|
tallest crocodile posted:I prefer Wolverine's white fudge sounds delicious.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2014 21:51 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 13:07 |
|
I wonder if they have Mystique's chocolate starfish?
|
# ? Dec 11, 2014 21:57 |
|
DrBouvenstein posted:That's How to, Batman! (Or at least smeone cosplaying as him.) That's fcking amazing. I couldn't lose weight at the rate if I used a chainsaw.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2014 22:18 |
|
spog posted:That's fcking amazing. I couldn't lose weight at the rate if I used a chainsaw. Sure you could. To be fat like that takes a lot of eating and a lot of laziness, all he has to do it stop eating so much and be less sedentary. Source: I lost 120 pounds in 12 months by not eating fast food and going to the gym a few times per week.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2014 22:33 |
|
spog posted:That's fcking amazing. I couldn't lose weight at the rate if I used a chainsaw. The fatter you are the faster you lose weight just by not being a fast food hulking couch loaf.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2014 23:23 |
|
Hamburlgar posted:I wonder if they have Mystique's chocolate starfish? Blueberry.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 00:14 |
|
Hamburlgar posted:I wonder if they have Mystique's chocolate starfish? Here's the whole set. You want some of Magneto's dark chocolate?
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 00:44 |
|
Just one of the many attractions at "China's Disneyland".
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 01:10 |
|
The MSJ posted:Here's the whole set. You want some of Magneto's dark chocolate? Really theres a black guy on the bag and they don't name it after him
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 02:29 |
|
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 03:10 |
|
Cheeky buggers!
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 03:16 |
|
The Ringo jab is one of my favourite burns of all time.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 03:52 |
|
Forgot the best one:
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 06:01 |
Toriori posted:The Ringo jab is one of my favourite burns of all time. It is, unfortunately, not true: http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-magazine-monitor-26577314 http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/john-lennon/ringo-isnt-even-the-best-drummer-in-the-band/ I wish it were real, because it's pretty funny.
|
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 06:39 |
|
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 06:51 |
Would.
|
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 07:19 |
|
Chard posted:Would. You'd seriously go to the party of someone who abuses apostrophes like that? Have you no dignity?
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 07:25 |
|
IslamoNazi posted:You'd seriously go to the party of someone who abuses apostrophes like that? Have you no dignity? He's not a hive mind of people named gus so what's wrong with that apostrophe?
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 07:39 |
|
IslamoNazi posted:You'd seriously go to the party of someone who abuses apostrophes like that? Have you no dignity? Looks pretty legit to me.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 07:39 |
|
Perhaps the concern is that it could be interpreted as Gus is the person having the abortion? I'm in the 'this apostrophe is correct' camp though.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 08:06 |
|
I think the trailing S after an apostrophe on a name ending in S varies by country. British English I'm pretty sure would just write Gus' (see also James', Chris', etc) Either that or someone taught me the wrong way and I've been doing it wrong all these years.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 08:20 |
|
Vulpes posted:I think the trailing S after an apostrophe on a name ending in S varies by country. British English I'm pretty sure would just write Gus' (see also James', Chris', etc) The double S is only used in instances of plurals ending in S, such as "there were several James's". So, in this instance it would only be correct if there were multiple Gus (Geese?) running the company.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 09:33 |
|
Vulpes posted:I think the trailing S after an apostrophe on a name ending in S varies by country. British English I'm pretty sure would just write Gus' (see also James', Chris', etc) This is correct, Gus' is correct. Gus's is an abomination unto man and the Lord.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 09:43 |
|
I disagree but, for lack of a more authoritative source, have this internet link: http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/apostrophes/apostrophes-with-words-ending-in-s/ And if you don't click it I'll bring it to you: Surprise - we can do it a number of ways, everyone is right enough and just be consistent in your method. However - as the original comment that started this derail was the alleged 'abuse' of an apostrophe and no-one here is saying that the apostrophe shouldn't be there (as opposed to it's position or what follows or doesn't follow it)... I guess we could just move on... But well done IslamoNazi on firing up the grammar nazi debate. John Cadaver has a new favorite as of 09:48 on Dec 12, 2014 |
# ? Dec 12, 2014 09:45 |
|
John Cadaver posted:But well done IslamoNazi on firing up the grammar nazi debate. He sure opened up a can of octopuses
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 10:43 |
|
Zophar posted:The double S is only used in instances of plurals ending in S, such as "there were several James's". What if you wanted to talk about something the multiple Gus's owned. Gus's'? What if Gus' Abortion & Barbeque decides to rebrand its self to a simpler and snappier Gus' and then franchises so there's more than one, how would you refer to them collectively? What if several of those franchises pool their resources and buy a wharehouse, whose wharehouse is that?
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 10:57 |
|
From a few pages ago, but this has gotta be a photoshop: the guy looking over the chair is Shakeel Ahmad Bhat. He's a Kashmiri Muslim activist/protester. Dude is almost never photographed not screaming.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 10:57 |
|
Yes, I can tell by the pixels. And I've seen quite a few 'shops in my time.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 12:30 |
|
SurreptitiousMuffin posted:From a few pages ago, but this has gotta be a photoshop: Sure looks real to me!
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 12:31 |
|
SurreptitiousMuffin posted:From a few pages ago, but this has gotta be a photoshop: the guy looking over the chair is Shakeel Ahmad Bhat. He's a Kashmiri Muslim activist/protester. Dude is almost never photographed not screaming. This is the great things about goons there is always someone goofier then you
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 12:40 |
|
neonbregna posted:This is the great things about goons there is always someone goonier then you
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 12:41 |
|
SurreptitiousMuffin posted:From a few pages ago, but this has gotta be a photoshop...
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 12:42 |
|
SurreptitiousMuffin posted:From a few pages ago, but this has gotta be a photoshop: Look at you, here to brighten everyone's day
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 13:20 |
|
Look at the size of his loving head yeah it might be a Photoshop
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 13:58 |
|
neonbregna posted:This is the great things about goons there is always someone goofier than you
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 14:35 |
Best part about the next-to-last one: That was at the Royal Command Performance. So "everyone else"? The royal family.
|
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 14:54 |
|
I love the look of the other guys. "OK, we get it, you're angry, maybe you should just take a deep breath and count to 10? drat, dude."
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 15:00 |
|
SurreptitiousMuffin posted:From a few pages ago, but this has gotta be a photoshop: the guy looking over the chair is Shakeel Ahmad Bhat. He's a Kashmiri Muslim activist/protester. Dude is almost never photographed not screaming. Dude owns. I'd hire him to be angry at stuff for me.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 16:55 |
|
The MSJ posted:Here's the whole set. You want some of Magneto's dark chocolate? I work at a place that they have a break room that's stocked with random snacks. One of them being single servings of these things. Yesterday I went looking for some and we were out, and I made a comment about it to a co-worker. He went to the grocery store last night and apparently they had them on sale 10 bags for $10. He brought a box of them in today and I couldn't exactly explain to him why I was laughing.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 17:28 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 13:07 |
|
|
# ? Dec 12, 2014 17:42 |