Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Space Whale
Nov 6, 2014

Zeitgueist posted:

Oh snap we're at puppetmaster:smuggo: already?

You're calling others predictable?

I did it. Why did everyone let me if this is so predictable you gotta bust out the brows?

YOU of all people, who post threads in places I've been about how tiring it is to post in DnD to get people on the side lines to see the way you see things, should have seen what I was doing, especially since we're not strangers! You've shown yourself to have a big brain and the willingness to use it over the years.

I felt like taking a vacay from seriousness to go trolling where I eat, and it turns out being subverting the subversives uncovered some weaknesses we don't want to address.

Seriously, if you guess who I am shoot me a PM and I'll mail you some beer for Christmas for my trouble. If you can't by Christmas I'll send you a case, 'cause you're too stressed to think straight. :gonk:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Space Whale
Nov 6, 2014

Job Truniht posted:

Literally the best thing that could happen to the left is if it's organization became autocratic in a sense that someone representative of its core goal and forced everyone either to fall in line kick out the non believers. Banning Tumblr and privilege theory in general from leftist social discourse would also help.cehere we're going doesn't require distinction about race or gender.

I realize you're probably still pissed at me but I agree with this 100%, not that I want my sentiments to it to make it look bad by association.

Zeitgueist
Aug 8, 2003

by Ralp

Job Truniht posted:

Literally the best thing that could happen to the left is if it's organization became autocratic in a sense that someone representative of its core goal and forced everyone either to fall in line kick out the non believers. Banning Tumblr and privilege theory in general from leftist social discourse would also help.cehere we're going doesn't require distinction about race or gender.

Leftism generally has a core goal of social equality and I don't really know if Tumblr has anything to do with that beyond providing a convenient codeword for people who generally didn't care much about SJ issues to point at when they try and poo poo on people with reasonable opinions.

Privelege theory is fine within the group but has it's shortcomings and probably shouldn't be used for public actions because of linguistic confusion. Having said that every single time I've heard of "ban privilege chat" in a leftist group context it's been a middle-upper class white protest tourist who is angry at being yelled at for shouting down people in oppressed groups.

SMILLENNIALSMILLEN
Jun 26, 2009



Space Whale posted:

Who is worse the derailleur or the derailed? Yes I know this isn't about bikes

I guess it's arguable whether or not there's justification in "as demonstrated with this offensive act, y'all focus too much on scoring points to be productive and are generally hard to put up with" justifying being offensive, but the fact that it's easy as poo poo to make people go off like this and keep it going stands. It only ended when I actually had work to do.

But yes I am the one trolled by them you see.

Anyway, if you were genuinely offended when I said g__k, I'm genuinely sorry. If you just look for poo poo to go accusing over, please reflect on how easy it is to derail you and what it says about your community that anyone can do this so easily. For gently caress's sake.


Remember when I said privilege and original sin are the same thing, then someone goldmined the thread with the single post "God actually offers forgiveness?"

:q:

Seriously, thanks for getting this out of my performance. You made it worth it. Now I need to go check my privileges a thousand times so if I self identify as left wing or socialist saying gook on something awful doesn't make stigmata appear on my forehead in the form of "CASEY JONES" in big red text while an Elephant somehow scoots over it like a dog scraping it's butt.

You posted your life story and fuckload of words in defence of a weird racist grandpa simpson thing to say. You've posted twice more in the time it took to post this.

Zeitgueist
Aug 8, 2003

by Ralp

Space Whale posted:

I did it. Why did everyone let me if this is so predictable you gotta bust out the brows?

YOU of all people, who post threads in places I've been about how tiring it is to post in DnD to get people on the side lines to see the way you see things, should have seen what I was doing, especially since we're not strangers! You've shown yourself to have a big brain and the willingness to use it over the years.

I felt like taking a vacay from seriousness to go trolling where I eat, and it turns out being subverting the subversives uncovered some weaknesses we don't want to address.

Seriously, if you guess who I am shoot me a PM and I'll mail you some beer for Christmas for my trouble. If you can't by Christmas I'll send you a case, 'cause you're too stressed to think straight. :gonk:

I have no idea who you are I just saw someone posting for pages on end about being 'language policed' and I assume everyone in D&D is posting in earnest and not trolling.

Also I post here to relieve stress, it doesn't create it.

