|
git is the node of source control
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 08:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 08:18 |
|
|
AWWNAW posted:git is the node of source control i see what you're going for but i disagree. node comes from complete idiots. git comes from linux kernel devs, who generally know what they're doing, but probably spend at least 1 hour doing version control for every 8 hours programming. this makes sense given the size of the project and global distribution of its developers. the problem is that git expects you to care about silly details of version control that you probably don't need to care about. also its command line interface (the only interface worth using) is bad bad bad.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 08:21
|
|
|
whats the big deal? i use github but i just use sourcetree for everything and i've never read up on How Git Works or anything
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 09:03
|
|
|
shithub
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 09:04
|
|
|
fwiw i have some systems in operations that require commit messages for no reason and i like to just include random facts. i'll be arsed to put in "added a customer (customername)" thats stupid. ill put in like, a world record in sports from the 1800s or something.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 09:05
|
|
|
MononcQc posted:A fun way to gently caress poo poo up with git was when it still had 'push' default to pushing all branches, so that if you had a bunch of branches with hosed up state or lagging on the origin you're pushing to and someone forgot about it and --forced the push, then you'd be crushing unrelated branches all by accident. --force should be disabled as soon as a repo has more than one contributor.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 09:08
|
|
|
fart simpson posted:whats the big deal? i use github but i just use sourcetree for everything and i've never read up on How Git Works or anything and who do you have to bother when your funky merge breaks the build and you have no idea how to fix it? the office git wizard, the one person who really does want to spend 1/8 of his day on version control. he's the reason you're using git, after all
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 09:19
|
|
|
Space Whale posted:I made a boo boo with Git yesterday. It was fixed, quickly, however the buildnazi got furious with me when I talked about it today. The issue was basically "merging the QA build into my work branch" when I meant to "merge my work branch into the QA build." Assuming your work branch didn't have too many commits, I'd probably just make a new branch based off the QA branch and cherry-pick my commits over. Also you guys should be using pull requests.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 10:02
|
|
|
git is actually good and cool
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 13:06
|
|
|
JewKiller 3000 posted:and who do you have to bother when your funky merge breaks the build and you have no idea how to fix it? the office git wizard, the one person who really does want to spend 1/8 of his day on version control. he's the reason you're using git, after all not sure what kind of funky merges you're talking about. Every dev in the office has implied knowledge of how to merge. It's not any worse than merging branches on SVN. that being said, you probably shouldn't use rebase, like ever
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 13:28
|
|
|
MeruFM posted:not sure what kind of funky merges you're talking about. Every dev in the office has implied knowledge of how to merge. It's not any worse than merging branches on SVN. no, you should rebase all your typos and fixups into one neat commit before you submit your pull request. i know this is the safe zone and all, but you fuckers just don't know how this poo poo works.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 13:44
|
|
|
JewKiller 3000 posted:and who do you have to bother when your funky merge breaks the build and you have no idea how to fix it? the office git wizard, the one person who really does want to spend 1/8 of his day on version control. he's the reason you're using git, after all i dont know, how do you do it when your weird merge breaks the build in svn or whatever
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 14:34
|
|
|
the only reason people use git is because torvalds knocked out a prototype, no-one really gives a drat about changeset vs snapshot semantics.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 16:15
|
|
|
rotor posted:some shitbag at my last job gave an hourlong talk about how to "craft the code story" with your commits
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 16:26
|
|
|
one of my coworkers wants to move some of the code we've written to a public github repo while preserving commit history and i didn't have the heart to tell him just how poorly our commit messages would reflect on the company's ~~reputational capital~~ lol if you curate your commits instead of just vomiting code onto the screen
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 16:42
|
|
|
quitting your job using a commit message is extremely pro
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 17:32
|
|
|
githubs api is trash. the only scope permission that gives you access to the commit history of private repos you have contributed to also gives you write access to it
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 17:33
|
|
|
Valeyard posted:github is trash
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 17:33
|
|
|
bobbilljim posted:git is actually good and cool this version control seems good to me
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 18:21
|
|
|
rotor posted:this version control seems good to me source your quotes
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 18:24
|
|
|
why don't more people use mercurial?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 18:56
|
|
|
because git is fine and is easier to type on ur keyboard
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 19:11
|
|
|
Garbd posted:because git is fine and is easier to type on ur keyboard
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 19:11
|
|
|
Garbd posted:because git is fine and is easier to type on ur keyboard git is my #1 go to example for worse is better
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 19:49
|
|
|
sourcetree is very needs suiting
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 20:00
|
|
|
what's the technical name for people who tend to write redundant crap? I mean, like this:Python code:Python code:
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 20:02
|
|
|
People who are safe in this thread!
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 20:03
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:why don't more people use mercurial? Unless there's some hidden warts in Mercurial that I'm not aware of, it feels like its largely cultural at this point. The CLI is sane, and it still handles much of the stuff but does, but there's no Github for mercurial, Bitbucket did it but not before git through Github solidified as the defacto version control system for new open source projects.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 20:27
|
|
|
Maluco Marinero posted:Unless there's some hidden warts in Mercurial that I'm not aware of, it feels like its largely cultural at this point. The CLI is sane, and it still handles much of the stuff but does, but there's no Github for mercurial, Bitbucket did it but not before git through Github solidified as the defacto version control system for new open source projects* * javascript frameworks
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 20:29
|
|
|
it comes as a large surprise that other people in the industry do different things
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 20:32
|
|
|
yup the only thing on github is javascript frameworks, and the only people who use github are javascript framework developers. it's github's shameful secret... some people in the industry don't use javascript (it's pretty shocking, i know) so we can't use githoob. We do.. different things 
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 21:20
|
|
|
most go packages are on github
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 21:21
|
|
|
sounds like yr complaints are now invalid HTH
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 21:21
|
|
|
Papes posted:what's the best resource for learning how to use laTex? a few pages old, but I just read the book and did a few examples from it on my own system to get used to the tools and style. I also used an editor with great LaTeX support at the time (Alpha), which helped a lot. hard to believe the OS, Alpha, a reasonably complete TeX distribution, GhostScript, and a ton of other stuff (including Eudora, Netscape, NiftyTelnet, CodeWarrior, Lotus 1-2-3, and WordPerfect) fit and ran well on a 25 MHz 68040 with 120 MB of disk.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 21:40
|
|
|
the danger of using latex is once ytou start, you will find yourself needing to type up documents or anything paper based and be thinking "hmmm, now i better do this in latex"
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 21:43
|
|
|
sourceforge is really bad compared to everything
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 21:45
|
|
|
Papes posted:what's the best resource for learning how to use laTex? http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3330117 
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 21:47
|
|
|
Valeyard posted:the danger of using latex is once ytou start, you will find yourself needing to type up documents or anything paper based and be thinking "hmmm, now i better do this in latex" don't see the problem as long as you erase your memories of writing latex afterwards
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 21:54
|
|
|
when i was studying math i tried to do all my homework in latex
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 22:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 08:18 |
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:sourceforge is really bad compared to everything but you can't deliver ads and viruses over git pull!
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2014 22:11
|
|