|
I think a Mel Brooks Great Lakes Avengers would be pretty swell.
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 22:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 17:40 |
|
|
CzarChasm posted:Mel Brooks to write, direct and star in Deadpool movie. Pre-order your tickets now gently caress...I really want to see that. Also Mel has an awesome twitter account. My brother Lenny wrote “Happy Hannukah Hitler” on one of the bombs he dropped from his B17 Flying Fortress in WWII #AVeryMelHannukah — Mel Brooks (@MelBrooks) December 21, 2014 https://twitter.com/MelBrooks/status/546769369196285953
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2014 06:04
|
|
|
I'm just picturing all the goofy, off the wall scenes from Mel Brooks movies that would fit in a Deadpool theme -Notching six arrows on a bow and firing them so they pin a guy to a tree -Having to zoom in on a picture of DP killing some guy, and you see another DP waaay in the background, giving the finger -Having an alien bust out of some guy's chest and then have it do a song and dance routine. Tell me you can't see it with a deadpool mask on now. The Action Man posted:I would love to watch Deadpool chase the villain of his movie through a screening of his movie. Exactly. It doesn't have to be Mel Brooks behind it, but that is the kind of humor that would work for deadpool. It wouldn't get old too fast, but it has that element of random WTF to it. If you want kind of funny, goofy, silly mixed with semi-serious action, how about Bill Zane in Demon Knight? He's an rear end in a top hat, he quips, he heals fast, and he has bizarre superpowers, including an impromptu dance number. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGeAEE1A2T0 My favorite part starts at about 7:11 and goes for about a minute - minus the bad jump cut. He's more annoyed that he lost a par of sunglasses than getting stabbed in the eye.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2014 17:56
|
|
|
More Sony Spider-Man e-mail hillariousness. This is Drew Goddard writing to Amy Pascal in June on how they're going to pitch playing Sandman in Sinister Six over Dr. Strange to Tom Hardy Drew Goddard posted:I/m gonna write him up a note this weekend. But, off the top of my head, some possible talking points are: Why does Sony seem intent on making Sandman into some kind of giant sand monster? They already did that in Spider-Man 3 and it wasn't good. I don't recall it happening that often in the comics either. Also these e-mails seem to indicate that they've thrown away the assumed Sinister Six Lineup that ASM2 teased (Goblin, Electro, Rhino, Kraven, Ock, Vulture) Dacap fucked around with this message at 22:48 on Dec 24, 2014 |
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2014 22:46
|
|
|
It's funny that the first three points could basically have been used to sell him on Suicide Squad.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2014 23:03
|
|
|
It really is just message board trolls with million dollar salaries.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2014 23:06
|
|
|
The Dave posted:It really is just message board trolls with million dollar salaries. Well, it is the guy who directed TV Tropes the Movie.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2014 23:13
|
|
|
fatherboxx posted:Well, it is the guy who directed TV Tropes the Movie. I didn't think Whedon was involved in any of this?
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2014 23:39
|
|
|
Drew Goddard directed Cabin in the Woods.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2014 23:47
|
|
|
My mistake. I was halfway there, anyway.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2014 23:52
|
|
|
CzarChasm posted:If you want kind of funny, goofy, silly mixed with semi-serious action, how about Bill Zane in Demon Knight? He's an rear end in a top hat, he quips, he heals fast, and he has bizarre superpowers, including an impromptu dance number.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2014 23:58
|
|
|
Dacap posted:Also these e-mails seem to indicate that they've thrown away the assumed Sinister Six Lineup that ASM2 teased (Goblin, Electro, Rhino, Kraven, Ock, Vulture) All these e-mails seem to indicate that they've thrown away everything that ASM2 teased, set-up or even just contained.
|
|
#
?
Dec 25, 2014 17:23
|
|
|
DrPaper posted:All these e-mails seem to indicate that they've thrown away everything that ASM2 teased, set-up or even just contained. It's a Christmas miracle!
|
|
#
?
Dec 26, 2014 03:04
|
|
|
Sarchasm posted:It's a Christmas miracle! Truly Zuzu if mankind has finally seen the whole of the Amazing Spider-man movies with eyes unclouded tis' a Christmas miracle indeed. Oh come all yee faithful they were both hot garbage boring and plodding with scripts both sub-par
|
|
#
?
Dec 26, 2014 03:28
|
|
|
We wish they had done better, We wish they performed better, Now we think we know better, And we'll reboot next year
|
|
#
?
Dec 26, 2014 23:53
|
|
|
Dacap posted:Why does Sony seem intent on making Sandman into some kind of giant sand monster? They already did that in Spider-Man 3 and it wasn't good. I don't recall it happening that often in the comics either. What? Peter and Harry teaming up to fight giant Sandman was one of the few legitimately great parts of that movie. And it's kind of the natural endpoint for any series of battles involving Sandman. I'm pretty sure it actually does happen in the comics relatively frequently, though I don't see why that should even enter into things.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2014 01:24
|
|
|
I think I just don't like that when he's in giant mode he turns into a mindless, roaring monster. Turning giant worked as a boss battle, but I would've preferred he retained his ability to speak.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2014 01:34
|
|
|
The natural endpoint to any Sandman fight:  
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2014 02:10
|
|
|
Wouldn't he just be able to break out of the vacuum cleaner? It's not like hes sucking him into the phantom zone
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2014 03:30
|
|
|
Not unless the vacuum cleaner was designed by Reed Richards.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2014 03:45
|
|
|
Away all Goats posted:Wouldn't he just be able to break out of the vacuum cleaner? It's not like hes sucking him into the phantom zone It's all mental. Being sucked into a household vacuum cleaner is too depressing to continue fighting.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2014 04:16
|
|
|
Cnut the Great posted:What? Peter and Harry teaming up to fight giant Sandman was one of the few legitimately great parts of that movie. Because 10 minutes later the giant loving monster man that was pounding the poo poo out of Spidey gets all emo about his daughter and everything is forgiven.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2014 05:36
|
|
FilthyImp posted:That was such a loving stupid part of an already criminally mindless movie. "Your actions directly led to my mentally ill friend being mortally wounded, but I forgive you. Oh poo poo, I should probably go check on him, huh!"