Ormi
Feb 7, 2005

B-E-H-A-V-E
Arrest us!

A Buttery Pastry posted:

The opposite of expecting people to "give up" their privileges sounds like expecting people to hold on to them to me?

Yes. They're not going anywhere and any misguided attempts to relinquish privilege are a result of questionable motivations and are largely counterproductive in any case. Some people might feel the hairs on their neck raise and intuit that you want to send them to GULAG when you talk about their privilege, but nobody is insisting that we make things more equal by dragging others into hell.

Flectarn
May 29, 2013

Space Whale posted:

I did it. Why did everyone let me if this is so predictable you gotta bust out the brows?

YOU of all people, who post threads in places I've been about how tiring it is to post in DnD to get people on the side lines to see the way you see things, should have seen what I was doing, especially since we're not strangers! You've shown yourself to have a big brain and the willingness to use it over the years.

I felt like taking a vacay from seriousness to go trolling where I eat, and it turns out being subverting the subversives uncovered some weaknesses we don't want to address.

Seriously, if you guess who I am shoot me a PM and I'll mail you some beer for Christmas for my trouble. If you can't by Christmas I'll send you a case, 'cause you're too stressed to think straight. :gonk:

smdh @ this shameful puppetmaster attempt

Job Truniht
Nov 7, 2012

MY POSTS ARE REAL RETARDED, SIR
Or it could be that those groups are the makeup of every successful socialist movement in the last two centuries. Do you think the Bolshevicks were open to policital discourse? I disagree with Zizek's argument that you can't go from revolutionary violence to post revolutionary politics. All you have to do is purge the revolutionaries.

People can't be full time leftists. I think that's consequently why they bring intangible poo poo in to poison the well without any regard for its harmful effects. A dedicated leader could be that full time leftist.

Space Whale
Nov 6, 2014

katlington posted:

You posted your life story and fuckload of words in defence of a weird racist grandpa simpson thing to say. You've posted twice more in the time it took to post this.



To be serious though, the fact that people's life experiences (these things we think are so loving important!) might mean they're not exposed to things, or that the meanings of words are different fro them in the context of their lived experiences than to others. Those sounds we recognize as words might not be offensive, and stuff!

You might want to think about your approach to telling people "Hey this thing that is innocuous to you? It's a big deal to us. Not like you could have known, but it really gets people whipped up" instead of "you ist with the ism you are beyond hope you are awful apologize to us now."

Zeitgueist posted:

I have no idea who you are I just saw someone posting for pages on end about being 'language policed' and I assume everyone in D&D is posting in earnest and not trolling.

Also I post here to relieve stress, it doesn't create it.

I really hope so for your sake.

Rodatose
Jul 8, 2008

corn, corn, corn

Effectronica posted:

I'm not saying that they're arguing in bad faith, or deluded about their real interests. I'm saying that someone who holds views like the person you described, or along a continuum towards him, that such a person is ignorant. They have minimal-to-limited understanding of leftism both as theory and as a historical perspective, and their politics are solely based upon an existential despair. Consider the fatuousness necessary to insist that things have only gotten worse than slavery with even a basic understanding of how slavery operated.
I did not say things got worse. I said things were not fixed. Especially in regard to racial attitudes, which is what was fronted. White people supposedly 'checking their privilege' to free the Downtrodden Race did not result in whites thinking they were racially equal to blacks. Scientific racism and the nadir of race relations followed abolition, not preceeded it. It took more than a century for whites to finally start acknowledging white superiority and this was done out of fear of revolution and economic pressure thanks to efforts organized at the top.
But with abolitionists and the civil war, people went after effects, not causes. Ultimately, deference to the rights of the property-owning class was paid in consolation for their loss of (immorally owned) property. They were not expropriated or disenfranchised from high political office. The common reaction is joy over the burning of atlanta or all the dead soldiers. What good do those low-level deaths bring?

Along those lines, how many times have you heard someone say "we should nuke Iran/Iraq?" The reason someone says this is to relieve political frustrations caused by the ruling elite of another country. Yet such an action is aimed at the populace. Would you say the people of Nagasaki or Hiroshima deserved their deaths for supporting the Japanese Empire? Did their deaths avenge all of the koreans and chinese killed or made into sex-slaves?

