|
 Love it
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2014 21:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 20:50 |
|
|
 Taman Merdeka, Melaka, Malaysia by alkanphel, on Flickr  Jalan Kota, Melaka, Malaysia by alkanphel, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2014 01:30
|
|
|
You can get some pretty decent results out of year-old C-41 chems   drat flickr sharpening
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 09:02
|
|
|
Pretty sure I need to learn to stop down more. Shed by rstop bstop, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 09:51
|
|
|
Baron Dirigible posted:Pretty sure I need to learn to stop down more. I use f/32 and f/45 all the time, you get used to it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 10:40
|
|
|
I shot some sweet portraits and a sweet living room with amazing light, I used some portra 800 for the job. Turned out I had black and white 320 in the camera. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 15:54
|
|
|
I also saw some cars and stuff at night. untitled by polysynthesism, on Flickr untitled by polysynthesism, on Flickr untitled by polysynthesism, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 04:14
|
|
|
bobmarleysghost posted:I shot some sweet portraits and a sweet living room with amazing light, I used some portra 800 for the job. Had the opposite happen today, thought I was shooting Tri-X, turns out it was Ektar. I had just forgot to change the tag on the back of the camera and it was long enough ago that I wouldn't have been able to remember what it was anyway.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 06:50
|
|
|
Some more Acros! Jalan Kota II, Melaka, Malaysia by alkanphel, on Flickr  Jalan Kota III, Melaka, Malaysia by alkanphel, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 07:32
|
|
|
bobmarleysghost posted:I shot some sweet portraits and a sweet living room with amazing light, I used some portra 800 for the job. Not a big huge deal, just add a little dev time. Tri-X 400 didn't need much for a one stop push I bet 320 is pretty similar.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 09:32
|
|
|
PushingKingston posted:Had the opposite happen today, thought I was shooting Tri-X, turns out it was Ektar. I had just forgot to change the tag on the back of the camera and it was long enough ago that I wouldn't have been able to remember what it was anyway. Oh poo poo. That's actually worse than my situation 8th-snype posted:Not a big huge deal, just add a little dev time. Tri-X 400 didn't need much for a one stop push I bet 320 is pretty similar. Yea and I've pushed it before with good results, but those shots were taken in the day. We'll see how these turn out.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 14:44
|
|
|
alkanphel posted:Some more Acros! Lovely stuff as always. I just shot some Acros for the first time recently, and was wondering how to develop it. I don't think that my usual HC-110 developer I use on Tri-x would do it justice. Mind telling my what you use and how? These tones are lovely.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 15:06
|
|
|
Putrid Grin posted:Lovely stuff as always. I do all of my Acros in HC-110 dilution E for 7 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 16:21
|
|
|
Yeah I think I used the standard formula for Acros, as what MBA used. I usually don't deviate unless I'm pushing or pulling film (which is very rare).
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 23:07
|
|
|
I've been using this for acros and it's worked great: http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php?Film=Neopan+100+Acros&Developer=Ilfosol+3&mdc=Search&TempUnits=C  Domino Sugar by Paul Frederiksen, on Flickr
vxsarin fucked around with this message at 02:30 on Dec 19, 2014 |
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 23:48
|
|
|
Putrid Grin posted:Lovely stuff as always. Rodinal is great on Acros too. Rodinal "intensifies grain" but Acros doesn't have any grain to start with so it just turns out super duper sharp. Depending on the dilution it can be high contrast or normal contrast. I wasn't a big fan of Microdol-X with it, that was too low-contrast for my taste, but other than that I don't know too many things that DON'T work well with Acros. It's a miracle film.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 02:27
|
|
|
Got myself a Christmas present: omgomgomgomg
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 10:38
|
|
|
nice! deaders I know where you live rohan fucked around with this message at 13:02 on Dec 19, 2014 |
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 12:57
|
|
|
deaders posted:Got myself a Christmas present: Sweet. I wish I could find the video of a street photographer with a 7 walking against a flood of on coming people shooting bags and bags of film. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 14:03
|
|
|
i want dat
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 14:17
|
|
|
Spedman posted:Sweet. Here's the video: http://youtu.be/Fnh8x_FrnGQ
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 14:39
|
|
|
alkanphel posted:Here's the video: http://youtu.be/Fnh8x_FrnGQ It's fun to imagine all the people with surprised looks on their faces are thinking "that's a lot of film he's wasting". I want a Mamiya now. Why am I so afflicted by GAS?
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 14:59
|
|
|
deaders posted:Got myself a Christmas present: So sexy. You can pry my 6 from my cold dead fingers.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 15:41
|
|
|
deaders posted:Got myself a Christmas present: Awesome.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 16:08
|
|
|
alkanphel posted:Here's the video: http://youtu.be/Fnh8x_FrnGQ  
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 16:51
|
|
|
All 220 rolls of Portra 400 indeed
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 16:54
|
|
|
deaders posted:Got myself a Christmas present: so jealous
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 17:43
|
|
|
deaders posted:Got myself a Christmas present: Welcome to the club! Have you checked the rangefinder calibration? Mine was pretty off when I first got it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 19:20
|
|
|
 Yeah, that's the shot that was stuck in my memory, all I can think of is the processing and scanning.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 23:00
|
|
|
PushingKingston posted:Welcome to the club! Have you checked the rangefinder calibration? Mine was pretty off when I first got it. Not yet, will be testing it all out today. Was it easy to adjust yourself?
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 23:32
|
|
|
deaders posted:Not yet, will be testing it all out today. Was it easy to adjust yourself? No, I ended up sending it in to Robert Watkins at Precision Camera Works. Took a little over a month I think before it got back to me. You could always point the camera at something really far away and check to at least see if the rangefinder matches up at infinity though as a quick test. Mine wasn't even close to alignment when I first got it. Speaking of the Mamiya 7:  
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 00:00
|
|
|
All looks good so far, infinity matches up. Anyway, most of the time I just use the distance scale on the lens, f/16 and be there.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 00:05
|
|
|
Spedman posted:
Scanning 1 roll of 120 is a chore... Scanning...50+ (maybe?) rolls of 220....yeesh
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 05:01
|
|
|
You don't have to scan every picture.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 07:06
|
|
|
  Ran out of distilled water for the final rinse so I had water spots all over the goddamn place.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 09:13
|
|
|
try it with a lime posted:You don't have to scan every picture. yeah you do 
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 09:18
|
|
|
try it with a lime posted:You don't have to scan every picture. I have a V750, and for a while I would do a low res "contact print" scan of the whole Printfile sleeve (so I'd have everything available digitally if I wanted some more context for the keepers, or to decide if I wanted to scan anything new), and only do full res scans of the negatives I intended to process/upload. I don't really mind scanning everything though, as it gives me more time to be in PS doing corrections on the most recent batch, rather than being interrupted every few minutes to change negatives.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 14:13
|
|
|
I brought my pentax 67 to the big protest a couple weeks ago because I'm a loving moron.  Untitled by spikemccue, on Flickr  Untitled by spikemccue, on Flickr  Untitled by spikemccue, on Flickr  Hands up by spikemccue, on Flickr  Untitled by spikemccue, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 19:02
|
|
|
What lens you using on the P67?
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 21:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 20:50 |
|
|
try it with a lime posted:What lens you using on the P67? Those are all with the 75mm 4.5
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 23:22
|
|