|
idk. I like https://mui.codeplex.com/ but I've never written anything big. the only one I can think of off the top of my head is the github client (lol)
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 00:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 17:57 |
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:only a 90s kid would remember this *picture of sega genesis* only 90s kids remember this *pictures of people owning houses and starting families. being happy*
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 00:59
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:there are lots of millennial's with jobs, we just dont identify as millennials. we prefer 90s kids.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 02:19
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:only 90s kids remember this *pictures of people owning houses and starting families. being happy*
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 02:40
|
|
|
I made a boo boo with Git yesterday. It was fixed, quickly, however the buildnazi got furious with me when I talked about it today. The issue was basically "merging the QA build into my work branch" when I meant to "merge my work branch into the QA build." Just what can you undo, or not undo, with git? I had the actual boss saying "do command line!" and the buildnazi say "use sourcetree!" and by their powers combined I hosed up. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 03:48
|
|
|
Space Whale posted:I made a boo boo with Git yesterday. It was fixed, quickly, however the buildnazi got furious with me when I talked about it today. The issue was basically "merging the QA build into my work branch" when I meant to "merge my work branch into the QA build." the entire point of source control is that it makes fixing human errors like this easy. no one should be mad, they should just offer you advice on how to avoid it in the future. if they're going to get that mad about mistakes they should make you merge your code in via pull requests
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 03:53
|
|
|
i mean if they're doing automatic deploys for QA then yeah it's going to make someones day slightly more annoying but all they need to do is roll back to the old branch, merge your code in properly, and deploy
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 03:57
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:the entire point of source control is that it makes fixing human errors like this easy. no one should be mad, they should just offer you advice on how to avoid it in the future. lol OK, so, wtf CAN'T git undo? I've heard you can't (easily) undo reversions.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 03:57
|
|
|
Space Whale posted:lol anything can be undone just by checking out the previous commit. the bad thing is when something gets hosed up but no one notices and people start working against the hosed up branch i guess you rpboably shouldn't git push :master
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 04:02
|
|
|
it's pretty easy to get git into a really hosed up state
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 04:03
|
|
|
i think the dumbest thing i do with git is, when i want to merge in a branch, i rebase it to the branching commit (this merges all of the changes into a single commit) and then cherry-pick that over into master rather than merging
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 04:07
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:anything can be undone just by checking out the previous commit. the bad thing is when something gets hosed up but no one notices and people start working against the hosed up branch Yeah I never push master. Pull only. Master is a rope rotor posted:it's pretty easy to get git into a really hosed up state How? Also, how do you defuckelate it?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 04:08
|
|
|
push to heroku master directly
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 04:27
|
|
|
MeruFM posted:push to heroku master directly lol that reminds me We're a .NET shop otherwise but actually have mongo and we're gonna use it for pictures. Is this the actual use case for mongo?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 04:32
|
|
|
git rules I miss it so much funny thing is my new job is "planning" to move from svn to git which is good news for me as a coder but it's probably a really bad idea for them since they version tons of large binary assets and git sucks poo poo at that
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 04:37
|
|
|
Space Whale posted:lol that reminds me you mean put binary blobs into mongo? Not really The only "use case' for mongo is when you have a bunch of "maybe existing maybe not" fields and are too lazy to make a relational key value table
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 04:40
|
|
|
HORATIO HORNBLOWER posted:git rules I miss it so much svn isn't any better at it
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 04:44
|
|
|
re: wpf chat the github wpf app is pretty great. idk if they used a designer though. i guess phil haack owns a lot of that project and he seems like a reasonable guy
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 04:44
|
|
|
are there any use cases at all where svn is better than git
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 04:47
|
|
|
note: TFS, not SVN. I've heard that shelf sets in TFS are easier to use than branches in git, but that might be just "I used TFS longer than I used git."
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 04:51
|
|
|
Space Whale posted:note: TFS, not SVN. shelvesets aren't an alternative to branching though, TFS has branches.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 05:12
|
|
|
So what is a GIT "shelfset"
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 05:14
|
|
|
Space Whale posted:So what is a GIT "shelfset" a stash
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 05:19
|
|
|
The direct analogy to a shelfset would be the stash, but when actually working with git you typically use branches for most of the things you'd want a shelfset for anyway.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 05:28
|
|
|
A fun way to gently caress poo poo up with git was when it still had 'push' default to pushing all branches, so that if you had a bunch of branches with hosed up state or lagging on the origin you're pushing to and someone forgot about it and --forced the push, then you'd be crushing unrelated branches all by accident. then they changed that and things were slightly less worse.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 05:37
|
|
|
Series DD Funding posted:are there any use cases at all where svn is better than git checking out a subtree, storing large binaries, a reasonable set of consistent commands
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 05:51
|
|
|
supports empty directories, you don't have to deal with a local repo so you don't have to commit THEN push, you don't have awful people spending hours preening their commits because they're vain as hell
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 05:53
|
|
|
some shitbag at my last job gave an hourlong talk about how to "craft the code story" with your commits
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 06:01
|
|
|
rotor posted:some shitbag at my last job gave an hourlong talk about how to "craft the code story" with your commits  git rules use cli only or ur a n00b
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 06:05
|
|
|
it is easy to gently caress your git up though since it lets you do stupid poo poo. svn is somewhat better in that u can't do anything with it so u can't go as wrong
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 06:06
|
|
|
lol if 90% of ur commit messages don't involve the word "gently caress"
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 06:08
|
|
|
my commit messages don't matter since it all gets pulled out into a single thing (with a new description) when it gets sent out for code review the only person who sees them is me
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 06:15
|
|
|
Jabor posted:my commit messages don't matter since it all gets pulled out into a single thing (with a new description) when it gets sent out for code review oh that's the other cool thing about git: it encourages users to not commit to master often, so lots of man hours of work are sitting on dev laptops that are of course backed up regularly right I remember some guy in #cobol came in and was like "I accidentally deleted my local repo. it had a weeks worth of work on [some bullshit thing] on it."
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 06:29
|
|
|
lol if you don't work on secondary branches, pushing them to origin whenever you feel like it
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 06:31
|
|
|
rotor posted:oh that's the other cool thing about git: it encourages users to not commit to master often, so lots of man hours of work are sitting on dev laptops that are of course backed up regularly right i know this is your stymie but while i'd say "bad codebases/expectations lead to people not committing to mainline often" is more true, git does allow someone to be much worse about it
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 06:33
|
|
|
rotor posted:some shitbag at my last job gave an hourlong talk about how to "craft the code story" with your commits i worry about my commit history too much and even i'm angry reading this.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 06:46
|
|
|
rotor posted:some shitbag at my last job gave an hourlong talk about how to "craft the code story" with your commits lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 07:32
|
|
|
fidel sarcastro posted:my commit history this is the yospos version of "my girlfriend" rofl
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 07:34
|
|
|
lmao
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 07:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 17:57 |
|
|
git is bad obtuse software for idiots who would rather masturbate over bad ways of doing version control than do work
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 07:47
|
|