Helsing posted:

If you've run into people who use their leftism or their identity politics as an excuse to be bad people then you should shun them. But also please try to recognize that this anger and bitterness comes in a historical context: identity politics didn't cause the left to drive into a ditch, rather the left was defeated and identity politics went from being a useful idea to a full fledged ideology that was plugged into the Marx shaped hole at the centre of the leftist conceptual universe.

This makes more sense, so I'd agree with that and disown my previous statement. I was probably mistaking changes in how rightist masculinist backlash manifests itself nowadays with causes.

I would like to know more about how it came about in the 70s and how it turned into what it is today if anyone would like to offer. It's helpful to understand that sort of thing

Rodatose fucked around with this message at 23:47 on Dec 8, 2014

Space Whale
Nov 6, 2014

Flectarn posted:

smdh @ this shameful puppetmaster attempt

Yes, attempt. For like 5 pages.

smgdh

Zeitgueist
Aug 8, 2003

by Ralp

Job Truniht posted:

Or it could be that those groups are the makeup of every successful socialist movement in the last two centuries. Do you think the Bolshevicks were open to policital discourse? I disagree with Zizek's argument that you can't go from revolutionary violence to post revolutionary politics. All you have to do is purge the revolutionaries.

People can't be full time leftists. I think that's consequently why they bring intangible poo poo in to poison the well without any regard for its harmful effects. A dedicated leader could be that full time leftist.

Where did I say you can't have those groups in leftism? I'm saying that folks who whine about "privilege" are almost always doing so with a specific agenda.

It's like whining about Al Sharpton on Facebook. Sure, maybe one of those times it's somebody going off about his homophobic comments or the fact that he was an FBI snitch. But 9/10 times an entirely different issue.

Space Whale
Nov 6, 2014

Rodatose posted:

... such an action is aimed at the populace. Would you say the people of Nagasaki or Hiroshima deserved their deaths for supporting the Japanese Empire? Did their deaths avenge all of the koreans and chinese killed or made into sex-slaves?

When I say "if you want to change all of society you need an answer for all of society and a place for everyone in it" this is what I mean. You can't go "gently caress the others/bad guys/our enemies right now" and not expect them to fight back. Practicality is a thing. The fact that what side of whatever border you're on as much as your sex and race determined your "team" by the lottery of birth is something people oh so easily forget.

Generally, most people fight for whatever team they're on, since they were born into it and can't change teams. And if they could, they'd probably all join the winning team.


Zeitgueist posted:

Where did I say you can't have those groups in leftism? I'm saying that folks who whine about "privilege" are almost always doing so with a specific agenda.

It's like whining about Al Sharpton on Facebook. Sure, maybe one of those times it's somebody going off about his homophobic comments or the fact that he was an FBI snitch. But 9/10 times an entirely different issue.

Getting people to get over their needs for purity and instead realize human beings are fallible creatures with perhaps wildly different views and lived experiences that they bring with them, and you need to get a thick skin and realize you won't get your way 100% is my specific agenda.

All of this "We're sick of some babby bishie bolshevik screaming CYP all day" poo poo didn't erupt out of the ether, nor was it some insidious trolling by moles from the right. It's your own sick of the poo poo they put up with to try to find company and organize and do things. Even if the theory is fine a lot of people use it in a bad way.

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe
You wake up in a ditch. You do not know what has happened.
Your political alignment is now: Nubio-Marxist

Exits: up
Press ? for help.

>

Space Whale
Nov 6, 2014

SedanChair posted:

You wake up in a ditch. You do not know what has happened.
Your political alignment is now: Nubio-Marxist

Exits: up
Press ? for help.

>

go up, look around

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

SedanChair posted:

I know right? I kept thinking he was on a higher level from me.

e: 90% of PMs I receive are "you're white" :smugdog: or some variant of "human being" 500 times

Why so many saying you're white? I can count the times you mention your race on one hand.

Zeitgueist
Aug 8, 2003

by Ralp

Who What Now posted:

Why so many saying you're white? I can count the times you mention your race on one hand.

One drop rule for whiteness

Job Truniht
Nov 7, 2012

MY POSTS ARE REAL RETARDED, SIR

Zeitgueist posted:

Where did I say you can't have those groups in leftism? I'm saying that folks who whine about "privilege" are almost always doing so with a specific agenda.

