|
code:useful news resource for information security professionals: http://reddit.com/r/netsec/ here are some old threads that haven't been archived: Security Fuckup Megathread - v7.69 (stay safe security ghost) (aug-nov 2014) Security Fuckup Megathread - v7.2 "BoringSFM" (jun-aug 2014) Alereon posted:seriously though people dont post anything that would allow a lurker from gbs to gently caress with anything Lain Iwakura fucked around with this message at 01:33 on Nov 29, 2014 |
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 14:22 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:20
|
|
|
sulk's here, thread already compromised
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:23
|
|
|
stay safe security thread
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:23
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:sulk's here, thread already compromised
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:24
|
|
|
sooo.... what was that that got the last thread closed?
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:24
|
|
|
quote:a bunch of routers with default username + password exposed to the open internet
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:25
|
|
|
A new thread means another successful hack. Good job everyone! 
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:25
|
|
|
I'm actually not the security fuckup that for the old thread closed
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:26
|
|
|
hey yossec
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:26
|
|
|
oh man i figured it was a video shames thing. yeah that post should be scrubbed :| Peanut and the Gang posted:A new thread means another successful hack. Good job everyone! 
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:26
|
|
|
v10.0, a very nice choice
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:28
|
|
|
Necc0 posted:oh man i figured it was a video shames thing. yeah that post should be scrubbed :|
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:29
|
|
|
i remember when google was rolling out mandatory ssl i read an op ed about how it might be unethical to force it on people because some dumb reasons. anybody have any idea what i'm talking about
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:31
|
|
|
vOv posted:i remember when google was rolling out mandatory ssl i read an op ed about how it might be unethical to force it on people because some dumb reasons. anybody have any idea what i'm talking about self signed certs
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:32
|
|
|
Alereon posted:yeah i already did. seriously though people dont post anything that would allow a lurker from gbs to gently caress with anything woop my bad. won't happen again
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:32
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:self signed certs nah this was about them doing mandatory ssl on their own stuff
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:33
|
|
|
vOv posted:i remember when google was rolling out mandatory ssl i read an op ed about how it might be unethical to force it on people because some dumb reasons. anybody have any idea what i'm talking about quote:I'm a big believer in offering protections for personal privacy online, but Google's decision to force all Gmail subscribers to use HTTPS encryption goes too far.
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:33
|
|
|
quote:Since when is removing consumer choice a good thing? Does Google really know better than you do what your security posture should be for your Gmail accounts? ... In taking this step Google joins the ranks of other dubious "we know what's good for you" initiatives, such as former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's now infamous ban on the sale of large-sized soft drinks in the Big Apple. lmao jesus christ it's just as dumb as i remembered
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:35
|
|
|
gonna try to keep up with the security thread this time
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:36
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:44
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:47
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:sulk's here, thread already compromised
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 01:51
|
|
|
anime? mods?
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:00
|
|
|
im the dangar
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:00
|
|
|
Peanut and the Gang posted:A new thread means another successful hack. Good job everyone! surprised the thread lasted as long as it did
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:02
|
|
|
+---------------------------------------------------+ | An impromptu security story: Defeating the hackers. | +---------------------------------------------------+ Oh no! The hackers are here!  They're stealing our lunch money! Gimme ur lunch money, punk! \  Noo! Noooooo! ]  Ha ha ha! I'm downloading your lunch money as we speak! \  Somebody, please save us!! Somebody help! \  Don't worry guys! Linux is here to save the day! I know how to use iptables to defeat the hackers! \  # sudo iptables --policy INPUT DROP  Now they can't attack us! \ eff you, hackers! \  Good job linux! you saved the day!  Thank you LInux. Thank you computer. \ 
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:08
|
|
|
That was a great story.
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:14
|
|
|
just noticed a closed thread with 3000+ unread in bookmarks, better get in on the ground floor
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:15
|
|
|
same
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:21
|
|
|
Forums Terrorist posted:That was a great story. that post was good as heck
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:23
|
|
|
cool how did the last one die
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:30
|
|
|
theadder posted:cool how did the last one die it was just a google search that highlighted routers that had default passwords remember when we used to have whole threads for publicly accessible webcams 
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:34
|
|
|
"Last Christmas" by Wham Last christmas you rooted my box and the very next day 't was spamming away This year I give you a stick A botnet for someone special
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:35
|
|
|
i hope security ghost is safe..
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:41
|
|
|
can we continue the discussion about why security people tend towards being dicks?
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:55
|
|
|
has science gone too far
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:56
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:can we continue the discussion about why security people tend towards being dicks? hey i don't take kindly to people making GBS threads on pr0zac
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:57
|
|
|
Jewel posted:i hope security ghost is safe.. well he's dead
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 02:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 14:22 |
|
|
Vicas posted:well but is he secure? 
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2014 03:06
|
|