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2014 06:15
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:"Your actions directly led to my mentally ill friend being mortally wounded, but I forgive you. Oh poo poo, I should probably go check on him, huh!" "By the way, I know there's this publisher who would pay an obscene amount of money if someone told him who Spider-Man is and you need money for your kid and you know who I really am but uh...."
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2014 07:19
|
|
|
Dacap posted:Why does Sony seem intent on making Sandman into some kind of giant sand monster? They already did that in Spider-Man 3 and it wasn't good. I don't recall it happening that often in the comics either. A. No idea, because literally no one I know of cares about the spider man sandman as a villain. B. It happened a couple times but sandman is easily defeated by a vacuum cleaner as shown above C. Sony is super stupid when it comes to managing it's spider man IP license. They had two ok movies with Toby, and were like "ok now shove Venom into the plot in a way that is inaccurate/doesn't make sense!" and Raimi basically said "fine, but I'm going to do it horribly". Then they rebooted ASM, had one good film and were like "We have to create a multiverse out of this ASAP" and ASM2 happened. As much as everyone would like to see a sinister 6 movie, no one is going to like a sinister 6 movie that is put out by the current idiots in charge. Were they smart, they'd give the 90's fans ( a decent majority of the superhero moviegoing public these days) a not terrible symbiote storyline. Give me Brock as Venom and Cletus as Carnage and you'd have a huge hit. Instead they are trying to focus on characters that no one who read comics past the 70's cares about. Doc Ock was good, Lizard was good, no one cares about The Vulture or the worst Hobgoblin or Sandman or the Goblin that covered an incredible actors face for all the villain moments. They literally cannot figure out how to get the series right, which is where Marvel is spanking them so hard, they prob have execs literally browbeating scriptwriters with "You better come up with something that makes Avengers money or you're fired!" every hour on the hour like J Jonah Jameson.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2014 12:12
|
|
|
Old Man Pants posted:They literally cannot figure out how to get the series right, which is where Marvel is spanking them so hard, they prob have execs literally browbeating scriptwriters with "You better come up with something that makes Avengers money or you're fired!" every hour on the hour like J Jonah Jameson. 'WE NEED PICTURES*! PICTURES OF SPIDER-MAN!' But seriously, don't drag JJJ into this, he was at least competent at running his own business. *referring in this case to the old-timey slang for films.
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2014 00:57
|
|
|
Old Man Pants posted:Were they smart, they'd give the 90's fans ( a decent majority of the superhero moviegoing public these days)
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2014 07:55
|
|
|
Yeah I guess that was probably truer 10 years ago.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2014 09:24
|
|
|
Old Man Pants posted:They literally cannot figure out how to get the series right, which is where Marvel is spanking them so hard, they prob have execs literally browbeating scriptwriters with "You better come up with something that makes Avengers money or you're fired!" every hour on the hour like J Jonah Jameson. Marvel directed this movie in a cave! With a box of scraps!
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2014 09:40
|
|
|
AnonSpore posted:Marvel directed this movie in a cave! With a box of scraps! "Let's do a movie about Aunt May!"
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2014 07:18
|
|
|
Oh hey. Vin Diesel. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2014 16:29
|
|
|
Here's some official Ant man promo art featuring our first look at Yellowjacket. It looks like they haven't made any real changes to the Ant Man suit since the proof of concept teaser video, I'm pretty surprised they kept his face that covered. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2014 17:18
|
|
|
The costumes looK cool. I'd enjoy seeing a Beetle Borg take on Thanos.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2014 17:26
|
|
|
We should be getting a trailer this week so I'm curious to see how it looks without Wright's direction
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2014 17:38
|
|
|
Dacap posted:We should be getting a trailer this week so I'm curious to see how it looks without Wright's direction I'd guess next week with the Agent Carter premiere, actually, but could be sooner than that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2014 17:42
|
|
|
Barry Convex posted:I'd guess next week with the Agent Carter premiere, actually, but could be sooner than that. Most likely this week with the inevitable leak.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2014 18:23
|
|
|
Dacap posted:Here's some official Ant man promo art featuring our first look at Yellowjacket. Well, they proved you could do a full face mask with Iron Man, so maybe this will do something similar with it sliding out of the way/interior shots of his face during battles.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2014 19:12
|
|
|
It'll inevitably work like Tony's visor coming up, or Star Lord's mask folding away or whatever. 90% of the concept art for GotG leading up to it had SL with his full mask on, and in the actual movie he's got it on for all of a handful of scenes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2014 23:10
|
|
|
I want this movie to be an exact compromise between iron man and honey I shrunk the kids. I don't know if anything less will satisfy me.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2014 00:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 17:40 |
|
|
Ignite Memories posted:I want this movie to be an exact compromise between iron man and honey I shrunk the kids. I don't know if anything less will satisfy me. That's like a bad 90s VHS cover tagline "It's Iron Man Meets... Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!" -Toledo Sun Weekly
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2014 00:52
|
|