04 |
|
Oh the other thread got closed. Here comes the nonsense. .
|
# ? Nov 24, 2014 04:49 |