It's like whining about Al Sharpton on Facebook. Sure, maybe one of those times it's somebody going off about his homophobic comments or the fact that he was an FBI snitch. But 9/10 times an entirely different issue.

I have an agenda alright. I think almost everyone on Tumblr is insecure and mentally ill. Their political alignment is based solely on projecting those insecurities.

Zeitgueist
Aug 8, 2003

by Ralp

Space Whale posted:

Getting people to get over their needs for purity and instead realize human beings are fallible creatures with perhaps wildly different views and lived experiences that they bring with them, and you need to get a thick skin and realize you won't get your way 100% is my specific agenda.

All of this "We're sick of some babby bishie bolshevik screaming CYP all day" poo poo didn't erupt out of the ether, nor was it some insidious trolling by moles from the right. It's your own sick of the poo poo they put up with to try to find company and organize and do things. Even if the theory is fine a lot of people use it in a bad way.

Wait are we trolling again or earnest, this is all moving too fast for me.

Mortley
Jan 18, 2005

aux tep unt rep uni ovi

Space Whale posted:

I realize you're probably still pissed at me but I agree with this 100%, not that I want my sentiments to it to make it look bad by association.

I wanted to agree with Job Truniht but I was hoping he would go back and edit that post. I can't follow exactly what was being said.

Zeitgueist
Aug 8, 2003

by Ralp

Job Truniht posted:

I have an agenda alright. I think almost everyone on Tumblr is insecure and mentally ill. Their political alignment is based solely on projecting those insecurities.

A whole lot of tumblrs are just folks posting porn pictures. You're using Tumblr as a codeword.

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.

SedanChair posted:

You wake up in a ditch. You do not know what has happened.
Your political alignment is now: Nubio-Marxist

Exits: up
Press ? for help.

>

INV
XYZZY
KILL DRAGON

Number Two Stunna
Nov 8, 2009

FUCK
I think the Vampire's Castle article captures the problem pretty well- there's a large group of people that are using left wing politics not as a means for positive change, but as a way to be self-righteous. Campus leftism has always had its share of idiots and dilettantes, but in the past few years it's taken on a very toxic disposition (especially on the internet), partly because of the way social media enforces groupthink and dehumanization of the other, partly because of the limitations of privilege theory.

Just an observation, the left wing tumblr types are some of the meanest, most insufferable people I've ever spoken to in my life. As a socialist, it's horrible to see these people slowly becoming the new face of leftism.

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

Space Whale posted:

You might want to think about your approach to telling people "Hey this thing that is innocuous to you? It's a big deal to us. Not like you could have known, but it really gets people whipped up" instead of "you ist with the ism you are beyond hope you are awful apologize to us now."

We did. You're response was "I've never heard it used in a racist manner ergo it can't be racist!"

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

Space Whale posted:

go up, look around

As you struggle to your feet, you realize this is not really a ditch and is more of a culvert. You have been laying in what is, in essence, a shallow depression in the ground.

You look at your surroundings.



Across the street, which runs north to south, you see a low building: Reed Graphics. It looks empty. To the north, in the distance, you can see cars turning in and out of the parking lot of what looks like a busy gas station. The road stretches away south, framed by fences, tall weeds and small houses. A side street runs west.

Exits: north, south, west

>

Space Whale
Nov 6, 2014

SedanChair posted:

As you struggle to your feet, you realize this is not really a ditch and is more of a culvert. You have been laying in what is, in essence, a shallow depression in the ground.

You look at your surroundings.



Across the street, which runs north to south, you see a low building: Reed Graphics. It looks empty. To the north, in the distance, you can see cars turning in and out of the parking lot of what looks like a busy gas station. The road stretches away south, framed by fences, tall weeds and small houses. A side street runs west.

Exits: north, south, west

>

INSPECT Reed Graphics.

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

SedanChair posted:

As you struggle to your feet, you realize this is not really a ditch and is more of a culvert. You have been laying in what is, in essence, a shallow depression in the ground.

You look at your surroundings.



Across the street, which runs north to south, you see a low building: Reed Graphics. It looks empty. To the north, in the distance, you can see cars turning in and out of the parking lot of what looks like a busy gas station. The road stretches away south, framed by fences, tall weeds and small houses. A side street runs west.

Exits: north, south, west

>

>CHECK PRIVILEGE

Job Truniht
Nov 7, 2012

MY POSTS ARE REAL RETARDED, SIR

Zeitgueist posted:

A whole lot of tumblrs are just folks posting porn pictures. You're using Tumblr as a codeword.

Alright, I can't say this any other way. There's no real nice way to say it. There's going to be backlash for that. You don't have to agree with it. It's entirely an opinion. Here it goes.

I think modern feminists, privilege, and LGBT activists should be banned from leftist discourse. Specifically, the internet and neb-activist kind that poo poo up said website above and are the source of wherever mockery GBS is willing to give them. I think they're wholly toxic in their creation. You're free to join those groups. You're free to exist within those groups and discourse within those groups. You're even free to come into leftist activism as being self identified as any of those groups. You're not free to discuss anything other than leftism within the leftist movement. It's not discrimination. It's not spite. It's good sense, because anyone with good sense would've recognized that the feel good bullshit that they bring to the table entirely conflicts with core leftism in every possible way. It cannot afford to make the distinctions that these people are making.

goatse.cx
Nov 21, 2013
This thread is going to some interesting places isn't it.

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

Space Whale posted:

INSPECT Reed Graphics.

It's an extremely nondescript concrete building. It is painted tan.

Who What Now posted:

>CHECK PRIVILEGE

You absently put your hands in the pockets of your fleece vest. In your left pocket you find a card.

a business card posted:

RACE TRAITORS' COLLECTIVE
Tacoma, WA Chapter
There is no contact information on the card.

back of card posted:

(handwritten) Consider your privilege...checked!!! LOL xoxoxox

>

woke wedding drone fucked around with this message at 00:57 on Dec 9, 2014

Foma
Oct 1, 2004
Hello, My name is Lip Synch. Right now, I'm making a post that is anti-bush or something Micheal Moore would be proud of because I and the rest of my team lefty friends (koba1t included) need something to circle jerk to.
This is some crazyness Emily Yoffe experienced

http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/12/college_rape_campus_sexual_assault_is_a_serious_problem_but_the_efforts.html

quote:

It’s a surprisingly loaded subject, given the widely acknowledged prevalence of drinking on American campuses. Last year, I wrote about drinking and sexual assault in a Slate piece titled, “College Women: Stop Getting Drunk.” I said that binge drinking was bad for everyone but that it presented a particular danger for young women because it made them more vulnerable to sexual assault—I described sober predators who specifically targeted intoxicated women. I was widely denounced for “victim-blaming.” This year, I was disinvited to speak at a West Coast college after board members of a student organization that had invited me decided my presence would make student victims “feel unsafe.”

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

Job Truniht posted:

Alright, I can't say this any other way. There's no real nice way to say it. There's going to be backlash for that. You don't have to agree with it. It's entirely an opinion. Here it goes.

I think modern feminists, privilege, and LGBT activists should be banned from leftist discourse. Specifically, the internet and neb-activist kind that poo poo up said website above and are the source of wherever mockery GBS is willing to give them. I think they're wholly toxic in their creation. You're free to join those groups. You're free to exist within those groups and discourse within those groups. You're even free to come into leftist activism as being self identified as any of those groups. You're not free to discuss anything other than leftism within the leftist movement. It's not discrimination. It's not spite. It's good sense, because anyone with good sense would've recognized that the feel good bullshit that they bring to the table entirely conflicts with core leftism in every possible way. It cannot afford to make the distinctions that these people are making.

Let me help you with this. Those "new wave feminists" and "SJWS" and all that? These people you're talking about don't actually exist in the real world outside of the Internet. You are all worked up over a boogeyman chariacture that you've convinced yourself is lurking around every corner and within every shadow.

Zeitgueist
Aug 8, 2003

by Ralp

Job Truniht posted:

I think modern feminists, privilege, and LGBT activists should be banned from leftist discourse. Specifically, the internet and neb-activist kind that poo poo up said website above and are the source of wherever mockery GBS is willing to give them. I think they're wholly toxic in their creation. You're free to join those groups. You're free to exist within those groups and discourse within those groups. You're even free to come into leftist activism as being self identified as any of those groups. You're not free to discuss anything other than leftism within the leftist movement. It's not discrimination. It's not spite. It's good sense, because anyone with good sense would've recognized that the feel good bullshit that they bring to the table entirely conflicts with core leftism in every possible way. It cannot afford to make the distinctions that these people are making.

Your trying to ban the discussion of feminism(lets just start there) in leftist activism.

:staredog:


I'm gonna go ahead and stop taking you seriously now.

Minarchist
Mar 5, 2009

by WE B Bourgeois

Who What Now posted:

Let me help you with this. Those "new wave feminists" and "SJWS" and all that? These people you're talking about don't actually exist in the real world outside of the Internet. You are all worked up over a boogeyman chariacture that you've convinced yourself is lurking around every corner and within every shadow.

They had a big hand in ruining OWS with "step up, step back" since a lot of genuinely interested and motivated people were flat out prevented from speaking in favor of "oppressed" people who were more interested in identity politics than curbing the power of banks and corporations.

Also #gamergate is getting people IRL riled up a bit

Also that guy who landed a ship on a comet was reduced to a blubbering mess because he made the fatal mistake of giving a poo poo what people on twitter think.

Minarchist fucked around with this message at 00:39 on Dec 9, 2014

Minarchist
Mar 5, 2009

by WE B Bourgeois

Zeitgueist posted:

Your trying to ban the discussion of feminism(lets just start there) in leftist activism.

:staredog:


I'm gonna go ahead and stop taking you seriously now.

I think he was referring to the "kill all men" and "all sex is rape" and "PATRIARCHYYYYYY~" types of radical feminists that people tend to automatically associate with feminism as a whole because of how drat loud they are.

Zeitgueist
Aug 8, 2003

by Ralp

Minarchist posted:

I think he was referring to the "kill all men" and "all sex is rape" and "PATRIARCHYYYYYY~" types of radical feminists that people tend to automatically associate with feminism as a whole because of how drat loud they are.

Yes, I get it, when people talk about huge swathes of groups they're always talking about those types, because otherwise they might come off as being a piece of poo poo. :rolleyes:

Hey, I don't have anything against social justice thats why I will call anyone who ever complains about me being an rear end in a top hat ever as a SJW, but actually it's about ethics in video game journalism.

Job Truniht
Nov 7, 2012

MY POSTS ARE REAL RETARDED, SIR

Who What Now posted:

Let me help you with this. Those "new wave feminists" and "SJWS" and all that? These people you're talking about don't actually exist in the real world outside of the Internet. You are all worked up over a boogeyman chariacture that you've convinced yourself is lurking around every corner and within every shadow.

They exist. I just posted a video of them in Portland a few pages back, doing exactly what I said they'd do.


Zeitgueist posted:

I'm gonna go ahead and stop taking you seriously now.

Blanket equality also means blanket message. There can be no distinctions. I gave you my reasons. That's the best I can do.

Zeitgueist
Aug 8, 2003

by Ralp
"All sex is rape" feminists are about as common as welfare queens.

In that I they don't exist and are creation of reacionaries in order to smear something they don't like in exactly the way it is being used here.

Zeitgueist
Aug 8, 2003

by Ralp
Guys guys guys I'm not a racist when I talk about those types of people abusing welfare I'm talking about the Welfare Queens. They exist because I saw a black woman at the Quick-E-Mart buying Snickers for 14 kids.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Harold Fjord
Jan 3, 2004
I was wondering how long it would take him to claim puppetmaster. The best was when he kept insisting about it for 5 more posts. He's posted like 3x the :words: of anyone else here, but he's totes puppetmastering. You all lost your minds at his bad word. Really, you did. Now stop quoting him so I don't have to read his posts.

me posted:

You don't give a poo poo about discussion or privelege you just want to bitch about leftists while casually dropping slurs so you can then play the upstanding citizen being harassed by the PC police when called on it. Or you genuinely believe what you said in the post I quoted above and you are beyond the ability to look at yourself critically at all. Either way everyone in this thread would be best served by putting you on ignore. You might have well said someone was trying to "Jew me out of my money."

I did this then, you should too.

Does anyone have the study handy where people would, generally, rather have $50 and everyone else $20 than everyone have $70? And more importantly, is there any evidence that this can be applied to other things? Because that's a pretty obvious place where we can apply privilege theory. Poor whites still have white privilege, and they may want to keep it specifically because they enjoy having superiority where they can get it.

  • Locked thread